Investigating the seismic isolation effect of the cushioned pile raft foundation in soft clay through dynamic centrifuge tests

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106554Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Centrifuge tests were performed for the seismic isolation effect of Cushioned-PR on earthquake.

  • The isolation effect of Cushioned-PR becomes significant with the increase in the magnitude of the earthquake load.

  • The interposed layer has a significant impact on the propagation of inertial loading and interaction between soil and piles.

  • The nonlinear performance and the isolation effect mechanism of Cushioned-PR are investigated.

Abstract

Cushioned pile-raft foundation (Cushioned-PR) is a new type of foundation for sea-crossing bridges in deep water (more than 50 m in depth). Cushioned-PR is able to tolerate a certain amount of slide that occurs between the raft and the piles under strong earthquakes. This characteristic could reduce the seismic motion transmitted to the superstructure to maintain the integrity of the bridge. Thus, Cushioned-PR has become popular for bridges under the threat of strong earthquakes. However, the dynamic responses of the Cushioned-PR under various earthquake intensities in soft clay have not been thoroughly understood. It is essential to better evaluate the isolation effect of Cushioned-PR to improve the design. In this study, the non-linear behavior of Cushioned-PR and the isolation effect of its interposed layer are evaluated using centrifuge tests. A series of dynamic centrifuge tests are performed with a 3 × 3 pile group foundation embedded in soft clay under different earthquake motions. Both the cushioned pile raft foundation system (Cushioned-PR) and the connected pile raft foundation system (Connected-PR) are tested in the centrifuge tests. Acceleration and residual displacement of the super-structure, and bending moment of columns and piles, are monitored during the experiments. The results show that the interposed layer in Cushioned-PR has a significant impact on the bending moment and residual displacement of the pile-raft system. Based on the observation from this study, the maximum bending moment of the column in the Cushioned-PR is around 28%–54% of the values from the Connected-PR. On the other side, the maximum horizontal displacement of Cushioned-PR is about 2–10 times larger than that of the Connected-PR. The results show that Cushioned-PR can effectively reduce the seismic excitation transmitted to the super-structure if the seismic intensity is high. However, the benefit of Cushioned-PR is marginal under low-intensity earthquakes.

Introduction

With great demands of transportation infrastructure due to economic growth, many bridges are under construction or planning, especially those wide crossing rivers or seas [21]. Generally, the connected pile raft foundation (Connected-PR) is recognized as an economical and sustainable foundation form and is widely used due to its promising performance [8], [11], [16], [20], [25], [28], [36], [37], [39]. This is because piles below the raft foundation can reduce settlement, which not only solves the problem of bearing deformation but also improves the stability and serviceability of a bridge [22]. Analytical methods have been proposed to calculate the bearing capacity and deformation of Connected-PR [6,28,40]. Further, centrifuge testing is performed to study the response of Connected-PR under pseudo-static and dynamic loading conditions [24]. The behavior of Connected-PR has been well documented. Although Connected-PR is a good solution in many cases, it has very limited tolerance of deformation. If the deformation exceeds a certain limit, Connected-PR could lead to catastrophic failure, for example, the accident of the Kobe line of Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake [31].

In the seismic zones, earthquake is the major natural hazard leading to structural damage [2,4,12], where Connected-PR may not always be the best choice. A new foundation type has been proposed to overcome the deficiency of Connected-PR [7,35,45], whose piles are disconnected from the raft, namely the cushioned pile raft foundation system (Cushioned-PR). For Cushioned-PR, a cushion, typically a layer of granular materials, is located between the piles and the raft. The cushion can also be referred as the interposed layer. When a bridge with Cushioned-PR encounter an earthquake, the cushion is able to tolerate a certain amount of slide occurring between the raft and the piles under strong earthquakes. This way, Cushioned-PR can effectively reduce the seismic motion transmitted to the super-structure to maintain the integrity of the bridge [15,17,41].

Cushioned-PR is firstly applied in the Rion-Antirion bridge and has quickly become popular [23,33,34,45]. There has been a considerable amount of studies focusing on the performance of Cushioned-PR under static loadings. Previous researches suggest that the interposed layer could improve the overall performance and influence the static and dynamic characteristics of foundations [3,14,19,27,38,48]. Also, numerical simulations of the complex interactions between the components (raft, piles, and soil) of Cushioned-PR indicate the connection form of Cushioned-PR benefits the structure stability under dynamic load [43,44,46]. Previous studies have investigated the bearing capacity and settlement behavior of Cushioned-PR. Dynamic responses of Cushioned-PR are also studied by both experimental and numerical approaches [1,17,32]. Unfortunately, the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR, especially Cushioned-PR in soft clay under dynamic loadings, has not been thoroughly understood [18].

This study aims to evaluate the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR and its dynamic responses during seismic excitations in soft clay. A series of centrifuge tests are performed to investigate the dynamic response of both Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR in soft clay under different input motions. Parameters include acceleration, strain, and displacement are quantified and compared between the two types of foundation. The influences of the different peak base acceleration (PBA) and the earthquake waves are also analyzed through the Fourier transform and response-spectrum.

Section snippets

Centrifuge testing system

For centrifuge tests, the gravity field is simulated by increasing the centrifugal acceleration, and the actual problem is simulated by using the scale model [47,49]. In this study, centrifuge tests are performed on the centrifuge device (TLJ-150) in the Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling Laboratory at Tongji University [29], as shown in Fig. 1. This device is able to reach a maximum centrifugal acceleration of 50 g, and a maximum vibration acceleration of 20 g. A customized laminar shear box,

Test results and discussions

In this section, the dynamic responses of Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR are analyzed and compared, including acceleration, bending moment, horizontal displacement, and vertical settlement.

Summary and conclusion

A series of centrifuge tests are conducted to compare the seismic responses of Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR to investigate the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR. The synthetic ACCe100 wave, El-Centro wave, and Mexico City wave are employed to test the two types of foundations, respectively. The peak response acceleration of the super-structure, the natural period, and the natural frequency of the system, the horizontal and vertical displacement of the system, and the bending moment of

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878487). Financial support from these organizations is gratefully acknowledged.

References (51)

  • Y. Zhou et al.

    Zhejiang University benchmark centrifuge test for LEAP-GWU-2015 and liquefaction responses of a sloping ground

    Soil Dynam Earthq Eng

    (2018)
  • J.D. Allmond et al.

    Design considerations for rocking foundations on unattached piles

    J Geotech Geoenviron Eng

    (2014)
  • ASCE/SEI 41 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings

    (2014)
  • A.S. Azizkandi et al.

    Load sharing and carrying mechanism of piles in non-connected pile rafts using a numerical approach

    Int J Civ Eng

    (2019)
  • S. Banerjee et al.

    Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions

    Struct Infrastruct Eng

    (2013)
  • A. Bhaduri et al.

    Serviceability-based finite-element approach on analyzing combined pile–raft foundation

    Int J GeoMech

    (2020)
  • X. Cao et al.

    Behavior of model rafts resting on pile-reinforced sand

    J Geotech Geoenviron Eng

    (2004)
  • P. Clancy et al.

    An approximate analysis procedure for piled raft foundations

    Int J Numer Anal Methods GeoMech

    (1993)
  • C. Cui et al.

    Effect of radial homogeneity on low-strain integrity detection of a pipe pile in a viscoelastic soil layer

    Int J Distributed Sens Netw

    (2018)
  • C. Cui et al.

    Dynamic response of pipe pile embedded in layered visco-elastic media with radial inhomogeneity under vertical excitation

    Geomech Eng

    (2018)
  • R.P. Cunha et al.

    Investigation of design alternatives for a piled raft case history

    J Geotech Geoenviron Eng

    (2001)
  • L. Deng et al.

    Seismic design of rocking shallow foundations: displacement based methodology

    J Bridge Eng

    (2014)
  • M.G. Durante et al.

    Experimental measurements of geotechnical system in 1-g tests[C]//Imeko Tc4 International Symposium & International Workshop on Adc Modelling & Testing Research on Electric & Electronic Measurement for the Economic Upturn

    (2014)
  • V. Fioravante et al.

    Contact versus noncontact piled raft foundations

    Can Geotech J

    (2010)
  • G. Gazetas et al.

    Simple Methods for the Seismic Response of Piles Applied to Soil-Pile-Bridge Interaction. Third International conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics April 2-7

    (1995)
  • Cited by (16)

    • A simplified approach for the response of pile groups composed of dissimilar piles

      2021, Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is difficult to apply the traditional load transfer approach directly to the analysis of the behaviour of pile groups. The pile interactions need to be considered in the analysis of load-settlement behaviour of pile groups [20–28]. The interaction coefficient, defined as the additional settlement at the pile top induced by the loaded neighbouring pile divided by the settlement under self-loading, was originally proposed by Poulos [23] to analyse the behaviour of pile groups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text