Abstract
Physiological integration of connected plants of the same clone, or ramets, often increases clonal fitness when ramets differ in resource supply. However, review of the literature found that no study has directly tested the hypothesis that integration can increase the ability of clones to compete against other species. To test this, we grew two-ramet clonal fragments of the stoloniferous, perennial herb Fragaria chiloensis in which none, one, or both of the ramets had neighbors of a naturally co-occurring, dominant grass, Bromus carinatus, and connections between ramets were either severed to prevent integration or left intact. We also grew four-ramet fragments in which all ramets had neighbors and connections were severed or intact. Severance decreased the final leaf mass and area of two-ramet fragments by 25% and their final total mass by 15% when just one ramet was grown with B. carinatus. Severance had no significant effect on the total mass of fragments when none or all of the ramets were grown with the grass. This provides the first direct evidence that physiological integration can increase the competitive ability of clonal plant species, though only when competition is spatially heterogeneous. Integration may thus enable plant clones to grow into plant communities and to compete within communities with fine-scale disturbance. However, integration may not increase the competitive ability of clonal plants within uniformly dense communities of taller species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera A, Alpert P, Dukes J, Harrington R (2010) Ecosystem impacts of the invasive plant Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) on plant communities and ecosystem processes. Biol Invasions 12:1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9543-z
Alpert P (1991) Nitrogen sharing among ramets increases clonal growth in Fragaria chiloensis. Ecology 72:69–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938903
Alpert P (1995) Does clonal growth increase plant performance in natural communities? Abstr Bot 19:11–16
Alpert P (1996) Nutrient sharing in natural clonal fragments of Fragaria chiloensis. J Ecol 84:395–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261201
Alpert P (1999) Clonal integration in Fragaria chiloensis differs between populations: ramets from grassland are selfish. Oecologia 120:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050834
Alpert P, Mooney H (1986) Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis. Oecologia 70:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379244
Alpert P, Mooney H (1996) Resource heterogeneity generated by shrubs and topography on coastal sand dunes. Vegetatio 122:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052818
Alpert P, Lumaret R, Di Giusto F (1993) Population structure inferred from allozyme analysis in the clonal herb Fragaria chiloensis (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 80:1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15326.x
Alpert P, Holzapfel C, Benson JM (2002) Hormonal modification of resource sharing in the clonal plant Fragaria chiloensis. Funct Ecol 16:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00610.x
Baldwin BG, Goldman D, Keil DJ, Patterson R, Rosatti TJ, Wilken D (eds) (2012) The Jepson manual. Vascular plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley
Bittebiere AK, Benot M-L, Mony C (2020) Clonality as a key but overlooked driver of biotic interactions in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 43:125510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2020.125510
Březina S, Koubek T, Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2006) Ecological benefits of integration of Calamagrostis epigejos ramets under field conditions. Flora 201:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.10.003
Cabaço S, Apostolaki ET, García-Marín P, Gruber R, Hernández I, Maritinez-Crego B, Mascaró O, Pérez M, Prathep A, Robinson C, Romero J, Schmidt AL, Short FT, van Tussenbroek BI, Santos R (2013) Effects of nutrient enrichment on seagrass population dynamics: evidence and synthesis from the biomass–density relationships. J Ecol 101:1552–1562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12134
de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) (1997) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden
Dickson TL, Gross KL (2013) Plant community responses to long-term fertilization: changes in functional group abundance drive changes in species richness. Oecologia 173:1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2722-8
Dickson TL, Mittlebach GG, Reynolds HL, Gross KL (2014) Height and clonality traits determine plant community responses to fertilization. Ecology 95:2445–2452. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1875.1
Dong B-C, Alpert P, Zhang Q, Yu F-H (2015) Clonal integration in homogeneous environments increases performance of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Oecologia 179:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3338-y
Duchoslavová J, Herben T (2020) Effects of clonal growth form on the relative performance of species in experimental communities over time. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 43:125532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2020.125532
Duchoslavová J, Jansa J (2018) The direction of carbon and nitrogen fluxes between ramets in Agrostis stolonifera changes during ontogeny under simulated competition for light. J Exp Bot 69:2149–2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery068
Eilts JA, Mittelbach GG, Reynolds HL, Gross KL (2011) Resource heterogeneity, soil fertility, and species diversity: effects of clonal species on plant communities. Am Nat 177:574–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/659633
Gough L, Gross KL, Cleland EE, Clark CM, Collins SL, Fargione JE, Pennings SC, Suding KN (2012) Incorporating clonal growth form clarifies the role of plant height in response to nitrogen addition. Oecologia 169:1053–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2264-5
Gross KL, Mittlebach GG (2017) Negative effects of fertilization on grassland species richness are stronger when tall clonal species are present. Folia Geobotanica 52:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-017-9300-5
Gruntman M, Novoplansky A (2004) Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:3863–3867. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306604101
Hartnett DC (1993) Regulation of clonal growth and dynamics of Panicum virgatum (Poaceae) in tallgrass prairie: effects of neighbor removal and nutrient addition. Am J Bot 80:1114–1120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445538
Hartnett DC, Bazzaz FA (1985) The integration of neighborhood effects by clonal genets in Solidago canadensis. J Ecol 73:415–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260484
Herben T, Suzuki J (2002) A simulation study of the effects of architectural constraints and resource translocation on population structure and competition in clonal plants. Evol Ecol 15:403–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1345-0_10
Herben T, Nováková Z, Klimešová J (2016) Clonal growth and plant species abundance. Ann Bot 114:377–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct308
Holzapfel C, Alpert P (2003) Root cooperation in a clonal plant: connected strawberries segregate roots. Oecologia 134:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1062-x
Klimešová J, Klimeš L (2006) CLO‐PLA3: a database of clonal growth architecture of Central European plants. http://clopla.butbn.cas.cz
Li S, Pennings SC (2016) Disturbance in Georgia salt marshes: variation across space and time. Ecosphere 10:e01487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1487
Li X-X, Fan Z-W, Shen Y-D, Wang Y, Liu Y, Huang Q-Q (2019) Nutrient addition does not increase the benefits of clonal integration in an invasive plant spreading from open patches into plant communities. Plant Biol 21:1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13034
Liu J, Dong M, Miao SL, Song MH, Wang RQ (2006) Invasive alien plants in China: role of clonality and geographical origin. Biol Invasions 8:1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5838-x
Maron JL, Jefferies RL (1999) Bush lupine mortality, altered resource availability, and alternative vegetation states. Ecology 80:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5b0443:BLMARA%5d2.0.CO;2
Nuñez-Mir GC, Guo Q, Rejmánek M, Iannone BV III, Fei S (2019) Predicting invasiveness of exotic woody species using a traits-based framework. Ecology 100:e02797. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2797
Oborny B, Kun A, Czaran T, Bokros S (2000) The effect of clonal integration on plant competition for mosaic habitat space. Ecology 81:3291–3304. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5b3291:TEOCIO%5d2.0.CO;2
Oborny B, Mony C, Herben T (2012) From virtual plants to real communities: a review of modelling clonal growth. Ecol Model 234:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.010
Pauliukonis N, Gough L (2004) Effects of the loss of clonal integration on four sedges that differ in ramet aggregation. Plant Ecol 173:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026342.25767.17
Peltzer DA (2002) Does clonal integration improve competitive ability? A test using aspen (Populus tremuloides [Salicaceae]) invasion into prairie. Am J Bot 89:494–499. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.3.494
Pennings SC, Callaway RM (2000) The advantages of clonal integration under different ecological conditions: a community-wide test. Ecology 81:709–716. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5b0709:TAOCIU%5d2.0.CO;2
Price EAC, Hutchings MJ (1996) The effects of competition on growth and form in Glechoma hederacea. Oikos 75:279–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546251
Pyšek P, Prach K, Šmilauer P (1995) Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions—general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 39–60
R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Roiloa SR, Alpert P, Tharayil N, Hancock G, Bhowmik P (2007) Capacity for division of labour in clones of Fragaria chiloensis is greater in patchier habitats. J Ecol 95:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01216.x
Roiloa SR, Rodríguez-Echeverria S, de la Peña E, Freitas H (2010) Physiological integration increases the survival and growth of the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis. Biol Invasions 12:1815–1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9592-3
SAS Institute, Inc. (2011) SAS/STAT®9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Schiffman PM (2007) Ecology of native animals in California grasslands. In: Stromberg MR, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (eds) California grasslands: ecology and management. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 180–189
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schmid B, Bazzaz FA (1987) Clonal integration and population structure in perennials: effects of severing rhizome connections. Ecology 68:2016–2022. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939892
Song Y-B, Yu F-H, Keser LH, Dawson W, Fischer M, Dong M, van Kleunen M (2013) United we stand, divided we fall: a meta-analysis of experiments on clonal integration and its relationship to invasiveness. Oecologia 171:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2430-9
Travis SE, Marburger JE, Windels S, Kubátová B (2010) Hybridization dynamics of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Western Great Lakes Region of North America: a molecular analysis. J Ecol 98:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01596.x
Vitová A, Macek P, Lepš J (2017) Disentangling the interplay of generative and vegetative propagation among different functional groups during gap colonization in meadows. Funct Ecol 31:458–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12731
Wang N, Yu F-H, Li PX, He WM, Liu FH, Liu JM, Dong M (2008) Clonal integration affects growth, photosynthetic efficiency and biomass allocation, but not the competitive ability, of the alien invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides under severe stress. Ann Bot 101:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn005
Wang P, Alpert P, Yu F-H (2016) Clonal integration increases relative competitive ability in an invasive aquatic plant. Am J Bot 103:2079–2086. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600160
Wang YJ, Müller-Scharer H, van Kleunen M, Cai AM, Zhang P, Yan R, Dong B-C, Yu F-H (2017) Invasive alien plants benefit more from clonal integration in heterogeneous environments than natives. New Phytol 216:1072–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14820
Xiao K, Yu D, Wang L, Han Y (2011) Physiological integration helps a clonal macrophyte spread into competitive environments and coexist with other species. Aquat Bot 95:249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.07.002
You W, Fan S, Yu D, Xie D, Liu C (2014) An invasive clonal plant benefits from clonal integration more than a co-occurring native plant in nutrient-patchy and competitive environments. PLoS ONE 9:e97246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097246
Yu F-H, Wang N, Alpert P, He W-M, Dong M (2009) Clonal integration in an introduced, invasive plant increases its spread into experimental communities and promotes their diversity. Am J Bot 96:183–189. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800426
Zhang YY, Zhang DY, Barrett SCH (2010) Genetic uniformity characterizes the invasive spread of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), a clonal aquatic plant. Mol Ecol 19:1774–1786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04609.x
Zhou J, Li H-L, Alpert P, Zhang M-X, Yu F-H (2017) Fragmentation of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides decreases its growth but not its competitive effect. Flora 228:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.01.007
Acknowledgements
We thank Lauren Healey for assistance in the greenhouse, Bi-Cheng Dong and Wei Xue for help with statistical analyses, the Morrill Greenhouse staff for logistical support, and Point Reyes National Seashore and Año Nuevo State Reserve for permission to collect plants.
Funding
This study was funded by the University of Massachusetts, the Chinese Scholarship Council, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (award 31570413), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (award 2015ZCQ-BH-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PW and PA conceived and designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript, in consultation with FHY. PA collected plants. PW and PA performed the experiment. PW and FHY analyzed the data. PW and PA prepared the figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Brian J. Wilsey.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, P., Alpert, P. & Yu, FH. Physiological integration can increase competitive ability in clonal plants if competition is patchy. Oecologia 195, 199–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04823-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04823-5