Elsevier

Fisheries Research

Volume 236, April 2021, 105848
Fisheries Research

Estimates of availability and catchability for select rockfish species based on acoustic-optic surveys in the Gulf of Alaska

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105848Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Surveyed trawlable and untrawlable Gulf of Alaska bottom trawl survey grid cells.

  • Acoustic and lowered stereo camera tools utilized.

  • Catchabilty (q) calculated based on grid cell designations and camera trawlability estimates.

  • Rockfish species availability and catchability compared between trawlability types.

  • q = 0.46-harlequin rockfish, 0.50-northern rockfish, 0.64-dusky rockfish, 1.15-Pacfic ocean perch.

Abstract

Fishery-independent surveys, such as bottom trawl surveys, provide time-series abundance estimates, which inform many modern stock assessments. Area-swept biomass estimates from trawl surveys assume that fish densities do not differ between trawlable (T) and untrawlable (UT) areas. Bias and imprecision in the biomass estimates can occur when this assumption is not met. Thus, reliable estimates are needed for both the extent of T and UT habitat types in the surveyed area, and the relative densities of the fish species in the two habitat types to accurately assess groundfish populations. Acoustics and stereo-camera survey tools were used in the present study to determine the extent of T and UT habitat within 25-km2 bottom trawl survey grid cells historically designated as T/UT. Splitbeam acoustics were used to compare the abundance of rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) between the T/UT grid cell areas. Acoustic data were collected along uniformly spaced transects within 52 T and 43 UT grid cells throughout the Gulf of Alaska during summers 2013, 2015, and 2017. The acoustic backscatter attributed to rockfishes in UT grid cells was approximately three times that in T cells, and the percentages available to the bottom trawl survey were 40 % for harlequin rockfish, 43 % for northern rockfish, 51 % for dusky rockfish, and 98 % for Pacific ocean perch (POP). These findings allowed for estimation of the trawl catchability coefficient (q; a scaler between estimates of the area-swept survey abundance and actual abundance) of 0.46 for harlequin rockfish, 0.50 for northern rockfish, and 0.64 for dusky rockfish, and 1.15 for POP. These values could be used to inform the relationship between trawl survey estimated and actual abundances of rockfishes to improve the accuracy of stock assessments for these species.

Introduction

Statistical catch-at-age assessments of marine fishes are the backbone of modern fishery stock assessments (Hilborn, 1992; Quinn and Deriso, 1999; Deriso, 1980). These assessments typically rely on fisheries-independent time series of stock biomass from sources such as standard bottom trawl surveys (von Szalay and Raring, 2016), acoustic-trawl surveys (Stienessen et al., 2017), longline surveys (Sigler, 2000), and/or underwater camera surveys (O’Connell and Carlile, 1993; Yoklavich et al., 2000). For some species such as rockfishes, which can be difficult to age, biomass estimates from fisheries-independent surveys can be used directly to set total allowable catch using methodologies such as Kalman filters (Spencer and Ianelli, 2005) or multi-year running averages (NPFMC, 2017). Stock assessments are thus largely dependent on unbiased estimates of stock size from fisheries-independent surveys.

For fisheries-independent surveys, the estimated abundance is a function of the catchability (q) of the trawl survey, which scales the area-swept survey estimates to population abundance. Catchability for a species and gear is composed of two primary components, the effectiveness of the gear in capturing the species (i.e., species vulnerability to capture) and the species availability in terms of the survey area and in relation to the gear (Arreguín-Sánchez, 1996; Cordue, 2007; Somerton et al., 1999). When components of the catchability coefficient are uncertain, error may be introduced into the assessment to bias resulting population estimates. Gear effectiveness could be related to length (age) selectivity based on such factors as gear mesh size, and could also be related to behavioral responses of the species to the gear such as herding or diving. The availability component of catchability is the probability of the fishing gear encountering individuals in the population (Marr, 1951). If a population is not uniformly distributed in time and space, or a fraction of the population is in habitat that is inaccessible to the sampling gear, a constant value or prior distribution on q based on auxiliary information is informative to account for availability, and thus catchability, of individuals of a species.

Population assessments for fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) rely heavily on the biennial bottom trawl survey conducted by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC). The bottom trawl survey routinely encounters areas deemed untrawlable due to high vertical relief. Many fish species, especially rockfishes, associate with, and find refuge in, high-relief substrate, where bottom trawl surveys are ineffective (O’Connell and Carlile, 1993; Yoklavich et al., 2000; Zimmermann, 2003). Abundance of many rockfishes can vary considerably between trawlable and untrawlable areas (Jagielo et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2012; Krieger and Sigler, 1996; Rooper et al., 2007, 2010; Stein et al., 1992). Nevertheless, mean estimates of species catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) from locations sampled by the bottom trawl are expanded across the entire survey area, including untrawlable areas, to estimate the population biomass. This extrapolation of abundance from trawlable to untrawlable areas thus represents a substantial source of uncertainty (and potential bias) in absolute survey abundance estimates. Species that inhabit both habitat types to differing degrees should have corrections applied to their catchability coefficient to account for the proportion of the stock that is unavailable to the sampling gear (Cordue, 2007).

Acoustic-trawl surveys can effectively assess pelagic rockfish populations in areas of relatively low relief (Wilkins, 1986; Richards et al., 1991; Stanley et al., 2000; Krieger et al., 2001), to permit water-column estimates of abundance in untrawlable habitat. However, fishes on the seabed or in close proximity to the seabed within the acoustic dead zone will be largely undetected (Ona and Mitson, 1996), particularly in areas where the bottom terrain is rough or variable (Demer et al., 2009). In areas of high topographical relief, where abundance estimates are not possible near the seabed using acoustics and trawling, stereo camera surveys can provide information on species composition and abundance (Jones et al., 2012; Rooper et al., 2010).

The primary objective of this study was to use a combination of acoustic backscatter measurements and underwater imaging to improve estimates of availability of four rockfish species in the GOA; Pacific ocean perch (POP; Sebastes alutus), northern rockfish (S. polyspinis), dusky rockfish (S. variabilis), and harlequin rockfish (S. variegatus) to the NMFS GOA bottom trawl survey. This objective was accomplished by conducting acoustic surveys and deploying a lowered stereo camera (LSC) in grid cells designated as trawlable or untrawlable to determine substrate trawlability and fish species abundance. These data were used to develop estimates of density in the different habitat types and ultimately determine the availability, and thus catchability, of specific rockfish species to a survey bottom trawl.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was conducted across the GOA shelf during the biennial GOA acoustic-trawl surveys that took place June 8 - Aug. 9, 2013 (Jones et al., 2014), June 11 - Aug. 16, 2015 (Jones et al., 2017), and June 12 - Aug. 14, 2017 (Jones et al., 2019). All of the surveys were conducted aboard the NOAA ship, Oscar Dyson. At the completion of daily survey activities, sampling areas were selected from nearby “trawlable” or “untrawlable” grid cells as designated by the AFSC GOA bottom trawl survey

Results

A total of 110 BTS grid cells were surveyed in all years combined, of which 52 were designated as T, 43 were designated as UT, and 15 were not yet classified as T or UT (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). A total of 228 lowered stereo camera deployments were conducted (Supplemental Table 1). The majority of grid cells (82 %) had at least two camera deployments completed within them. LSC images were not collected within 6 acoustically surveyed grid cells due to connectivity issues or weather

Discussion

Trawlability designation of an area is determined by the scale at which it is evaluated. The AFSC bottom trawl survey determines trawlability based on topography and whether or not a 15-minute bottom trawl haul at 3.0 knots can be successfully placed in any portion of a 25 km2 grid cell. This means that each trawlable grid cell could potentially have some portion of untrawlable habitat contained within it and vice-versa. In contrast, the determination of trawlability using the LSC was based on

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Darin T. Jones: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Christopher N. Rooper: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Resources, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Christopher D. Wilson: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Paul D. Spencer: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Dana H. Hanselman: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Rachel E. Wilborn:

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center and Essential Fish Habitat project #2015-07. We thank Pete Hulson, Cindy Tribuzio, Curry Cunningham, and Kresimir Williams for suggestions and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Rick Towler and Kresimir Williams for design and expertise in stereo camera and analysis software development and construction. The constructive comments and suggestions provided by anonymous reviewers and the Editor are greatly appreciated.

References (52)

  • D.A. Demer et al.

    A statistical-spectral method for echo classification

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2009)
  • R.B. Deriso

    Harvesting strategies and parameter estimation for an age-structured model

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1980)
  • K.H. Fenske et al.

    Assessment of the Dusky Rockfish Stock in the Gulf of Alaska. In Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Resources of the Gulf of Alaska, Chapter 12

    (2018)
  • K.G. Foote et al.

    Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide

    ICES Coop. Res. Rep

    (1987)
  • R. Hilborn

    Current and future trends in fisheries stock assessment and management

    S. Afr. J. Marine Sci.

    (1992)
  • P.J.F. Hulson et al.

    Assessment of the Pacific Ocean Perch Stock in the Gulf of Alaska. In Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Resources of the Gulf of Alaska

    (2017)
  • T. Jagielo et al.

    Demersal groundfish densities in trawlable and untrawlable habitats off Washington: implications for estimation of the trawl survey habitat bias

    Fish. Bull., U.S.

    (2003)
  • D.T. Jones et al.

    Statistical combination of multifrequency sounder-detected bottom lines reduces bottom integrations

    U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo

    (2011)
  • D.T. Jones et al.

    Evaluation of rockfish abundance in untrawlable habitat: combining acoustic and complementary sampling tools

    Fish. Bull., U.S.

    (2012)
  • D.T. Jones et al.

    Results of the Acoustic-trawl Survey of Walleye Pollock (Gadus Chalcogrammus) in the Gulf of Alaska, June-august 2013 (DY2013-07). AFSC Processed Rep. 2014-06, 95 P

    (2014)
  • D.T. Jones et al.

    Results of the Acoustic-trawl Survey of Walleye Pollock (Gadus Chalcogrammus) in the Gulf of Alaska, June-august 2015 (DY2015-06). AFSC Processed Rep. 2017-03, 102 P

    (2017)
  • D.T. Jones et al.

    Results of the Acoustic Trawl Survey of Walleye Pollock (Gadus Chalcogrammus) in the Gulf of Alaska, June August 2017 (DY2017-06), AFSC Processed Rep. 2019- 08, 110 P

    (2019)
  • K.J. Krieger

    Distribution and abundance of rockfish determined from a submersible and by bottom trawling

    Fish. Bull., U.S.

    (1993)
  • J.K. Krieger et al.

    Catchability coefficient for rockfish estimated from trawl and submersible surveys

    Fish. Bull., U.S.

    (1996)
  • K. Krieger et al.

    Rockfish assessed acoustically and compared to bottom-trawl catch rates

    Alaska Fish. Res. Bull.

    (2001)
  • D.N. MacLennan et al.

    A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada V9T 6N7.

    View full text