Abstract
Recently, ECMWF has released a new generation of reanalysis, acknowledged as ERA5, able to deliver a comprehensive, free, and operative picture of the past weather, exploiting the data assimilation of historical observations from different sources (satellite, in situ, multiple variables) for both atmospheric and soil variables. Experiences concerning flooding issues suggest that ERA5 could support also landslide investigations. In this sense, a number of questions may be raised: (i) can ERA5 data be reliable in reproducing rainfall histories leading to a landslide event? (ii) can ERA5 soil moisture estimations be reliable proxies for antecedent slope wetness condition? (iii) can ERA5 be implemented in a landslide early warning system to improve the performances? This study tries addressing these questions referring to some historical Campanian events (Southern Italy) with a special focus on the fully investigated event occurred in Nocera Inferiore on March 4, 2005. The study shows the following: (i) ERA5 precipitation can appropriately reproduce actual rainfall histories leading to the events occurred in the last years; (ii) ERA5 soil moisture may act as proxy of slope wetness conditions; (iii) ERA5 data could be easily implemented in LEWSs in areas poorly covered by field monitoring networks.
Notes
GloFAS represents the global flood service of the European Commission’s Copernicus Emergency Management Service (CEMS) providing an operational system for monitoring and forecasting floods across the world.
References
Balsamo G, Viterbo P, Beljaars A, van den Hurk B, Hirsch M, Betts A, Scipal K (2009) A revised hydrology for the ECMWF model: verification from field site to terrestrial water storage and impact in the Integrated Forecast System. J Hydrometeorol 10:623–643. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1
Bogaard T, Greco R (2018) Invited perspectives: hydrological perspectives on precipitation intensity-duration thresholds for landslide initiation: proposing hydrometeorological thresholds. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:31–39. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-31-2018
Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2008) On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Process 22(5):629–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6629
Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JW (2008) A prototype system for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, area. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area: Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, vol v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.4020(06)
Ciavolella M, Bogaard TA, Gargano R, Greco R (2016) Is there predictive power in hydrological catchment information for regional landslide hazard assessment? Proced Earth Plan Sci 16:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2016.10.021
Comegna L, Damiano E, Greco R, Guida A, Olivares L, Picarelli L (2016) Field hydrological monitoring of a sloping shallow pyroclastic deposit. Can Geotech J 53:1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0344
Coppola L, Reder A, Rianna G, Pagano L (2020) The role of cover thickness in the rainfall-induced landslides of Nocera Inferiore 2005. Geosciences 10(6):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10060228
D.P.G.R. n. 299 30/06/2005 “Decreto del Presidente della Giunta Regionale della Campania: Il Sistema di Allertamento Regionale per il rischio Idrogeologico e Idraulico ai fini di protezione civile”, Bollettino ufficiale della regione Campania, n. speciale 01/08/2005. Italian regional law, in Italian
de Rosnay P, Balsamo G, Albergel C, Muñoz-Sabater J, Isaksen L (2014) Initialisation of land surface variables for numerical weather prediction. Surv Geophys 35:607–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9207-x
De Vita P, Napolitano E, Godt JW, Baum R (2012) Deterministic estimation of hydrological thresholds for shallow landslide initiation and slope stability models: case study from the Somma-Vesuvius area of southern Italy. Landslides 10:713–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0348-2
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut JN, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 137:553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
FAO (2003) Digital soil map of the world (DSMW). Tech. rep., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Re-issued version
Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
Harrigan S, Zsoter E, Alfieri L, Prudhomme C, Salamon P, Wetterhall F, Barnard C, Cloke H, Pappenberger F (2020) GloFAS-ERA5 operational global river discharge reanalysis 1979–present. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss 12:2043–2060. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-232, in review
Hersbach H, Dee D (2016) ERA5 reanalysis is in production, ECMWF Newsletter No 147, 7
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Abdalla S, Abellan X, Balsamo G, Bechtold P, Biavati G, Bidlot J, Bonavita M, Chiara G, Dahlgren P, Dee D, Diamantakis M, Dragani R, Flemming J, Forbes R, Fuentes M, Geer A, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hogan RJ, Hólm E, Janisková M, Keeley S, Laloyaux P, Lopez P, Lupu C, Radnoti G, Rosnay P, Rozum I, Vamborg F, Villaume S, Thépaut JN (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc 146(730):1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y
Liu Y, Han D, and Pregnolato M (2020) Assessing climate change effects on the occurrence of hydrological landslides in Emilia Romagna ( Italy) Region. EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-8402, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8402
Marino P, Peres DJ, Cancelliere A, Greco R, Bogaard TA (2020) Soil moisture information can improve shallow landslide forecasting using the hydrometeorological threshold approach. Landslides. 17:2041–2054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01420-8
Mirus B, Morphew M, Smith J (2018) Developing hydro-meteorological thresholds for shallow landslide initiation and early warning. Water 10:1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091274
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513
Pagano L, Picarelli L, Rianna G, Urciuoli G (2010) A simplified approach for timely prediction of precipitation-induced landslides in unsaturated pyroclastic soils. Landslides 7(3):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0216-x
Pagano L, Reder A, Rianna G (2019) Effects of vegetation on hydrological response of silty volcanic covers. Can Geotech J 56(9):1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0625
Picarelli L, Olivares L, Damiano E, Darban R, Santo A (2020) The effects of extreme precipitations on landslide hazard in the pyroclastic deposits of Campania Region: a review. Landslides. 17:2343–2358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01423-5
Piciullo L, Gilbert G (2020) Definition of soil water content and rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence. EGU General Assembly 2020 (EGU2020-16688), updated on 10 Jun 2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-16688
Ponziani F, Pandolfo C, Stelluti M et al (2012) Assessment of rainfall thresholds and soil moisture modeling for operational hydrogeological risk prevention in the Umbria region (central Italy). Landslides 9:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0287-3
Posner AJ, Georgakakos KP (2015) Soil moisture and precipitation thresholds for real-time landslide prediction in El Salvador. Landslides 12:1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0618-x
Reder A, Pagano L, Picarelli L, Rianna G (2017) The role of the lowermost boundary conditions in the hydrological response of shallow sloping covers. Landslides 14(3):861–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0753-z
Reder A, Rianna G, Pagano L (2018) Physically based approaches incorporating evaporation for early warning predictions of rainfall-induced landslides. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 18:613–631. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-613-2018
Reder A, Raffa M, Montesarchio M, Mercogliano P (2020) Performance evaluation of regional climate model simulations at different spatial and temporal scales over the complex orography area of the Alpine region. Nat Hazards 102:151–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03916-x
Rianna G, Pagano L, Urciuoli G (2014) Investigation of soil-atmosphere interaction in pyroclastic soils. J Hydrol 510:480–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.042
Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. J Appl Phys 1:318–333. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010
Saadatkhah N, Kassim A, Lee ML (2015) Hulu Kelang, Malaysia regional mapping of rainfall-induced landslides using TRIGRS model. Arab J Geosci 8:3183–3194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1410-2
Segoni S, Piciullo L, Gariano SL (2018a) A review of the recent literature on rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence. Landslides 15(1483–1501):1483–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0966-4
Segoni S, Rosi A, Lagomarsino D, Fanti R, Casagli N (2018b) Brief communication: using averaged soil moisture estimates to improve the performances of a regional-scale landslide early warning system. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:807–812. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-807-2018
Temimi M, Leconte R, Chaouch N, Sukumal P, Khanbilvarde R, Brissette F (2010) A combination of remote sensing data and topographic attributes for the spatial and temporal monitoring of soil wetness. J Hydrol 388:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.021
Thomas MA, Collins BD, Mirus BB (2019) Assessing the feasibility of satellite-based thresholds for hydrologically driven landsliding. Water Resour Res 55:9006–9023. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025577
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Zhuo L, Dai Q, Han D, Chen N, Zhao B, Berti M (2019) Evaluation of remotely sensed soil moisture for landslide hazard assessment. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 12:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2883361
Acknowledgments
ERA5 data have been generated using Copernicus Climate Change Service Information and downloaded from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=overview.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. HTESSEL soil model
Appendix. HTESSEL soil model
HTESSEL soil model schematizes the vertical movement of liquid water in the soil unsaturated zone relying on the Richards (1931) equation:
where t and z are time spatial coordinate, θ and s are the volumetric water content and soil suction, θ(s) and k(θ(s)) represent the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC), and the hydraulic conductivity function (HCF), Sθ(θ(s), z) is a volumetric sink term corresponding to root extraction, and γw represent the unit weight of water.
Using such an equation requires soil hydraulic parameters stated through the SWCC and HCF. The HTESSEL model accounts for SWCC using the acknowledged equation proposed by van Genuchten (1980):
where Se is the so-called effective saturation degree, θs and θr are the saturated and the residual volumetric water content, n and α [kPa-1] are two empirical parameters.
As for HCF, the HTESSEL model combines the van Genuchten SWCC with the capillary model by Mualem (1976) relying on the saturated hydraulic conductivity ksat (m/s), and an empirical parameter, λ, that accounts for pore tortuosity and connectivity:
Regarding boundary conditions, such a model implements:
-
at the uppermost boundary, P − E − R (where P, E, R are precipitation, evaporation and surface runoff, respectively); specifically, the evaporation results, as well as transpiration, from the surface energy budget computed by using a resistance-based approach while the surface runoff relies on a Hortonian mechanism;
-
at the lowermost boundary, a “free drainage” condition corresponding to the “unit gradient” or infinite “layer assumption” as detailed in Reder et al. (2017).
The outputs are yielded at hourly scale as volumetric soil water considering a four-layer representation of soil (layer 1 = 0–7 cm, layer 2 = 7–28 cm, layer 3 = 28–100 cm, layer 4 = 100–289 cm).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reder, A., Rianna, G. Exploring ERA5 reanalysis potentialities for supporting landslide investigations: a test case from Campania Region (Southern Italy). Landslides 18, 1909–1924 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01610-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01610-4