Abstract
This study provides insights from individuals working to reestablish permanent housing in Sea Bright, NJ, following Hurricane Sandy. To collect these perspectives, we gathered data in two ways: a self-administered questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. We mailed questionnaires to every household in Sea Bright that included a number of fixed response items and open-ended questions that focused on the interface of government and citizens to discuss their housing recovery process and problems or pitfalls they have encountered while recovering. To complement our questionnaire data, we conducted interviews with full-time residents, part-time residents, homeowners, renters, and representatives of the local, state, and federal government. We utilized conventional content analysis methods to discover sociological themes, focusing on the underlying behaviors, actions, and emotions the text portrayed. Several powerful themes emerged from our analysis of the open-ended questions and interviews. Most notably, we found a fundamental disconnect between how policymakers and homeowners viewed the housing recovery process. In particular, survivors highlighted the amount of and complexity-laden paperwork associated with the aid process, unfavorable interactions with government employees and a system that seemed to have goals that were inherently different from their own, and the sense that the rules associated with aid were constantly changing. We conclude with a discussion of additional research needs and some preliminary policy recommendations based on these insights.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In cases where more than one interviewee participated, we use P1 and P2 to delineate between the two participants.
References
Alesch DJ, Petak WJ (2002) Overcoming obstacles to implementation: addressing political, institutional and behavioral problems in earthquake hazard mitigation policies. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 1:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0019-8
Andrew SA, Arlikatti S, Long LC, Kendra JM (2013) The effect of housing assistance arrangements on household recovery: an empirical test of donor-assisted and owner-driven approaches. J Hous Built Environ 28:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9266-9
Arlikatti S, Andrew SA (2012) Housing design and long-term recovery processes in the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Nat Hazards Rev 13:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000062
Arlikatti S, Peacock WG, Prater CS et al (2010) Assessing the impact of the Indian Ocean tsunami on households: a modified domestic assets index approach. Disasters 34:705–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01166.x
Ashman B, Blackman E, Browder E et al (2013) Resilient rebuild: sea bright, New Jersey-strategies for long-term recovery. https://bloustein.rutgers.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/Sea_Bright__Studio_Report_2013.pdf
Bachman R, Paternoster R (2008) Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Bates FL, Peacock WG (1992) Measuring disaster impact on household living conditions: the domestic assets approach. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 10:133–160
Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D (1993) Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17:93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.x
Binder SB, Greer A, Baker CK (2018) Home buyout programs: recommendations for policy & practice. https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/58500
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2014) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
Bolin R (1976) Family recovery from natural disaster: a preliminary model. Mass Emerg 1:267–277
Bolin R, Stanford L (1991) Shelter, housing and recovery: a comparison of U.S disasters. Disasters 15:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x
Bolin RC, Bolton PA (1983) Recovery in Nicaragua and the USA. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 1:125–144
Brady J (2013) After Sandy, Can the Jersey Shore Come Home Again? In: NPR. http://www.npr.org/2013/01/03/168555442/after-sandy-can-the-jersey-shore-come-home-again. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Burden BC, Canon DT, Mayer KR, Moynihan DP (2012) The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: evidence from election administration. Public Adm Rev 72:741–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
Comerio MC (1997) Housing issues after disasters. J Conting Cris Manag 5:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00052
Comerio MC (1998) Disaster hits home: new policy for urban housing recovery. University of California Press, Oakland
Comfort LK, Birkland TA, Cigler BA, Nance E (2010) Retrospectives and prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: five years and counting. Public Adm Rev 70:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02194.x
DeWaard J, Curtis KJ, Fussell E (2016) Population recovery in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: exploring the potential role of stage migration in migration systems. Popul Environ 37:449–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0250-7
Dillman DA (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley, Hoboken
FEMA (2009) National Disaster Housing Strategy. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1819-25045-9288/ndhs_core.pdf
Fothergill A, Maestas EGM, Darlington JD (1999) Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters 23:156–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00111
Gajewski S, Bell H, Lein L, Angel RJ (2011) Complexity and Instability: the response of nongovernmental organizations to the recovery of Hurricane Katrina survivors in a host community. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 40:389–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010362115
Green TF, Olshansky RB (2012) Rebuilding housing in New Orleans: the Road Home Program after the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Hous Policy Debate 22:75–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2011.624530
Halpin SH (2013) The impact of superstorm Sandy on New Jersey towns and households. Newark, NJ
Harrald JR (2006) Agility and discipline: critical success factors for disaster response. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 604:256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285404
Heinrich CJ (2016) The bite of administrative burden: a theoretical and empirical investigation. J Public Adm Res Theory 26:403–420
Henry J (2013) Return or relocate? An inductive analysis of decision-making in a disaster. Disasters 37:293–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01303.x
Herd P, Deleire T, Harvey H, Moynihan DP (2013) Shifting administrative burden to the state: the case of medicaid take-up. Public Adm Rev 73:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12114
Herd P, Moynihan DP (2019) Administrative burden: policymaking by other means—Pamela Herd, Donald P. Moynihan-Google Books. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Johnson C (2007) Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters 31:435–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01018.x
Keiser LR, Miller SM (2020) Does administrative burden influence public support for government programs? Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Adm Rev 80:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13133
Kim J, Oh SS (2014) The virtuous circle in disaster recovery: who returns and stays in town after disaster evacuation? J Risk Res 17:665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.822917
Korten D (1980) Community organization and rural development: a learning process approach. Public Adm Rev 4:480–511
Lee JY, Van Zandt S (2019) Housing tenure and social vulnerability to disasters: a review of the evidence. J Plan Lit 34:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412218812080
May PJ (1992) Policy learning and failure. J Public Policy 12:331–354
May PJ (1999) Fostering policy learning: a challenge for public administration. Int Rev Public Adm 4:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.1999.10804920
Mendonça D, Beroggi G, Wallace W (2001) Decision support for improvisation during emergency response operations. Int J Emerg Manag 1:30–39
Olshansky RB, Hopkins LD, Johnson LA (2012) Disaster and recovery: processes compressed in time. Nat Hazards Rev 13:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
Peacock WG (1997) Cross national and comparative disaster research. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 15:117–133
Peacock WG, Dash N, Zhang Y (2007) Sheltering and housing recovery following disaster. In: Rodríguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 258–274
Peacock WG, Dash N, Zhang Y, Van Zandt S (2018) Post-Disaster sheltering, temporary housing and permanent housing recovery. In: Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor J (eds) Handbook of disaster research, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 569–594
Peacock WG, Killian C, Bates F (1987) The effects of disaster damage and housing aid on household recovery following the 1976 Guatemalan earthquake. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 5:63–88
Peacock WG, Van Zandt S, Zhang Y, Highfield WE (2014) Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters. J Am Plan As 80:356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.980440
Phillips BD (2015) Disaster recovery, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Quarantelli EL (1982) General and particular observations on sheltering and housing in American disasters. Disasters 6:277–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1982.tb00550.x
Queeley A (2011) "She Jes’ Gits Hold of Us Dataway": the greens and blues of neighborhood recovery in Post-Katrina New Orleans. Transform Anthropol 19:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-7466.2011.01111.x.21
Richardson BK, Siebeneck LK, Shaunfield S (2014) From “No Man’s Land” to a “Stronger Community”: communitas as a theoretical framework for successful disaster recovery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 32:194–219
Rumbach A, Makarewicz C, Németh J (2016) The importance of place in early disaster recovery: a case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. J Environ Plan Manag 59:2045–2063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1116981
Rumbach A, Sullivan E, Makarewicz C (2020) Mobile home parks and disasters: understanding risk to the third housing type in the United States. Nat Hazards Rev 21:05020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000357
Saldaña J (2012) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, New York
Sapat A, Li Y, Mitchell C, Esnard A-M (2011) Policy learning and policy change: Katrina, Ike and post-disaster housing. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 29:26–56
Schneider S (1992) Governmental response to disasters: the conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Adm Rev 52:135–145
Schneider S (1995) Flirting with disaster: public management in crisis situations. ME Sharpe, New York
Sea Bright Rising (2014) Sea bright rising. http://seabrightrising.org/about-sea-bright-rising/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018
Smith CH (2013) Floor statement on Sandy supplemental. https://chrissmith.house.gov/uploadedfiles/floor_remarks_on_sandy_jan_2_2013.pdf
Smith G (2012) Planning for post-disaster recovery: a review of the United States disaster assistance framework. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Smith G (2017) Pre-and post-disaster conditions, their implications, and the role of planning for housing recovery. Evaluating collegiate disaster resilient design curricula view project Vermont state agency policy memo smart growth implementation assistance program: Di. In: Sapat A, Esnard A-M (eds) Coming home after disaster: multiple dimensions of housing recovery. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 277–292
Smith G, Wenger D (2007) Sustainable disaster recovery: operationalizing an existing agenda. In: Rodríguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 234–257
Spahr R (2012) Hurricane Sandy aftermath photos: sea bright residents return home to devastation, but also progress. In: NJ.com. http://www.nj.com/monmouth/index.ssf/2012/11/hurricane_sandy_aftermath_photos_sea_bright_residents_return_home_to_devastation_but_also_progress.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Stallings RA (2002) Weberian political sociology and sociological disaster studies. Sociol Forum 17:281–305
Sutley EJ, Hamideh S (2020) Postdisaster housing stages: a markov chain approach to model sequences and duration based on social vulnerability. Risk Anal Risa. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13576
Tafti MT, Tomlinson R (2019) Theorizing distributive justice and the practice of post-disaster housing recovery. Environ Hazards 18:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2018.1435406
Tierney KJ (2007) From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annu Rev Sociol 33:503–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743
Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Meeting the challenge: organizational and governmental response in disasters. Facing unexpected disaster prep. Response United States 5:121–156
Tobin GA, Whiteford LM (2002) Community resilience and volcanic hazards: the eruption of Tungurahua and evacuation of Faldas in Ecuador. Disasters 26:28–48
United States Census Bureau (2010) Demographic data. http://www.census.gov/. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (2014) Sandy damage estimates by block group. http://www.huduser.org/maps/map_sandy_blockgroup.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Webb GR, Tierney KJ, Dahlhamer JM (2002) Predicting long-term business recovery from disaster: a comparison of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Glob Environ Chang Part B Environ Hazards 4:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(03)00005-6
Wyczalkowski CK, Holm EJ, Esnard A, Lai BS (2019) Uneven neighborhood recovery: Hurricane damage and neighborhood change in the Houston-Galveston region since 1970. City Commun 18:689–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12390
Zhang Y, Lindell MK, Prater CS (2009) Vulnerability of community businesses to environmental disasters. Disasters 33:38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01061.x
Zhang Y, Peacock WG (2009) Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew. J Am Plan As 76:5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903294556
Funding
This work was supported by the Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT) at Rutgers University through the University Transportation Center Program (funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation [Grant DTRT12-G-UTC16]). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greer, A., Trainor, J.E. A system disconnected: perspectives on post-disaster housing recovery policy and programs. Nat Hazards 106, 303–326 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04463-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04463-1