Elsevier

Journal of Neuroimmunology

Volume 351, 15 February 2021, 577471
Journal of Neuroimmunology

Long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes of anti-GABABR encephalitis patients: A prospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2020.577471Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Most patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis had residual cognitive deficits and NPSes.

  • Cognitive deficits occurred in memory, executive function and nonverbal reasoning.

  • Age of disease onset ≥45 years was a risk factor for long-term cognitive deficits.

Abstract

Long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes of anti-gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (anti-GABABR) encephalitis are unclear. In this prospective study, 31 patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis were underwent cognitive and neuropsychiatric evaluations every 6 months. At 24 months' follow-up, cognitive impairments were observed in 80% of patients that mainly included deficits in memory, executive functions and nonverbal reasoning; and neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in 50% of patients that mainly included depressive symptoms and irritation. The risk factors associated with cognitive deficits was age > 45 years. This study demonstrated that most patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis had persistent cognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Introduction

Anti-gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (anti-GABABR) encephalitis, which was first described by Lancaster et al. in 2010, is a rare type of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) (Lancaster et al., 2010). Different types of AE have different clinical characteristics and prognoses (Yao et al., 2019). Compared to other types of AE, patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis have a poorer long-term functional prognosis (Yao et al., 2019). Previous studies showed that the fatality rate of anti-GABABR encephalitis (22–45%) (van Coevorden-Hameete et al., 2019; Guan et al., 2015; Hoftberger et al., 2013; Lancaster et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2019; Maureille et al., 2019; Onugoren et al., 2015) was significantly higher than that of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein-1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis (6–19%) (Arino et al., 2016; Lai et al., 2010; van Sonderen et al., 2016) and anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis (2–11%) (Chi et al., 2017; Titulaer et al., 2013a; Titulaer et al., 2013b; Xu et al., 2020). Several studies reported prolonged cognitive impairments and neuropsychiatric problems in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis anti-LGI1 encephalitis (Arino et al., 2016; de Bruijn et al., 2018; Finke et al., 2012; van Sonderen et al., 2016). However, it is unclear whether anti-GABABR encephalitis shares these features.

GABAB receptors are G-protein-coupled receptors that are composed of GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits (Enna and Bowery, n.d.). GABAB receptors are mainly distributed in the hippocampus, frontal cortex, thalamus and cerebellum. It has been reported that GABABR dysfunction is associated with spontaneous seizures, memory impairment, executive dysfunction, learning impairments, depression and anxiety (Gassmann et al., 2004; Kitamura et al., 2009; Sibbe and Kulik, 2017; Wang et al., 2013). Although several reports suggest that cognitive impairments (67%–100% of patients previously reported) and psychiatric behavior changes (61%–100% of patients previously reported) almost always occur at disease onset, long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric recovery are poorly understood (Guan et al., 2015; Lancaster et al., 2010; Maureille et al., 2019). Furthermore, prospective studies on long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes are still lacking. Here, for the first time, we performed a prospective follow-up study to evaluate the long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes in a series of Chinese patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis and to identify the potential factors affecting cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes.

Section snippets

Patients

We prospectively analyzed patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis from the inpatient clinic of the Department of Neurology, West China Hospital between June 2013 and December 2019. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria (Graus et al., 2016): (1) patients with a subacute onset (rapid progression of less than 3 months) of working memory deficits, seizures or psychiatric symptoms; (2) patients in whom GABABR antibodies were confirmed to be present in cerebrospinal fluid

Demographic and clinical manifestation

Altogether, 39 patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis were screened and 31 patients were included and continued a follow-up with a median follow-up duration of 18 months (range: 6–63 months; Supplementary Fig. 1). The demographic clinical characteristics were summarized in Table 1 and the detailed clinical and laboratory characteristics for each case were shown in Supplementary Table 2. Nineteen of 31 (61.3%) patients were male. The median age at onset of disease was 52 years (range:

Discussion

The present study is the first to prospectively investigate the long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes of anti-GABABR encephalitis in Han Chinese individuals. Several major advances have been made in this investigation: (1) Although prolonged cognitive deficits and NPSes improved over time, most patients in this cohort presented residual cognitive deficits and NPSes during the long-term follow-up. (2) Cognitive domains that were most affected included working memory, visual memory,

Conclusions

Overall, this study, for the first time, prospectively revealed that patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis may have persistent cognitive impairments and NPSes after clinical recovery. Impairments in the cognitive domain of working memory, visual memory, executive functioning and nonverbal reasoning may be predominant in these patients. Thus, the investigation, assessment and intervention of neuropsychological sequelae are critical for individuals with anti-GABABR encephalitis.

Author contributions

J. Lin and Li. C collected data and drafted the manuscript. A. Li, X. Liu, C. Chen and X. Gong carried out the statistical analysis and interpreted the data. D. Zhou revised the manuscript. Z. Hong conceptualized and designed the study and revised the manuscript.

Study funding

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81971213 and 81671291) and National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1312300).

Disclosure

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all participants for their participation in our study.

References (39)

  • M. de Bruijn et al.

    Long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis

    Neurology

    (2018)
  • X.P. Chen et al.

    Encephalitis with antibodies against the GABA(B) receptor: seizures as the most common presentation at admission

    Neurol. Res.

    (2017)
  • X. Chi et al.

    Risk factors for mortality in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis

    Acta Neurol. Scand.

    (2017)
  • M.H. van Coevorden-Hameete et al.

    The expanded clinical spectrum of anti-GABA(B)R encephalitis and added value of KCTD16 autoantibodies

    Brain

    (2019)
  • M. de Bruijn et al.

    Long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis

    Neurology

    (2018)
  • Enna SJ, Bowery NG. GABA(B) receptor alterations as indicators of physiological and pharmacological function. DOI:...
  • C. Finke et al.

    Cognitive deficits following anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • C. Finke et al.

    Functional and structural brain changes in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2013)
  • C. Finke et al.

    Evaluation of cognitive deficits and structural hippocampal damage in encephalitis with leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated 1 antibodies

    JAMA Neurol.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Psychiatric manifestations of autoimmune encephalitis

      2022, Autoimmunity Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prominent psychiatric features with paranoia, delusions and hallucinations are atypical and may indicate presence of an additional antibody (i.e. NMDAR, onconeuronal antibodies) leading to an altered clinical phenotype [72,73]. Mood disturbances and anxiety usually develop later in the disease course with up to two thirds of patients experiencing depression and/or anxiety at two years [74,75]. Cognitive deficits gradually improve with immunotherapy however responses are often incomplete.

    • Rare antibody-mediated and seronegative autoimmune encephalitis: An update

      2022, Autoimmunity Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neurological outcomes however, do not appear to differ in paraneoplastic or idiopathic cases [12]. Other predictors of mortality have included patient older age, and increasing number of neurologic complications [44], whilst a poorer prognosis has been associated with older age, delay to immunotherapy and the presence of respiratory failure in various studies [41,43]. Anti-KCTD16 antibodies are associated with presence of underlying tumour, higher CSF anti-GABABR antibody titres, ICU admissions for SE [12].

    • Executive deficits in neuropsychological testing differentiate between autoimmune temporal lobe epilepsy caused by limbic encephalitis and temporal lobe epilepsies with non-autoimmune etiologies

      2021, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, it is unsurprising that AI-TLE is also primarily related to episodic long-term memory dysfunctions [3–4,8–9]. However, besides these expected memory impairments, some studies [10–11] have additionally identified deficits in attentional and executive functions in patients with AI-TLE, usually related to extra-temporal brain networks. As patients with AI-TLE clinically resemble patients with NAI-TLE, but with a different prognosis and requiring specific adjusted therapies, their adequate differentiation is essential [2,12].

    • Outcome and Sequelae of Autoimmune Encephalitis

      2024, Journal of Clinical Neurology (Korea)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors have contributed equally to the manuscript.

    View full text