Acknowledgements:
This work is supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement N324115-FRONTSEM (PI: Schlenker). The study was conducted at Institut d’Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure - PSL Research University. Institut d’Études Cognitives is supported by grants ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*.
References
Aristodemo, V. 2017. Gradable constructions in Italian Sign Language. PhD thesis. Paris, Franceris: EHESS.Search in Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. 2000. La Langue des Signes Française. Les voies de l’iconicité. In Faits de Langues 15/16. Ṕaris, France: Editions Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, K. 2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(6). 477–520.10.1093/0199246297.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, C. & C. Ebert. 2014. Gestures, demonstratives, and the attributive/referential distinction. Talk given at Semantics and Philosophy in Europe (SPE 7). Berlin, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & D. Brentari. 2017. Gesture, sign and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40. e46. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X15001247.Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, S. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Search in Google Scholar
Schlenker, P. 2015. Gestural presupposition. Snippets 30. 9–11.10.7358/snip-2015-030-schlSearch in Google Scholar
Schlenker, P. 2017. Super monsters II: Role Shift, iconicity and quotation in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics 10(12). 1–67.10.3765/sp.10.12Search in Google Scholar
Schlenker, P. 2018. Iconic pragmatics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(3). 877–936.10.1007/s11049-017-9392-xSearch in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
