Skip to main content
Log in

Making a family decision to donate the brain for genomic research: lessons from the genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx)

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sheds light on the attitudes and circumstances that influence decisions by families to donate the brain of a deceased family member for research. This study, a part of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, interviewed families of patients who had authorized organ and/or tissue donation for transplantation. A total of 384 family decision makers (FDMs) who decided to donate organs and/or tissues for transplantation were also asked to donate to GTEx. Of these, 297 families were asked to donate their loved one’s whole brain and 87 families responded to a hypothetical request for brain donation. The decision to donate the brain to GTEx, actually or hypothetically, was the major outcome measure. The majority of the FDMs would choose to donate the brain, 78%. Unwillingness to donate the brain was associated with four attitudes: (1) the FDM unwillingness to donate their own tissues for research (OR 1.91, 95% CI .67 to 2.96; p = .05), (2) concern with potential for-profit use of tissues (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7; p = .008), (3) reported squeamishness about tissue donation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7; p = .006), and (4) belief that FDMs should have a say in how the donated tissues are used (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.5; p = .01). Organ and tissue donors may present a plenteous source of brains for research. Family concerns about tissue use and collection should be addressed by requesters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Requests for anonymized data sets may be made of the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ELSI project acknowledges the work of the GTEx OPO partners: Gift of Life in Philadelphia, PA; Center for Organ Recovery and Education in Pittsburg, PA; LifeNet Health in Virginia Beach, VA; Washington Regional Transplant Center in Washington DC; and LifeGift in Houston TX. The authors also thank the participants for their assistance in this project.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Contract No. HHSN261200800001E—Leidos Prime contract with National Cancer Institute) and the National Disease Research Interchange (Contract No. 10XS170).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura A. Siminoff.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All participants provided consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

All participants provided consent for study results to be published.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Virginia Commonwealth University and Temple University’s IRB boards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Tissue donation attitude questions

Biobanks are useful even if they only produce more scientific knowledge and not medical advancement

Tissue donation makes something positive come out of death

The idea of tissue donation makes me feel squeamish and uncomfortable

Genetic research will improve our lives

Policy makers should consider the possibility that the U.S. should not pursue biobanking

Donors should share in any money that is made through research on donated tissues

Educating people about health issues (e.g., diet and lifestyle changes) promises greater health benefits than investing in biobanks

Donors should be able to have a say in deciding what the donated tissues will be used for

It’s o.k. for tissues donated in the U.S. to be sent to other countries for research purposes

It is acceptable to do research on personally identifiable samples without permission

Donors should always be able to withdraw their sample from research at any time

Donors should have property rights to the tissues donated

Donors should be contacted every time researchers want to use the donated tissues for research so they consent to the specific study

Researchers should be allowed to use samples for research but they should not own them

Scientists can be trusted to have access to all unidentified, personal tissue samples for research

Donors should have access to the results of DNA testing done on their tissue samples

Donors should have access to results that could impact their families’ health

Appendix B

Tissue donation discussion topics

The tissue samples from the patient are for research related purposes

Storage of the samples for an indefinite period of time

Establishment of a DNA database for researchers to use for genetic research

Development of cell lines that can be made to grow forever/indefinitely

Right to decline participation

Right to withdraw DNA and medical information after you have donated

Information about whom to contact to withdraw consent

Information about whom to contact with questions or concerns

Use of DNA and medical records to study various diseases

That it will not be known in advance the specific studies the donated tissue might be used for

Ability to consent to donation of specific types of tissue

Consent to medical record review

No direct benefits of participation

Risk to family associated with release of genetic information

No cost associated with donation

Tissue samples, including DNA and medical record information, may be made available to for-profit companies

Specific diseases that could be cured or treated by biobanking research

Law enforcement or other legal entities ability to access biobanking information

The use of samples in cloning or stem cell research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siminoff, L.A., Mash, D., Wilson-Genderson, M. et al. Making a family decision to donate the brain for genomic research: lessons from the genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx). Cell Tissue Bank 22, 431–441 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09890-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-020-09890-9

Keywords

Navigation