Estimation of Leaf Water Use Efficiency Threshold Values for Water Stress in Winter Wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.)

Xinqiang, Qiu; Yushun, Zhang; Haixia, Qin; Min, Wang; Yanping, Wang; Haochen, Yang; Zhenguang, Lu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8815940

Journal of Sensors

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Advanced Sensor Technologies in Agricultural, Environmental, and Ecological Engineering

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8815940 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8815940

Estimation of Leaf Water Use Efficiency Threshold Values for Water Stress in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Qiu Xinqiang,¹Zhang Yushun,¹Qin Haixia,¹Wang Min,¹Wang Yanping,¹Yang Haochen,¹and Lu Zhenguang¹

Academic Editor: Yuan Li

Received18 Sept 2020

Revised03 Nov 2020

Accepted08 Dec 2020

Published31 Dec 2020

Abstract

Drought significantly threatens crop productivity and food security worldwide. However, the severity of drought is predicted to increasingly intensify in the future. To provide an antidrought strategy for farmers and breeders, the response of stomatal behavior of crops to water stress should be well studied. In this study, a lysimeter experiment was conducted to study the relationship between gas exchange parameters and grain yields of winter wheat. Light, moderate, and severe drought levels were imposed at seedling, jointing, heading, and filling stages. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration (ET_c, mm) of winter wheat during the entire growing season was limited by drought imposed at any growth stage, and ET_c under severe drought treatment was always the lowest. The stomatal limitation value had a significant linear correlation with the stomatal conductance (Gs, μmol mol H₂O m^–2 s^–1) and transpiration rate (Tr, mmol H₂O m^–2 s^–1). Light and moderate drought levels at the seedling stage did not generate irreversible physiological stress on wheat plants, while severe drought at any growth stage caused significant reduction in gas exchange parameters and grain yields. Theoretical threshold values of leaf water use efficiency (WUE_l) for light, moderate, and severe drought levels were 2.62, 3.36, and 4.11 μmol mmol^–1, respectively. The threshold values are useful to provide theoretical reference for achieving smart irrigation in the North China Plain.

1. Introduction

Drought is one of the most common factors threatening food security worldwide. It is predicted that the severity of drought will continue in the future under the current climate change scenarios [1]. Nevertheless, global demand for major grains such as wheat and maize is projected to increase by 70% by 2050 due to the ever-increasing population [2]. This means the agricultural sector will double the present consumption of the water resources on the planet under the current water use efficiency (WUE) level [3]. To mitigate the conflict between water consumption for food production and water supply for agriculture, modern irrigation technology should be developed toward smart and precision irrigation with efficient use of water [4]. However, the present efficiency of irrigation in the world is relatively low, especially in Southeast Asia, North Africa, and South America [5–7]. Taking China, for example, the mean utilization coefficient of irrigation water was 0.45 in 2019 [8]. Precision irrigation according to the crop water requirement is the key to achieving high leaf water use efficiency (WUE_l). However, the main difficulty for precision irrigation lies in real-time and rapid monitoring of gas exchange parameters of crop leaves, such as the stomatal conductance (Gs, μmol mol H₂O m^-2 s^-1) and transpiration rate (Tr, mmol H₂O m^-2 s^-1), and WUE_l [9].

The North China Plain (NCP) is one of the most important granaries in China, accounting for 30 and 60% of the domestic maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production [10]. Over recent years, NCP has been subjected to serious water shortages due to the rapid development of irrigated agriculture. For example, groundwater for irrigated agriculture in the NCP has accounted for nearly 70% of total water use in 2015 [11]. Consequently, every year’s decline of the groundwater table reached 1.0 m over the past decade, causing the deepest groundwater table of 105 m in the groundwater depression cone [12]. During winter wheat growing seasons, only 25–40% of the crop water requirement can be met by seasonal precipitation, which is around 100–180 mm in the NCP [3]. Generally, the crop needs 2–4 times of irrigation to meet the water requirement and achieve high yield formation of wheat. Therefore, timely irrigation according to the water requirement of crops is the key to high productivity of winter wheat. However, the main difficulty for timely irrigation remains in real-time and rapid monitoring of crop water status. Some scholars developed a probabilistic method for modeling the dynamics of soil water content to guide irrigation, but the model is too complicated to be of wide practical use [13–15]. Using a crop canopy temperature monitoring system which measured real-time data at a 1 h interval, Jiabing et al. [16] adopted the difference between canopy temperature and air temperature to identify the crop water deficit, which could be further used to trigger irrigation. However, how to reasonably separate canopy temperature from surface temperature when the vegetation coverage is low caused overestimation of crop transpiration [17]. Moreover, how to accurately determine dependable threshold values for irrigation decision-making is also a difficult point for automatic irrigation [18]. So far, few publications have been found using WUE_l as the threshold value of wheat to support data-driven automatic irrigation. In practice, less is known about how to quantitatively analyze the soil moisture status through monitoring crop water status and other photosynthetic parameters, which is critical to determine the irrigation timing and amount.

Accurate identification and measurement of crop water status is the basis for smart irrigation [19]. In order to make crops grow normally without water stress, timely irrigation should be conducted before excessive drought occurs. Studies have shown that, when subjected to drought stress, crop leaves always make the first and rapid response to water stress [20]. Besides, the leaf is a major carrier where photosynthesis and crop transpiration occur. Crops regulate the transpiration rate through adjusting stomatal conductance so that they can maintain the balance of plant water status and intercellular CO₂ concentration [21] and cool down themselves when exposed to high temperature [22]. Also, leaf water potential is one of the most important indicators that is associated with stomatal conductance [23], and it will change immediately after the change of stomatal conductance [24]. Leaf water use efficiency (WUE_l) is defined as the ratio of photosynthesis to transpiration, which reflects the change of related quantity in the process of leaf gas exchanges [25]. Moreover, intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci) is an important decision basis to determine whether the main reason for the change of the photosynthetic rate is attributable to stomatal factors [26]. Under soil water stress, there is a “threshold” response of photosynthesis of wheat leaves to soil water content [27]. When the intercellular CO₂ concentration of leaves changes from decreasing to increasing, it indicates that the main reason for the decrease of the photosynthetic rate is caused by water stress changes from stomatal limitation to nonstomatal limitation [28, 29]. It is known that the moderate water deficit in a specific growth period does not reduce crop yield but increases crop productivity and WUE [30, 31].

We hypothesize that timely and appropriate irrigation can be achieved based on the real-time crop water requirement by monitoring gas exchange parameters such as WUE_l as threshold values of crops. The objectives of this study are as follows: (i) to compare the difference of gas exchange parameters of winter wheat leaves under different water stress conditions in a lysimeter experiment, (ii) to clarify the response of leaf stomatal behavior to water stress, and (iii) to figure out the threshold values of WUE_l, providing guidance for water-saving and smart irrigation of winter wheat in the NCP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The experiment was carried out at the Maozhuang Experimental Station of Henan Water-Saving Irrigation Engineering Technology Research Center, Central Station of Henan Irrigation Experiment, China (34°16N, 112°42E, a.s.l. 85 m) (see Figure 1). The place has a continent temperate monsoon climate. The mean annual temperature is 14.0–14.3°C, mean annual precipitation is 640.9 mm, frost-free period is 220 d, and annual sunshine hours are about 2400 h. The soil was a silty loam soil. The field water holding capacity in 0–100 cm soil layers is 23% (by weight), average bulk density in the same layers is 1.42 g cm^–3, and water table was detected more than 5 m below the soil surface. The content of organic matter, total phosphorus, total potassium, total nitrogen, alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and potassium in 0–30 cm soil layers was 5.62 g kg^–1, 0.44 g kg^–1, 15.12 g kg^–1, 0.37 g kg^–1, 24.91 mg kg^–1, 23.89 mg kg^–1, and 75 mg kg^–1, respectively.

2.2. Experimental Design

The field experiments were carried out in a lysimeter facility equipped with an automatic rainproof shelter. The research facility consisted of 24 lysimeters () packed uniformly with silty loam soil. These lysimeters were arranged in two rows, and between the rows of each system, a 2.5 m wide concrete platform was constructed level with the top of the lysimeters. The electrically operated double rain shelters were installed for the lysimeters. The rainproof shelters were moved over all lysimeters before precipitation happened.

Popularly used wheat seeds (c.v. Zhoumai 22) were selected as the experimental materials. Nine rows were sown in each lysimeter with a row spacing of 20 cm and a sowing rate of 150 kg h m^–2. The experiment was conducted in two wheat growing seasons (2012–2013 and 2013–2014). Wheat was sown on October 17, 2012, and October 12, 2013, and harvested on May 30, 2013, and 2014. The whole growth period was 225 d and 230 d, respectively. Before sowing, the soil was deeply ploughed. While ploughed, compound fertilizer (15-15-15 of N-P₂O₅-K₂O, Shandong Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Company, LY, China) was applied at the rate of 750 kg ha^–1. In the meantime, 10 t ha^–1 of dry chicken manure was applied as amendment fertilizer. After sowing, full irrigation of 65 mm was applied to guarantee seed germination. Each plot was irrigated independently, and the type of irrigation was surface irrigation. To measure and control irrigation amount, a precision flow meter (Shanghai Water Meter Manufacturing Ltd., Co., Shanghai, China) was adopted. Weed and pest control was applied according to local governmental recommendations. The field crop management was kept the same during the two growing seasons of winter wheat.

In this experiment, 3 drought levels expressed in percentage of field holding capacity (%FC) were arranged, including the light drought level (55%FC), moderate drought level (45%FC), and severe drought level (35%FC), respectively. Irrigation was ceased once relative soil moisture content (%FC) reached the 3 corresponding drought levels for each treatment. Furthermore, the 3 drought levels were separately imposed at the seedling stage, jointing stage, heading stage, and filling stage, respectively. Furthermore, to investigate the effects of continuous drought on crop growth, the moderate drought level (45%FC) was continuously imposed in the early growth period (i.e., seedling+jointing stages), middle growth period (jointing+heading stages), and late growth period (heading+filling stages), respectively, whereas the suitable soil moisture level, whose relative soil water content was kept ≥65%FC in the whole growth period, was taken as control (CK). Consequently, a total of 18 irrigation treatments were set up (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Diagram of the nonstress (T1, CK), the three drought stress levels (light, moderate, and severe) separately imposed at seedling (T2, T3, and T4), jointing (T5, T6, and T7), heading (T8, T9, and T10), and filling (T11, T12, and T13) stages, and the moderate drought stress continuously imposed at seedling and jointing stages (T14), jointing and heading stages (T15), and heading and filling stages (T16), respectively. FC: field holding capacity (cm³ cm^–3). %FC in the table represents the lower limit for triggering irrigation.

2.3. Data Collection and Measurements

2.3.1. Soil Water Content

Soil water content (%) was measured at 20 cm increments to a depth of 100 cm using the soil core method. Soil samples were taken every 7 d and were oven-dried at 105°C for 24 h for analysis of the gravimetric soil water content. Additional measurement was conducted before and after irrigation.

2.3.2. Grain Yield

At maturity, 9 middle rows in 3.3 m long were selected from each plot to determine grain yield. All the plants in each plot were hand-harvested and air-dried for 2 weeks until constant mass, and then the grain was separated, cleaned, and weighed. Grain yield was calculated on a dry matter basis (13%). Besides, ten representative winter wheat plants were randomly selected for the investigation of yield components.

2.3.3. Leaf Gas Exchange Parameters

Relevant leaf gas exchange parameters, including the photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol CO₂ m^–2 s^–1), transpiration rate (Tr, mmol H₂O m^–2 s^–1), stomatal conductance (Gs, mol H₂O m^–2 s^–1), and intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci, μmol CO₂ mol^–1 air), were measured from 9:30 to 12:30 a.m. at each major growth stage on the top full leaves before flag leaves appeared and on the flag leaves after their appearance. Three uniform plants from three selected sampling areas in each plot were measured using a Li-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The chamber was adjusted to 25°C (temperature), ambient CO₂ concentration (Ca) was 360 μM mol^–1, and photosynthetic photon flux density is 800 μM m^–2 s^–1. Leaf water use efficiency (, μmol mmol^–1) and stomatal limitation () were calculated accordingly.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and differences between the means were tested by the least significant difference (Duncan’s multiple comparison method). Significance was declared at the probability level of 0.05 unless otherwise stated. All figures were illustrated using Origin 9.0 software (OriginLab, Northampton, USA). Relationships between WUE_l, Ls, and gas exchange parameters were estimated by means of regression using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Water Stress at the Seedling Stage on Leaf Gas Exchange of Winter Wheat

In this experiment, leaf gas exchange parameters, including Pn, Tr, Ci, and Gs, were measured at the seedling stage during the two growing seasons (see Figure 3). Pn, Tr, Ci, and Gs of winter wheat leaves during the drought period (March 22–27) decreased continuously with the intensification of drought levels. T4 treatment showed the greatest effects on suppressing gas exchange parameters. In detail, T4 decreased Pn by 35.4%, Tr by 55.0%, Ci by 16.5%, and Gs by 43.6%, respectively, compared with CK (T1). The difference was also significant between T2 and T4. After rewatering at the jointing stage, gas exchange parameters of each drought treatment increased. Crop growth performance of T2 and T3 treatments was generally better than that of CK. What is more, the growth performance of T4 treatment was only slightly weaker than that of CK. Therefore, although drought at the seedling stage weakened the gas exchange process of winter wheat leaves to a certain extent, it had nonsignificant adverse effects on photosynthetic rates after rewatering at the jointing stage. Previous studies have shown that moderate water stress in the early stage could ensure a higher photosynthetic rate of wheat leaves and helped to improve WUE, while the severe water deficit had a significant negative effect on the stomatal opening [32, 33]. Also, grain yield of light and moderate drought treatments at the seedling stage was not significantly affected, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [34, 35]. Consequently, properly intensifying soil water stress at the seedling stage of winter wheat not only is conducive to water saving but also can achieve the purpose of “promoting root penetration” in the early growth stage.

3.2. Effects of Water Stress at the Jointing Stage on Leaf Gas Exchange of Winter Wheat

Pn, Tr, and Ci of winter wheat leaves decreased at first and then increased from jointing to flowering (see Figure 4). At the jointing stage of the 2012–2013 growing season, Pn of drought treatments was generally lower than that of CK. The maximum reduction in Pn was 7.1% (light drought), 15.5% (moderate drought), and 15.6% (severe drought), respectively, compared with CK. The difference in Pn between drought treatments and CK in the 2013–2014 growing season was relatively small. Compared with CK, Ci, Tr, and Gs decreased by 10.4%, 20.2%, and 43.6%, respectively, for light, moderate, and severe treatments, before irrigation (April 1, 2014). After irrigation, the above indexes returned to normal levels rapidly (April 9, 2014), and Tr values increased by 16.5% (T5), 31.9% (T6), and 46.7% (T7), respectively, showing a rapid stomatal response to soil moisture restoration. Therefore, we pointed out that appropriate drought stress at the jointing stage helped promote crop root growth and improve water uptake. Our study demonstrated that physiological indexes (e.g., Pn, Tr, and Ci) of winter wheat (c.v. Zhoumai 24) were rapidly compensated after light water stress rewatering, and the supercompensation effect was observed after moderate water stress rewatering at the jointing stage. Similar results were also observed in another lysimeter experiment using another winter wheat variety (c.v. Shijiazhuang 8) as experimental material [36].

3.3. Effects of Water Stress at the Heading Stage on Leaf Gas Exchange of Winter Wheat

There were significant differences between treatments T8 and T10 (see Figure 5). During the 2013–2014 growing season, Pn of T10 treatment decreased by 14.3% compared with CK. Under treatments T8 and T9, gas exchange parameters did not significantly decrease, while Tr was increased by 15.3% and 18.5%, respectively, compared with CK. Under continuous water stress, Pn, Tr, and Gs of all treatments decreased, while Ci increased (except for that of severe drought treatment). The results showed that Pn and Tr of T10 treatment were significantly lower than those of other drought treatments. Furthermore, compared with CK, Ci and Gs of T10 treatment were significantly decreased by 11.9% and 31.2%, respectively. Severe drought at the heading stage had significant negative effects on gas exchange parameters of winter wheat leaves, and the variability of the above parameters was large.

3.4. Effects of Water Stress at the Filling Stage on Leaf Gas Exchange of Winter Wheat

With the intensification of water stress, Pn, Tr, and Gs of drought treatments decreased significantly at the filling stage (see Figure 6). Pn, Tr, Ci, and Gs of T13 treatment decreased by 74.9%, 73.2%, 7.64%, and 87.1%, respectively, compared with CK at the filling stage. However, Pn, Tr, Ci, and Gs of T11 and T12 treatments did not significantly decrease. Under continuous water stress, Pn, Tr, Ci, and Gs of each drought treatment decreased significantly by 40.6% (Pn), 47.7% (Tr), 11.1% (Ci), and 69.6% (Gs), respectively. Severe drought had the greatest decreasing effect on Pn, Tr, and Gs at the filling stage.

3.5. Effects of Continuous Water Stress on Leaf Gas Exchange of Winter Wheat

During the drought period of the 2012–2013 growing season, Tr, Ci, and Gs of continuous drought treatments in the early growth stage decreased by 19.6%, 17.3%, and 50.4%, respectively (see Figure 7). Similarly, those of continuous drought treatments in the late growth stage decreased by 45.2% (Tr), 15.7% (Ci), and 78.9% (Gs), respectively. After rewatering, differences of Tr, Ci, and Gs between the drought treatments and CK were significantly reduced. Ci and Gs returned to the level of CK treatment, whereas Tr “rebounded” to 1.92 times (2012–2013) and 1.28 times (2013–2014) the CK treatment. The differences between continuous drought treatments and CK began to be significant at the filling stage, and they gradually increased with time and reached the maximum in the late filling stage.

Figure 7

Variations in leaf gas exchange parameters of winter wheat under well-watered control treatment (T1), continuous moderate drought stress at seedling and jointing stages (T14), at jointing and heading stages (T15), and at heading and filling stages (T16), respectively. Data are the of three replicates, where for the photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci), and stomatal conductance (Gs). Different letters above the bars indicate statistical significance ().

3.6. Correlations of Leaf Water Use Efficiency and Stomatal Limitation Values Related to Leaf Gas Exchange Parameters

Stomatal limitation (Ls) was defined as . Ls had a quadratic relationship with Pn and a linear relationship with Gs and Tr (see Figure 8). Ls mainly concentrated at the level below 0.3. Leaf water use efficiency (WUE_l) had a quadratic relationship with Pn and Tr and a nonlinear ellipse relationship with Gs. Furthermore, Tr decreased under drought stress, and the decreasing rates of Tr became larger with the intensification of water stress. Our study showed that moderate water stress led to the increase of WUE_l, and WUE_l continued to increase even if wheat crops suffered severe drought stress. Under soil water stress, the plant stomatal regulation mechanism is considered to be feedback to make plants adaptable to drought stress [37, 38]. When soil water is sufficient, stomatal conductance increases with the increase of photosynthetic active radiation intensity. Under severe drought, plants will suffer excessive water loss through transpiration, resulting in changes in leaf water potential and the decrease of the stomatal opening. However, under moderate water stress, the photosynthetic rate did not decrease or even became higher than that of nonstress treatment.

In this study, WUE_l decreased until nonstomatal restriction became a main limiting factor for leaf gas exchange, which was consistent with the previous studies [39, 40]. With the increase of WUE_l, Pn and Tr both increased first and then decreased. When WUE_l was about 2.62 μmol mmol^–1, Tr reached the maximum value. When WUE_l reached 3.36 μmol mmol^–1, the drought level increased from light to moderate water stress. Similarly, when WUE_l exceeded 3.81 μmol mmol^–1, Pn reached the maximum value. It was when WUE_l reached 4.11 μmol mmol^–1 that it began to decrease quickly, indicating that crops had suffered from severe water stress. At the same time, the nonstomatal factor had become a main limiting factor of leaf photosynthesis [41]. The recommendation of WUE_l threshold values (i.e.,WUE_l of 2.62, 3.36, and 4.11 μmol mmol^–1 represents light, moderate, and severe drought levels, respectively) that define different levels of drought stress will be of more practical significance for realizing the unification of water-saving and high yield of wheat.

3.7. Crop Evapotranspiration, Grain Yield, and Water Use Efficiency

Crop evapotranspiration (ET_c) was limited by drought at any growth stage (Table 1). Generally, ET_c decreased with the intensification of drought. Compared with light and moderate drought treatments, ET_c of severe drought treatment at any growth stage was always the lowest. On average, grain yield and ET_c of winter wheat in the 2012–2013 growing season were decreased by 7.38% and 6.63% (light drought), 10.3% and 7.94% (moderate drought), and 15.3% and 31.8% (severe drought), respectively, compared with CK. Similar results were also observed in 2013–2014. Grain yield of light and moderate drought treatments at the seedling stage generally decreased within 5%, while water use efficiency (WUE) was generally higher, which indicated that moderate drought at the seedling stage was beneficial to improve WUE of winter wheat, and did not lead to significant yield reduction. Compared with CK, WUE of drought treatments at heading and filling stages was decreased by up to 21.7% (2012–2013) and 27.5% (2013–2014), respectively. WUE was lowest under continuous drought conditions at middle growth stages. Under moderate water stress, the stomatal opening decreased significantly, and the transpiration rate decreased faster than the photosynthetic rate, giving rise to the highest WUE. Under severe water stress, the photosynthetic activity of mesophyll cells decreased, leading to stomatal limitation.

4. Conclusion

Grain yield of light and moderate drought treatments at the seedling stage was similar to CK, indicating that light and moderate water stress levels at the seedling stage did not generate an irreversible effect on wheat plants. However, severe drought in any growth stage caused significant negative effects on gas exchange parameters, WUE_l, and grain yields of winter wheat. Based on the correlation between WUE_l and Pn, Tr, and Gs, the theoretical threshold values of WUE_l for light, moderate, and severe drought levels were 2.62, 3.36, and 4.11 μmol mmol^–1, respectively. Photosynthetic rates of wheat leaves reached their maximum values when WUE_l was 3.81 μmol mmol^–1. The WUE_l threshold values are useful to identify different levels of drought stress the crops suffered from and provide a theoretical reference threshold to achieve smart irrigation for winter wheat in the North China Plain.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of the study can be available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Henan Water Conservancy Science and Technology Project (GG201509, GG201602), and Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (212102110069). The page fee for this manuscript comes from the project undertaken by the author.

References

C. Su, S. Song, Y. Lu et al., “Potential effects of changes in climate and emissions on distribution and fate of perfluorooctane sulfonate in the Bohai Rim, China,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 613-614, pp. 352–360, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tilman, C. Balzer, J. Hill, and B. L. Befort, “Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 50, pp. 20260–20264, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Fang, L. Ma, T. R. Green, Q. Yu, T. D. Wang, and L. R. Ahuja, “Water resources and water use efficiency in the North China Plain: current status and agronomic management options,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1102–1116, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sun, J. Liu, P. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Zhao, and X. Zhang, “Comprehensive evaluation of water use in agricultural production: a case study in Hetao Irrigation District, China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 4569–4575, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Giuliani, F. Carucci, E. Nardella et al., “Combined effects of deficit irrigation and strobilurin application on gas exchange, yield and water use efficiency in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.),” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 233, pp. 149–158, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Oda, K. Moriwaki, K. Tanigaki, Y. Nomura, and T. Sumi, “Irrigation ponds in the past, present, and future: a case study of the Higashi Harima Region, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan,” Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, vol. 26, pp. 19–24, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kazem Attar, H. Noory, H. Ebrahimian, and A.-M. Liaghat, “Efficiency and productivity of irrigation water based on water balance considering quality of return flows,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 231, p. 106025, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Ismail and K. Ozawa, “Improvement of crop yield, soil moisture distribution and water use efficiency in sandy soils by clay application,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 81–89, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Améglio, P. Archer, M. Cohen et al., “Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation,” Plant and Soil, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Qin, D. Ning, Z. Liu et al., “Structural equation modeling of soil moisture effects on evapotranspiration of maize in the North China Plain,” National Academy Science Letters, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zou, Z. Xie, C. Zhan et al., “Effects of anthropogenic groundwater exploitation on land surface processes: a case study of the Haihe River Basin, northern China,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 524, pp. 625–641, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Feng, J. Zhang, C. Cao et al., “Soil salt accumulation and crop yield under long-term irrigation with saline water,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, vol. 141, no. 12, pp. 04015025–04015729, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Salvucci, “Estimating the moisture dependence of root zone water loss using conditionally averaged precipitation,” Water Resources Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1357–1365, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Porporato, F. Laio, L. Ridolfi, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, “Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: III. Vegetation water stress,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 725–744, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Miller, D. D. Baldocchi, B. E. Law, and T. Meyers, “An analysis of soil moisture dynamics using multi-year data from a network of micrometeorological observation sites,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1065–1081, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jiabing, X. Di, S. Nan, and W. E. I. Zheng, “Real-time monitoring system of crop canopy temperature and soil moisture for irrigation decision-making,” Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 133–139, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Han, H. Zhang, J. L. Chávez, L. Ma, T. J. Trout, and K. C. DeJonge, “Improved soil water deficit estimation through the integration of canopy temperature measurements into a soil water balance model,” Irrigation Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 187–201, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Culman, C. M. de Farias, C. Bayona, and J. D. Cabrera Cruz, “Using agrometeorological data to assist irrigation management in oil palm crops: a decision support method and results from crop model simulation,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 213, pp. 1047–1062, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, E. Kendy, Y. Qiang, L. Changming, S. Yanjun, and S. Hongyong, “Effect of soil water deficit on evapotranspiration, crop yield, and water use efficiency in the North China Plain,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hao, H. Cao, H. Wang, and X. Pan, “The physiological responses of tomato to water stress and re-water in different growth periods,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 143–154, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Fang, Y. Li, J. Nie et al., “Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on the leaf photosynthetic characteristics, agronomic traits and grain yield in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.),” Field Crops Research, vol. 219, no. 4, pp. 160–168, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Saryoko, Y. Fukuda, I. Lubis, K. Homma, and T. Shiraiwa, “Physiological activity and biomass production in crop canopy under a tropical environment in soybean cultivars with temperate and tropical origins,” Field Crops Research, vol. 216, no. 12, pp. 209–216, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Heinemann, L. F. Stone, and N. K. Fageria, “Transpiration rate response to water deficit during vegetative and reproductive phases of upland rice cultivars,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zenone, M. Fischer, N. Arriga et al., “Biophysical drivers of the carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a short-rotation poplar coppice,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 209-210, pp. 22–35, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Shao, J. Cui, S. Yu et al., “Impacts of controlled irrigation and drainage on the yield and physiological attributes of rice,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 149, pp. 156–165, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, S. Kang, X. Zhang, F. Li, and H. Lu, “Deficit irrigation provokes more pronounced responses of maize photosynthesis and water productivity to elevated CO₂,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 195, pp. 71–83, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. C. Mitchell, V. J. Mitchell, and D. W. Lawlor, “Response of wheat canopy CO₂ and water gas-exchange to soil water content under ambient and elevated CO₂,” Global Change Biology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 599–611, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zheng, J. Ma, X. Sun et al., “Responses of photosynthesis, dry mass and carbon isotope discrimination in winter wheat to different irrigation depths,” Photosynthetica, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1437–1446, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, Q. Li, K. Ma, and L. Chen, “Temperature-dependent gas exchange and stomatal/non-stomatal limitation to CO₂ assimilation of Quercus liaotungensis under midday high irradiance,” Photosynthetica, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 383–388, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lampurlanés, D. Plaza-Bonilla, J. Álvaro-Fuentes, and C. Cantero-Martínez, “Long-term analysis of soil water conservation and crop yield under different tillage systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions,” Field Crops Research, vol. 189, pp. 59–67, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Qin, Y. Fang, D. Ning et al., “Incorporation of manure into ridge and furrow planting system boosts yields of maize by optimizing soil moisture and improving photosynthesis,” Agronomy, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 865, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ozaki, R. Oguchi, and K. Hikosaka, “Dependence of functional traits related to growth rates and their CO₂ response on multiple habitat climate factors across Arabidopsis thaliana populations,” Journal of Plant Research, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 987–999, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qu, P. Song, Y. Hu et al., “Regulation of stomatal movement by cortical microtubule organization in response to darkness and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 467–479, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sallam, A. M. I. Mourad, W. Hussain, and P. Stephen Baenziger, “Genetic variation in drought tolerance at seedling stage and grain yield in low rainfall environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Euphytica, vol. 214, no. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Niu, S. Zhang, S. Liu et al., “The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought stress,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 224-225, pp. 30–48, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liu, W. Hao, Q. Bai, X. R. Mei, and Y. L. Yan, “Differential compensatory effects of winter wheat in water stress and re-watering during jointing stage in North China,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 37–40, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Lefi, H. Medrano, and J. Cifre, “Water uptake dynamics, photosynthesis and water use efficiency in field-grown Medicago arborea and Medicago citrina under prolonged Mediterranean drought conditions,” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cheng, F. Zhang, and S. Chai, “Stomatal response of spring wheat and related affecting factors under different irrigation treatments,” Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Ehleringer and C. S. Cook, “Carbon and oxygen isotope ratios of ecosystem respiration along an Oregon conifer transect: preliminary observations based on small-flask sampling,” Tree Physiology, vol. 18, no. 8-9, pp. 513–519, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Salvucci and S. J. Crafts-Brandner, “Inhibition of photosynthesis by heat stress: the activation state of Rubisco as a limiting factor in photosynthesis,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Thompson, M. Gallardo, L. C. Valdez, and M. D. Fernández, “Using plant water status to define threshold values for irrigation management of vegetable crops using soil moisture sensors,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 88, no. 1-3, pp. 147–158, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Qiu Xinqiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

628

Downloads

880

Citations