Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of the questions embedded under predicates normally selecting for propositions like know (unselected embedded questions UEQ). This problem was handled in Adger and Quer (Adger, David & Josep Quer. 2001. The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77. 107–133) and Öhl (Öhl, Peter. 2007. Unselected embedded interrogatives in German and English : S-selection as dependency formation. Linguistische Berichte 212. 403–438). Both articles notice a difference between yes/no- and wh-questions. The distribution of the latter seems to be less restricted. However data from Classical Greek shed new light on the matter. Classical Greek uses two sets of wh-items in what looks like embedded questions (h- and t-). It is shown that h-clauses do not denote questions but propositions. The selection mismatch arises with t-clauses. They denote questions and have the same distribution as yes/no-questions. Moreover Classical Greek provides new evidence in favor of 1) the sensitivity of the UEQ to the polarity of the environment, building on Giannakidou’s (Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins) definition of nonveridicality; 2) the presence of a determiner on top of the UEQ as proposed in Adger and Quer (2001). The article argues nevertheless that the sensitivity is not due to the determiner, but to an operator going along with UEQs. It is shown that the determiner is a type-shifter turning the question into a proposition and thus repairing the apparent selection mismatch.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thanks two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. All remaining errors are mine.
References
Abels, Klaus. 2007. Deriving selectional properties of ‘exclamative’ predicates. In Andreas Späth (ed.), Interfaces and interface conditions, 115–140. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Adger, David & Josep Quer. 2001. The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77. 107–133.10.1353/lan.2001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena. 2015. On the various sizes of complementizers. Probus 27. 193–236.10.1515/probus-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2004. Decomposing the left periphery: Dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 59–95. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110912111.59Search in Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures. Volume 2, the structure of CP and IP, 52–75. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Berman, Stephen. 1994. On the semantics of wh-clauses. New York: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
de Boel, Gunnar. 1980. Towards a theory of the meaning of complementizers in classical Attic. Lingua 52. 285–304.10.1016/0024-3841(80)90038-8Search in Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2007. The syntax and pragmatics of embedded yes/no questions. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (ed.), On information structure, meaning and form, 447–466. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.24eckSearch in Google Scholar
Égré, Paul. 2008. Question-embedding and factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 78. 85–125.10.1163/18756735-90000845Search in Google Scholar
Égré, Paul & Benjamin Spector. 2015. A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer. Synthese 192. 1729–1784.10.1007/s11229-015-0722-4Search in Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2010. Les Subordonnées interrogatives dans la prose grecque classique : les questions constituantes. Paris: Paris IV-Sorbonne dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2011. Are some indirect interrogatives free relatives used as concealed questions? In Katerina Chatzopoulou, Alexandra Ioannidou & Suwon Yoon (eds.), Proceedings of the international conference of the 9th international conference on Greek linguistics (ICGL 9), 154–164. Chicago. 29 October – 31 October 2009. https://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/ICGL/proceedings/14_Richard_Faure_KEDITED_154.pdf (accessed November 7 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2014a. Argument clauses. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of ancient Greek language and linguistics, 172–178. Amsterdam: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2014b. Les emplois communs de τίς et de ὅστις. In Emmanuel Dupraz & Camille Denizot (eds.), Latin quis, grec τίς/τις : Deux grammèmes parallèles ?, 13–34. Rouen: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre.Search in Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2015. Le couple ὅς / ὅστις en grec classique. Glotta 91. 62–89.10.13109/glot.2015.91e.1.62Search in Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.07fraSearch in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.23Search in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 367–421.10.1023/A:1005492130684Search in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua 119. 1883–1908.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.007Search in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer. 2013. Exhaustive and non-exhaustive variation with free choice and referential vagueness: Evidence from Greek, Catalan, and Spanish. Lingua 26. 120–149.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.005Search in Google Scholar
Giannakis, Georgios K (ed.). 2014. Encyclopedia of ancient Greek language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1995. Resolving questions, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 567–609.10.1007/BF00983299Search in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1977. English Wh-constructions and the theory of grammar. Amherst: University of Massachussetts Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Guerzoni, Elena & Yael Sharvit. 2007. A question of strength: On NPIs in interrogative clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 361–391.10.1007/s10988-007-9014-xSearch in Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman. 1993. ANY. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 353–422.10.1007/BF00985272Search in Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 3–44.10.1007/BF00351935Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Jooyoung & Satoshi Tomioka. 2014. Two types of unselected embedded questions. In Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st west coast conference on formal linguistics, 276–284. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Klima, Edward. 1964. Negation in english. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold Katz (eds.), The structure of language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphaël & Bernhard Gerth. 1904. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache II: Satzlehre (2). Hanovre: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. Questions and answers in embedded contexts. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form : Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2005. Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementiser system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103. 339–396.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00157.xSearch in Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry G., Robert Scott & Henry S. Jones. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. With a revised supplement. Revised and augmented by Henry S. Jones, with the assistance of Roperick McKenzie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, Salvador. To appear. Complementizer doubling in European Portuguese. Rivista di grammatica generativa.Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. To appear. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Neubarth, Friedrich. 2006. Polarity, alternatives, and scales. Vienna: University of Vienna dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Öhl, Peter 2007. Unselected embedded interrogatives in German and English : S-selection as dependency formation. Linguistische Berichte 212. 403–438.Search in Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk. 1984. Prolepsis in Greek as a discourse strategy. Glotta 62. 26–39.Search in Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1994. Negative and positive polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554308Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int (errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585473949_016Search in Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the left periphery : Modal particles and complementisers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1. 65–94.10.1075/jgl.1.05rouSearch in Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 2007. A whether forecast. In Peter Bosch, David Gabelaia & Jérôme Lang (eds.), Logic, language, and computation: 7th international tbilisi symposium on logic, language, and computation, TbiLLC 2007, Tbilisi, Georgia, October 1 – 5, 2007 : Revised selected papers, 189–199. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Sánchez Valencia, Victor, Ton van der Wouden & Frans Zwart. 1993. Polarity, veridicality, and temporal connectives. In Paul Dekker & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Proceeding of the Ninth Amsterdam colloquium, 587–606. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.Search in Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W. 1956. Greek grammar. Revised by Gordon M. Messing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Turnbull-Sailor, Craig 2007. Syntactic patterns of embedded wh-clauses. University of Kansas MA Thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Uegaki, Wataru. 2011. ‘Nearly free’ control as an underspecified de se report. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8 (proceedings of CSSP 2009), 511–536. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss8 (accessed 16 May 2018).Search in Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. The syntax of ellipsis. Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375640.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wakker, Gerry C. 1999. La différence entre οἶδα ὅς et οἶδα ὅστις. In Bernard Jacquinod (ed.), Les Complétives en grec ancien : Actes du colloque international de Saint-Étienne (3–5 septembre 1998), 145–163. Saint-Étienne: Presses de l’université de Saint-Étienne.Search in Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1989. The V2 conspiracy: A synchronic and diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110250442Search in Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy A. Hall (eds.), Studies on universal grammar and typological variation, 59–107. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.13.04wilSearch in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
