Abstract
This study documents the effects of social inequality on different dimensions of lexical comprehension in Spanish-speaking Argentinian toddlers, a population in which socioeconomic differences are more striking than in previously studied populations. Using a performance-based forced-choice lexical recognition task implemented on a tablet, an adaptation of the Computerized Comprehension Task (CCT; Friend and Keplinger. Journal of Child Language, 35(01), 77-98. 2003), recognition accuracy and haptic response time to nouns, verbs, and adjectives were assessed. Low and middle (socioeconomic status) SES toddlers (N = 113) were tested at the daycares they attended. Results of the regression analyses showed overall SES effects on recognition accuracy but not on response time. Further analyses that considered the lexical category identified that middle SES children were only more accurate on the recognition of nouns and adjectives but not verbs. Findings also indicated that while low SES children showed longer response times to adjectives than to the other lexical categories, middle SES response times were longer in the case of verbs. The discussion links SES differences in children performance to previous evidence regarding the characteristics of both groups of children’s linguistic experiences in the ebb and flow of everyday life.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These are marginalized urban slums that are characterized by precarious housing, which was partly built from wood and salvaged materials and insufficient or nonexistent infrastructure and services. Although most of these neighborhoods are connected to the municipal network for drinking water, they all lack sewers and natural gas connections. In many cases, they are illegally connected to the power grid, as the inhabitants do not have the resources to pay for the service. Such neighborhoods are accessed by narrow dirt- or cement-floored corridors.
References
Arriaga, R. I., Fenson, L., Cronan, T., & Pethick, S. J. (1998). Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from low- and middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010043.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwin, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology., 53(1), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.
Brito, N. H. (2017). Influence of the home linguistic environment on early language development. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217720699.
Buckingham, J., Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2014). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: the school years. Educational Review, 66(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.795129.
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(1), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203646.
De León, L. (2001). Finding the richest path: language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development Language Culture and Cognition (pp. 544–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620669.020.
DeAnda, S., Arias-Trejo, N., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2016). Minimal second language exposure, SES, and early word comprehension: New evidence from a direct assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000820.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Dirección General de Estadística y Censos. (2016). Encuesta Anual de Hogares 2015. Condiciones de Vida: vivienda y habitat [Annual home survey. Living conditions: housing and environment]. Ministerio de Hacienda, Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. https://www.estadisticaciudad.gob.ar/eyc/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ir_2016_1086.pdf.
Farah, M. J., Betancourt, L., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., & Hurt, H. (2008). Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Developmental Science, 11(5), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00688.x.
Feldman, H. M., Dollaghan, C. A., Campbell, T. F., Kurs-Lasky, M., Janosky, J. E., & Paradise, J. L. (2000). Measurement properties of the MacArthur communicative development inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development, 71(2), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00146.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research. Child Development, 59(5), 1–173 discussion 174-85.PMID: 7845413.
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.98.
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I. A. Sekerina, E. M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Language acquisition and language disorders (Vol. 44. Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children's language processing, pp. 97–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.44.06fer.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science,16(2), 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12019.
Frank, M. C., Sugarman, E., Horowitz, A. C., Lewis, M. L., & Yurovsky, D. (2016). Using tablets to collect data from young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528.
Friend, M., & Keplinger, M. (2003). An infant-based assessment of early lexicon acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 35(2), 302–309 ISSN: 1554-3528 (Online).
Friend, M., & Keplinger, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the computerized comprehension task (cct): Data from American English and Mexican Spanish infants. Journal of Child Language, 35(01), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008264.
Friend, M., Schmitt, S. A., & Simpson, A. M. (2012). Evaluating the predictive validity of the computerized comprehension task: Comprehension predicts production. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025511.
Friend, M., DeAnda, S., Arias-Trejo, N., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Zesiger, P. (2017). Developmental changes in maternal education and minimal exposure effects on vocabulary in English- and Spanish-learning toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.003.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hemphill, L., & Tivnan, T. (2008). The importance of early vocabulary for literacy achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk., 13(4), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660802427710.
Hendrickson, K., Mitsven, S., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2015). Looking and touching: What extant approaches reveal about the structure of early word knowledge. Developmental Science, 18(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12250.
Hendrickson, K., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2017). Assessing a continuum of lexical–semantic knowledge in the second year of life: A multimodal approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.003.
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00612.
Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027238.
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2007). Spoken word recognition by latino children learning spanish as their first language. Journal of Child Language, 34(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007896.
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children´s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.002.
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Bates, E., & Gutierrez-Clellen, V. (1993). Early lexical development in spanish-speaking infants and toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008461.
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (2017). Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics., 3(1), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-03422.
Prats, L., Segretin, M. S., Fracchia, C., Kamienkowski, J., Pietto, M., Hermida, J., Giovannetti, F., Mancini, N., Gravano, A., Sheese, B., & Lipina, S. (2017). Associations between individual and contextual factors with cognitive performance in preschoolers from Unsatisfied Basic Needs (UBN) homes. Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology, 11(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS11.2.201.
Psaki, S. R., Seidman, J. C., Miller, M., Gottlieb, M., Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, A. S., Bessong, P., John, S. M., Kang, G., Kosek, M., Lima, A., Shrestha, P., Svensen, E., & Checkley, W. (2014). Measuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight-country MAL-ED study. Population Health Metrics, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-12-8.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Ramírez, M. L., Ibañez, M. I., Migdalek. M. J., Stein, A., Mealla, M. y Rosemberg, C.R. (2019) La función pragmática de las emisiones dirigidas al niño en el entorno del hogar: el impacto de la educación materna. Lingüística. Revista de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina. ALFAL, 35(2).
Rogoff, B., Correa-Chavez, M., & Silva, K. G. (2011). Cultural variation in children’s attention and learning. In M. A. Gernsbaber, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 154–163). Worth Publishers.
Rosemberg, C.R., Arrúe, J. & Alam, F. (2012) CONICET, 1. http://www.ciipme-conicet.gov.ar/wordpress/datos-de-investigacion/.
Rosemberg,C.R., Stein, A. y Alam, F. (2019). El entorno lingüístico en hogares de niños pequeños de Argentina. El impacto del nivel socioeconómico. Paper presented at the IX Congreso Internacional de Adquisición del Lenguaje. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). Madrid, España, Sep.4-6.
Rosemberg, C. R., Alam, F., Audisio, C. P., Ramírez, M. L., Garber, L., & Migdalek M. J. (2020). Nouns and verbs in the linguistic environment of Argentinian toddlers: Socioeconomic and context-related differences. First Language, 40(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719901226.
Rosen, M. L., Hagen, M. P., Lurie, L. A., Miles, Z. E., Sheridan, M. A., Meltzoff, A. N., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2019). Cognitive stimulation as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status with executive function: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 91(4), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13315.
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development, and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008343.
Rowe, M. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x.
Schwab, J. F., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016). Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2016(7), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1393.
Snow, C. E., & Matthews, T. J. (2016). Reading and language in the early grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 57–74.
Sperry, D. E., Sperry, L. L., & Miller, P. (2018). Reexamining the verbal environments of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Child Development., 90(4), 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13072.
Tanriver, A. (2016) Bubble blasting for babies, available from https://appadvice.com/app/bubbles-bubble-blasting-for-baby/1067515069
Tiramonti, G. (Ed.). (2004). La trama de la desigualdad educativa: mutaciones recientes en la escuela media. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Manantial.
Vernon-Feagans, L., Garrett-Peters, P., Willoughby, M., Mills-Koonce, R., & the Family Life Project Key Investigators. (2012). Chaos, poverty, and parenting: Predictors of early language development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.11.001.
Webb, S., Janus, M., Duku, E., Raos, R., Brownell, M., Forer, B., Guhn, M., & Muhajarine, N. (2017). Neighbourhood socioeconomic status indices and early childhood development. Population Health., 3, 48–56.
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613488145.
Weisleder, A., Marchman, V., Otero, N., & Fernald, A. (2017). Early language experience helps explain SES-differences in language-processing skill and vocabulary in Spanish-learning children. Lyon: International Association for the Study of Child Language Conference.
Funding
This research was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 80/2015 to Dr. Celia Rosemberg). The development of the software used to assess toddlers’ vocabulary was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France) [PICS 261838 period: 2016 to August 2017] to Dr. Alejandrina Cristia (CNRS, France) and Dr.Celia Rosemberg (CONICET, Argentina).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Celia Rosemberg’s current research themes are (a) early linguistic experience and its impact on children’s outcomes and (b) socioeconomic and sociocultural differences in vocabulary and discourse development.
Most relevant publications in the field are the following:
- Rosemberg, C.; Alam, F.; Audisio, C.; Ramírez, L.; Garber, L.& Migdalek, M. (2020). Nouns and Verbs in the Linguistic Environment of Argentinian Toddlers: Socio-Economic and Context-Related Differences. First Language. 40 (2) 192-217. 10.1177/0142723719901226
- Migdalek M.J & C.R. Rosemberg. (in press) SES differences in children´s argumentative production. European Journal of Psychology. 16(2) 10.5964/ejop.v16i2.1665
- Shiro, M., Migdalek, M.J. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2019) Stance taking in Spanish-speaking preschoolers’ argumentative interaction. Psychology of Language and Communication. 23(1), 184-211.https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2019-0009
- Rosemberg, C R & Silva, M.L. (2009). Teacher-Children interaction and concept development. Discourse Processes. 46, 572–591. 10.1080/01638530902959588
Dr. Florencia Alam’s current research themes are (a) narrative and vocabulary development and (b) multimodal interaction and its impact on language learning.
Most relevant publications in the field of psychology of education are the following:
- Alam, F., Rosemberg C.R. & Scheuer (2019) Gestos y habla en la construcción infantil de narrativas entre pares. Número especial: La experimentación multimodal en la comunicación y en el aprendizaje. Cuadernos 89. Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación, pp 185-210. ISSN-e 1668-0227, N°. 89, 2019-2020
- Alam, F., Migdalek, M.J., Ramírez, L., Stein, A. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2017). “¿Sabés qué es...?” Explicaciones de niños tutores en torno a vocabulario no familiar. Un estudio con niños de poblaciones urbano marginadas de Argentina. Revista Costarricense de Psicología. 36(2), 83-103. Online version ISSN 1659-2913 Print version ISSN 0257-1439
- Alam, F. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2016). “¡Uy, no! ¡Mirá lo que pasó!” Uso de recursos evaluativos en narrativas de ficción por niños pequeños de poblaciones urbano-marginadas. Íkala. Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, Universidad de Antioquia, Escuela de idiomas 21(3), 00-00. 0.17533/udea.ikalav21n03a04
- Alam, F. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2013). El uso de conectores en relatos infantiles de ficción. Diferencias según el contexto interaccional de producción. Lenguas Modernas, 4 1, 11-32. ISSN: 0716-0542
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(XLSX 481 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosemberg, C.R., Alam, F. Socioeconomic disparities in the comprehension of lexical categories. A study with Spanish-speaking Argentinian toddlers. Eur J Psychol Educ 36, 989–1008 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00522-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00522-0