Abstract
Anaerobic digestion is a biological process that can partially convert organic matter into gases with potential to energy generation. However, in case of continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) for the treatment of sludge from swine manure, a digestate with a high concentration of solids, undigested carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus is usually obtained, which can limit the direct application to the soil or other direct uses or disposal. Therefore, an additional treatment of digestate is still needed to meet environmental requirements for the viability of an anaerobic digestion plant to enable the disposal of the liquid effluent. In this study, solid-liquid separation (SLS) strategies were studied for treatment of digestate from swine sludge CSTR biodigester. The following processes were tested: settling, centrifugation and chemical flocculation.The performance of each process was evaluated by monitoring the concentrations of the following parameters in the raw digestate and after treatment: total carbon (TC), phosphorus, total kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, total solids (TS), volatile solids and fixed solids. The factorial design was used for the optimization of centrifugation and chemical flocculation tests. Total carbon, solids and phosphorus were significantly reduced from digestate using the different SLS processes. However, higher removal efficiencies were obtained by centrifugation, being more expressive to phosphorus, TC and TS (reduction of 95, 90 and 83%, respectively). Furthermore, the sludge production by centrifugation was 3.8 and 7.3 times lower than by settling and chemical flocculation, respectively. Thus, centrifugation could be considered the most appropriate SLS process to enable digestate treatment and the liquid efluent is suitable to be treated by deammonification process for nitrogen removal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, G., Mottet, A., Lemaigre, S., et al. (2018). Fractionation of anaerobic digestates by dynamic nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: An industrial pilot case evaluation for nutrient recovery. J Environ Chem Eng, 6, 6723–6732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.033.
Akhiar, A., Battimelli, A., Torrijos, M., & Carrere, H. (2017). Comprehensive characterization of the liquid fraction of digestates from full-scale anaerobic co-digestion. Waste Manag, 59, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.005.
Amaral, A. C., Kunz, A., Radis, A., Steinmetz, R. L., et al. (2016). Influence of solid-liquid separation strategy on biogas yield from a stratified swine production system. Journal of Environmental Management, 168, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.014.
Barampouti, E. M., Mai, S., Malamis, D., et al. (2020). Exploring technological alternatives of nutrient recovery from digestate as a secondary resource. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, 110370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110379.
Capdevielle, A., Sýkorová, E., Biscans, B., et al. (2013). Optimization of struvite precipitation in synthetic biologically treated swine wastewater-Determination of the optimal process parameters. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244–245, 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.054.
Chini, A., Bolsan, A. C., Hollas, C. E., et al. (2019). Evaluation of deammonification reactor performance and microrganisms community during treatment of digestate from swine sludge CSTR biodigester. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.113.
Chini, A., Ester Hollas, C., Chiapetti Bolsan, A., et al. (2020). Process performance and anammox community diversity in a deammonification reactor under progressive nitrogen loading rates for swine wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123521.
Díaz-Vázquez, D., Alvarado-Cummings, S. C., Meza-Rodríguez, D., et al. (2020). Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and multicriteria site selection for centralized anaerobic digester systems: The case of Jalisco. México. Sustainability, 12, 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093527.
Feng, Y., Lu, X., Al-Hazmi, H., & Mąkinia, J. (2017). An overview of the strategies for the deammonification process start-up and recovery after accidental operational failures. Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology, 16, 541–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-017-9441-2.
Fernandes, G. W., Kunz, A., Steinmetz, R. L. R., et al. (2012). Chemical phosphorus removal: A clean strategy for piggery wastewater management in Brazil. Environ Technol (United Kingdom), 33, 1677–1683. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2011.642896.
Gaspareto, T. C., Scapini, T., Venturin, B., et al. (2020). Pre-treatment strategies for value addition in poultry litter. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00477.
Hjorth, M., Christensen, K. V., Christensen, M. L., & Sommer, S. G. (2010). Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in therory and practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev, 30, 153–180.
Hollas, C. E., Chini, A., Antes, F. G., et al. (2019). Modified Ludzack-Ettinger system role in efficient nitrogen removal from swine manure under high total suspended solids concentration. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02326-2.
Jørgensen, K., & Jensen, L. S. (2009). Chemical and biochemical variation in animal manure solids separated using different commercial separation technologies. Bioresource Technology, 100, 3088–3096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.065.
Kooijman, G., De Kreuk, M. K., & Van Lier, J. B. (2017). Influence of chemically enhanced primary treatment on anaerobic digestion and dewaterability of waste sludge. Water Science and Technology, 76, 1629–1639. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.314.
Kunz, A., Steinmetz, R. L. R., Ramme, M. A., & Coldebella, A. (2009). Effect of storage time on swine manure solid separation efficiency by screening. Bioresource Technology, 100, 1815–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.022.
Li, C., Li, J., Pan, L., et al. (2020a). Treatment of digestate residues for energy recovery and biochar production: From lab to pilot-scale verification. J Clean Prod, 265, 121852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121852.
Li, Y., Han, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020b). Factors affecting gaseous emissions, maturity, and energy efficiency in composting of livestock manure digestate. Science of the Total Environment, 731, 139157.
Lu, Y., Liaquat, R., Astals, S., et al. (2018). Relationship between microbial community, operational factors and ammonia inhibition resilience in anaerobic digesters at low and moderate ammonia background concentrations. N Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2018.02.013.
Magrí, A., Giovannini, F., Connan, R., et al. (2017). Nutrient management from biogas digester effluents: a bibliometric-based analysis of publications and patents. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 14, 1739–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1293-3.
Miao, Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2018). Partial nitrification-anammox (PNA) treating sewage with intermittent aeration mode: Effect of influent C/N ratios. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334, 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.072.
Mores, R., Treichel, H., Zakrzevski, C. A., et al. (2016). Remove of phosphorous and turbidity of swine wastewater using electrocoagulation under continuous flow. Separation and Purification Technology, 171, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.07.016.
Popovic, O., Gioelli, F., Dinuccio, E., et al. (2017). Centrifugation of digestate: The effect of chitosan on separation efficiency. Sustain, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122302.
Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., Eaton, A. D., & Clesceri, L. S. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.
Rodrigues, M. I., & Lema, A. F. (2014). Experimental design and process optimization. New York: CRC Press.
Shan, J., Yang, P., Shang, X., et al. (2018). Anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification in a paddy soil as affected by temperature, pH, organic carbon, and substrates. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 12, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1263-z.
Suzin, L., Antes, F. G., Bedendo, G. C., et al. (2018). Chemical removal of phosphorus from swine effluent : the impact of previous effluent treatment technologies on process efficiency. Water, Air, and Soil pollution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4018-4.
Svehla, P., Radechovska, H., Pacek, L., et al. (2017). Nitrification in a completely stirred tank reactor treating the liquid phase of digestate: The way towards rational use of nitrogen. Waste Manag, 64, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.041.
Tambone, F., Orzi, V., D’Imporzano, G., & Adani, F. (2017). Solid and liquid fractionation of digestate: Mass balance, chemical characterization, and agronomic and environmental value. Bioresource Technology, 243, 1251–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.130.
Tápparo, D. C., Rogovski, P., Cadamuro, R. D., et al. (2020). Nutritional, energy and sanitary aspects of swine manure and carcass co-digestion. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00333.
Tápparo, D. C., Viancelli, A., Amaral, A. C., et al. (2018). Sanitary effectiveness and biogas yield by anaerobic co-digestion of swine carcasses and manure. Tecnologia Ambiental, 3330, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1508256.
Van Nieuwenhuijzen, A., & Van der Graaf, J. (2012). Handbook on particle separation processes (1st ed.). London: IWA Publishing.
Wang, X., Wang, W., Zhou, B., Xu, M., Wu, Z., Liang, J., & Zhou, L. (2020). Improving the performance of solid-liquid separation of anaerobic digested food waste by oxidation of thermally activated persulfate. J Hazard Material, 398, 122989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122989 .
Zhou, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). A new single-stage process that integrates simultaneous COD oxidation, partial nitrification-denitrification and anammox (SCONDA) for the treatment of ammonia-rich organic wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 254, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.057 .
Acknowledgments
This study had financial support from CAPES, CNPq and SISTRATES FUNTEC-BNDES (grant number 15.2.0837.1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chini, A., Hollas, C.E., Bolsan, A.C. et al. Treatment of digestate from swine sludge continuous stirred tank reactor to reduce total carbon and total solids content. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 12326–12341 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01170-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01170-6