Abstract
In this article we examine patterns of root allomorphy in Greek that involve vowel alternations and propose a Generalized Non-linear Affixation (Bermúdez-Otero 2012) analysis according to which these alternations result from the competition between segments that belong, on the one hand, to the vocabulary items of roots and, on the other, to the exponents of functional heads (Voice/Aspect, n). More specifically, we claim that phonological entities have a gradient degree of presence in a structure, that is, are specified with a certain activation strength value underlyingly (Smolensky and Goldrick 2016). As a result, the surface realization of roots is determined by the relevant activation level of the exponents of functional heads they are eventually combined with. From all available exponents, the one that optimally complements the strength value of the vocabulary item of a given root will eventually surface. Our analysis is shown to be theoretically advantageous because it develops a strictly phonological account of allomorphy and, moreover, it captures the attested generalizations without resorting to extensive stem/span listing or to the application of phonologically unrestricted readjustment rules.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. We are also thankful to the audiences of Roots V (June 16–18, 2017, QMUL & UCL), Comparative Linguistics Meetings 2017 (October 18, 2017, AUTh) and Strength in Grammar (November 10–11, 2017, Leipzig University) for valuable feedback. All errors and infelicities remain our own.
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. Roots and lexicality in distributed Morphology. In Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds.), York-Essex Morphology meeting Vol. 5, 1–21. York: University of York, Department of Language and Linguistic Science.Search in Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2005. Roots and patterns: Hebrew morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2014. A monoradical approach to some cases of disuppletion. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4). 311–330.10.1515/tl-2014-0014Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2012. The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 8–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2013. The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1). 3–103.10.1515/probus-2013-0009Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2016. We do not need structuralist morphemes, but we do need constituent structure. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 387–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.13berSearch in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Joe Pater. 2016. Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 389–434. London: Equinox Press.Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1997. Allomorphy and the autonomy of morphology. Folia Linguistica XXXI(1–2). 25–56.10.1515/flin.1997.31.1-2.25Search in Google Scholar
Brandão, Joaquim, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds.). 2008. Lenition and fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius. 2012. Exponence, phonology and non-concatenative morphology. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 427–495. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2012. Morphophonological polarity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 121–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November, 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.270.03embSearch in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the Syntax-Morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar
Faust, Noam & Paul Smolensky. 2017a. Activity as an alternative to autosegmental association. Paper presented at the MFM 25, Manchester, 25–27 May 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Faust, Noam & Paul Smolensky. 2017b. Activity as an alternative to autosegmental association. Ms., Université Paris 8 & John Hopkins University.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris 1992. The Latvian declension. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), The yearbook of Morphology 1991, 33–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_4Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4). 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2016. Readjustment: Rejected? In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 303–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.11hauSearch in Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. & Daniel Siddiqi. 2016. Towards a restricted realization theory. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 343–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.12hauSearch in Google Scholar
Holton, David, Peter Mackridge, Irene Philippaki-Warburton & Vassilios Spyropoulos. 2012. Greek: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203802380Search in Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2015. Confidence scales: A new approach to derived environment effects. In Yuchau E. Hsiao & Lian Hee-Wee (eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages, 45–75. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Kimper, Wendell. 2016. Positive constraints and finite goodness in Harmonic Serialism. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 221–235. London: Equinox Press.Search in Google Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine, Antonella Sorace & Paul Smolensky. 2006. The optimality theory – Harmonic Grammar connection. In Paul Smolensky & Géraldine Legendre (eds.), The harmonic mind: From neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic grammar, 903–966. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Giorgos. 2018. Phonological realization of morphosyntactic features. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 273–303.10.1162/LING_a_00182Search in Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van. 2005. Expressing inflection tonally. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4. 107–126. http://revistes.uab.cat/catJL/article/view/v4-van-oostendorp.10.5565/rev/catjl.115Search in Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2014. A minimalist approach to roots. In Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Lilia Schürcks & Teodora Radeva-Bork (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 287–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.11.11panSearch in Google Scholar
(Philippaki-)Warburton, Irene. 1970. On the verb of modern Greek. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1998. Functional categories and modern Greek syntax. The Linguistic Review 15. 158–186.10.1515/tlir.1998.15.2-3.159Search in Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1997. Optimality Theory and features. In Diana Archangeli & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Optimality theory: An overview, 59–101. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul & Mathew Goldrick. 2016. Gradient symbolic representations in grammar: The case of French liaison. http://roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1552_smolensky_1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Anthi Revithiadou. 2009. The morphology of past in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 29. 108–122.Search in Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2011. Phonological aspects of Western nilotic mutation morphology. Habilitation thesis. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2012. Ø-exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 326–354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen & Eva Zimmermann. 2014. Generalised mora affixation and quantity-manipulating morphology. Phonology 31(3). 463–510.10.1017/S0952675714000220Search in Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva. 2017. Morphological length and prosodically defective morphemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198747321.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
