Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 9, 2019

Roots don’t select, categorial heads do: lexical-selection of PPs may vary by category

  • Jason Merchant EMAIL logo
From the journal The Linguistic Review

Abstract

The vast majority of roots in English show uniform selectional properties across their various instantiations in verbs, nouns, or adjectives: relyVon, relianceNon, reliantAon. This paper reports a new discovery: there are more than a hundred roots that display nonuniform selectional behavior. Their selectional class depends on whether the root is realized as a verb, a noun, or an adjective: prideVoneself on, prideNin, proudAof. I argue that this is best modeled if the categorizing node itself determines selection.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to audiences at Cornell, the Berkeley Linguistics Society, UC-Santa Cruz, the University of Minnesota, the Zentrum füur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Cambridge Comparative Syntax 6, and Roots V, and especially to Andrew Nevins, Julie Legate, Theresa Biberauer, Hagit Borer, and David Adger for invaluable feedback.

References

Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018616.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207491Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vols. 1. and 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structure sense: Volume III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Word formation is syntactic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32. 363–422.10.1007/s11049-014-9227-ySearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (ed.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, Massachusetts: Ginn-Blaisdell.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler. 2016. A formalization of Minimalist syntax. Syntax 19. 43–78.10.1111/synt.12117Search in Google Scholar

Cowie, A. P. & R. Macken. 1993. Oxford dictionary of phrasal verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2014. On diagnosing complement-taking roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 361–373.10.1515/tl-2014-0017Search in Google Scholar

Georgi, Doreen. 2017. Patterns of movement reflexes as the result of the order of Merge and Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 48. 585–626.10.1162/LING_a_00255Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8387.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2014. Some definitions. Ms., University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 273–304.10.1162/LING_a_00182Search in Google Scholar

Müuller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.7Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, Ad. 1997. PP-complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 89–137.10.1023/A:1005700831534Search in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2015. Lectures on postsyntactic morphology. Ms., University College London.Search in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Timothy J. 2015. Productivity and reuse in language: A theory of linguistic computation and storage. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262028844.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Payne, John, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Barbara C. Scholz & Eva Berlage. 2013. Anaphoric one and its implications. Language 89. 794–829.10.1353/lan.2013.0071Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero syntax: Vol. 2: Infinitives. Ms., MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Spears, Richard A. 2008. McGraw-Hill’s essential phrasal verb dictionary, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Stabler, Edward. 2014. Recursion in grammar and performance. In Tom Roeper and Margaret Speas (ed.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition, 159–178. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7_8Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Frederick T. 1967. English prepositional idioms. New York, NY: St Martins Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-09
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2019-2020/html
Scroll to top button