Abstract
The growing electricity demand impels the expansion of generation capacity. For an effective and detailed planning, it is vital to know the supply capacity and the growth potential of a power plant technology. For the growth of a power generation technology, the electricity generated from it needs reinvestment for the construction of newer power plants, other than just meeting the demand. This paper proposes a framework employing dynamic energy analysis to examine the capacity expansion, growth potential and energy dynamics of six different technologies (solar PV, wind, hydro, nuclear, coal and gas). The power plant characteristics include lifetime, construction time, energy payback time and energy reinvestment factor. Energy payback time, relative to the lifetime of a power plant, is the primary constraint in capacity expansion. We analyze energy reinvestment strategies, affecting the growth rate, and determine its optimal value. The solar PV power plant has the least maximum growth potential of 15%, while gas power plant has the highest maximum growth potential of 124%. Relationships are developed to find the minimum time frame required to follow a self-sustainable path with optimal reinvestment for any technology. A case study is presented to reach the global demand capacity target for the year 2030 following a low-carbon-emission path.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C(t):
-
Capacity of the power plant under construction (MW)
- D(t):
-
Demand capacity or load demand or energy provided to active consumers (MWh/y)
- E(t):
-
Total energy produced from a power plant (MWh)
- N :
-
Time of analysis at which the demand capacity is maximum (y)
- P(t):
-
Installed capacity of a power plant (MW)
- t :
-
Time instant (y)
- T :
-
Lifetime of a power plant (y)
- y :
-
Year
- β :
-
Energy reinvestment factor of a power plant i (value lies between 0 and 1)
- μ :
-
Construction time of a power plant (y)
- τ :
-
Energy payback time of a power plant (y)
- φ :
-
Capacity factor of a power plant
- α :
-
Growth rate of a power plant (y−1)
- i :
-
Technology type
- max:
-
Maximum
- min:
-
Minimum
- opt:
-
Optimal
- thres:
-
Threshold
- CED:
-
Cumulative energy demand
- EPBT:
-
Energy payback time
- EROI:
-
Energy return on investment
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- LCA:
-
Life cycle assessment
- NEA:
-
Net energy analysis
- PV:
-
Photovoltaic
References
Alsema EA (2000) Energy pay-back time and CO2 emissions of PV systems. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 8(1):17–25
Arun P, Banerjee R, Bandyopadhyay S (2009) Optimum sizing of photovoltaic battery systems incorporating uncertainty through design space approach. Sol Energy 83(7):1013–1025
Bandyopadhyay S (2020) Interval pinch analysis for resource conservation networks with epistemic uncertainties. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(30):13669–13681
Barrett, M., and Spataru, C. (2015, March). DyneMo: a dynamic energy model for the exploration of energy, society and environment. In: 2015 17th UKSim-AMSS International Conference on Modelling and Simulation (UKSim). IEEE, pp 255–260
Becerra-Lopez HR, Golding P (2007) Dynamic exergy analysis for capacity expansion of regional power-generation systems: case study of far West Texas. Energy 32(11):2167–2186
Brockway PE, Owen A, Brand-Correa LI, Hardt L (2019) Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nat Energy 4(7):612–621
Brundtland Commission (1987) World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future
Buceti G (2014) Sustainable power density in electricity generation. Manag Environ Qual Int J 25(1):5–18
Buonocore E, Vanoli L, Carotenuto A, Ulgiati S (2015) Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy. Energy 86:476–487
Capellán-Pérez I, de Castro C, González LJM (2019) Dynamic Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies. Energy Strategy Rev 26:100399
Carbajales-Dale M, Barnhart CJ, Benson SM (2014) Can we afford storage? A dynamic net energy analysis of renewable electricity generation supported by energy storage. Energy Environ Sci 7(5):1538–1544
Carley S, Andrews RN (2012) Creating a sustainable US electricity sector: the question of scale. Policy Sci 45(2):97–121
Cleveland CJ, Costanza R, Hall CA, Kaufmann R (1984) Energy and the US economy: a biophysical perspective. Science 225(4665):890–897
Destek MA, Aslan A (2017) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: evidence from bootstrap panel causality. Renew Energy 111:757–763
EIA (2020) Electric power monthly. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/current_month/october2020.pdf
Emmott CJM, Ekins-Daukes NJ, Nelson J (2014) Dynamic carbon mitigation analysis: the role of thin-film photovoltaics. Energy Environ Sci 7(6):1810–1818
Gibon T, Arvesen A, Hertwich EG (2017) Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1283–1290
Hall CA, Cleveland CJ, Kaufmann R (1986) Energy and resource quality: the ecology of the economic process. Wiley Interscience, New York
Hondo H (2005) Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 30(11–12):2042–2056
Hu Y, Hall CA, Wang J, Feng L, Poisson A (2013) Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of China’s conventional fossil fuels: Historical and future trends. Energy 54:352–364
Huang YF, Gan XJ, Chiueh PT (2017) Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems. Renew Energy 102:98–106
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017a) Report on CO2 emissions from fuel combustion
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017b) Report on key world energy statistics
IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
Jones C, Gilbert P, Raugei M, Mander S, Leccisi E (2017) An approach to prospective consequential life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of distributed electricity generation. Energy Policy 100:350–358
Kato K, Murata A, Sakuta K (1998) Energy payback time and life-cycle CO2 emission of residential PV power system with silicon PV module. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 6(2):105–115
Kenny R, Law C, Pearce JM (2010) Towards real energy economics: energy policy driven by life-cycle carbon emission. Energy Policy 38(4):1969–1978
Kessides IN, Wade DC (2011a) Towards a sustainable global energy supply infrastructure: net energy balance and density considerations. Energy Policy 39:5322–5334
Kessides IN, Wade DC (2011b) Deriving an improved dynamic EROI to provide better information for energy planners. Sustainability 3(12):2339–2357
Khan I (2019) Greenhouse gas emission accounting approaches in electricity generation systems: a review. Atmos Environ 200:131–141
Krishna Priya GS, Bandyopadhyay S (2017) Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning. Appl Energy 202:335–347
Mathur J, Bansal NK, Wagner HJ (2004) Dynamic energy analysis to assess maximum growth rates in developing generation capacity: case study of India. Energy Policy 32:281–287
Neumeyer C, Goldston R (2016) Dynamic EROI assessment of the IPCC 21st century electricity production scenario. Sustainability 8(5):421
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2020) Global Monitoring Division, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/index.html. Accessed on 30 June 2020.
Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) (2015) Report on nuclear energy: combating climate change
Østergaard PA, Duic N, Noorollahi Y, Mikulcic H, Kalogirou S (2020) Sustainable development using renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 146:2430–2437
Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013) Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:255–274
Pearce JM (2008) Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology. Int J Nuclear Govern Economy Ecol 2(1):113–130
Pires JCM (2019) Negative emissions technologies: a complementary solution for climate change mitigation. Sci Total Environ 672:502–514
Raadal HL, Gagnon L, Modahl IS, Hanssen OJ (2011) Life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the generation of wind and hydro power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(7):3417–3422
Raugei M (2019) Net energy analysis must not compare apples and oranges. Nat Energy 4(2):86–88
Roy A, Kedare SB, Bandyopadhyay S (2010) Optimum sizing of wind-battery systems incorporating resource uncertainty. Appl Energy 87(8):2712–2727
Siddiqui O, Dincer I (2017) Comparative assessment of the environmental impacts of nuclear, wind and hydro-electric power plants in Ontario: a life cycle assessment. J Cleaner Prod 164:848–860
Sims RE, Rogner HH, Gregory K (2003) Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation. Energy Policy 31(13):1315–1326
Steffen B, Hischier D, Schmidt TS (2018) Historical and projected improvements in net energy performance of power generation technologies. Energy Environ Sci 11(12):3524–3530
Tan RR, Foo DCY (2007) Pinch analysis approach to carbon constrained energy sector planning. Energy 32(8):1422–1429
Voss A (2001) LCA and external costs in comparative assessment of electricity chains: decision support for sustainable electricity provision. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-1547
Walmsley TG, Walmsley MR, Atkins MJ (2017) Energy Return on energy and carbon investment of wind energy farms: a case study of New Zealand. J Cleaner Prod 167:885–895
Wang Z, Xu G, Wang H, Ren J (2019) Distributed energy system for sustainability transition: a comprehensive assessment under uncertainties based on interval multi-criteria decision making method by coupling interval DEMATEL and interval VIKOR. Energy 169:750–761
Weißbach D, Ruprecht G, Huke A, Czerski K, Gottlieb S, Hussein A (2013) Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. Energy 52:210–221
World Nuclear Association (2011) Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation sources. Online report http://www.world-nuclear.org/our-association/publications/online-reports.aspx Last retrieved on 11 Mar 2018
World Population Prospects—Population Division United Nations. esa.un.org. Retrieved 15 Jun 2017
Wu P, Ma X, Ji J, Ma Y (2017) Review on life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emission profit of solar photovoltaic systems. Energy Proc 105:1289–1294
Xu L, Pang M, Zhang L, Poganietz WR, Marathe SD (2018) Life cycle assessment of onshore wind power systems in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:361–368
World Energy Outlook Special Report (2015) Energy and Climate Change, IEA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyakurel, M., Nawandar, K., Ramadesigan, V. et al. Capacity expansion of power plants using dynamic energy analysis. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 669–683 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01995-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01995-9