Layer detection algorithm for CALIPSO observation based on automatic segmentation with a minimum cost function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107498Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A layer detection algorithm is proposed based on automatic segmentation.

  • We determine most of the cloud and aerosol layers at 1 and 5 km resolutions.

  • The layer we detected is 170 m thicker than the CALIPSO product.

Abstract

CALIPSO (cloud-aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observation) provides unique opportunities for profiling global cloud and aerosol. It is crucial to accurately detect the boundaries of cloud and aerosol layers from CALIPSO observation because the detecting error will be passed to further retrieval. Considered superior to other layer detection methods, the threshold method is the core of the selective iterated boundary location (SIBYL) algorithm developed for producing the CALIPSO official products. However, the threshold method can miss many tenuous layers, and the use of the slope method to refine the layer base in SIBYL leads to considerable uncertainty due to its high sensitivity to noise. This study proposed a new layer detection algorithm based on an automatic segmentation method with a minimum cost function. Results show that the new algorithm determines 21% and 13% more layers than SIBYL at 1 km and 1-5 km resolution, respectively, which indicates that the new algorithm has higher detection efficiency. Moreover, the layers detected by the new algorithm are 170 m thicker than that detected by SIBYL on average, which indicates that the SIBYL misses layer edges where the signal to noise ratio is low. The new algorithm can improve the accuracy and resolution of the layer products of CALIPSO as well as other space-based lidars.

Introduction

Cloud and aerosol layers play an essential role in local weather and global climate change, but the accurate estimation of their impacts is still challenging [1]. Accurate 3D observation of clouds and aerosols is critical to assess their meteorological and climatic impact and feedback [2,3]. Passive satellites are commonly used to capture global cloud and aerosol information. However, thin optical layers often failed to be detected [4], and the cloud base and top heights are difficult to be accurately measured [5]. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) sensor onboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite is a unique active remote sensor that provides global clouds and aerosols profiles with high vertical resolutions [6], [7], [8]. However, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of CALIPSO is very low due to the effects of the long detecting range and intense solar light in the daytime. Thus, it is still a challenge to accurately detect cloud and aerosol boundaries from CALIPSO observation. If this problem remains unresolved, the detecting error will be passed to further retrieval [9].

At present, many methods have been developed for layer detection, including the slope method [10], the wavelet method [11], the simple multi-scale method [12], and the threshold method [13,14], etc. The slope method identifies the layer based on the signal slope, which can be directly applied to un-calibrated raw data. However, when the slope oscillates to zero, layer detection would be difficult. The wavelet method identifies discontinuous signal points by continuous wavelet transform, which is insensitive to noise. However, the local modulus maxima of the wavelet correspond to the fastest-changing bins, which are not precise layer boundaries because changes near the boundaries are usually slow. The simple multi-scale method identifies the layer boundaries by determining the trend index of the signal [12]. The method is relatively insensitive to noise but cause bias due to missing attenuation losses within a layer. The threshold algorithm determines a layer top when the signal is continually larger than the threshold, which is considered relatively superior to the others, thus used as the core method of the selective iterated boundary location (SIBYL) algorithm developed for producing the CALIPSO official products [15].

However, many studies reported that the CALIPSO AOD was substantially underestimated due to missing layers compared with various observations [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. For instance, Rogers et al. compared CALIPSO AOD with NASA's airborne high spectral resolution lidar and found that the undetected aerosols in the free troposphere introduced a mean underestimate of 0.02 in the CALIPSO AOD of the nighttime dataset examined [21]. Omar et al. found that CALIPSO AOD was smaller than AERONET AOD over ocean and land [22]. Kim retrieved aerosol extinction for the undetected aerosol layers and found a global mean undetected layer AOD of 0.031 [23]. Toth et al. found that the mean AOD at 550 nm of MODIS and AERONET were approximately 0.06 and 0.08, respectively, for the CALIOP profiles with no aerosols detected [24]. Thus, a more accurate and robust layer detection algorithm should be developed to improve CALIPSO retrievals and serve scientific applications.

In this study, a signal segmentation method based on a minimum cost function is proposed to determine layer boundaries. This algorithm can adapt to the general variation trend of signals, instead of being limited only to local variation. As a result, the accuracy and the resolution of the layer products of CALIPSO are effectively improved.

Section snippets

Attenuated scattering ratios

CALIPSO measures backscatter signals at 532 and 1064 nm. The total attenuation backscatter coefficient at 532 nm provided in the level 1 product is usually used in layer detection since it is more sensitive to small aerosol particles than 1064 nm [15,25]. The attenuation backscatter coefficient is a nonlinear function with the detection range, usually converted to an attenuated scatter ratio (ASR) profile for layer detection to ensure a linear and clear signal structure [26]. The ASR can be

Single profile detection

The performance of the proposed algorithm and the SIBYL at the profile level is shown in Fig. 2. After removing the strong signals (grey dashed line in Fig. 2(a)) by referring to the threshold array, segmentation is performed with a minimum cost function. The segments can accurately represent the shape of the remaining signals, as shown by the red line in Fig. 2(a). Layer-base height is often overestimated by the SIBYL when the signal was drastically attenuated by a strong layer, such as the

Conclusion

In this study, we proposed a layer detection algorithm based on automatic segmentation with minimum cost function to improve the accuracy and resolution of the layer product of CALIPSO. The results of the case and statistical analyses demonstrate that the proposed algorithm has advantages in layer detection in the following three aspects:

  • (1)

    The signal segmentation method with minimum cost function can capture the variation of the statistical characteristics of signals, which helps locate the top

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Feiyue Mao: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - review & editing. Mengdi Zhao: Data curation, Software, Writing - original draft. Wei Gong: Investigation, Resources, Writing - review & editing. Liuzhu Chen: Software, Validation. Zhenxing Liang: Software, Validation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41627804, 41971285, and 41701381) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042019kf0192 and 2042020kf0216). The CALIPSO data was obtained from the NASA Langley Research Centre and Atmospheric Sciences Data Centre (eosweb.larc.nasa.gov). We thank Dr. Jia Sun and Dr. Jia Hong for linguistic assistance during the revision of this manuscript.

References (43)

  • X. Ma

    Ten-year global particulate mass concentration derived from space-borne CALIPSO lidar observations

    Sci Total Environ

    (2020)
  • A. Kumar

    Evaluation and utilization of MODIS and CALIPSO aerosol retrievals over a complex terrain in Himalaya

    Remote Sens Environ

    (2018)
  • S. Solomon

    Climate change the physical science basis

  • Y.J. Kaufman et al.

    A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system

    Nature

    (2002)
  • D. Winker

    The CALIPSO mission: a global 3D view of aerosols and clouds

    Bull Am Meteorol Soc

    (2010)
  • K. Sassen et al.

    Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations (CALIPSO) measurements

    J Geophys Res

    (2008)
  • E.E. Clothiaux

    Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the ARM CART sites

    J Appl Meteorol

    (2000)
  • Z. Liu

    The CALIPSO lidar cloud and aerosol discrimination: version 2 algorithm and initial assessment of performance

    J Atmos Ocean Technol

    (2009)
  • Z. Huang

    Investigation of aerosol absorption with dual-polarization lidar observations

    Opt Express

    (2020)
  • G. Stephens

    CloudSat and CALIPSO within the a-train: ten years of actively observing the Earth system

    Bull Am Meteorol Soc

    (2018)
  • S.R. Pal et al.

    Automated method for lidar determination of cloud-base height and vertical extent

    Appl Opt

    (1992)
  • Y. Morille

    STRAT: an automated algorithm to retrieve the vertical structure of the atmosphere from single-channel lidar data

    J Atmos Ocean Technol

    (2007)
  • M. Feiyue et al.

    Simple multi-scale algorithm for layer detection with lidar

    Appl Opt

    (2011)
  • M.A. Vaughan

    Fully automated detection of cloud and aerosol layers in the CALIPSO lidar measurements

    J Atmos Ocean Technol

    (2008)
  • W.H. Hunt et al.

    CALIPSO lidar description and performance assessment

    J Atmos Ocean Technol

    (2009)
  • M. Kacenelenbogen

    An evaluation of CALIOP/CALIPSO's aerosol-above-cloud detection and retrieval capability over North America

    J Geophys Res

    (2014)
  • M.H. Kim

    Comparison of aerosol optical depth between CALIOP and MODIS-Aqua for CALIOP aerosol subtypes over the ocean

    J Geophys Res Atmos

    (2013)
  • J. Redemann

    The comparison of MODIS-Aqua (C5) and CALIOP (V2 & V3) aerosol optical depth

    Atmos Chem Phys

    (2012)
  • G.L. Schuster

    Comparison of CALIPSO aerosol optical depth retrievals to AERONET measurements, and a climatology for the lidar ratio of dust

    Atmos Chem Phys

    (2012)
  • T.J. Thorsen

    The impact of lidar detection sensitivity on assessing aerosol direct radiative effects

    Geophys Res Lett

    (2017)
  • R.R. Rogers

    Looking through the haze: evaluating the CALIPSO level 2 aerosol optical depth using airborne high spectral resolution lidar data

    Atmos Meas Tech

    (2014)
  • Cited by (5)

    • A simple multiscale layer detection algorithm for CALIPSO measurements

      2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Vaillant de Guélis et al. (2021) and Hagihara et al. (2010b) proposed advanced two-dimensional detection methods, which are applied to a 2D lidar scene instead of a 1D lidar profile, but still relied on the threshold array. Mao et al. (2021) proposed a detection method based on automatic segmentation with a minimum cost function, as an improvement of the SIBYL, which also requires the threshold array. It is necessary to consider a new detection method that is insensitive to noise and independent of the threshold array, while yielding complete and accurate layer information at a high resolution of 1 or 5 km.

    View full text