Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neo-liberal urbanism and sustainability in Turkey: commodification of nature in gated community marketing

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neoliberalism arose as a project to reinforce the power of capitalism against the working class in the post-1970 period and created unequal geographies as well as unearned income-oriented urban development practices in which the capital-owning class is operative. As in many other countries, urbanization and the construction sector have been used as important powers in Turkey in absorbing the plus value created by capitalism. After 1980, with the influence of the perspective towards the construction sector and the housing policies of Turkey, luxurious gated communities’ production started in metropoles. In an environment of increasing competition, these housing projects started to present nature as a commodity by referring to projects’ concepts such as natural life, sustainable environment, eco-friendly, etc. however, in contrast, the living environments they create. This paper aims to evaluate the physical and urban sustainability performances of luxurious gated communities that emphasize natural life and present nature as a commodity by emphasizing natural life and sustainable living environments in Konya by using an indicator-based approach. Even though these new living environments claim to create a sustainable and natural living environment and be eco-friendly projects, it can be seen after the evaluation results that they cannot go further than presenting nature as a commodity. In fact, in this capitalist system, while the construction sector destroys nature, it aims to increase the sales rates of the projects by making use of people's longing for nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

(Source: Prepared based on Google Earth (2020)

Fig. 5

(Source: Photos are taken by researchers)

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

(Source: a. (URL2), b. (URL1), c. Prepared by researchers.)

Fig. 9

(Source: Photos are taken by researchers.)

Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

(Source: a. (URL2), b.(URL3), c. Prepared by researchers.)

Fig. 13

(Source: Photos are taken from Google Earth Photos (2019)

Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

(Source: a. (URL2), b.(URL4), c. Prepared by researchers

Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. TOKİ is Turkish abbreviation of The Mass Housing Administration in Turkey.

  2. 2B land is used as the abbreviation of the second article of Forest Law No. 6831. 2B is used fort he lands which has lost its forest quality but suitable for agricultural use. Thanks to the 2B law which was enacted in 2012, TOKİ has gained to chance to implement urban regeneration projects in these lands (Resmi Gazete, 2012).

References

  • Akbulut, A. (2018). Urban sustainability-consumerism-media: The case Of gated communities in Istanbul. 12th UPE (Urban planning and environment) Conference, 426–437.

  • Akseki, H., & Meşhur, M. Ç. (2013). An analysis on the urbanized fertile agricultural lands with urban sprawl in Konya. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty Of Architecture E-Journal, 8(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2013.99609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, E., & Akyol Altun, D. (2016). New approaches to luxury housing construction in izmir in the context of neoliberal urbanization: Folkart housing projects. Planning, 26(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.5505/planlama.2016.03522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaban, O. (2011). İnşaat sektörü neyin lokomotifi? Birikim, 270, 19-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaban, O. (2012a). Climate change and cities: A review on the impacts and policy responses. Metu Jfa, 29(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2012.1.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaban, O. (2012b). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in turkey: unraveling the role of the public sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykal, Z., & Denli, N. (2017). İdealize edilen yeni yaşamin tanidik yüzü: korunakli-güvenlikli konut sitelerinin reklam filmleri üzerine bir içerik analizi. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.345506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Preface: from the “New Localism” to the spaces of neoliberalism. Antipode, 34(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: World commission on environment and development. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvet, M. S., & Broto, V. C. (2016). Green Enclaves, Neoliberalism and The constitution of the experimental city in Santiago de Chile. The Experimental City (pp. 107-121.). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, P., & Owusu, F. (2016). Neoliberalism, urbanization and change in africa: the political economy of heterotopias. J. Afr. Dev., 18, 61-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanheira, G., & Bragança, L. (2014). The Evolution of the sustainability assessment Tool SBToolPT: From buildings to the built environment. Scientific World Journal, 2014, 491791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/491791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2003). Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph428oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C., & Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in britain: the example of the liverpool ropewalks partnership. Cities, 17, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00008-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2009). Sustainable development for some: green urban development and affordability. Local Environment, 14, 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830903089283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, R. (2017). Retail urbanism: the neoliberalization of urban society by consumption in Santiago de Chile. Neoliberalism and urban development in Latin America (pp. 97-114.). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst, D. (2001a). linking ımpact assessment with sustainable development and the ıntroduction of strategic environmental assessment. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How Green Is the City (pp. 129-156.). NewYork: Columbia University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst, D. (2001b). Sustainability assessment at the local level. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How Green Is the City? (pp. 175-206.). NewYork: Columbia University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, I. (2011). The impact of neoliberal policies on historic urban space: areas of urban renewal in istanbul. International Planning Studies, 16, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.552474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, C., & Landman, K. (2007). The impact of gated communities on urban sustainability: a difference of opinion or a matter for concern. Stads-en Streeksbeplanning = Town and Regional Planning, 2007(51), 16-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encinas, F., Marmolejo-Duarte, C., Sánchez de la Flor, F., & Aguirre, C. (2018). Does energy efficiency matter to real estate-consumers? survey evidence on willingness to pay from a cost-optimal analysis in the context of a developing country. Energy for Sustainable Developement., 45, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercoşkun, Ö. Y. (2015). Large scale housing projects in ankara and sustainability. Paper presented at the ISBS, 2nd International Sustainable Building Symposium, Ankara.

  • Erol, Ş. Y., & Karadayı, A. (2013). Bir Yaşam Tercihi Olarak Kapalı Siteler: İstanbul için Bir Çalışma. Mimarlık(369).

  • Freyman, M. (2012). IRI working paper an exploration of sustainability and ıts application to corporate reporting. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14497.45921.

  • Gülhan, S. (2016). Devlet Müteahhitlerinden Gayrımenkul Geliştiricilerine, Türkiye’de Kentsel Rant ve Bir Meta Olarak Konut Üreticiliği – Konuta Hücum. Birikim, 270, 27-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günay, B. (2009). Kentsel Planlamada Arazi Kullanım Standartları. Ankara.: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Yayını.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güzey, Ö. (2014). Neoliberal Urbanism Restructuring the City of Ankara: Gated Communities as a New Life Style in a Suburban Settlement. Cities, 36, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2010). Social Justice and the City: University of Georgia Press.

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London.: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2019). A brief History of Neoliberalism. USA.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, L., Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (2004). An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: part 1, conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies, 41, 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000194089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, B. R. (1988). The brundtland report: ‘our common future.’ Medicine and War, 4(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimyon, D. (2015). Konut Üretim ve Tüketiminde Medyanin Yeni Rolü Konut (pp. 34–60): TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Ankara Şubesi Yayını.

  • Görgülü, Ş.T., & Koca, S. (2007). Türkiye’de Barınma Biçimlerinde Yaşanan Değişimler: Son Dönemde Yapılan Tüketim Odaklı Konutlar. Mimarlık, (337), 29–33.

  • Koernoev, L. (2001). Strategic Environmental Assessment and the Decision-Making Process. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How Green Is the City? (pp. 157-174.). USA: Columbia University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz, C., & Balaban, O. (2020). Sustainability of Urban Regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the Performance of the North Ankara Urban Regeneration Project. Habitat International, 95, 102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, Z., & Hegedűs, G. (2014). Gated Communities as New Forms of Segregation in Post-Socialist Budapest. Cities, 36, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyrukçu, E. Y., & Ulusoy, M. (2014). Yeni Konutlaşma Eğilimi Olan Dışa Kapalı Konut Yerleşmelerinde Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Analizi: Konya Örneği. S.Ü. Müh. Bilim ve Tekn. Dergisi, 2, 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.15317/Scitech.201439625.

  • Küçükerdoğan, R. (2007). İstanbul’da Konutlar ve Konut Reklamları: “Tarabya Evleri” Ya Da “Butik Site”, “Sample City”, “ Trend Plus.” Journal of İstanbul Kültür University, 5(3), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2015). Low Carbon Cities. London u. a.: Taylor et Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.-H., & Ke, S.-G. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable urban land use in china from the perspective of sustainable urbanization. Habitat International, 77, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (2002). From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a “Revanchist City”? On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s Renaissance. Antipode, 34(3), 602–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahgoub, Y., & Khalfani, F. (2012). Sustainability of Gated Communities in Developing Countries. Developing Country Studies, 2, 53-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercille, J. (2014). The Role of the media in sustaining Ireland’s housing bubble. New Political Economy, 19(2), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.779652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2008). A Brief History of Neoliberalism, David Harvey Oxford University Press, 2005, 247 pages. Economics and Philosophy, 24(1), 111-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108001715

  • Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as Sustainable Ecosystems: Principles and Practices. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press.

  • Obeng-Odoom, F. (2014). Green Neoliberalism: Recycling and Sustainable Urban Development in Sekondi-Takoradi. Habitat International, 41, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, B. (2015). Konut Üretiminde Aşırılık ve Stok Boşluk Oranları: Yenimahalle ve Altındağ Örnekleri. In Konut, Ankara: TMOBB Şehir Plancıları Odası.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir Sarı, Ö. B. (2019). Redefining the housing challenges in turkey: an urban planning perspective. In Ö. B. Özdemir Sarı, S. S. Özdemir and N. Uzun (Eds.), Urban and Regional Planning in Turkey (pp. 167–184). Cham: Springer, NewYork.

  • Özdemir Sarı, Ö. B., & Aksoy Khurami, E. (2018). Housing affordability trends and challenges in the turkish case. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9617-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkazanç, S., & Özdemir Sönmez, F. N. (2017). Spatial analysis of social exclusion from a transportation perspective: a case study of ankara metropolitan area. Cities, 67, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro, J. (2007). Sustainable Housing, Sustainable Cities. Housing and Human Settlements Working Party, 4th Meeting. Lisboa: Portugal.

  • Penbecioğlu, M. (2011). Kapitalist kentleşme dinamiklerinin türkiye’deki son 10 yili: devlet, yapili çevre üretimi ve büyük ölçekli kentsel projeler. Birikim, 270, 62-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. (2014). Articulating Neoliberalism in Critical Media and Communication Studies, in Neoliberalism, Media and the Political (pp. 12-33.). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2008). Thinking Globally, Acting Locally – Institutionalizing Climate Change at the Local Government Level in Durban, South Africa. Environment and Urbanization - Environ Urban, 20, 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, U., & Vanolo, A. (2015). Urban Neoliberalism. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 846-853.). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: a literature survey 1990–2010. Prog. Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, S. (2014). The financial crisis and the hegemony of urban neoliberalism: lessons from frankfurt am main. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzmantel, J. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Contemporary Political Theory, 6(2), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2005). The New Urban Frontie: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London.: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stossel, Z., Kissinger, M., & Meir, A. (2015). Measuring the Biophysical Dimension of Urban Sustainability. Ecological Economics, 120, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanulku, B. (2017). The formation and perception of safety, danger and insecurity inside gated communities: two cases from istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9560-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taşan-Kok, T. (2012). Introduction: Contradictions of Neoliberal Urban Plannin. In T. Tasan-Kok & G. Baeten (Eds.), Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies, and Politics (pp. 1-19.). Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli, İ. (2009). Gündelik Yaşam, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Yerellik Yazıları İlhan Tekeli Toplu Eserler 12. İstanbul.: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • TÜİK. (2019). Retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/yapiizin/giris.zul.accessed in 12th May 2019.

  • URL1. Retrieved from http://www.dagmuhendislik.com/dogasehir, accessed in 18th April 2018.

  • URL2. Retrieved from https://keos.selcuklu.bel.tr/HARITA/, accessed in 18th April 2018.

  • URL3. Retrieved from http://dagmuhendislik.com/florasehir/, accessed in 18th April 2018.

  • URL4. Retrieved from http://www.naturaparkkonya.com/, accessed in 18th April 2018.

  • Ülkü, G. (2010). Advertising Media And Housing Production: Gated Communities of İstanbul in the post-2000s (PhD), İzmir Institute of Technology.

  • Verma, P., & Raghubanshi, A. S. (2018). Urban Sustainability Indicators: Challenges and Opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 93, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban Green Space, Public Health, And Environmental Justice: The Challenge of Making Cities ‘Just Green Enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçıntan, M., Çalışkan, Ç., Çılgın, K., & Dündar, U. (2014). İstanbul Dönüşüm Coğrafyası. Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları: Sınırlar, Mücadeleler, Açılımlar (pp. 47–70). Metis Yayınları: Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yenice, M. S. (2012). Konya Kentinin Planlama Tarihi ve Mekânsal Gelişimi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(4), 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zérah, M. (2007). Conflict Between Green Space Preservation and Housing Needs: The Case of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai. Cities, 24, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zygiaris, S. (2013). Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

“This article has been prepared within the scope of PhD course called “Urban Planning under the sway of Neo-Liberal Policies and Globalization” which is conducted by Prof. H. Filiz Alkan Meşhur at Konya Technical University, Graduate Education Institute, Department of City and Regional Planning.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of City and Regional Planning, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey

    Cansu Korkmaz & H. Filiz Alkan Meşhur

Authors
  1. Cansu Korkmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Filiz Alkan Meşhur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cansu Korkmaz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korkmaz, C., Alkan Meşhur, H.F. Neo-liberal urbanism and sustainability in Turkey: commodification of nature in gated community marketing. J Hous and the Built Environ 36, 1165–1198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09800-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09800-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation