Abstract
This study sheds light on the attitudes and circumstances that influence decisions by families to donate the brain of a deceased family member for research. This study, a part of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, interviewed families of patients who had authorized organ and/or tissue donation for transplantation. A total of 384 family decision makers (FDMs) who decided to donate organs and/or tissues for transplantation were also asked to donate to GTEx. Of these, 297 families were asked to donate their loved one’s whole brain and 87 families responded to a hypothetical request for brain donation. The decision to donate the brain to GTEx, actually or hypothetically, was the major outcome measure. The majority of the FDMs would choose to donate the brain, 78%. Unwillingness to donate the brain was associated with four attitudes: (1) the FDM unwillingness to donate their own tissues for research (OR 1.91, 95% CI .67 to 2.96; p = .05), (2) concern with potential for-profit use of tissues (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7; p = .008), (3) reported squeamishness about tissue donation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7; p = .006), and (4) belief that FDMs should have a say in how the donated tissues are used (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.5; p = .01). Organ and tissue donors may present a plenteous source of brains for research. Family concerns about tissue use and collection should be addressed by requesters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Requests for anonymized data sets may be made of the corresponding author.
References
Aguet F, Brown AA, Castel SE et al (2017) Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24277
Alzheimer’s Association (2016) 2016 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement 12:459–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001
Alzheimer’s Association (2018) 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement 14:367–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001
Ardlie KG, Deluca DS, Segre A V., et al (2015) The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science (80-) 348:648–660. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1262110
Azizi L, Garrick TM, Harper CG (2006) Brain donation for research: Strong support in Australia. J Clin Neurosci 13:449–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.06.008
Barnes LL, Shah RC, Aggarwal NT et al (2013) The Minority Aging Research Study: Ongoing efforts to obtain brain donation in African Americans without dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res 9:734–745. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720512801322627
Bianchi D, Gordon J, Koroshetz W (2017) The NIH NeuroBioBank: Addressing the urgent ueed for brain donation. In: NIMH Sci. News. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2017/the-nih-neurobiobank-addressing-the-urgent-need-for-brain-donation.shtml
Boise L, Hinton L, Rosen HJ, Ruhl M (2016) Will My Soul Go to Heaven If They Take My Brain? Beliefs and Worries About Brain Donation Among Four Ethnic Groups. Gerontologist 57:gnv683. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv683
Boise L, Hinton L, Rosen HJ et al (2017) Willingness to be a brain donor: A survey of research volunteers from 4 racial/ethnic groups. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 31:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000174
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) Report to Congress on traumatic brain bnjury in the United States: Epidemiology and rehabilitation. Atlanta, GA
Costello H, Francis PT, Brayne C (2017) A scientifically informed brain donation programme: a DPUK initiative to offer brain donation to participants in longitudinal cohorts. Alzheimer’s Dement 13:P516–P517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.595
Eatough V, Shaw K, Lees A (2012) Banking on brains: Insights of brain donor relatives and friends from an experiential perspective. Psychol Health 27:1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.669480
Fonseca MK, Rodrigues-Neto E, Costa ASR et al (2015) Assessing families’ and patients’ attitudes toward brain donation for research purposes in a Brazilian population sample. Cell Tissue Bank 16:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-014-9465-6
Garrick T, Howell S, Terwee P et al (2006) Brain donation for research: Who donates and why? J Clin Neurosci 13:524–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.06.014
Garrick T, Sundqvist N, Dobbins T et al (2009) Factors that influence decisions by families to donate brain tissue for medical research. Cell Tissue Bank 10:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9136-1
Glaw XM, Garrick TM, Terwee PJ et al (2009) Brain donation: who and why? Cell Tissue Bank 10:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9121-8
Harris C, Kiger A, Counsell C (2013) Attitudes to brain donation for Parkinson’s research and how to ask: a qualitative study with suggested guidelines for practice. J Adv Nurs 69:1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06099.x
Hayes G, Hudspith R, Francis P (2012) The Brains for Dementia Research cohort: Demographics of people agreeing to regular assessment and brain donation for research. Alzheimer’s Dement 8:P488–P489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.1324
Insel TR (2008) Assessing the economic costs of serious mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 165:663–665. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030366
Insel TR, Landis SC, Collins FS (2013) The NIH BRAIN Initiative. Science (80-) 340:687–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239276
Jefferson AL, Lambe S, Cook E et al (2011) Factors associated with African American and White eldersʼ participation in a brain donation program. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 25:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181f3e059
Lin MJP, Jowsey T, Curtis MA (2019) Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review. Cell Tissue Bank 20:447–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09786-3
Mighdoll MI, Deep-Soboslay A, Bharadwaj RA et al (2018) Implementation and clinical characteristics of a posttraumatic stress disorder brain collection. J Neurosci Res 96:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24093
Millar T, Lerpiniere C, Walker R, et al (2008) Postmortem tissue donation for research: a positive opportunity? Br J Nurs 17:644–649. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29479
NIH (2019) Learn how to become a brain donor-NIH NeuroBioBank. https://neurobiobank.nih.gov/donors-how-become-donor/. Accessed 18 June 2019
Reardon S (2016) Worldwide brain-mapping project sparks excitement — and concern. Nature 537:597. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20658
Samarasekera N, Salman RA-S, Huitinga I et al (2013) Brain banking for neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol 12:1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70202-3
Samarasekera N, Lerpiniere C, Fonville AF et al (2015) Consent for Brain Tissue Donation after Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Community-Based Study. PLoS ONE 10:e0135043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135043
Schmitt FA, Wetherby MMC, Wekstein DR et al (2001) Brain donation in normal aging. Gerontologist 41:716–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.6.716
Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM (2009) Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med 68:781–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020
Sewell M, Neugroschl J, Li C, Sano M (2015) Decision making concerning brain donation in Alzheimer’s research among research participants and their families. Alzheimer’s Dement 11:P735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.1641
Siminoff LA (2001) Factors Influencing Families’ Consent for Donation of Solid Organs for Transplantation. JAMA 286:71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.1.71
Siminoff LA, Traino HM, Gordon N (2010) Determinants of Family Consent to Tissue Donation. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 69:956–963. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d8924b
Siminoff LA, Traino HM, Mosavel M et al (2016) Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research. Genet Med 18:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.38
Stevens M (1998) Factors influencing decisions about donation of the brain for research purposes. Age Ageing 27:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/27.5.623
US Department of Health and Human Services (2015) The 2012 and 2015 National Tissue Recovery through Utilization Survey Report. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ntrus-report-2015.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2020
Wu C, Bendriem RM, Garamszegi SP et al (2017) RNA sequencing in post-mortem human brains of neuropsychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 71:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12550
Yuste R, Bargmann C (2017) Toward a global BRAIN initiative. Cell 168:956–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.023
Acknowledgements
The ELSI project acknowledges the work of the GTEx OPO partners: Gift of Life in Philadelphia, PA; Center for Organ Recovery and Education in Pittsburg, PA; LifeNet Health in Virginia Beach, VA; Washington Regional Transplant Center in Washington DC; and LifeGift in Houston TX. The authors also thank the participants for their assistance in this project.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Contract No. HHSN261200800001E—Leidos Prime contract with National Cancer Institute) and the National Disease Research Interchange (Contract No. 10XS170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All participants provided consent to participate in the study.
Consent for publication
All participants provided consent for study results to be published.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by Virginia Commonwealth University and Temple University’s IRB boards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Tissue donation attitude questions
Biobanks are useful even if they only produce more scientific knowledge and not medical advancement |
Tissue donation makes something positive come out of death |
The idea of tissue donation makes me feel squeamish and uncomfortable |
Genetic research will improve our lives |
Policy makers should consider the possibility that the U.S. should not pursue biobanking |
Donors should share in any money that is made through research on donated tissues |
Educating people about health issues (e.g., diet and lifestyle changes) promises greater health benefits than investing in biobanks |
Donors should be able to have a say in deciding what the donated tissues will be used for |
It’s o.k. for tissues donated in the U.S. to be sent to other countries for research purposes |
It is acceptable to do research on personally identifiable samples without permission |
Donors should always be able to withdraw their sample from research at any time |
Donors should have property rights to the tissues donated |
Donors should be contacted every time researchers want to use the donated tissues for research so they consent to the specific study |
Researchers should be allowed to use samples for research but they should not own them |
Scientists can be trusted to have access to all unidentified, personal tissue samples for research |
Donors should have access to the results of DNA testing done on their tissue samples |
Donors should have access to results that could impact their families’ health |
Appendix B
Tissue donation discussion topics
The tissue samples from the patient are for research related purposes |
Storage of the samples for an indefinite period of time |
Establishment of a DNA database for researchers to use for genetic research |
Development of cell lines that can be made to grow forever/indefinitely |
Right to decline participation |
Right to withdraw DNA and medical information after you have donated |
Information about whom to contact to withdraw consent |
Information about whom to contact with questions or concerns |
Use of DNA and medical records to study various diseases |
That it will not be known in advance the specific studies the donated tissue might be used for |
Ability to consent to donation of specific types of tissue |
Consent to medical record review |
No direct benefits of participation |
Risk to family associated with release of genetic information |
No cost associated with donation |
Tissue samples, including DNA and medical record information, may be made available to for-profit companies |
Specific diseases that could be cured or treated by biobanking research |
Law enforcement or other legal entities ability to access biobanking information |
The use of samples in cloning or stem cell research |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siminoff, L.A., Mash, D., Wilson-Genderson, M. et al. Making a family decision to donate the brain for genomic research: lessons from the genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx). Cell Tissue Bank 22, 431–441 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09890-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09890-9