General SectionModular equations for congruence subgroups of genus zero (II)☆
Introduction
It is well known that the modular equation of the elliptic modular function for the full modular group satisfies the so-called Kronecker's congruence relation for any prime p (see [8, §2 in Chapter 5] or [6, Theorem 11.18]). After this classical result, Chen and Yui [2, Theorem 2.6], Cais and Conrad [1, Section 6], Cho, Koo, and Park [4], [5], and Cho [3, Theorem 2.1] showed that modular equations of other Hauptmoduln also satisfy certain forms of Kronecker's congruence relation. For more details, see the introduction in the author's article [3]. Instead, it is worth noting that every Kronecker's congruence relation that appeared in the articles above was of the form or modulo .
Recently, Lee and Park [10] gave a systematic way to compute modular equations of the continued fraction of order six and raised an interesting conjecture (see [10, Remark 3.10]) that its modular equation satisfies Kronecker's congruence relation of the form For explicit computations of , see [12, Section 2] and [10, Table 1]. Observe that a new form of Kronecker's congruence relation has conjecturally appeared. Naturally, this observation motivated the author to deal with their conjecture.
Section snippets
Modular equations for and
Throughout the remainder of this article, let N and t be positive integers with , and H a subgroup of , and where denotes the reduction of modulo N. Without loss of generality, we may assume that , i.e. . For notational convenience, we simply denote by . For any , let Given an integer with , we fix such that
Proofs of main theorems
We begin by introducing some elementary identities.
Lemma 3.1 (1) If , then we have (2) For any , we have (3) For any , we have
Proof The identities (1) and (2) are proven in [3, Lemma 3.1] and
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his sincere thanks to the anonymous referee for his or her careful reading and valuable comments on the manuscript, especially for giving a much shorter and simpler proof of Lemma 3.1 (3) than the author's original proof. Some other proofs also became clearer and simpler thanks to the referee.
References (12)
- et al.
Modular curves and Ramanujan's continued fraction
J. Reine Angew. Math.
(2006) - et al.
Singular values of Thompson series
Modular equations for congruence subgroups of genus zero
Ramanujan J.
(2020)- et al.
Arithmetic of the Ramanujan–Göllnitz–Gordon continued fraction
J. Number Theory
(2009) - et al.
On Ramanujan's cubic continued fraction as a modular function
Tohoku Math. J.
(2010) Primes of the Form
(2013)
Cited by (0)
- ☆
The author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1A2B6001645) and the Dongguk University Research Fund of 2019.