Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple decision support methods have been developed to support multi-criteria problems, offering a structured approach. One such method is FITradeoff, which is based on tradeoff, and has a strong axiomatic structure. Implemented in a Decision Support System, FITradeoff offers an experience with low cognitive effort and time demanded by the decision maker. Despite its advantages, some issues remain unclear. In this study, we sought to perform an analysis about the cognitive aspects during the elicitation process using FITradeoff in which the subjects solved decision problems developed by themselves. Two neuroscience tools, Eye-Tracker and a 14-channel EEG were used for neurological and psychophysiological data collection. From the results obtained, analyzes and considerations were made about the elicitation process with FITradeoff and the impact of different types of criteria on the performance of the decision maker. With these findings, it is expected to create direction for improvements in the Decision Support System.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially sponsored by the Coordination for the Improvements of Higher Education Personnel – Brazil (CAPES) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for which the authors are most grateful.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordination for the Improvements of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anderson Lucas Carneiro de Lima da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

CAAE – 69253017.0.0000.5208.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 14.

Table 14 Definition of the parameters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, A.L.C.d.L., Costa, A.P.C.S. & de Almeida, A.T. Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools. Ann Oper Res 312, 1147–1169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0

Keywords

Navigation