Abstract
This paper presents a novel petrophysical experiment for measuring the 3D permeability tensor at reservoir conditions in fractured vuggy carbonate rock. The permeability variation with confining pressure is demonstrated through the experimental investigation; the permeability ellipse plots show the decrease of permeability, as a function of the increase in effective stress. The experiment was developed at reservoir conditions (120 °C temperature and variable confining pressure) in a native whole rock sample, from the Gulf of Mexico naturally fractured and vuggy reservoir. The analysis of the laboratory data reveals the elliptical behavior of permeability. Two ellipses were generated, one corresponding to the fracture network (secondary porosity system) and another for matrix porosity and permeability (primary porosity system). An important result is the compaction of the representative fracture network ellipse until it fuses with the matrix porosity ellipse at a high confining pressure state. The test contributes to the understanding of the mechanical and flow aspects of permeability, for naturally fractured reservoirs. The experimental results provide a basis for improving reservoir simulation studies, to obtain realistic predictions of reservoir behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \(k\) :
-
Permeability
- \(k_{x}\) :
-
Directional permeability in the “x” axis
- \(k_{y}\) :
-
Directional permeability in the “y” axis
- \(k_{z}\) :
-
Directional permeability in the “z” axis
- \(p_{1}\) :
-
Nitrogen gas injection pressure
- \(q_{1}\) :
-
Nitrogen gas volumetric flow rate
- \(\mu\) :
-
Nitrogen gas viscosity
- \(\overline{p}\) :
-
Mean pressure \(\left( {p_{1} + p_{2} } \right)/2\)
- \(\Delta p\) :
-
Pressure drop between the inlet and the outlet \(\left( {p_{1} - p_{2} } \right)\)
- \(b\) :
-
Klinkenberg parameter
- \(L\) :
-
Length of the core
- \(\theta\) :
-
Opening angle exposed to nitrogen gas flow
- \(\alpha\) :
-
One half of the opening angle \(\left( {\theta /2} \right)\)
- \(G\left( \alpha \right)\) :
-
Geometric correction factor
- \(k_{\max t}\) :
-
Theoretical maximum permeability
- \(k_{\max r}\) :
-
Real maximum permeability
- \(k_{{{\text{matrix}}}}\) :
-
Maximum theoretical permeability of the pseudo-matrix region
- \(p_{c}\) :
-
Confining pressure
- \(p_{{{\text{frac}}}}\) :
-
Maximum closing pressure of the fractured vuggy region
- \(p_{\max r}\) :
-
Real maximum closing pressure of the pseudo-matrix region
- \(p_{\max t}\) :
-
Theoretical maximum closing pressure of the pseudo-matrix region
- \(k_{{H{\text{MAX}}}}\) :
-
Maximum transversal permeability
- \(k_{H90}\) :
-
Minimum permeability perpendicular to \(k_{{H{\text{MAX}}}}\)
- \(k_{v}\) :
-
Vertical permeability
- \(k_{df}\) :
-
Directional permeability in the flow direction
- \(k_{dp}\) :
-
Directional permeability in the velocity potential gradient vector
- \(\overline{\overline{k}}\) :
-
Permeability tensor in the principal axes
- \(\overline{\overline{k}}_{f}\) :
-
Permeability tensor of the fractured region
- \(\overline{\overline{k}}_{m}\) :
-
Permeability tensor of the pseudo-matrix region
- \(\overline{\overline{k}}_{pr}\) :
-
Permeability tensor of the primary porosity region
- \(k_{330}\) :
-
Directional permeability 330°
- \(k_{60}\) :
-
Directional permeability 60°
- \(\vec{v}\) :
-
Velocity vector flow
- \({\Phi }\) :
-
Potential velocity flow function
- \(\nabla\) :
-
Nabla operator
- \(\beta\) :
-
The acute angle between the Darcy velocity vector and the velocity potential flow gradient vector
References
Bagheri M, Settari A (2007) Methods for modelling full tensor permeability in reservoir simulators. J Can Pet Technol 46(03):31–38. https://doi.org/10.2118/07-03-02
Chen M, Bai M, Roegiers JC (1999) Permeability tensors of anisotropic fracture networks. Math Geol 31(04):335–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007534523363
Collins RE (1952) Determination of the transverse permeabilities of large core samples from petroleum reservoirs. J Appl Phys 23(6):681–684. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702278
Collins RE (1961) Flow of fluids through porous materials. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York
Dobrynin VM (1962) Effect of overburden pressure on some properties of sandstones. Soc Pet Eng J 2(04):360–366. https://doi.org/10.2118/461-PA
Fatt I, Davis DH (1952) Reduction in permeability with overburden pressure. J Pet Technol 4(12):16. https://doi.org/10.2118/952329-G
Fitzgibbon A, Pilu M, Fisher RB (1999) Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(5):476–480. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.765658
Gangi AF (1978) Variation of whole and fractured porous rock permeability with confining pressure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90957-9
Gray DH, Fatt I (1963) The effect of stress on the permeability of sandstone cores. Soc Pet Eng J 3(02):95–100. https://doi.org/10.2118/531-PA
Greenkorn RA, Johnson CR, Shallenberger LK (1964) Directional permeability of heterogeneous anisotropic porous media. Soc Pet Eng J 4(02):124–132. https://doi.org/10.2118/788-PA
Herrera R (2000) Estudio petrofísico de muestras de diámetro completo con doble porosidad, Phd Thesis, School of Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Jones FO (1975) A laboratory study of the effects of confining pressure on fracture flow and storage capacity in carbonate rocks. J Pet Technol 27(01):21–27. https://doi.org/10.2118/4569-PA
Jones SC (1988) Two-point determinations of permeability and PV vs. net confining stress. SPE Form Eval 3(01):235–241. https://doi.org/10.2118/15380-PA
Lei G, Dong PC, Mo SY, Yang S, Wu ZS, Gai SH (2015) Calculation of full permeability tensor for fractured anisotropic media. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 5(2):167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-014-0138-6
Leung WF (1986) A tensor model for anisotropic and heterogeneous reservoirs with variable directional permeabilities. Soc Pet Eng J 15134:405–420. https://doi.org/10.2118/15134-MS
Liakopoulos AC (1965) Variation of the permeability tensor ellipsoid in homogeneous anisotropic soils. Water Resour Res 1(01):135–141. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR001i001p00135
Nelson R (1975) Fracture permeability in porous reservoirs: experimental and field approach. Ph.D., Dissertation, Department of Geology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843.
Oda M (1985) Permeability tensor for discontinuous rock masses. Géotechnique 35(04):483–495. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.483
Peters EJ (2012) Advanced petrophysics volume 1: geology, porosity, absolute permeability, heterogeneity, and geostatistics. Live Oak Book Company, Palo Alto
Renard P, Genty A, Stauffer F (2001) Laboratory determination of the full permeability tensor. J Geophys Res 106(B11):26443–26452. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000243
Rose WD (1982) A new method to measure directional permeability. J Pet Technol 34(05):1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.2118/9971-PA
Sheidegger AE (1954) Directional permeability of porous media to homogeneous fluids. Geofis Pura Appl 28(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01992394
Sheidegger AE (1956) On directional permeability. Geofis Pura Appl 33(1):111–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629951
Snow DT (1969) Anisotropic permeability of fractured media. Water Resour Res 5(06):1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i006p01273
Zhang X, Sanderson D (1996) Effects of stress on the two-dimensional permeability tensor of natural fracture networks. Geophys J Int 125(03):912–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb06034.x
Acknowledgements
The experiments were developed within the facilities of the Fractured Rocks Laboratory “Edgar R. Rangel German” of the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico City.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabrera, D., Samaniego, F. Experimental Permeability Tensor for Fractured Carbonate Rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 1171–1191 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02323-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02323-9