Abstract
Theoretical models predict the existence of an island of stability at the proton shell closures Z = 114 or 120 or 126 and at the neutron shell closure N = 184 due to the microscopic shell effects. In this article, mass distributions of fragments from ternary fission of superheavy nuclei are investigated with the aid of the statistical theory. We have computed the fission mass distributions for the simultaneous decay into three fragments of nuclei 298Fl, \(^{304}_{120}\)X and \(^{310}_{126} \)X, at the two excitation energies E∗ = 20 and 50 MeV, with the constraint on one of the fragment to be 50Ca and 72Ni. With the fixed third fragments of mass number A3 = 50, 72, asymmetric breakup (A1 ≠ A2) has a larger ternary fission yield for Z = 114, 120 and 126 isotopes. Predominantly, one of the fragments with the neutron closed-shell nucleus (N ≈ 82, 50) is favoured at higher excitation energies. Subsequently, we have considered the ternary fragmentation of the neutron-rich superheavy elements \(^{314}_{120}\)X and \(^{320}_{126} \)X again for the same excitation energies and fixed third fragment. Interestingly, for the superheavy nucleus \(^{314}_{120}\)X, symmetric fission (A1 ≈ A2) with doubly closed-shell nuclei 132Sn for the third fragment 50Ca is favoured at higher E∗. For the isotope \(^{320}_{126} \)X, relative yields of fragments with closed shell increase at higher excitation energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S.A. Giuliani, Z. Matheson, W. Nazarewicz, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 011001 (2019)
W. Nazarewicz, Nat. Phys. 14, 537 (2018)
V. Viola, G. Seaborg, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 741 (1966)
Y.K. Gambhir, A. Bhagwat, M. Gupta, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 42, 125105 (2015)
W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966)
S.G. Nilsson, C.F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 131, 1 (1969)
A. Sobiczewski, F. Gareev, B. Kalinkin, Phys. Lett. 22, 500 (1966)
A.V. Afanasjev, T.L. Khoo, S. Frauendorf, G.A. Lalazissis, I. Ahmad, Phys. Rev. C. 67, 024309 (2003)
A. V. Afanasjev, Phys. Scr. T125, 62 (2006)
M. Bender, K. Rutz, P.-G. Reinhard, J.A. Maruhn, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C. 60, 034304 (1999)
S. Ćwiok, J. Dobaczewski, P.-H. Heenen, P. Magierski, W. Nazarewicz, Nucl. Phys. A. 611, 211 (1996)
A.T. Kruppa, M. Bender, W. Nazarewicz, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 61, 034313 (2000)
K. Rutz, M. Bender, T. Bürvenich, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 56, 238 (1997)
S. Hofmann, G. Münzenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000)
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, Y.V. Lobanov, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A. 15, 201 (2002)
Y.T. Oganessian, V.K. Utyonkov, Y.V. Lobanov, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 74, 044602 (2006)
M.G. Itkis, Y.T. Oganessian, V.I. Zagrebaev, Phys. Rev. C. 65, 044602 (2002)
P. Armbruster, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35, 135 (1985)
G. Münzenberg, Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 57 (1988)
P. Armbruster, Y.K. Agarwal, W. Brüchle, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 406 (1985)
Y.T. Oganessian, A.V. Yeremin, A.G. Popeko, et al., Nature. 400, 242 (1999)
E. Vardaci, M.G. Itkis, I.M. Itkis, G. Knyazheva, E.M. Kozulin, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. 46, 103002 (2019)
R.L. Fleischer, P.B. Price, R.M. Walker, E.L. Hubbard, Phys. Rev. 143, 943 (1966)
H. Becker, P. Vater, R. Brandt, A. Boos, H. Diehl, Phys. Lett. B. 50, 445 (1974)
W.J. Swiatecki, in . Second UN International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva (Pergamon Press, London, 1960), p. 1958
H. Diehl, W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B. 45, 35 (1973)
H. Schultheis, R. Schultheis, Phys. Lett. B. 49, 423 (1974)
H. Schultheis, R. Schultheis, Phys. Rev. C. 15, 1601 (1977)
H. Schultheis, R. Schultheis, Phys. Lett. B. 58, 384 (1975)
K. Manimaran, M. Balasubramaniam, Eur. Phys. Jour. A. 45, 293 (2010)
M. Balasubramaniam, K.R. Vijayaraghavan, K. Manimaran, Phys. Rev. C. 93, 014601 (2016)
A.K. Nasirov, W. von Oertzen, A.I. Muminov, R.B. Tashkhodjaev, Phys. Scr. 89, 054022 (2014)
M. Rajasekaran, V. Devanathan, Phys. Rev. C. 24, 2606 (1981)
M. Balasubramaniam, C. Karthikraj, S. Selvaraj, N. Arunachalam, Phys. Rev. C. 90, 054611 (2014)
M.T. Senthil Kannan, B. Kumar, M. Balasubramaniam, B.K. Agrawal, S.K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C. 95, 064613 (2017)
C. Karthikraj, S. Subramanian, S. Selvaraj, Eur. Phys. J. A. 52, 173 (2016)
V.I. Zagrebaev, A.V. Karpov, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C. 81, 044608 (2010)
M.T. Senthil Kannan, M. Balasubramaniam, Eur. Phys. J. A. 53, 164 (2017)
P. Fong, Phys. Rev. 102, 434 (1956)
H.A. Bethe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 69 (1937)
T. Ericson, Adv. Phys. 9, 425 (1960)
A. Bohr, B. Mottelson, Vol. I. Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1969)
V.S. Ramamurthy, S.S. Kapoor, S.K. Kataria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 386 (1970)
J.R. Huizenga, L.G. Moretto, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 22, 427 (1972)
P. Möller, J. Nix, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. 39, 213 (1988)
Y.V. Pyatkov, D.V. Kamanin, W. von Oertzen, et al., Eur. Phys. Jour. A. 45, 29 (2010)
Y.V. Pyatkov, D.V. Kamanin, W. von Oertzen, et al., Eur. Phys. Jour. A. 48, 94 (2012)
A.V. Karpov, Phys. Rev. C. 94, 064615 (2016)
K.-H. Schmidt, A. Kelić, M.V. Ricciardi, Eur. Phys. Lett. 83, 32001 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
V. O. Chidambaram College and The M. D. T. Hindu College are affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subramanian, S., Kannan, M.T.S. & Selvaraj, S. Ternary Fission Mass Distributions of Superheavy Nuclei Within a Statistical Model. Braz J Phys 51, 136–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-020-00812-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-020-00812-4