Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Surfactants’ Tail Number on the PVDF/GO/TiO2-Based Nanofiltration Membrane for Dye Rejection and Antifouling Performance Improvement

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the novel utilisation of customised double- and triple-tail sodium bis(3,5,5-trimethyl-1-hexyl) sulphosuccinate (AOT4) and sodium 1,4-bis(neopentyloxy)-3-(neopentyloxycarbonyl)-1,4-dioxobutane-2-silphonate (TC14) surfactants to assist the direct graphene oxide (GO) synthesis via electrochemical exfoliation utilising dimethylacetamide (DMAc) as a solvent were investigated. The synthesised DMAc-based GO and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles were then used to fabricate polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based nanofiltration (NF) membranes by the non-solvent-induced phase separation method. The incorporation of GO and TiO2 as hydrophilic nanoparticles were to enhance membrane hydrophilicity. The utilisation of higher surfactants’ tail number obviously alters the fabricated membrane’s morphology which further affects its performance for dye rejection and antifouling ability. Higher surfactants’ tail number resulted in higher oxidation process which then provided more interaction between the GO and PVDF. Based on the dead-end cell measurement, PVDF/TC14-GO/TiO2 presented a slightly higher dye rejection efficiency of 92.61% as compared to PVDF/AOT4-GO/TiO2 membrane (92.39%). However, PVDF/TC14-GO/TiO2 possessed three times higher water permeability (48.968 L/m2 h MPa) than PVDF/AOT4-GO/TiO2 (16.533 L/m2 h MPa) and also higher hydrophilicity as presented by lower contact angle (65.4 ± 0.17°). This confirmed that higher surfactants’ tail number improved the fabricated membrane’s performance. Both fabricated membranes also exhibited high flux recovery ratio (FRR) (\(>\) 100%) which indicated better antifouling properties.

Graphic abstract

Article Highlights

  • High dye rejection by using simpler electrochemical exfoliation utilising surfactant for GO synthesis.

  • Improved water permeability by utilising triple-tail-based GO.

  • Enhanced hydrophilicity by utilising triple-tail-based GO.

  • Higher membrane porosity by utilising triple-tail-based GO.

  • High antifouling performance by different surfactants’ tail number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support Fundamental Research Grand Scheme (Grant no. FRGS/1/2020/STG07/UPSI/01/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Suriani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamat, R., Suriani, A.B., Mohamed, A. et al. Effect of Surfactants’ Tail Number on the PVDF/GO/TiO2-Based Nanofiltration Membrane for Dye Rejection and Antifouling Performance Improvement. Int J Environ Res 15, 149–161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00299-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00299-6

Keywords

Navigation