Acknowledgements
I owe a great debt of gratitude to the eight colleagues who volunteered to respond to my article. Their inquisitive, explorative, supportive, and unsupportive comments have been immensely useful to me, and are much appreciated. Thanks also to Thomas klein Goldewijk, Paula Rubio Fernández, and Huub Vromen for discussion and feedback on the first draft of this paper, and special thanks to Hans-Martin Gärtner for supervising the entire project with so much diligence, patience, and wisdom. Research for this paper was supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project 5-100.
References
Abramova, E. 2018. The role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive basis, and an alternative. Journal of Language Evolution 3. 26–40.10.1093/jole/lzx021Search in Google Scholar
Bar-On, D. 2013. Origins of meaning: must we “go Gricean”? Mind and Language 28. 342–375.10.1111/mila.12021Search in Google Scholar
Beyssade, C. & J.-M. Marandin 2009. Commitment: une attitude dialogique. Langue Française 162. 89–107.10.3917/lf.162.0089Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1983. Asserting. Noûs 17. 637–650.10.2307/2215086Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994. Making it explicit. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Breheny, R. 2006. Communication and folk psychology. Mind and Language 21. 74–107.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00307.xSearch in Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1992. Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, N. 2017. How we talk: the inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Gauker, C. 2003. Words without meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7290.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Geurts, B. 2018. Making sense of self talk. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9. 271–285.10.1007/s13164-017-0375-ySearch in Google Scholar
Green, M. S. 2015. Speech acts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.edu.Search in Google Scholar
Horty, J. F. 2012. Reasons as defaults. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744077.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 1984. Group speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 379–395.10.1007/BF00631073Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2016. Evidence. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Search in Google Scholar
Kissine, M. 2013. Speech act classifications. In: M. Sbisà & K. Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 173–202. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214383.173Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, K. S. 2019. The speaker authority problem for context-sensitivity (or: you can’t always mean what you want). To appear in Erkenntniss.10.1007/s10670-018-0089-2Search in Google Scholar
McHugh, C. & D. Whiting 2014. The normativity of belief. Analysis 74. 698–713.10.1093/analys/anu079Search in Google Scholar
Meijers, A. 2007. Collective speech acts. In: S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Intentional acts and institutional facts, 93–110. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6104-2_4Search in Google Scholar
Poschmann, C. 2008. All declarative questions are attributive? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22. 247–269.10.1075/bjl.22.12posSearch in Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P. & B. Geurts 2013. How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday. Psychological Science 24. 27–33.10.1177/0956797612447819Search in Google Scholar
Sbisà, M. 2009. Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5. 33–52.10.2478/v10016-009-0003-0Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. & D. Vanderveken 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: CUP.10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_5Search in Google Scholar
Verbeek, B. 2014. On the normativity of intentions. Topoi 33. 87–101.10.1007/s11245-013-9221-8Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
