Abstract
In this work, we aim to study the performance of the k0-standardization method in neutron activation analysis when using the Kayzero for Windows software at the National Center for Energy, Sciences, and Nuclear Techniques (CNESTEN) of Morocco. Accuracy and precision were ensured by using certified reference materials from the IAEA, NIST, and WEPAL. Samples were irradiated using the pneumatic transfer system and rotary specimen rack facilities of the TRIGA Mark II research reactor at CNESTEN. The obtained results agree well with the certified values, thus demonstrating their accuracy and the success of the method’s implementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya RN, Nair AGC, Reddy AVR, Manohar SB (2002) Validation of a neutron activation analysis method using k0-standardization. Appl Radiat Isotopes 57:391–398
Simonits A, De Corte F, Hoste J (1975) Single-comparator methods in reactor neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 24:31–46
Lin X, Baumgärtner F, Li X (1997) The program “MULTINAA” for various standardization methods in neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 215:179–191
De Corte F, Simonits A, De Wispelaere A, Hoste J (1987) Accuracy and applicability of the k0-standardization method. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 113:145–161
De Corte F (1987) The k0 standardization method: a move to the optimization of NAA. Gent University, Gent
Kennedy G, ST-Pierre J, Wang K, Zhang Y, Preston J, Grant C, Vutchkov M (2000) Activation constants for Slowpoke and MNS reactors calculated from the neutron spectrum and k0 and Q0 values. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:167–172
Esen AN, Haciyakupoglu S (2016) Implementation of k0-INAA standardisation at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor, Turkey based on k0-IAEA software. Radiat Phys Chem 119:282–286
Moon J, Dung H, Kim S, Chung Y (2009) Implementation of the k 0-NAA method by using k0-IAEA software and the NAA# 3 irradiation hole at the HANARO research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 280:439–444
ICH H T G (1997) Validation of analytical procedure: methodology (Q2B). In: International conference on harmonization
CIPAC Document No. 3807—Guidelines on method validation to be performed in support of analytical methods for agrochemical formulations, cipac.org on 28 July 2003
ISO 5725-1 (1986) Precision of test methods—repeatability and reproducibility. ISO Standards
Bounouira H, EmbarchK AH, Bounakhla M, Blaauw M (2014) Neutron flux characterization of the Moroccan Triga Mark II research reactor and validation of the k0 standardization method of NAA using k0-IAEA program. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300:465–471
Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Validation of k0 standardization method in neutron activation analysis—the use of Kayzero for Windows programme at the nuclear physics institute, Řež. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 622:403–406
Menezes MABC, Jaćimović R (2008) Validation of the k0_IAEA software using SMELS material at CDTN/CNEN, Brazil. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:607–611
Bounouira H, Choukri A, Cherkaoui R, Gaudry A, Delmas R, Mariet C, Chakiri S (2008) Multielement analytical procedure coupling INAA, ICP-MS and ICP-AES: application to the determination of major and trace elements in sediment samples of the Bouregreg river (Morocco). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:65
Guide I. S. O. 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Geneva
Smodiš B, Bučar T (2006) Overall measurement uncertainty of k0-based neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 269:311–316
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chahidi, H., Bounouira, H., Amsil, H. et al. Performance of k0 standardization method in neutron activation analysis using Kayzero for Windows software at the National Center for Energy, Sciences and Nuclear Techniques (CNESTEN-Morocco). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327, 59–64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07416-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07416-x