Abstract
The purpose of this article is to use an algorithm to obtain a non-static solution to the Einstein–Euler equations of a spherically symmetric matter distribution of a perfect fluid. The equations obtained make up a nonlinear system of partial derivative equations (PDE), which in the vast majority of cases is quite difficult to solve, either analytically or numerically. In this context, the spherical symmetry of space-time is very useful since it allows to establish the self-similarity of the solutions. This assumption reduces the PDEs to a set of ordinary differential equations (ODE). Therefore, the self-similarity hypothesis is very powerful in the search for non-static analytical or numerical solutions. The ODEs thus established allow defining a set of variables adjusted to the boundary conditions of the spherical distribution of matter, together with an equation of state (EOS). In this work, Tolman’s V solution has been selected as EOS. Once the numerical integration has been carried out, the variables established in the ODE and some other physical variables determined in the algorithm (density, pressure, radiation, etc.) can present damped oscillations (rebounds), depending on the initial values. This behavior is similar to that found near phase transitions in condensed matter physics, but now the mass distribution plays the role of an order parameter. This result has been obtained in other simulations of numerical relativity, where the PDE obtained from the gravitational field equations are integrated and the expression of an ultrarelativistic fluid \(\left( P=\kappa \,\rho \right) \). It is important to note that there is the possibility of carrying out simulations with other EOS (with electrical charge, anisotropy, etc.) with this algorithm. Many of the calculations to obtain the field equations, such as the conservation equations, were performed using the GRTensorIII computational algebra package, running on Maple 2017; as well as some Maple routines that have been used for these types of problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P M Pizzochero arXiv e-prints arXiv:1001.1272 (2010)
G Baym, T Hatsuda, T Kojo, P D Powell, Y Song and T Takatsuka Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 056902 (2018)
J Bicak ArXiv General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology e-prints (2006)
L Blanchet Living Rev. Relativ. 17 2 (2014)
T Nakamura, K Oohara, and Y Kojima Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90 1 (1987)
R Gomez, J Winicour, and R Isaacson J. Comput. Phys. 98 11 (1992)
R Gómez and J Winicour J. Math. Phys. 33 1445 (1992)
R Gómez and J Winicour Phys. Rev. D 45 2776 (1992)
T W Baumgarte and S L Shapiro Phys. Rev. D 59 024007 (1998)
P Grandclément and J Novak Living Rev. Relativ. 12 1 (2009)
T W Baumgarte, P J Montero, I Cordero-Carrión and E Müller Phys. Rev. D 87 044026 (2013)
T Baumgarte in APS Meeting Abstracts (2014)
T W Baumgarte, P J Montero and E Müller Phys. Rev. D 91 064035 (2015)
T W Baumgarte and P J Montero Phys. Rev. D 92 124065 (2015)
J Celestino and T W Baumgarte Phys. Rev. D 98 024053 (2018)
T W Baumgarte ArXiv e-prints (2018)
M W Choptuik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 9 (1993)
C Gundlach arXiv e-prints arXiv:gr-qc/9712084 (1997)
A Wang Braz. J. Phys. 31 188 (2001)
C Gundlach Phys. Rev. D 65 084021 (2002)
D Garfinkle Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 016901 (2017)
C Gundlach Phys. Rev. D 65, 064019 (2002)
A Koutras and J E F Skea, Comput. Phys. Commun. 115 350 (1998)
B J Carr and A A Coley, Class. Quantum Gravity 16 R31 (1999)
B J Carr and A Koutras Astrophys. J. 405 34 (1993)
B J Carr and A A Coley Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37 2165 (2005)
V Medina and N Falcon , Prog. Phys. 14 46 (2018)
G I Barenblatt and Y B Zel’dovich Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4 285 (1972)
K Tomita Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 2025 (1981)
C R Evans and J S Coleman Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1782 (1994)
T Koike, T Hara and S Adachi Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 5170 (1995)
S M Wagh and K S Govinder Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38 1253 (2006)
S Banerjee Pramana 91 27 (2018)
R C Tolman Phys. Rev. 55 364 (1939)
A Patiño and H Rago Lett. Nuovo Cimento 38 321 (1983)
K D Krori, P Borgohain and R Sarma Phys. Rev. D 31 734 (1985).
J P de Leon Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 25 865 (1993)
L Andersson and A Y Burtscher Annales Henri Poincarè 20 813 (2019)
J D Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 4 2185 (1971).
A Patiño and H Rago Astrophys. Space Sci. 257 213 (1997)
L Herrera, J Jiménez, and G J Ruggeri Phys. Rev. D 22 2305 (1980)
M Cosenza, L Herrera, M Esculpi and L Witten Phys. Rev. D 25 2527 (1982)
V Medina, L Núñez, H Rago and A Patiño, Can. J. Phys. 66 981 (1988)
W Barreto and A da Silva, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 28 735 (1996)
A di Prisco, N Falcón, L Herrera, M Esculpi and N O Santos, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 29 1391 (1997)
W Barreto, B Rodríguez and H Martínez Astrophys. Space Sci. 282 581 (2002)
L Herrera, W Barreto, A di Prisco and N O Santos Phys. Rev. D 65 104004 (2002)
J M Martín-García and C Gundlach Phys. Rev. D 59 064031 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Medina, V. A self-similar solution of a fluid with spherical distribution in general relativity. Indian J Phys 96, 317–328 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01959-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01959-1