Correction to: Oecologia (2020) 192:699–711 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04607-x

The authors would like to correct errors in the original publication of the article. In Table 3, one column was missing, the one containing the data on the estimated number of consumed bank voles. The corrected version of Table 3 can be found here.

Table 3 Estimated prey weight (kg) consumed by pygmy owls during the food-storing season, the percentage of biomass consumed by the age and sex classes, and the estimated number of the five most important prey groups consumed in the study area during 2003–17