Elsevier

Livestock Science

Volume 243, January 2021, 104377
Livestock Science

Cooling growing/finishing pigs with showers in the slatted area: Effect on animal occupation area, pen fouling and ammonia emission

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104377Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Showers over the slats during warm periods decreased lying of the pigs in this area.

  • Pen fouling was reduced with showers over the slats during warm periods.

  • Ammonia emissions were reduced by 45% in rooms with showers.

  • Improved animal environment due to better pen hygiene and lower NH3 concentration.

Abstract

Growing and finishing pigs kept in insulated buildings are often exposed to high ambient temperature during summer. In high-temperature conditions, pigs in partly slatted pens change their behaviour to increase lying on the slatted area and fouling on the solid floor area, resulting in increased ammonia emissions. One way to cool the animals is to shower/sprinkle water in the slatted area, allowing pigs to wet their skin to increase heat loss. This study examined the effects of providing showers on pig activity and occupation area in pens, pen fouling and ammonia emission from the room. The investigation was performed in a commercial growing-finishing house with 10 identical rooms, each containing 16 pens for 9–13 pigs growing from 25–30 kg to 115–120 kg. Pigs were introduced into two parallel rooms in the house. During two summers and four batches, one room with showers in the slatted area and one room without per batch were compared in terms of concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and ammonia (NH3), pig activity and occupation area in the pen, pen fouling and NH3 emissions, recorded on four measuring occasions (M1–M4) during the growing period. Gas concentrations were measured using a photoacoustic analyser, pig activity and occupation area detected by machine vision techniques and pen fouling was visually investigated. Climate parameters (air temperature and relative humidity) were logged continuously during the entire growing period. Ammonia emission was calculated from ventilation rate (determined by the indirect CO2 tracer gas method) and the difference in ammonia concentration between outlet and inlet air.

The results showed that the pigs spent less time lying on the slats (p < 0.05) and the solid floor was cleaner (p < 0.05) on measuring occasions M2, M3 and M4 in rooms with showers than in control rooms. Mean NH3 emission for the four measurement occasions were 3.0–5.1 g pig−1 day−1 and 4.2–10.0 g pig−1 day−1 for the shower and control rooms, respectively. The differences were significant (p < 0.05) for all measuring occasions. The results also show improved animal environment when using showers to cool pigs at high ambient temperatures.

Overall, providing showers in the slatted area in partly slatted pens encouraged growing/finishing pigs to lie in the lying area, reduced problems with pen fouling and decreased NH3 emissions by 45%. The latter could be partly due to reduced pen fouling and partly to dilution of urine on the slatted area and on the surface of slurry in the pit.

Introduction

Growing and finishing pigs in northern Europe raised in confined and insulated buildings with mechanical ventilation are often exposed to high ambient temperatures during summer. Even at maximum ventilation rate, the indoor air temperature in most buildings in summer may be around 5 °C higher than the outdoor temperature (Schauberger et al., 2000). When the ambient temperature exceeds the thermal comfort zone of pigs they become heat-stressed, which affects their performance, health and welfare (Banhazi et al., 2008). In a partly slatted pen with a lightly bedded lying area, the upper thermal tolerance level is 21 °C for growing pigs weighing about 30 kg and 17 °C for pigs weighing more than 50 kg (Hillmann et al., 2004). Periods with high ambient temperatures in such buildings will increase with predicted global warming (Schauberger et al., 2019).

Pigs are sensitive to high ambient temperatures since they only have a few active sweat glands. Above a certain temperature, they start to increase their respiration rate (Huynh et al., 2007), but their behavioural adaptation to wet the skin by wallowing in mud and water (Bracke, 2011) is restricted in conventional pig housing (Bracke and Spoolder, 2011). Huynh et al. (2007) argue that evaporative cooling from the skin is important for pigs, since evaporative heat loss from respiration reaches a limit at high ambient temperature and relative humidity (RH). They also claim that it could be more comfortable for pigs to increase wallowing than to increase panting. To improve animal welfare at high ambient temperatures, pigs need to be able to wet their skin in order to decrease heat stress (Huynh et al., 2007).

The natural behaviour of the pig is to have separate areas for lying and eliminative behaviour (Ekesbo and Gunnarsson, 2018). In confined pig houses, pigs use a defined lying area (most often with a solid floor) and a separate area for defecation and urination if the housing conditions are optimal. However, ambient temperature is one of several factors affecting behaviour such as lying, defecation and urination. When the ambient temperature increases above an inflection point, pigs start to lie more on the slatted dunging area in a partly slatted pen, as it tends to be a colder place to lie, increasing their heat loss (Aarnink et al., 2006; Hillmann et al., 2004; Huynh et al., 2005a; Savary et al., 2009). Pigs also lie more on their sides and less against other pigs at high ambient temperatures, to increase their heat loss (Aarnink et al., 2006; Hillmann et al., 2004). Increasing ambient temperature also increases wallowing by pigs in the mixture of faeces and urine on the pen floor (Huynh et al., 2005a). When pigs lie more in the slatted dunging area, the number of excretions on the solid floor area increases (Aarnink et al., 2006; Savary et al., 2009).

The behavioural elements behind fouling in pens are multifactorial (Larsen et al., 2018). Thermal climate and space allowance are important factors affecting pen fouling in an existing pen (Larsen et al., 2018). The number of excretions on the solid floor also increases above an inflection temperature (Aarnink et al., 2006; Huynh et al., 2005a). Below the inflection temperature, the number of excretions is low and not influenced by temperature (Aarnink et al., 2006; Huynh et al., 2005a). In addition, the proportion of urinations is affected by temperature. With increasing temperature, the number of urinations decreases, but the proportion of urinations on the solid floor increases (Huynh et al., 2005a). The amount of fouling also increases as pigs grow heavier (Aarnink et al., 2006, 1996; Hacker et al., 1994). Pigs require more space with increasing body weight and temperature (Spoolder et al., 2012). With a smaller area per pig, they spend more time in the slatted dunging area, which prevents access by other pigs (Hillmann et al., 2004). Narrow pens can also prevent pigs from moving to the dunging area because of other pigs blocking them (Randall et al., 1983). Due to insufficient area in the last part of the finishing period, pens are often fouled (Aarnink et al., 2006, 1996).

Pen fouling leads to impaired hygiene and air quality, increased NH3 emission and extra work trying to keep the pen clean (Larsen et al., 2018). Ammonia emission from animal houses is also a multifactorial problem. Important factors affecting ammonia release include temperature and emitting surface area (Philippe et al., 2011; Sommer et al., 2006). Temperature has a direct effect on the release by favouring urease activity, biochemical degradation and volatilisation from the manure surface, but can also have an indirect effect via pig behaviour and pen fouling (Philippe et al., 2011). Pig houses with a partly slatted floor system have 25% lower NH3 emissions than houses with a fully slatted floor system (Giner Santonja et al., 2017), owing to their smaller emitting surface area (Aarnink et al., 1996; Groot Koerkamp et al., 1998; Sun et al., 2008). However, some studies have found higher NH3 emissions in houses with partly slatted floors during summer, due to pen fouling (Aarnink et al., 1995; Guingand and Grainer, 2001; Ni et al., 1999).

One method to cool the animals is by sprinkling or showering water in the slatted area, allowing the pigs to wet their skin with water. Use of sprinklers has been shown to reduce the amount of space that pigs need, as they lie less on their sides (Huynh et al., 2006; Spoolder et al., 2012). It could also prevent the increase in NH3 emission due to pen fouling during summer. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of showers in the slatted area in a commercial growing-finishing house with partly slatted pens regarding animal occupation area, pen fouling and NH3 emission.

Section snippets

Experimental facility

The study was performed on an integrated commercial pig farm with 480 sows and 3600 growing-finishing places located in southern Sweden (latitude 55.5°N). The farm has two growing-finishing pig houses, one of which was used in this study. The house was built in 2013 and has a south-north orientation and 10 identical rooms. Each room has 16 partly slatted pens arranged in two rows, with an inspection alley between the rows (Fig. 1).

Each pen has a total area of 10.86 m2 (4.825 m x 2.250 m) and

Results

The four consecutive batches compared started in mid-April, mid-May and late June in year 1 and mid-April in year 2. Depending on starting date and outdoor air temperature, the temperature in outlet air from the rooms (Tout) was above the set-point for different parts of batches (Fig. 4). Due to high outdoor air temperatures, the ambient temperature for the pigs was high for some periods in almost all batches. Maximum Tout was 32.6 °C and the difference between night and day temperatures varied

Discussion

The climate conditions for studying cooling of growing/finishing pigs in partly slatted pens by using showers were ideal in this study, since the investigation was carried out during two summers (2018 and 2019) with extremely hot weather in southern Sweden. This was reflected in the ambient temperature for the pigs in the rooms, with Tout exceeding 25 °C on several days. During summer 2018, the number of days with average diurnal outdoor temperature above 20 °C was between 20 and 45 in southern

Conclusions

This study evaluated the effect of providing showers in the slatted area in a commercial growing-finishing house with partly slatted pens on pig occupation area, pen fouling and ammonia emissions. Comparative measurements were made on four summer batches in two parallel rooms.

We concluded that the pigs was lying significantly more on the lying area and less on the slatted area with showers in the slatted area during high ambient temperatures. The difference appeared already when the pigs

CRediT author statement

ConceptualizationIdeas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims- Knut-Håkan Jeppsson and Anne-Charlotte Olsson
Data CurationManagement activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later reuse- Abozar Nasirahmadi
Formal analysisApplication of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the funding organization of the SusAn ERA-Net project PigSys. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement “No 696231”. This work was financially supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas, grant number “Dnr 2017-00152” and the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant number “2817ERA08D”. We also want to

References (52)

  • M.L.V. Larsen et al.

    Review: factors affecting fouling in conventional pens for slaughter pigs

    Animal

    (2018)
  • A. Nasirahmadi et al.

    Automatic scoring of lateral and sternal lying posture in grouped pigs using image processing and support vector machine

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2019)
  • J.Q. Ni et al.

    Effect of manure on ammonia emission from a fattening pig house with partly slatted floor

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (1999)
  • J.F. Patience et al.

    Nutritional and physiological responses of growing pigs exposed to a diurnal pattern of heat stress

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (2005)
  • G. Pastorelli et al.

    Static spatial requirements of growing-finishing and heavy pigs

    Livest. Sci.

    (2006)
  • F.-X. Philippe et al.

    Ammonia emissions from pig houses: Influencing factors and mitigation techniques

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2011)
  • J.M. Randall et al.

    Cooling gradients across pens in a finishing piggery. I. Measured cooling gradients

    J. Agric. Eng. Res.

    (1983)
  • P. Savary et al.

    Effect of a synthetic plate in the lying area on lying behaviour, degree of fouling and skin lesions at the leg joints of finishing pigs

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2009)
  • S.G. Sommer et al.

    Algorithms determining ammonia emission from buildings housing cattle and pigs and from manure stores

    Adv. Agron.

    (2006)
  • H.A.M. Spoolder et al.

    Effect of increasing temperature on space requirements of group housed finishing pigs

    Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

    (2012)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Effects of inductive methods on dunging behavior of weaning pigs in slatted floor pens

    Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng.

    (2016)
  • A.J.A. Aarnink et al.

    Temperature and body weight affect fouling of pig pens

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (2006)
  • T. Banhazi et al.

    Review of issues related to heat stress in intensively housed pigs

  • J.A.M. Botermans et al.

    Effect of feeding environment on performance, Injuries, Plasma cortisol and behaviour in growing-finishing Pigs: Studies on individual pigs housed in groups

    Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci.

    (2000)
  • M.B.M. Bracke et al.

    Review of wallowing in pigs: Implications for animal welfare

    Anim. Welf.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Review: Concrete outdoor runs for organic growing-finishing pigs – a legislative, ethological and environmental perspective

      2022, Animal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additional water, e.g. in the form of rainwater or showers, has the potential to decrease NH3 emission by diluting the NH3 concentration in the liquid and therefore changing the chemical equilibrium between liquid and gaseous phases (Philippe et al., 2011). Jeppsson et al. (2021) found a reduction of NH3 emissions by 45% in partly slatted indoor pens with showers during the hot season, probably due to a combined effect of reduced pen soiling and dilution of urine. However, this has not been tested in OUTRUNs.

    • Ammonia absorption performance of a liquid desiccant dehumidification system applied in laboratory rodent room

      2021, Applied Thermal Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The common ammonia concentration of laboratory rodent room is required to be kept below14 mg/m3. Large quantities of ammonia are generated and released from animal production activities, which may have extremely adverse effects on animal health [12,13]. In spite of the energy advantages of liquid desiccant dehumidification system, it may introduce ammonia from the return air to indoors during the heat and mass transfer process between solution and air in comparison with current full fresh air system.

    • Increased air velocity in the lying area improves pen hygiene and reduces ammonia emissions from houses with partly slatted pens for growing/finishing pigs

      2021, Livestock Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mean ammonia emission rate for the six batches was 5.8 g pig−1 day−1 and 5.1 g pig−1 day−1 for the control and IAV treatment, respectively. These levels correspond well to previous findings for growing/finishing pigs in the same house (Jeppsson et al., 2021). In other investigations, Aarnink et al., (1996) reported 5.7 and 6.4 g pig−1 day−1 for an experimental building with 25% and 50% slatted floor, respectively, above a slurry pit with vacuum removal system, while Ngwabie et al., (2011) reported values between 4.32 and 4.80 g pig−1 day−1 for an experimental building with 35% slatted area and daily manure removal by scrapers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text