Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Air pollution reduction and climate co-benefits in China’s industries

Nature Sustainability volume 4, pages 417–425 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 15 January 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Air pollution reduction policies can simultaneously mitigate CO2 emissions in the industrial sector, but the extent of these co-benefits is understudied. We analyse the potential co-benefits for SO2, NOx, particulate matter (PM) and CO2 emission reduction in major industrial sectors in China. We construct and analyse a firm-level database covering nearly 80,000 observations and use scenario simulations to estimate the co-benefits. The findings show that substantial co-benefits could be achieved with three specific interventions. Energy intensity improvement can reduce SO2, NOx, PM and CO2 emissions for non-power sectors by 26–44%, 19–44%, 25–46% and 18–50%, respectively. Reductions from scale structure adjustment such as phasing out small firms and developing large ones can amount to 1–8%, 1–6%, 2–20% and 0.2–3%. Electrification can reduce emissions by 19–25%, 4–28%, 20–29% and 11–12% if the share of electricity generated from non-fossil fuel sources is 70%. Since firm heterogeneity is essential to realize the co-benefits and directly determines the magnitudes of these benefits, stricter and sensible environmental policies targeting industrial firms can accelerate China’s sustainable transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Drivers of SO2 reduction in the main industrial sectors.
Fig. 2: Direct co-benefits through energy intensity adjustment.
Fig. 3: Indirect co-benefits through scale structure adjustment.
Fig. 4: Indirect co-benefits of electrification.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The firm-level emission database that supports the findings of this study is available from H.Q.’s GitHub repository (https://github.com/qianhaoqi/NS-co-benefit). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code that supports the findings of this study is available from H.Q.’s GitHub repository (https://github.com/qianhaoqi/NS-co-benefit).

Change history

References

  1. He, K., Huo, H. & Zhang, Q. Urban air pollution in China: current status, characteristics, and progress. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 397–431 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, X. et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494, 459–462 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Q., He, K. & Huo, H. Cleaning China’s air. Nature 484, 161–162 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Report on the State of the Ecology and Environment in China 2018 (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, 2019); http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/201905/P020190619587632630618.pdf

  5. 2015 Annual Statistic Report on Environment in China (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, 2017); https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/sthjtjnb/201702/P020170223595802837498.pdf

  6. Shan, Y. et al. China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170201 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollen, J., van der Zwaan, B., Brink, C. & Eerens, H. Local air pollution and global climate change: a combined cost–benefit analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 31, 161–181 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schreifels, J. J., Fu, Y. & Wilson, E. J. Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-Year Plans and lessons for the future. Energy Policy 48, 779–789 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu, A., Teng, F. & Feng, X. Effects of pollution control measures on carbon emission reduction in China: evidence from the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans. Clim. Policy 18, 198–209 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nam, K.-M., Waugh, C. J., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M. & Karplus, V. J. Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1648–1661 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollen, J. & Brink, C. Air pollution policy in Europe: quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies. Energy Econ. 46, 202–215 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henneman, L. R., Rafaj, P., Annegarn, H. J. & Klausbruckner, C. Assessing emissions levels and costs associated with climate and air pollution policies in South Africa. Energy Policy 89, 160–170 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, N. et al. Air quality improvement co-benefits of low-carbon pathways toward well below the 2 °C climate target in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 5576–5584 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, X. & Teng, F. Air quality benefit of China’s mitigation target to peak its emission by 2030. Clim. Policy 18, 99–110 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, W., Yang, J., Wagner, F. & Mauzerall, D. L. Substantial air quality and climate co-benefits achievable now with sectoral mitigation strategies in China. Sci. Total Environ. 598, 1076–1084 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, S., Worrell, E. & Crijns-Graus, W. Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China’s cement industry. Appl. Energy 147, 192–213 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vandyck, T. et al. Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges. Nat. Commun. 9, 4939 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, S. et al. Modeling energy efficiency to improve air quality and health effects of China’s cement industry. Appl. Energy 184, 574–593 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, X. & Xu, H. The energy-conservation and emission-reduction paths of industrial sectors: evidence from Chinas 35 industrial sectors. Energy Econ. 86, 104628 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, Y., Wang, D. D., Li, S. & Shi, Q. Assessment of US firm-level climate change performance and strategy. Energy Policy 92, 432–443 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bye, B. & Klemetsen, M. E. The impacts of alternative policy instruments on environmental performance: a firm level study of temporary and persistent effects. Environ. Resour. Econ. 69, 317–341 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong, H. et al. Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: a provincial leveled analysis. Appl. Energy 144, 165–174 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tong, D. et al. Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units. Nat. Sustain. 1, 59–68 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jorgenson, A., Longhofer, W. & Grant, D. Disproportionality in power plants’ carbon emissions: a cross-national study. Sci. Rep. 6, 28661 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grant, D., Jorgenson, A. & Longhofer, W. Targeting electricity’s extreme polluters to reduce energy-related CO2 emissions. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 3, 376–380 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang, L., Lin, C. & Lin, P. The determinants of pollution levels: firm-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing. J. Comp. Econ. 42, 118–142 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Du, L., Hanley, A. & Zhang, N. Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fuelled power plants in China: a parametric meta-frontier analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 43, 14–32 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun, K. & Wu, L. Efficiency distortion of the power generation sector under the dual regulation of price and quantity in China. Energy Econ. 86, 104675 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, M. Regulation-induced pollution substitution. Rev. Econ. Stat. 101, 827–840 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Novan, K. Overlapping environmental policies and the impact on pollution. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, S153–S199 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ang, B. W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32, 1131–1139 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ang, B. W. LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86, 233–238 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, Q. & Wang, Q. How China achieved its 11th Five-Year Plan emissions reduction target: a structural decomposition analysis of industrial SO2 and chemical oxygen demand. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 1104–1116 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Von Stechow, C. et al. Integrating global Climate Change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 363–394 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, T. M., Rausch, S., Saari, R. K. & Selin, N. E. A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 917–923 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shi, X. & Xu, Z. Environmental regulation and firm exports: evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 89, 187–200 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, X., Liu, C., Sun, C. & Yang, M. Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China. Energy Econ. 86, 104631 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, H., Guo, H., Zhang, B. & Bu, M. Westward movement of new polluting firms in China: pollution reduction mandates and location choice. J. Comp. Econ. 45, 119–138 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Energy Supply and Consumption Revolution Strategy (2016-2030) (National Development and Reform Commission of China and National Energy Administration of China, 2016); https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/zcssfz/zcgh/201704/W020190910670685518802.pdf

  40. Report on the Work of the Government 2020 (State Council of China, 2020); http://english.www.gov.cn/premier/news/202005/30/content_WS5ed197f3c6d0b3f0e94990da.html

  41. The Action Plan on Prevention and Control of Air Pollution (State Council of China, 2013); http://english.mee.gov.cn/News_service/infocus/201309/t20130924_260707.shtml

  42. Upgrade and Retrofit Plan for Coal-Fired Power Plants Aiming at Energy Savings and Emissions Reduction for 2014–2020 (National Development and Reform Commission of China, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China and National Energy Administration of China, 2014); http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/gwy/201409/W020140925407622627853.pdf

  43. Lo, K., Li, H. & Wang, M. Energy conservation in China’s energy-intensive enterprises: an empirical study of the Ten-Thousand Enterprises Program. Energy Sustain. Dev. 27, 105–111 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, B., Chen, X. & Guo, H. Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J. Public Econ. 164, 70–90 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaneko, S., Fujii, H., Sawazu, N. & Fujikura, R. Financial allocation strategy for the regional pollution abatement cost of reducing sulfur dioxide emissions in the thermal power sector in China. Energy Policy 38, 2131–2141 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Guidelines for Preparation of Provincial GHG (National Development and Reform Commission of China, 2011); http://www.cbcsd.org.cn/sjk/nengyuan/standard/home/20140113/download/shengjiwenshiqiti.pdf

  47. Holz, C. A. Chinese statistics: classification systems and data sources. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 54, 532–571 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hang, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Su, B. & Zhou, D. Industrial SO2 emissions treatment in China: a temporal–spatial whole process decomposition analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 243, 419–434 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fujii, H., Okamoto, S., Kagawa, S. & Managi, S. Decomposition of toxicity emission changes on the demand and supply sides: empirical study of the US industrial sector. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 124008 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Qian, Y., Cao, H. & Huang, S. Decoupling and decomposition analysis of industrial sulfur dioxide emissions from the industrial economy in 30 Chinese provinces. J. Environ. Manage. 260, 110142 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, X., Wang, S., Zhang, W., Li, J. & Zou, Y. Impacts of energy consumption, energy structure, and treatment technology on SO2 emissions: a multi-scale LMDI decomposition analysis in China. Appl. Energy 184, 714–726 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rafaj, P. & Amann, M. Decomposing air pollutant emissions in Asia: determinants and projections. Energies 11, 1299 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rafaj, P., Amann, M., Siri, J. & Wuester, H. Changes in European greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions 1960–2010: decomposition of determining factors. Clim. Change 124, 477–504 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hoekstra, R. & Van den Bergh, J. C. Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Econ. 25, 39–64 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Aström, S. et al. The impact of Swedish SO2 policy instruments on SO2 emissions 1990–2012. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 32–39 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fujii, H., Managi, S. & Kaneko, S. Decomposition analysis of air pollution abatement in China: empirical study for ten industrial sectors from 1998 to 2009. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 22–31 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tong, D. et al. Current emissions and future mitigation pathways of coal-fired power plants in China from 2010 to 2030. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 12905–12914 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sahin, S. Firm-Level Decomposition of Energy Consumption in Turkish Manufacturing Industry (World Bank, 2017).

  59. First National Pollution Census Data Compilation Committee. Pollution Census Data Collection 66–69 (China Environ. Sci. Press, 2011).

  60. Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for Energy Development (National Development and Reform Commission of China and National Energy Administration of China, 2016); http://fjb.nea.gov.cn/news_view.aspx?id=27538

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos 71925010, 71703027, 71904125, 72088101 and 71690244), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos 2018YFC1509007 and 2016YFA0602604) and the Shanghai Sailing Program (grant no. 18YF1417500).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Haoqi Qian, Shaodan Xu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Haoqi Qian

  2. LSE-Fudan Research Centre for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Haoqi Qian

  3. School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Shaodan Xu, Feizhou Ren & Libo Wu

  4. Center for Energy Economics and Strategy Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Shaodan Xu, Feizhou Ren & Libo Wu

  5. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Jing Cao

  6. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Wendong Wei

  7. SJTU-UNIDO Joint Institute of Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Wendong Wei

  8. Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, London, UK

    Jing Meng

  9. Institute for Big Data, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Libo Wu

Authors
  1. Haoqi Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaodan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feizhou Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wendong Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Libo Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.Q., W.W., J.M. and L.W. conceived the study. J.C. and F.R. provided the energy and emission data. H.Q. and S.X. performed the analysis. All authors (H.Q., S.X., J.C., F.R., W.W., J.M. and L.W.) interpreted the data. H.Q. and S.X. prepared the manuscript. W.W., J.M. and L.W. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wendong Wei, Jing Meng or Libo Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Hidemichi Fujii and Shaohui Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Each factor’s contribution to pollutant emission for each industrial sector based on LMDI decompositions (between 2011 and 2014).

A red block indicates the emission increase caused by each factor; a blue block shows the emission decrease caused by each factor. a, Drivers for SO2 emission reduction. b, Drivers for NOx emission reduction. c, Drivers for PM emission reduction.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Comparison of the estimated direct co-benefits by using different benchmarks.

a, SO2 emissions reduction. b, NOx emissions reduction. c, PM emissions reduction. d, CO2 emissions reduction. Different markers stand for different setting up for benchmarks.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Indirect co-benefits through electrification (setting the ratio of non-fossil fuel generation as 0.3).

a, SO2 emissions reduction. b, NOx emissions reduction. c, PM emissions reduction. d, CO2 emissions reduction. The horizontal axes are percentages of the fossil fuels that are assumed to be replaced by electricity. Percentages are from 5 to 30, with an interval of 5. This figure provides co-benefits estimations for the assumption that ratio of non-fossil fuel in electricity generation structure is 30%.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Indirect co-benefits through electrification (setting the ratio of non-fossil fuel generation as 0.5).

a, SO2 emissions reduction. b, NOx emissions reduction. c, PM emissions reduction. d, CO2 emissions reduction. The horizontal axes are percentages of the fossil fuels that are assumed to be replaced by electricity. Percentages are from 5 to 30, with an interval of 5. This figure provides co-benefits estimations for the assumption that ratio of non-fossil fuel in electricity generation structure is 50%.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–25, Tables 1–6 and Notes 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

The firm-level emission database that supports the findings of this study. This database is also available from H.Q.’s GitHub repository (https://github.com/qianhaoqi/NS-co-benefit).

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Data for the plots in Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Data for the plots in Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Data for the plots in Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Data for the plots in Fig. 4.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Data for the plots in Extended Data Fig. 1.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Data for the plots in Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Data for the plots in Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Data for the plots in Extended Data Fig. 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, H., Xu, S., Cao, J. et al. Air pollution reduction and climate co-benefits in China’s industries. Nat Sustain 4, 417–425 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00669-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00669-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene