Abstract
Multiple decision support methods have been developed to support multi-criteria problems, offering a structured approach. One such method is FITradeoff, which is based on tradeoff, and has a strong axiomatic structure. Implemented in a Decision Support System, FITradeoff offers an experience with low cognitive effort and time demanded by the decision maker. Despite its advantages, some issues remain unclear. In this study, we sought to perform an analysis about the cognitive aspects during the elicitation process using FITradeoff in which the subjects solved decision problems developed by themselves. Two neuroscience tools, Eye-Tracker and a 14-channel EEG were used for neurological and psychophysiological data collection. From the results obtained, analyzes and considerations were made about the elicitation process with FITradeoff and the impact of different types of criteria on the performance of the decision maker. With these findings, it is expected to create direction for improvements in the Decision Support System.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (1991). Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science, 37(12), 1603–1619.
Braboszcz, C., & Delorme, A. (2011). Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering. Neuroimage, 54, 3040–3047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.008.
Camilo, D. G. G., de Souza, R. P., Frazão, T. D. C., & da Costa Junior, J. F. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: Selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1054-y.
Carrillo, P. A. A., Roselli, L. R. P., Frej, E. A., & de Almeida, A. T. (2018). Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y.
Chalgham, M., Khatrouch, I., Masmoudi, M., Walha, O. C., & Dammak, A. (2019). Inpatient admission management using multiple criteria decision-making methods. Operations Research for Health Care, 23, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2018.10.001.
Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology: I. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 330.
de Almeida, A., Cavalcante, C., Alencar, M., Ferreira, R., de Almeida-Filho, A., & Garcez, T. (2015). Multicriteria and multi-objective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. International series in operations research & management science (Vol. 231, p. 416p). New York: Springer.
de Almeida, A. T., de Almeida, J. A., Costa, A. P. C. S., & de Almeida-Filho, A. T. (2016). A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058.
de Macedo, P. P., de Miranda Mota, C. M., & Sola, A. V. H. (2018). Meeting the Brazilian Energy Efficiency Law: A flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustainable cities and society, 41, 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.020.
Deepa, N., Srinivasan, K., Chang, C. Y., & Bashir, A. K. (2019). An efficient ensemble vtopes multi-criteria decision-making model for sustainable sugarcane farms. Sustainability, 11(16), 4288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164288.
Dell’Ovo, M., Frej, E. A., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S., Morais, D. C., & de Almeida, A. T. (2017, May). Multicriteria decision making for healthcare facilities location with visualization based on FITradeoff method. In International conference on decision support system technology (pp. 32–44). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_3
Dimoka, A., Davis, F. D., Gupta, A., Pavlou, P. A., Banker, R. D., Dennis, A. R., et al. (2012). On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703475.
Dortaj, A., Maghsoudy, S., Ardejani, F. D., & Eskandari, Z. (2020). Locating suitable sites for construction of subsurface dams in semiarid region of Iran: Using modified ELECTRE III. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00362-2.
Fischer, N. L., Peres, R., & Fiorani, M. (2018). Frontal Alpha Asymmetry and Theta Oscillations Associated with Information Sharing Intention. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 12, 166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00166.
Fossile, D. K., Frej, E. A., da Costa, S. E. G., de Lima, E. P., & de Almeida, A. T. (2020). Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121107.
Frej, E. A., Roselli, L. R. P., Araújo de Almeida, J., & de Almeida, A. T. (2017). A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4541914.
Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2014). Introduction: A brief history of neuroeconomics. In P. W. Glimcher & E. Fehr (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed., Vol. 560, p. xvii–xxviii). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00035-8.
Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102566.
Gusmão, A. P. H., & Pereira Medeiros, C. (2016). A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7850960.
Hasan, M. M., Lwin, K., Imani, M., Shabut, A., Bittencourt, L. F., & Hossain, M. A. (2019). Dynamic multi-objective optimisation using deep reinforcement learning: Benchmark, algorithm and an application to identify vulnerable zones based on water quality. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 86, 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.014.
Kang, T. H. A., Júnior, A. M. D. C. S., & de Almeida, A. T. (2018). Evaluating electric power generation technologies: A multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy, 165, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.165.
Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives—Preferences, and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Khalilpourazari, S., & Khamseh, A. A. (2017). Bi-objective emergency blood supply chain network design in earthquake considering earthquake magnitude: A comprehensive study with real world application. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2588-y.
Khalilpourazari, S., Naderi, B., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2020). Multi-objective stochastic fractal search: A powerful algorithm for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems. Soft Computing, 24(4), 3037–3066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04080-6.
Khalilpourazari, S., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2018). Multi-objective optimization of multi-item EOQ model with partial backordering and defective batches and stochastic constraints using MOWCA and MOGWO. Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0397-y.
Khalilpourazari, S., Soltanzadeh, S., Weber, G. W., & Roy, S. K. (2019). Designing an efficient blood supply chain network in crisis: Neural learning, optimization and case study. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03437-2.
Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3.
Li, M., Lauharatanahirun, N., Steinberg, L., King-Casas, B., Kim-Spoon, J., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Longitudinal link between trait motivation and risk-taking behaviors via neural risk processing. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 40, 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100725.
Li, H., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Cao, X., Zhu, J., & Chen, W. (2020). Establishing an interval-valued fuzzy decision-making method for sustainable selection of healthcare waste treatment technologies in the emerging economies. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00943-0.
Liao, X., Shi, J., Li, Z., Zhang, L., & Xia, B. (2020). A model-driven deep reinforcement learning heuristic algorithm for resource allocation in ultra-dense cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2954538.
Lotfi, R., Mostafaeipour, A., Mardani, N., & Mardani, S. (2018). Investigation of wind farm location planning by considering budget constraints. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 37, 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2018.1437160.
Lukinova, E., & Myagkov, M. (2016). Impact of short social training on prosocial behaviors: An fMRI study. Frontiers in systems Neuroscience, 10, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00060.
Ma, J., Harstvedt, J. D., Jaradat, R., & Smith, B. (2020). Sustainability driven multi-criteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106236.
Ma, Q., Hu, Y., Jiang, S., & Meng, L. (2015). The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: An ERP study. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00077.
Massar, S. A., Lim, J., Sasmita, K., & Chee, M. W. (2016). Rewards boost sustained attention through higher effort: A value-based decision making approach. Biological Psychology, 120, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.019.
Müller-Putz, G. R., Riedl, R., & Wriessnegger, S. C. (2015). Electroencephalography (EEG) as a research tool in the information systems discipline: Foundations, measurement, and applications. CAIS, 37, 46. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03746.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131.
Pergher, I., Frej, E. A., Roselli, L. R. P., & de Almeida, A. T. (2020). Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107669.
Pizzagalli, D. A. (2007). Electroencephalography and high-density electrophysiological source localization. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 56–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pogoda, L., Holzer, M., Mormann, F., & Weber, B. (2016). Multivariate representation of food preferences in the human brain. Brain and Cognition, 110, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.12.008.
Poudel, G. R., Bhattarai, A., Dickinson, D. L., & Drummond, S. (2017). Neural correlates of decision-making during a Bayesian choice task. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000730.
Raghuraman, A. P., & Padoa-SchioppA, C. (2014). Integration of multiple determinants in the neuronal computation of economic values. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(35), 11583–11603. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1235-14.2014.
Reznik, S. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2018). Frontal asymmetry as a mediator and moderator of emotion: An updated review. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12965.
Rosch, J. L., & Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. (2013). A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0234-7.
Roselli, L. R. P., de Almeida, A. T., & Frej, E. A. (2019a). Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Operational Research, 19(4), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00445-1.
Roselli, L. R. P., Pereira, L. S., Silva, A. L. C. L., de Almeida, A. T., Morais, D. C., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2019b). Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03394-w.
Schulz, S., Buscher, U., & Shen, L. (2020). Multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling with variable discrete production speed levels and time-of-use energy prices. Journal of Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00971-5.
Shaw, D., Czekóová, K., Gajdoš, M., Staněk, R., Špalek, J., & Brázdil, M. (2019). Social decision-making in the brain: Input-state-output modelling reveals patterns of effective connectivity underlying reciprocal choices. Human Brain Mapping, 40(2), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24446.
Souzangarzadeh, H., Jahan, A., Rezvani, M. J., & Milani, A. S. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of cylindrical segmented tubes as energy absorbers under oblique crushes: D-optimal design and integration of MULTIMOORA with combinative weighting. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02486-7.
Strombach, T., Weber, B., Hangebrauk, Z., Kenning, P., Karipidis, I. I., Tobler, P. N., et al. (2015). Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(5), 1619–1624. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414715112.
Sun, H., Verbeke, W. J., Pozharliev, R., Bagozzi, R. P., Babiloni, F., & Wang, L. (2019). Framing a trust game as a power game greatly affects interbrain synchronicity between trustor and trustee. Social Neuroscience, 14(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1566171.
Van der Linden, M., Juillerat, A. C., & Adam, S. (2003). Cognitive intervention. In: R. Mulligan, M. Van der Linden, & A.C. Juillerat (Eds.) (pp. 169–233). Erlbaum.
Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Figner, B., Weeda, W. D., Van Der Molen, M. W., Jansen, B. R., & Huizenga, H. M. (2016). Neural mechanisms underlying compensatory and noncompensatory strategies in risky choice. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(9), 1358–1373. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00975.
Verharen, J. P., Adan, R. A., & Vanderschuren, L. J. (2019). How reward and aversion shape motivation and decision making: A computational account. The Neuroscientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858419834517.
Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838.
Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993). Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-H.
You, J., Ampomah, W., & Sun, Q. (2020). Development and application of a machine learning based multi-objective optimization workflow for CO2-EOR projects. Fuel, 264, 116758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116758.
Zhao, Y., & Siau, K. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience in information systems research. In: Applications of neuroscience: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 158–175). IGI Global.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially sponsored by the Coordination for the Improvements of Higher Education Personnel – Brazil (CAPES) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for which the authors are most grateful.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordination for the Improvements of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
CAAE – 69253017.0.0000.5208.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 14.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, A.L.C.d.L., Costa, A.P.C.S. & de Almeida, A.T. Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools. Ann Oper Res 312, 1147–1169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0