Skip to main content
Log in

NaI cubic detector full-energy peak efficiency, including coincidence and self-absorption corrections for rectangular sources using analytical method

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Low activities of radionuclides in environmental and occupational samples demand for the lower detection limits of the measuring system, which can be achieved by minimizing the source-to-detector distance. Analytical technique to calculate full-energy peak efficiency and total efficiency, self-absorption of sources and a coincidence factor of the NaI cubic scintillation detector with rectangular cavity for rectangular source have been derived. The photon path length of the volumetric sources calculated and determined source self-absorption. The photon attention by rectangular sources and detector cap materials is also calculated. In the experiments gamma aqueous source containing Eu-152 radionuclide covering range from 121 to 1408 keV was used. By comparison analytical method for calculating the full energy peak efficiency and the corrected experimental efficiency values are in good a agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Badawi MS, Noureddine S et al (2020) Characterization of the efficiency of a cubic NaI detector with rectangular cavity for axially positioned sources. J Insturm 15:P02013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas MI, Badawi MS et al (2020) Efficiency of a cubic NaI(Tl) detector with rectangular cavity using standard radioactive point sources placed at non-axial position. Appl Radiat Isot 163:109139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee M, Park TS, Woo JK (2008) Coincidence summing effects in gamma-ray spectrometry using a Marinelli. Appl Radiat Isot 66:799–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas MI (2001) HPGe detector photopeak efficiency calculation including self-absorption and coincidence corrections for Marinelli beaker sources using compact analytical expressions. Appl Radiat Isot 54:761–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abbas MI (2007) Direct mathematical method for calculating full-energy peak efficiency and coincidence corrections of HPGe detectors for extended sources. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 256:554–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomarchio E, Rizzo S (2011) Coincidence-summing correction equations in gamma-ray spectrometry with p-type HPGedetectors. Radiat Phys Chem 80:318–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Khatib AM, Badawi MS et al (2017) Full-Energy peak efficiency of an NaI (Tl) detector with coincidence summing correction showing the effect of the source-to-detector distance. Chin J Phys 55:478–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jäderström H, Mueller W et al (2017) True coincidence summing correction and mathematical efficiency modeling of a well detector. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 784:264–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Debertin K, Ren J (1989) Measurement of activity of radioactive samples in Marinelli beakers. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 278:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elsafi M, Gouda MM et al (2017) Using mathematical procedure to compute the attenuation coefficient in spectrometry field. J Radiol Oncol 1:022–033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos TO, Rocha Z, et al (2015) Determination of the self-attenuation correction factor for environmental samples in gamma spectrometry. In: International nuclear AIC conference—INAC (2015), São Paulo, SP, Brazil, pp 4–9

  12. Moens L, Doner J et al (1981) Calculation of the absolute peak efficiency of gamma-ray detectors for different counting geometries. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res 187:451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Debertin K, Schotzig U (1979) Coincedence summing correction in Ge(Li) spectrometry at low source-to-detector distances. Nuclear Instrum Methods 158:471–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon ET, Kang MY (2020) Coincidence summing correction for a voluminous 152Eu source. Nucl Eng Technol 52:1266e1270

    Google Scholar 

  15. Badawi MS, Jovanovic SI et al (2017) Calibration of 4π NaI(Tl) detectors with coincidence summing correction using new numerical procedure and ANGLE4 software. AIP Adv 7(19):0350051

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Elsafi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, M.I., Elsafi, M., Gouda, M.M. et al. NaI cubic detector full-energy peak efficiency, including coincidence and self-absorption corrections for rectangular sources using analytical method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327, 251–258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07508-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07508-8

Keywords

Navigation