Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 23, 2018

Gradience, features and hierarchies

  • Ida Toivonen EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Raj Singh for providing helpful comments on a previous version of this paper.

References

Aarts, Bas. 2004. Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28. 1–49.10.1075/sl.28.1.02aarSearch in Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 435–483.10.1023/A:1024109008573Search in Google Scholar

Bayanati, Shiva & Ida Toivonen. 2015. Human, animals, things and animacy features. Talk presented at Workshop on Animacy in Language and Cognition. Leeds, November 9.Search in Google Scholar

Bayanati, Shiva & Ida Toivonen. under review. Human, animals, things and animacy features. Submitted to D. Nelson & V.A. Vihman (eds.), Open Linguistics special issue on ‘Effects of animacy in grammar and cognition’, to appear in 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In L. Uyechi & L.H. Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature geometric approach. Language 78. 482–526.10.1353/lan.2002.0158Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1987. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–172. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.46Search in Google Scholar

Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz- Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, Mary C. O’Connor & Tom Wasow. 2004. Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’04), Workshop on Discourse Annotation, 118–125. Barcelona.10.3115/1608938.1608954Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-05-23
Published in Print: 2018-05-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2018-0008/html
Scroll to top button