Investigating the seismic isolation effect of the cushioned pile raft foundation in soft clay through dynamic centrifuge tests
Introduction
With great demands of transportation infrastructure due to economic growth, many bridges are under construction or planning, especially those wide crossing rivers or seas [21]. Generally, the connected pile raft foundation (Connected-PR) is recognized as an economical and sustainable foundation form and is widely used due to its promising performance [8], [11], [16], [20], [25], [28], [36], [37], [39]. This is because piles below the raft foundation can reduce settlement, which not only solves the problem of bearing deformation but also improves the stability and serviceability of a bridge [22]. Analytical methods have been proposed to calculate the bearing capacity and deformation of Connected-PR [6,28,40]. Further, centrifuge testing is performed to study the response of Connected-PR under pseudo-static and dynamic loading conditions [24]. The behavior of Connected-PR has been well documented. Although Connected-PR is a good solution in many cases, it has very limited tolerance of deformation. If the deformation exceeds a certain limit, Connected-PR could lead to catastrophic failure, for example, the accident of the Kobe line of Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake [31].
In the seismic zones, earthquake is the major natural hazard leading to structural damage [2,4,12], where Connected-PR may not always be the best choice. A new foundation type has been proposed to overcome the deficiency of Connected-PR [7,35,45], whose piles are disconnected from the raft, namely the cushioned pile raft foundation system (Cushioned-PR). For Cushioned-PR, a cushion, typically a layer of granular materials, is located between the piles and the raft. The cushion can also be referred as the interposed layer. When a bridge with Cushioned-PR encounter an earthquake, the cushion is able to tolerate a certain amount of slide occurring between the raft and the piles under strong earthquakes. This way, Cushioned-PR can effectively reduce the seismic motion transmitted to the super-structure to maintain the integrity of the bridge [15,17,41].
Cushioned-PR is firstly applied in the Rion-Antirion bridge and has quickly become popular [23,33,34,45]. There has been a considerable amount of studies focusing on the performance of Cushioned-PR under static loadings. Previous researches suggest that the interposed layer could improve the overall performance and influence the static and dynamic characteristics of foundations [3,14,19,27,38,48]. Also, numerical simulations of the complex interactions between the components (raft, piles, and soil) of Cushioned-PR indicate the connection form of Cushioned-PR benefits the structure stability under dynamic load [43,44,46]. Previous studies have investigated the bearing capacity and settlement behavior of Cushioned-PR. Dynamic responses of Cushioned-PR are also studied by both experimental and numerical approaches [1,17,32]. Unfortunately, the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR, especially Cushioned-PR in soft clay under dynamic loadings, has not been thoroughly understood [18].
This study aims to evaluate the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR and its dynamic responses during seismic excitations in soft clay. A series of centrifuge tests are performed to investigate the dynamic response of both Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR in soft clay under different input motions. Parameters include acceleration, strain, and displacement are quantified and compared between the two types of foundation. The influences of the different peak base acceleration (PBA) and the earthquake waves are also analyzed through the Fourier transform and response-spectrum.
Section snippets
Centrifuge testing system
For centrifuge tests, the gravity field is simulated by increasing the centrifugal acceleration, and the actual problem is simulated by using the scale model [47,49]. In this study, centrifuge tests are performed on the centrifuge device (TLJ-150) in the Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling Laboratory at Tongji University [29], as shown in Fig. 1. This device is able to reach a maximum centrifugal acceleration of 50 g, and a maximum vibration acceleration of 20 g. A customized laminar shear box,
Test results and discussions
In this section, the dynamic responses of Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR are analyzed and compared, including acceleration, bending moment, horizontal displacement, and vertical settlement.
Summary and conclusion
A series of centrifuge tests are conducted to compare the seismic responses of Cushioned-PR and Connected-PR to investigate the vibration isolation effect of Cushioned-PR. The synthetic ACCe100 wave, El-Centro wave, and Mexico City wave are employed to test the two types of foundations, respectively. The peak response acceleration of the super-structure, the natural period, and the natural frequency of the system, the horizontal and vertical displacement of the system, and the bending moment of
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878487). Financial support from these organizations is gratefully acknowledged.
References (51)
- et al.
Effect of super-structure frequency on the seismic behavior of pile-raft foundation using physical modeling
Soil Dynam Earthq Eng
(2018) - et al.
Several geotechnical design and construction issues with Akashi Strait Bridge
Soils Found
(2010) - et al.
Development of new prediction model for capacity of combined pile-raft foundations
Comput Geotech
(2018) - et al.
Numerical analysis of composite piled raft with cushion subjected to vertical load
Comput Geotech
(2003) Simplified model for seismic pile bending at soil layer interfaces
Soils Found
(2001)- et al.
A novel cushioned piled raft foundation to protect buildings subjected to naomal fault rupture
Comput Geotech
(2019) - et al.
Natural frequencies of piled raft foundation including super-structure effect
Soil Dynam Earthq Eng
(2018) - et al.
Non-linear soil–structure interaction in disconnected piled raft foundations
Comput Geotech
(2015) - et al.
On the use of embedded pile elements for the numerical analysis of disconnected piled rafts
Comput Geotech
(2016) - et al.
Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element modeling of composite foundation formed by CFG–lime piles
Comput Geotech
(2008)
Zhejiang University benchmark centrifuge test for LEAP-GWU-2015 and liquefaction responses of a sloping ground
Soil Dynam Earthq Eng
Design considerations for rocking foundations on unattached piles
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
ASCE/SEI 41 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings
Load sharing and carrying mechanism of piles in non-connected pile rafts using a numerical approach
Int J Civ Eng
Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions
Struct Infrastruct Eng
Serviceability-based finite-element approach on analyzing combined pile–raft foundation
Int J GeoMech
Behavior of model rafts resting on pile-reinforced sand
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
An approximate analysis procedure for piled raft foundations
Int J Numer Anal Methods GeoMech
Effect of radial homogeneity on low-strain integrity detection of a pipe pile in a viscoelastic soil layer
Int J Distributed Sens Netw
Dynamic response of pipe pile embedded in layered visco-elastic media with radial inhomogeneity under vertical excitation
Geomech Eng
Investigation of design alternatives for a piled raft case history
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
Seismic design of rocking shallow foundations: displacement based methodology
J Bridge Eng
Experimental measurements of geotechnical system in 1-g tests[C]//Imeko Tc4 International Symposium & International Workshop on Adc Modelling & Testing Research on Electric & Electronic Measurement for the Economic Upturn
Contact versus noncontact piled raft foundations
Can Geotech J
Simple Methods for the Seismic Response of Piles Applied to Soil-Pile-Bridge Interaction. Third International conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics April 2-7
Cited by (16)
Inertial and kinematic demands of isolated pile-supported wharves in liquefiable soils: Centrifuge tests
2024, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringSeismic isolation effect of unconnected piles-caisson foundation: Large-scale shake table tests
2024, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringState-of-the-art review on responses of combined piled raft foundation subjected to seismic loads using static and dynamic approaches
2023, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringA simplified approach for the response of pile groups composed of dissimilar piles
2021, StructuresCitation Excerpt :However, it is difficult to apply the traditional load transfer approach directly to the analysis of the behaviour of pile groups. The pile interactions need to be considered in the analysis of load-settlement behaviour of pile groups [20–28]. The interaction coefficient, defined as the additional settlement at the pile top induced by the loaded neighbouring pile divided by the settlement under self-loading, was originally proposed by Poulos [23] to analyse the behaviour of pile groups.