Skip to main content
Log in

Instability Mechanism of Pillar Burst in Asymmetric Mining Based on Cusp Catastrophe Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pillars are often reserved asymmetrically in the mining process. The roof deflection curve under non-equal span conditions of adjacent stopes is derived by considering the roof-pillar system as a rock beam-pillar model. The pillar instability condition under asymmetric mining is determined based on instability theory and cusp catastrophe theory. Pillar burst represents the equilibrium stability of the roof-pillar system. The pillar failure may be in a violent manner or a gentle manner, depending on the post-peak stiffness ratio of the roof-pillar system. By calculating the factor of safety (FOS) and roof-pillar stiffness ratio K, the pillar stability with different stope spans can be evaluated. The theoretical results are validated by comparison with a case study and numerical simulation. When the stope spans are not equal, the pillar is affected by small-eccentric compression. Four pillar failure patterns under eccentric compression are proposed and explained. The main factors affecting pillar burst appear to include the geometric parameters and mechanical properties of the roof-pillar system. It is difficult to change the mechanical properties, but the stiffness ratio K can be increased by improving the geometric parameters, so as to minimize the burst tendency. Once K < 1 and the critical compression failure load is reached, the pillar on the larger stope span side fails first, and then, the whole pillar loses its stability. Considering the external work during the pillar unstable failure, the rockburst energy index is optimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

q :

Uniform load acting on the rock beam

M C :

Bending moment at point C

R :

Pillar supporting force against the roof

F :

Force of roof acting on the pillar

E :

Young’s modulus of pillar

σ, ε :

Stress and strain of pillar

ε 0, u 0 :

Average strain and deformation of pillar

m :

Shape parameter of pillar

k :

Initial stiffness of pillar

A :

Cross-sectional area of pillar

w p, h :

Width and height of pillar, respectively

u :

Pillar deformation

u c :

Pillar deformation corresponding to peak strength, uc = (1/m)1/m u0

u t :

Deformation at the inflection point of the pillar Fu curve, ut = (1 + 1/m)1/m u0

E b, I b :

Young’s modulus and inertia moment of rock beam, respectively

y, θ :

Deflection and rotation angle of rock beam

w o1, w o2 :

Widths of stope one and stope two, respectively

h b, l :

Thickness and total span of rock beam (or roof), l = wo1 + wo2 + wp/2

a, b :

The distances from pillar center to the boundary of UMO on both sides, a = wo1 + wp/2, b = wo2 + wp/2

F s0, M 0, θ 0, y 0 :

Shear force, bending moment, rotation angle, and deflection at coordinate O (0, 0), respectively

M A, R A :

Bending moment and shear force of beam at point A, respectively

M B, R B :

Bending moment and shear force of beam at point B, respectively

θ C, θ p :

Deflection angle of the beam and pillar at point C, respectively

α :

Coefficient defined in Eq. (13)

A 1, A 2, A 3 :

Parameters defined in Eq. (11)

B 1, B 2, B 3 :

Parameters defined in Eq. (14)

k 1 :

Post-peak stiffness of pillar at the inflection point, \(k_{1} = kme^{{ - \left( {1 + {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 m}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} m}} \right)}}\)

k 2 :

Local stiffness of roof at pillar position

C :

Parameter defined in Eq. (15)

e :

Eccentricity

p, q :

Control parameters in Eq. (17)

x :

State variable in Eq. (17)

Π :

Potential energy function of the roof-pillar system

K :

Stiffness ratio of the system defined as Eq. (23)

u j, u s :

Starting point and ending point of sudden jump (or pillar instability)

ΔW :

External work acting on the pillar during the unstable pillar failure

ΔE :

Excess energy that is not completely dissipated during the unstable pillar failure

W st :

Elastic strain energy stored in the pre-peak range of the pillar

W sf1 :

Pillar dissipated energy between the peak point and the instability starting point

W sf2 :

Dissipated energy during the unstable pillar failure

W cf :

Rockburst energy index

UMO:

Unmined orebody (or adjacent pillar)

FOS:

Factor of safety

LMS:

Local mine stiffness

References

  • Adam JM, Brencich A, Hughes TG, Jefferson T (2010) Micromodelling of eccentrically loaded brickwork: study of masonry wallettes. Eng Struct 32:1244–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary DP, Shen B, Fama MED (2002) A study of highwall mining panel stability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford A, Liechti KM (2020) Internal forces and moments in beams. Mechanics of materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Failla A, La Mendola L, Papia M (2005) Experimental and analytical response of masonry elements under eccentric vertical loads. Eng Struct 27:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook NGW (1965) A note on rockbursts considered as a problem of stability. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 65:437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook NGW, Hoek E, Pretorius JPG, Ortlepp WD, Salamon MDG (1966) Rock mechanics applied to the study of rockbursts. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 66:435–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterhuizen GS, Dolinar DR, Ellenberger JL (2011) Pillar strength in underground stone mines in the United States. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gei M, Misseroni D (2018) Experimental investigation of progressive instability and collapse of no-tension brickwork pillars. Int J Solids Struct 155:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZH (1999) Principle of reinforced concrete. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjigeorgiou J, Potvin Y (2011) A critical assessment of dynamic rock reinforcement and support testing facilities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauquin T, Gunzburger Y, Deck O (2018) Predicting pillar burst by an explicit modeling of kinetic energy. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 107:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the fifth North American rock mechanics symposium, Toronto, Canada

  • Jaiswal A, Shrivastva BK (2012) Stability analysis of the proposed hybrid method of partial extraction for underground coal mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, Ding ZX, Li D, Du XL (2018) Experimental and numerical investigations on the size effect of moderate high-strength reinforced concrete columns under small-eccentric compression. Int J Damage Mech 27:657–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcinovic D, Silva MAG (1982) Statistical aspects of the continuous damage theory. Int J Solids Struct 18:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JT, Cao P (2005) Cusp catastrophe model of instability of pillar in asymmetric mining. Appl Math Mech 26:1100–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li WF, Bai JB, Peng S, Wang XY, Xu Y (2015) Numerical modeling for yield pillar design: a case study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov A (1996) Rockbursts and the instability of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33:727–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann H (1987) Mechanics of “bumps’’’ in coal mines: a discussion of violent deformations in the sides of roadways in coal seams.” Appl Mech Rev 40:1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CD, Maybee WG (2000) The strength of hard-rock pillars. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:1239–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp WD (2005) RaSiM comes of age: a review of the contribution to the understanding and control of mine rockbursts. In: Ortlepp WD (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on rockburst and seismicity in mines (RaSiM6), The University of Western Australia: Australian Centre For Geomechanics, 2005. pp 3–20

  • Ortlepp WD, Stacey TR (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 9:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan YS, Li ZH (2005) Analysis of rock structure stability in coal mines. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29:1045–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Li AW, Qi YS (2009) Fold catastrophe model of dynamic pillar failure in asymmetric mining. Min Sci Technol 19:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen BA (2010) Coal pillar load calculation by pressure arch theory and near field extraction ratio. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1158–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin SQ, Jiao JJ, Tang CA, Li ZG (2006) Instability leading to coal bumps and non-linear evolutionary mechanisms for a coal-pillar-and-roof system. Int J Solids Struct 43:7407–7423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DP, Van der Merwe JN, Canbulat I, Sellers EJ, Coetzer S (2002) Development of a method to estimate coal pillar loading. In: Safety Mines Research Advis Comm Rep: 2001–2065

  • Salamon M (1970) Stability, instability and design of pillar workings. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 7:613–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Sheorey PR, Singh DP (2002) Stability of the parting between coal pillar workings in level contiguous seams. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:9–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CA (1993) Catastrophe in rock unstable failure. China Coal Industry Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom R (1976) Structural stability and morphogenesis. Behav Res Ther 8:629–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Lam KC, Au SK, Tang CA, Zhu WC, Yang TH (2006) Analytical and numerical study on the pillar rockbursts mechanism. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:445–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HW, Jiang YD, Zhao YX, Zhu J, Liu S (2013) Numerical investigation of the dynamic mechanical state of a coal pillar during longwall mining panel extraction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyatt JK, Blake W, Williams TJ, White BG (2002) 60 Years of rockbursting in the Coeur D’Alene district of Northern Idaho, USA: lessons learned and remaining issues. In: Whyatt JK, Blake W, Williams TJ, White BG (eds) Proceedings of the 109th annual exhibit and meeting, society for mining, metallurgy, and exploration, Phoenix, AZ, 2002, pp 1–10

  • Yu Y, Deng KZ, Luo Y, Chen SE, Zhuang HF (2018) An improved method for long-term stability evaluation of strip mining and pillar design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 107:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MT (1987) Instability theory and mathematical model for coal/rock bursts. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 6:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li XB, Mitri HS (2018) Evaluation method of rockburst: state-of-the-art literature review. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 81:632–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Zang H, Cao W, Du X, Chen L, Ke C (2019) Risk assessment for the cascading failure of underground pillar sections considering interaction between pillars. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 124:104142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu ST, Feng Y, Jiang FX, Liu JH (2018) Mechanism and risk assessment of overall-instability-induced rockbursts in deep island longwall panels. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 106:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubelewicz A, Mróz Z (1983) Numerical simulation of rock burst processes treated as problems of dynamic instability. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 2018M641706 and 2020M670782), Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China (Grant no. 170104026), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. U1710253 and 51904057). The authors are very grateful for the financial contributions and convey their appreciation to the organizations for supporting this basic research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Guan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The singular function method (Bedford and Liechti 2020) is introduced here as it was used to calculate the deflection equation of the rock beam shown in Fig. 1. There is a function family fn (x):

$$f_{n} \left( x \right) = \left\langle {x - s} \right\rangle^{n} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\left( {x - s} \right)^{n} } \hfill & {x \ge s} \hfill \\ 0 \hfill & {x < s} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.,$$
(32)

which is a singular function. Where s is an arbitrary constant. When n = 0, 1, 2, they are constant, primary, and secondary functions, respectively. The integral and derivative of the singular function are:

$$\int {\left\langle {x - s} \right\rangle^{n} {\text{d}}x} = \frac{1}{n + 1}\left\langle {x - s} \right\rangle^{n + 1} + C\quad n \ge 0$$
(33)
$$\frac{d}{{{\text{d}}x}}\left\langle {x - s} \right\rangle^{n} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} 0 \hfill & {n = 0} \hfill \\ {n\left\langle {x - s} \right\rangle^{n - 1} } \hfill & {n \ge 1} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right..$$
(34)

The mechanical model shown in Fig. 1c is fixed at both ends of the rock beam. If the fixed constraint is removed, the supporting forces RA, RB and bending moments MA, MB at points A and B are needed to maintain the equilibrium. The horizontal force on the rock beam is ignored, as it has little effect on the rock beam. The generalized forces on the rock beam include uniform load q; pillar support reaction R; bending moment MC; supporting forces RA, RB; and bending moments MA, MB. Taking point A as the coordinate origin, the shear force and bending moment equations of the rock beam are as follows:

$$F_{{\text{S}}} = R_{A} + R\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{0} - qx$$
(35)
$$M = R_{A} x - M_{A} + R\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{1} - M_{C} \left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{0} - \frac{{qx^{2} }}{2},$$
(36)

where FS and M are shear force and bending moment, respectively. a is the distance from the pillar center to the left boundary of the UMO. The approximate differential equation of rock beam deflection curve is:

$$E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y^{\prime\prime} = - M\left( x \right),$$
(37)

where EbIb is the bending stiffness of the beam. y is the rock beam deflection. By substituting Eqs. (36) into (37) and integrating twice, the rotation angle and deflection equation of rock beam are expressed as follows:

$$ \begin{aligned}E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} \theta &= E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y^{\prime} = - \frac{{R_{A} }}{2}x^{2} + M_{A} x - \frac{R}{2}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle ^{2} \\ &\quad+ M_{C} \left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle ^{1} + \frac{q}{6}x^{3} + C_{1}\end{aligned} $$
(38)
$$ \begin{aligned}E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y &= - \frac{{R_{A} }}{6}x^{3} + \frac{1}{2}M_{A} x^{2} - \frac{R}{6}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle ^{3} \\ &\quad+ \frac{1}{2}M_{C} \left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle ^{2} + \frac{q}{{24}}x^{4} + C_{1} x + C_{2} ,\end{aligned} $$
(39)

where θ is the rotation angle of rock beam; C1 and C2 are undetermined coefficients. When x = 0, the rotation angle and deflection of rock beam at point A are zero (θ0 = 0, y0 = 0). Substituting them into Eqs. (38) and (39), then C1 = C2 = 0. Therefore, Eqs. (38) and (39) can be rewritten as follows:

$$E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y^{\prime} = E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} \theta = M_{A} x - \frac{{R_{A} }}{2}x^{2} + M_{C} \left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle - \frac{R}{2}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{2} { + }\frac{q}{6}x^{3}$$
(40)
$$E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y = \frac{{M_{A} }}{2}x^{2} - \frac{{R_{A} }}{6}x^{3} + \frac{{M_{C} }}{2}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{2} - \frac{R}{6}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{3} + \frac{q}{24}x^{4} .$$
(41)

The following equation is obtained for the rock beam according to the static equilibrium in y direction:

$$R_{A} + R_{B} = ql - R,$$
(42)

where l is the total span of the rock beam, l = a + b = wo1 + wp + wo2. b is the distance from the pillar center to the right boundary of the UMO. wo1 and wo2 are the spans of stope 1 and stope 2, respectively. When x = l, the deflection and rotation angle of rock beam at point B are also zero, i.e., y (x = l) = 0, \(y^{\prime}_{{}} (x = l) = 0\). Substituting them into Eqs. (40) and (41), yields the following equations:

$$0 = M_{A} l - \frac{{R_{A} }}{2}l^{2} + M_{C} b - \frac{R}{2}b^{2} + \frac{q}{6}l^{3}$$
(43)
$$0 = \frac{{M_{A} }}{2}l^{2} + \frac{{M_{C} }}{2}b^{2} - \frac{{R_{A} }}{6}l^{3} - \frac{R}{6}b^{3} + \frac{q}{24}l^{4} .$$
(44)

RA and MA can be obtained by combining Eqs. (43) and (44) as:

$$R_{A} = \frac{ql}{2} - \left( {1 + \frac{2a}{l}} \right)\frac{{Rb^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} + \frac{{6M_{C} ab}}{{l^{3} }}$$
(45)
$$M_{A} = \frac{{ql^{2} }}{12} - \frac{{Rab^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} + \frac{{M_{C} b\left( {3a - l} \right)}}{{l^{2} }}.$$
(46)

Similarly, we can get RB and MB:

$$R_{B} = \frac{ql}{2} - \left( {1 + \frac{2b}{l}} \right)\frac{{Ra^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} - \frac{{6M_{C} ab}}{{l^{3} }}$$
(47)
$$M_{B} = \frac{{ql^{2} }}{12} - \frac{{Ra^{2} b}}{{l^{2} }} - \frac{{M_{C} a\left( {3b - l} \right)}}{{l^{2} }}.$$
(48)

By substituting MA and RA into Eq. (41), the deflection equation of rock beam is written as:

$$\begin{aligned} E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y & = \left[ {\frac{{ql^{2} }}{12} - \frac{{Rab^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} + \frac{{M_{C} b\left( {3a - l} \right)}}{{l^{2} }}} \right]\frac{{x^{2} }}{2} \\ & \quad - \left[ {\frac{ql}{2} - \left( {1 + \frac{2a}{l}} \right)\frac{{Rb^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} + \frac{{6M_{C} ab}}{{l^{3} }}} \right]\frac{{x^{3} }}{6} \\& \quad + \frac{{M_{C} }}{2}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{2} - \frac{R}{6}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{3} + \frac{q}{24}x^{4} . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Therefore, the equation of rotation angle of rock beam is:

$$\begin{aligned} E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} y^{\prime} & = E_{{\text{b}}} I_{{\text{b}}} \theta = \left[ {\frac{{ql^{2} }}{12} - \frac{{Rab^{2} }}{{l^{2} }} + \frac{{M_{C} b\left( {3a - l} \right)}}{{l^{2} }}} \right]x \\ & \quad - \left[ {\frac{ql}{2} - \frac{{Rb^{2} \left( {l + 2a} \right)}}{{l^{3} }} + \frac{{6M_{C} ab}}{{l^{3} }}} \right]\frac{{x^{2} }}{2} \\ \quad + M_{C} \left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle - \frac{R}{2}\left\langle {x - a} \right\rangle^{2} + \frac{q}{6}x^{3} . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(50)

R and MC are still unknown in Eqs. (49) and (50), but they can be determined according to the pillar constitutive equation and the boundary conditions at the bottom of the pillar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Guan, K., Yang, T. et al. Instability Mechanism of Pillar Burst in Asymmetric Mining Based on Cusp Catastrophe Model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 1463–1479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02313-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02313-x

Keywords

Navigation