Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative assessment of nutrient partitioning in healthy and root (wilt) disease affected coconut palms grown in an Entisol of humid tropical Kerala

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key Message

Nutrient uptake in the biomass of healthy and root (wilt) disease affected coconut palms are different.

Abstract

Root (wilt) is a predominant phytoplasmal disease affecting coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) palms and to sustain the palm health and productivity, better nutrient management practices are required. The objective of this research was to understand the uptake pattern and the partitioning of nutrients in the total biomass of healthy and root (wilt) diseased palms grown in humid tropical Entisol of Kerala. 5 coconut palms each were selected from diseased palms viz., Early (DE), Middle (DM) and Advanced (DA) category along with the control, which is Apparently Healthy palm (AH), without any diseases. The total biomass component with respect to each part viz., leaf (L), petiole (P), spadix (S), spathe (Sp), stem (St), leaf sheath fiber (LSF), husk (H) and nuts (copra:C + shell (Sh)) (N) were estimated. Nutrient uptake by the entire biomass uptake is classified as 1. Recyclable portion (L, P, S, Sp, H, LSF and Sh) 2. Removable portion (C) 3. Reserve biomass (St) and then computed the nutrient partitioning by standard analytical procedures. For all nutrients except Mg, reserve biomass had the greatest nutrient uptake followed by recyclable biomass and removable biomass components. Among the nutrients, potassium recorded the highest total uptake. In AH palm, the total uptake of potassium was 1075 g per palm, whereas it was 407.3 g per palm in the diseased palms. The total uptake of nutrients which showed a significant relation with disease index followed the order K > N > Ca > S > P > Mg in apparently healthy palms and N > K > Ca > S > P > Mg in diseased palms. The percentage reduction in total uptake of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and B by diseased palms in comparison with healthy palms was 36.5, 37.6, 57.5, 44.1 23.3, 43.7 and 48.9. The results of the study indicated that the pattern of nutrient uptake in the different biomass components of apparently healthy and root (wilt) disease affected palms are significantly different. This can instigate the formulation of appropriate nutrient management strategies in coconut with emphasis on its residue recycling potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger KC, Truog R (1939) Boron determination in soils and plants. Ind Eng ChemAna. Ed 11(10):540–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskaran R, Ramanathan T (1984) Occurrence and spread of Thanjavur wilt disease of coconut. Indian Coconut J 15(6):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat R, Sujatha S (2012) Influence of biomass partitioning and nutrient uptake on yield of arecanut grown on a laterite soil. Communic Soil Sci Pl Anal 43:1757–1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biddappa CC, Upadhyay AK, Hegde MR, Palaniswami C (1996) Organic matter recycling in plantation crops. J Plantn Crops 5:71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham FT (1982) Boron In methods of soil analysis, Part 2, 2nd edn. Page AL (eds) No. 9. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 437–447

  • Bloem E, Haneklaus S, Schung E (2015) Milestones in plant sulfur research on sulfur-induced-resistance (SIR) in Europe. Front Plant Sci 5:779

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Butler EJ (1908) Report on coconut palm disease in Travancore. Agric Res Inst Pusa Bull 9:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil SR (1975) Mineral composition of coconut leaves in relation to root (wilt) disease. J Plantn Crops 3:34–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chesnin L, Yien CH (1950) Turbidimetric determination of available sulphur. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 15:149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coconut Cultivation Practices (2007) ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala. Dhanapal R, Thampan C (eds). Extension publication No. 179. p26

  • Coconut development board (2018) Area Production and productivity statistics. http://coconutboard.nic.in/Statistics.aspx

  • Davis JL, Armengaud P, Larson TR, White PJ, Newton AC, Amtmann A (2018) Contrasting nutrient disease relationships: K gradients in barley leaves have opposite effects on two fungal pathogens with different sensitivities to jasmonic acid. Plant Cell Environm 41:2357–2372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva AT, Pillai GM, Mathes DT (1985) The S Nutrition of Coconut. COCOS. 3:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyzaguirre PB, Batugal P (1999) Farmer Participatory Research on Coconut Diversity: workshop report on methods and field protocols. International Fund for Agricultural Development, IGFRI, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

    Google Scholar 

  • George SB (2016) Absorption and translocation of 32P by root (wilt) affected coconut palms. MSc. Thesis submitted to the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry. College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, P. 101

  • George MV, Radha K (1973) Computation of disease index of root (wilt) disease of coconut. Indian J Agric Sci 43:336–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose S (2014) Studies on coconut leaf diseases in Orissa and their management. PhD Thesis. Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar. p.78

  • Humphries EC (1956) Mineral components and ash analysis. Modern methods of plant analysis, vol 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 465–502

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. (Released 2016)

  • Inagaki M, Tange T (2014) Nutrient accumulation in aboveground biomass of planted tropical trees: a meta-analysis. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60:598–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, p.498

  • Khan HH, Krishnakumar V (2019) Soil Productivity and Nutrition. In: Nampoothiri KUK, Krishnakumar V, Thampan PK, Nair MA (eds.) The Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera L.) - Research and development Perspectives: 323–442

  • Khan H, Upadhyay AK, Palaniswami C (2000) Integrated nutrient management of plantation crops. XIV Plantation Crops Symposium, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnakumar V, Maheswarappa HP (2010) Integrated nutrient management for root (wilt) diseased coconut palms. Indian J Agric Sci 80:384–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Song Z, Yan Z (2018) Silicon enhancement of estimated plant biomass carbon accumulation under abiotic and biotic stresses. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 38:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra SK, Maheswarappa HP, Selvamani V, Chowdappa P (2017) Diagnosis and management of soil fertility constraints in coconut (Cocos nucifera): A review. Indian J Agric Sci 87(6):711–726

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manimekalai R, Soumya VP, Sathishkumar R, Selvarajan R, Reddy K, Thomas GV, Sasikala M, Rajeev G, Baranwal K (2010) Molecular detection of 16SrX1 Group phytoplasma associated with root (wilt) disease of coconut (Cocos nucifera) in India. Plant Dis 94(5):636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew C (1977) Changes in carbohydrate content of coconut palm affected by root wilt disease. J Plant Crops 5:84–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Krishnakumar V, Srinivasan V, Bhat R, Namboothiri CGN, Harris AA (2018) Standardization of critical B level in soil and leaves of coconut palms grown in a tropical Entisol. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:376–387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michael KJ (1978) Respiratory rate and nut yield in root (wilt) diseased coconut palms. J Plant Crops 6:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S, Yamaji K, Ishida A (2010) Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1447–1451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrenoud S (1990) Potassium and Plant Health, 2nd edn. International Potash Institute Bern, Switzerland, pp 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai NG, Davis TA (1963) Exhaust of macronutrients by the coconut palm - a preliminary study. Indian Coconut J 16:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai NG, Wahid PA, Kamala Devi CB, Cecil RPL, Amma SR, Mathew Nambiar PGKCKB (1975) Mineral nutrition of root (wilt) disease affected coconut palms. Fourth Session, FAO Tech. Working Production, Protection and Processing. Kingston, Jamaica, Proc

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1966) Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publisher, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu SR, Subramanian P, Biddappa CC, Bopaiah BM (1998) Prospects of improving coconut productivity through vermiculture technology. Indian Coconut J 29(4):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Radha K, Lal SB (1972) Diagnostic symptoms of root (wilt) disease of coconut. Indian J Agric Sci 42:410–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawther TSS (1963) Soil conditions and disease incidence in coconut. Coconut Bull 17:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G, Beni C, Socciarelli S, Marconi S, Pastore M, Del Vaglio M, Gervasi F (2010) Mineral nutrition of pear and apricot trees cultivated in Southern Italy area damaged by phytoplasma microorganisms. Acta Hort 868:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnug E, Booth E, Haneklaus S, Walker KC (1995) S supply and stress resistance in oilseed rape. Proc. 9th Int. Rapeseed Congress 1:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern PJ (1969) Sulfur deficiency in coconuts. Oleagineux 24:211–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford S, English L (1949) Use of flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agron J 41:446–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sushma AR, Badrinath BPK, Sridhara MS, S. (2008) Residual effect of integrated nutrient management with coir pith compost and other organics on subsequent ragi crop yield and chemical properties of vertisols. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 55(4):500–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1970) Arylsulfatase activity of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 34(2):225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varkey T, Amma PGK, Ramanandan PL, Nambiar PTN (1979) Foliar yellowing in coconut palms in healthy and root (wilt) affected areas. J Plantn Crops 7:117–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexkull HR (1985) Potassium nutrition of some tropical plantation crops. In: Munson RD (ed) Potassium in agriculture. ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, pp 929–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahid PA, Kamalam NV (1988) Nutrient distribution in the crown of healthy and root (wilt) affected coconut palms. 1988. Indian Coconut J 18:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An estimation of the method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 34:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledge the Director, ICAR, Central Plantation Crop Research Institute, Kasaragod for supporting this research programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Kayamkulam, Alleppy, Kerala, India

    Jeena Mathew, A. Abdul Haris & V. Krishna Kumar

  2. ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India

    Ravi Bhat & K. Muralidharan

  3. ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekaryam, Kerala, India

    K. Susan John

  4. Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

    U. Surendran

Authors
  1. Jeena Mathew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Abdul Haris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ravi Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Krishna Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Muralidharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Susan John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. U. Surendran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeena Mathew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by LeBoldus.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathew, J., Haris, A.A., Bhat, R. et al. A comparative assessment of nutrient partitioning in healthy and root (wilt) disease affected coconut palms grown in an Entisol of humid tropical Kerala. Trees 35, 621–635 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02064-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02064-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation