Abstract
Despite previous studies (cf. among others Huang 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. Ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (In)definiteness, 226–253. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer; Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1998. Two types of existential sentences. Illinois Papers in Linguistics 26. 175–191; Pan, Haihua. 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(2). 409–432), the defining characteristics of existential sentences in Chinese (including potential equivalents of locative inversion in English) have remained controversial. This is shown to be due to the failure to acknowledge the existence of two different constructions, the existential construction (ExC) ‘Ø V DP’ where a sentence-initial phrase indicating location (PlaceP) is not required, on the one hand, and the locative construction (LoC) with an obligatory PlaceP, on the other: ‘PlaceP V DP’. Only the ExC can serve as a diagnostic context for unaccusative verbs, whereas the LoC allows for a wide range of verbs, including a subset of unergative verbs. Furthermore, two types of LoC need to be distinguished, depending on the type of aspect (perfective aspect -le vs imperfective aspect -zhe), giving rise to different semantics. Both have, however, in common that the PlaceP occupies the subject position (SpecTP), not the topic position, and that it is merged in SpecTP, not moved there, as evidenced by the systematic lack of a corresponding source structure with the PlaceP in postverbal position.
Acknowledgements
This article has greatly benefited from the comments and suggestions made by the three anonymous reviewers and the editors of this special issue, Mara Frascarelli and Francesca Ramaglia. We are also grateful to Victor Junnan Pan, Qiu Yiqin and Zhitang Yang-Drocourt for discussion and data. Any remaining errors are ours.
References
Badan, Linda. 2007. High and low periphery: A comparison between Italian and Chinese. Ph.D.dissertation. Dipartimento di Discipline Linguistiche, Communicative e dello Spettacolo, Università degli Studi di Padova [University of Padua].Search in Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of IP and CP. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: an International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(1). 43–88. https://idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/72530 (accessed 28 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and universal grammar. Language 70(1). 72–131:.10.2307/416741Search in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Jonni Kanerva. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization of grammar. Liguistic Inquiry 20(1). 1–50.Search in Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Robert D. Levine. 2001. Stylistic inversion in English: A reconsideration. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 283–310.10.1023/A:1010646417840Search in Google Scholar
Diercks, Michael. 2017. Locative inversion. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, second edition, chapter 82. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom082 (accessed 27 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane & Waltraud Paul. 2018. A new approach to –Zhe in Mandarin Chinese. In William McClure & Alexander Vovin (eds.), Studies in Japanese and Korean historical linguistics and beyond, 110–123. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004351134_012Search in Google Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane, Waltraud Paul & John Whitman. 2013. Postpositions vs. prepositions in Mandarin Chinese: The articulation of disharmony. In Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order, 74–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684359.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Dragunov, Alexander A. 1960 [1952]. Issledovanija po grammatike sovremennego kitajskogo jazyka [Studies in the grammar of modern Chinese]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences. [German translation by Lippert,Wolfgang. 1960. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik der modernen chinesischen Sprache. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.].Search in Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 1994. Functional categories and the Chinese Infl. Linguistics 32(2). 191–212.10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.191Search in Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama. 2007. Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew unaccusatives. Language Acquisition 14(4). 1–42.10.1080/10489220701600523Search in Google Scholar
Gu, Yang. 1991. On the locative existential construction in Chinese. In Dawn Bates (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th West coast conference on formal linguistics, 183–195. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Haselbach, Boris 2018. How to dance: On the unergative and unaccusative nature of German manner of motion verbs. Talk presented at the Workshop on Unergative Predicates: Architecture and Variation, University of the Basque Country and University of Deusto, Bilbao, January 18–19. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/71f56a_cb87432724a44eebaf39b2758ef7cc95.pdf (accessed 27 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Jianhua & Haihua Pan. 2007. Focus and the basic function of Chinese existential you-sentences. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 133–145. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_5Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Wenze. 1995. Verbal semantics of presentative sentences. Yuyan Yanjiu 1995, nr. 2: 100–112.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1983. On the representation of scope in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 11(1). 37–91.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. Ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, 226–253. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Shuō shì hé yǒu [On shì and yǒu].Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. [Academia Sinica, Taiwan] 59, part 1. 43–64.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–201. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & Ian Roberts. 2016. Principles and parameters of universal grammar. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The oxford handbook of universal grammar, 307–354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.14Search in Google Scholar
Jaxontov, Sergei J. 1988. Resultative in Chinese. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 113–133. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.12.11jaxSearch in Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9. 153–185.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas Hun-tak, Yaqiao Lu & Waltraud Paul. 2018. Unergative verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Poster presented at the Workshop on Unergative Predicates: Architecture and Variation, University of the Basque Country and University of Deusto, Bilbao, January 18–19. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/71f56a_a2af9d2f364149bdbc472fecaa5afa4f.pdf (accessed 27 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Linding. 1986. Xiàndài hànyǔ jùxíng [Sentence types in Mandarin Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Search in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1998. Two types of existential sentences. Illinois Papers in Linguistics 26. 175–191.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2002. Aspectual selection and temporal reference of the Chinese aspect marker -zhe. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies [New Series] 33(1). 199–240.Search in Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 2000 [1980]. Xiàndài hanyǔ bābáicí [Eight hundred words of modern Mandarin]. Beijing: Shangwu.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, Yaqiao 2017. Unaccusative and unergative verbs in child Mandarin: Revisiting the a-chain delay hypothesis (ACDH). Poster presented at The First International Conference on Theoretical East Asian Psycholinguistics (ICTEAP-1), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, March 10-12, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, Yaqiao. 2019. The acquisition of unaccusativity in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, Yaqiao & Thomas Hun-tak Lee. 2018. Telicity and objecthood in the acquisition of unaccusativity: Mandarin-speaking children’s interpretation of manner-of-motion verbs. Poster presented at The 43rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 43), Boston University, Boston, U.S., November 2-4. https://www.bu.edu/bucld/conference-info/Search in Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 1990. Cognate objects as thematic objects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 35(2). 161–190.10.1017/S0008413100013566Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(2). 409–432.10.1007/BF00133688Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2011. ATB topicalization in Mandarin Chinese: An intersective operator analysis. Linguistic Analysis 37(1-2). 231–272.Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2014. Wh-ex situ in Chinese: Mapping between information structure and split CP. Linguistic Analysis 39. 371–413.Search in Google Scholar
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1981. Problèmes de syntaxe et de sémantique en linguistique chinoise. Paris: Collège de France, Institut des Hautes Etudes chinoises.Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 1988. The syntax of verb-object phrases: Constraints and reanalysis. Paris: Langages croisés. http://crlao.ehess.fr/index.php?/publications/publicationscacheesmembrescrlao/1558-syntax ((accessed 27 July 2018)).Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques De Vincennes 33. 111–134.10.4000/rlv.1303Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110338775Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2017. Adverbs. In Rint Sybesma et al. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol. 1, 122–127. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & John Whitman. 2008. Shi … de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review 25(3/4). 413–451.10.1515/TLIR.2008.012Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & John Whitman. 2017. Topic Prominence. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn, volume VII, 4473–4503. Malden, MA: Wiley.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom065Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky. 1987. Wh-in situ: Movementand unseletive binding. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. Ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1980. Les constructions locatives en chinois moderne. Paris: Langages croisés.Search in Google Scholar
Ramaglia, Francesca & Mara Frascarelli. 2019. The (information) structure of existentials. In Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and interpretation. Contributions in honor of Rita M. Manzini. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501505201-028Search in Google Scholar
Randall, Janet, Angeliek van Hout, Jürgen Weissenborn & Harald Baayen. 2004. Acquiring unaccusativitity: A cross-linguistic look. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 332–370. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Rando, Emily & Donna Jo Napoli. 1978. Definites in there sentences. Language 54(2). 300–313.10.2307/412949Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammarI, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 3, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sano, Tetsuya. 2000. Issues on unaccusatives and passives in the acquisition of Japanese. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 1, 1–21. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Search in Google Scholar
Snyder, William, Nina Hyams & Paola Crisma. 1995. Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: Evidence for the early knowledge of unaccusativity. In Eve Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th annual child language research forum, 127–136. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Tan, Fu. 1991. Notion of subject in Chinese. Stanford, CA: University of Stanford dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X-bar theory. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 2001. Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2(2). 203–241.Search in Google Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin. 1975. A semantic study of transitivity relations in Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2008. Generalized inversion and the theory of Agree. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2013. Locative inversion in Bantu and predication. Linguistics 51(6). 1107–1146.10.1515/ling-2013-0046Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Jiqing. 1996. Yě tán ‘Posi yǒu N’ hé ‘Posi shì N’ [On ‘Posi yǒu N’ and ‘Posi shì N’]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu 1996(nr. 4). 37–42.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Lan. 2008. Locative inversion and aspect markers le and zhe in Mandarin Chinese. In Marjorie K.M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 2, 893–902. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
