Abstract
A modeling study has been conducted to simulate the June 13, 2013 U.S. East Coast meteotsunami event as a test of the model forecast concept. A numerical simulation based on the MOST (Method of Splitting Tsunami) model was employed for the meteotsunami propagation forecast, while the weather radar reflection imagery was used to simulate real-time input data for the atmospheric pressure-induced tsunami generation. The model tsunami was generated by a moving pressure field during 2.87 h of forcing, and the resultant tsunami was then simulated for additional 5.68 h of propagation without any forcing for a total of 8.55 h of meteotsunami evolution from generation to coastal impact. Simulated time series were compared with the measurements from sea-level coastal gages and the Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting for Tsunami (DART) data. The model is able to reproduce in general the recorded sea-level changes in the deep ocean and at the coast in terms of arrival times and amplitudes. The model was able to predict coastal tsunami impacts that occurred from one to two hours after the model data assimilation phase ended. Therefore, this approach shows promise for developing meteotsunami model forecast capability based on measurements and data assimilation in real time, at least for meteotsunamis generated by fast-moving weather systems visible on radar reflection imagery. All the data used in this study are already available in real time, the MOST model is already implemented as a seismically generated tsunami forecast model at the Tsunami Warning Centers (TWCs), which makes transition of potential meteotsunami forecast capability to warning operations straightforward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Available online and by request.
References
Anderson EJ, Bechle AJ, Wu CH, Schwab DJ, Mann GE, Lombardy KA (2015) Reconstruction of a meteotsunami in Lake Erie on 27 May 2012: roles of atmospheric conditions on hydrodynamic response in enclosed basins. J Geophys Res Ocean 120:8020–8038. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010883
Angove ML, Kozlosky P, Chu G et al (2020) Addressing the meteotsunami risk in the United States. Nat Hazards (in press)
Bailey K, DiVeglio C, Welty A (2014) An Examination of the June 2013 east coast meteotsunami captured by NOAA observing systems. Maryland: NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 079, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA National Ocean Service, Silver Spring. p. 42
Bernard E, Titov VV (2015) Evolution of tsunami warning systems and products. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 373(2053):20140371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0371
Churchill DD, Houston SH, Bond NA (1995) The Daytona Beach wave of 3–4 July 1992—a shallow-water gravity-wave forced by a propagating squall line. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076%3c0021:TDBWOJ%3e2.0.CO;2
Dusek G, DiVeglio C, Licate L et al (2019) A meteotsunami climatology along the U.S. east coast. Bull Amer Met Soc 100(7):1329–1345
Gusiakov VK (2009) Tsunami history: recorded. In: Bernard EN, Robinson AR (eds) The Sea, vol 15, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 23–53
Gusiakov VK, Dunbar PK, Arcos N (2019) Twenty-five years (1992–2016) of global tsunamis: statistical and analytical overview. Pure Appl Geophys 176(7):2795–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02113-7
Heidarzadeh M, Šepić J, Rabinovich A, Allahyar M, Soltanpour A, Tavakoli F (2020) Meteorological tsunami of 19 March 2017 in the Persian Gulf: observations and analyses. Pure Appl Geophys 177(3):1231–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02263-8
Knight WR, Whitmore P, Kim Y, Wang D, Becker NC, Weinstein S, Walker K (2013) The US East Coast meteotsunami of June 13, 2013. AGU 2013 Fall Meeting Abstracts 1:1740
Lipa B, Parikh H, Barrick D, Roarty H, Glenn S (2014) High-frequency radar observations of the June 2013 US East Coast meteotsunami. Nat Hazards 74:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0992-4
Lipa B, Barrick D, Isaacson J (2016). In: Mokhtari M (ed) Tsunami coastal tsunami warning with deployed HF radar systems. InTechOpen, London
Mercer D, Sheng J, Greatbatch RJ, Bobanović J (2002) Barotropic waves generated by storms moving rapidly over shallow water. J Geophys Res 107(C10):3152. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001140
Mofjeld HO (2009) Tsunami measurements. In: Bernard EN, Robinson AR (eds) The Sea, vol 15. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, England, pp 201–235
National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) (2013) Tsunami of 13 June, 2013 (Northwestern Atlantic Ocean), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Weather Service, https://ntwc.ncep.noaa.gov/previous.events/?p=06-13-13. Accessed from 2013
NOAA Center for Tsunami Research (NCTR) (2013) East Coast non-seismic tsunamis, teleconference on meteotsunami, July 18, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/eastcoast20130613/. Accessed from 2013
Mofjeld HO, Titov VV, González FI, Newman JC (2001) Tsunami scattering provinces in the Pacific Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 28(2):335–338. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011710
Monserrat S, Vilibić I, Rabinovich AB (2006) Meteotsunamis: atmospherically induced destructive ocean waves in the tsunami frequency band. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 6:1035–1051
Pattiaratchi CB, Wijeratne EMS (2014) Observations of meteorological tsunamis along the southwest Australian coast. Nat Hazards 74(1):281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1263-8
Pattiaratchi CB, Wijeratne EMS (2015) Are meteotsunamis an underrated hazard? Phil Trans Roy Soc A 373(20140377):1–23
Proudman J (1929) The effects on the sea of changes in atmospheric pressure. Geophys Suppl Monthly Notices Roy Astr Soc 2:197–209
Rabinovich AB (2009) Seiches and harbor oscillations. In: Kim YC (ed) Handbook of Coastal and ocean engineering. World Scientific Publ, Singapore, pp 193–236
Rabinovich AB (2020) Twenty-seven years of progress in the science of meteorological tsunamis following the 1992 Daytona Beach event. Pure Appl Geophys 177:1193–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02349-3
Salaree A, Mansouri R, Okal EA (2018) The intriguing tsunami of 19 March 2017 at Bandar Dayyer, Iran: field survey and simulations. Nat Hazards 90(3):1277–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3119-5
Šepić J, Vilibić I, Rabinovich AB, Monserrat S (2015a) Widespread tsunami-like waves of 23–27 June in the Mediterranean and Black seas generated by high-altitude atmospheric forcing. Sci Reports 5(11682):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11682
Šepić J, Vilibic ́ I, Fine I (2015b) Northern Adriatic meteorological tsunamis: assessment of their potential through ocean modeling experiments. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:2993–3010. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010795
Tang L, Titov VV, Chamberlin CD (2009) Development, testing, and applications of site-specific tsunami inundation models for real-time forecasting. J Geophys Res 114:C12025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005476
Titov VV (2018) Research to quantify hazard from meteotsunamis in real-time. Abstract NH41C-1008. Paper presented at 2018 Fall Meeting, AGU, Washington, D.C., 10–14 Dec 2018
Titov VV, González FI (2001) Numerical study of the source of the July 17, 1998 PNG tsunami. In: Hebenstreit GT (ed) Tsunami research at the end of a critical decade. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NY, pp 197–207
Titov VV, Kânoğlu U, Synolakis C (2016) Development of MOST for real-time tsunami forecasting. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 142(6):03116004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000357
Titov VV, Synolakis CE (1995) Modeling of breaking and nonbreak- ing long-wave evolution and runup using VTCS–2. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1995)121:6(308)
Titov VV, Synolakis CE (1998) Numerical modeling of tidal wave runup . J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 124(4):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1998)
Vilibić I (2005) Numerical study of the Middle Adriatic coastal waters’ sensitivity to the various air pressure travelling disturbances. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-3569-2005
Vilibić I (2008) Numerical simulations of the Proudman resonance. Cont Shelf Res 28(4–5):574–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.11.005
Wertman CA, Yablonsky RM, Shen Y, Merrill J, Kincaid CR, Pockalny RA (2014) Mesoscale convective system surface pressure anomalies responsible for meteotsunamis along the U.S. East Coast on June 13th, 2013. Sci Rep 4:7143. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07143
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the dedicated research support of NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory scientists and engineers that made this research possible (contribution number 5123). We would like to thank Nick Bond for useful discussion of meteorological aspects of this work and the staff of the NOAA Center for Tsunami Research for great scientific support. We also thank three anonymous reviewers of the paper for very constructive comments and suggestions that led to significant improvements of the initial manuscript.
Funding
Provided by NOAA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
none
Code availability
Custom code is used for simulations.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary information 1 (626 m4v)
Supplementary information 2 (9977 m4v)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Titov, V., Moore, C. Meteotsunami model forecast: can coastal hazard be quantified in real time?. Nat Hazards 106, 1545–1561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04450-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04450-6