Abstract
We explore certain predictions of the theory first presented in Acedo-Matellán and Real-Puigdollers (2014), whereby roots correspond to (lately inserted) Vocabulary Items that phonologically and semantically interpret functional nodes. First, we deal with categorizers (a, n, v), a prominent locus for the insertion of roots. Roots such as cat or up are Vocabulary Items that have no context of insertion and are insertable into any categorizer, accounting for the categorial variability of simple words. Derivational affixes like -ation or -al also correspond to roots inserted into little head categorizers (n and a, respectively, in this case), but their Vocabulary Items have a context of insertion accounting for their categorial rigidity and their c-selection properties. The exploration proposed here focuses, first, on the locality properties of morphemic interactions at the semantic interface, namely, allosemic interactions. We show that our approach makes felicitous predictions seemingly unavailable to those other localist approaches in which roots are distinct nodes in the syntax. Second, we show that the phenomenon of semi-lexicality, as illustrated by classifiers, can be successfully modeled, in our framework, as the insertion of roots into inflectional nodes.
Acknowledgments
For useful comments and discussion, we would like to thank the audience at the Roots V workshop (Queen Mary, University of London & University College London, 17–18 June 2017), as well as the participants in the “Types, tokens, roots and functional structure” workshop of OASIS 1 (CNRS & Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Paris, 26–27 November 2018). We would also like to thank Chenjie Yuan, who helped us with his intuitions and judgments in Chinese. Any error remains our own. The authors acknowledge support from the projects FFI2016-76045-P (Real-Puigdollers), FFI2014-56968-C4-1-P (Acedo-Matellán and Real-Puigdollers) and 2017 SGR 1478 (Real-Puigdollers).
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2016. The morphosyntax of transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu. 2014. From syntax to roots: A syntactic approach to root interpretation. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 14–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Cristina Real-Puigdollers. 2014. Inserting roots into (functional) nodes: Categories and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Analysis 39(1–2). 125–168.Search in Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals. A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. Roots and lexicality in distributed morphology. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2. 10(YPL 2). 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53. 284–310.10.1353/lan.1977.0043Search in Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2003. Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21. 737–778.10.1023/A:1025533719905Search in Google Scholar
Armelin, Paula Roberta Gabbai. 2017. On the morphosyntax of augmentatives in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista Letras 96. 7–32.10.5380/rel.v96i0.51040Search in Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Kirsten Fudeman. 2011. What is morphology? Malden/Oxford/Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Bale, Alan & Jessica Coon. 2014. Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: Consequences for the mass/count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4). 695–707.10.1162/LING_a_00170Search in Google Scholar
Bale, Alan & Hrayr Khanjian. 2008. Classifiers and number marking. Proceedings of SALT 18. 73–89.10.3765/salt.v18i0.2478Search in Google Scholar
Bale, Alan & Hrayr Khanjian. 2014. Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 1–26.10.1162/LING_a_00147Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In John C. Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, 31–67. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense. Volume III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius. 2012. Nonconcatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 427–495. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1998. Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28(3). 385–412.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.10.1162/002438999554192Search in Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.). 2001. Semi-Lexical categories. The content of function words and the function of content words. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874006Search in Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall. 2012. Aspects of individuation. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 199–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Creemers, Ava, Jan Don & Paula Fenger. 2017. Some affixes are roots, others are heads. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(1). 45–84.10.1007/s11049-017-9372-1Search in Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. Roots and affixes: Eliminating lexical categories from syntax. Utrecht University/UiL-OTS & HUBrussel/CRISSP dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke & Jeroen van Craenenbroeck. 2015. How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry 46(4). 625–655.10.1162/LING_a_00196Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 1–53.10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9. 1–39.Search in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guimarães, Maximiliano. 2000. In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 90–115.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1973. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4(1). 3–16.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL) 30: Papers at the Interface. 425–449.10.1075/cilt.202.07halSearch in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James W. 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 27–62.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, James W. 1999. Nasal depalatalization no, morphological wellformedness sí; the structure of Spanish word classes. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL) 33: Papers on Syntax and Morphology, Cycle One. 47–82.Search in Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Yun-Ru Chen. 2013. Unification of numeral classifiers and plural markers: Empirical facts and implications. Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC 27). 37–46.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2009. Antisymmetry and the Lexicon. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), The linguistic variation yearbook 2008, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/livy.8.01kaySearch in Google Scholar
Kolver, Ulrike. 1982. Klassifikatorkonstruktionen in Thai, Vietnamesisch und Chinesisch. In Hansjakob Seiler, Christian Lehmann & Franz J. Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, 160–245. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Kwon Song Nim & Anna Zribi-Hertz. 2004. Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural marking looks ‘truer’ in French than in Korean. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 5, 133–158. (On-line proceedings of the fifth Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris (CSSP 2003)).Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Lisa. 2014. The ontology of roots and verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 208–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Li, XuPing. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantics interface. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter/Mouton.10.1515/9783110289336Search in Google Scholar
Li, XuPing & Susan Rothstein. 2012. Measure readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle de. Language and Linguistics 13(4). 693–741.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702.10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693Search in Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(1). 75–99.10.1023/A:1008306431442Search in Google Scholar
Löbel, Elisabeth. 2001. Classifiers and semi-lexicality: Functional and semantic selection. In Norbert Corver & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, 223–272. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2014. Derivational affixes as roots: Phasal spell-out meets English stress shift. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 230–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarisa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds.), University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics 4, 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 95–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara, Alice Ter Meulen & Robert E. Wall. 1993. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2213-6Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2010. Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese: The rehabilitation of a much ostracized category. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 115–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.153.04pauSearch in Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e linguaggio 7(1). 47–66.Search in Google Scholar
Sanches, Mary & Linda Slobin. 1973. Numeral classifiers and plural marking: An implicational universal. Working Papers on Language Universals 11. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Tai, James H. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In Mathew Cheng & Ovid Tzeng (eds.), Essays in honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 479–494. Taiwan: Pyramid Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2008. The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(3). 639–694.10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Jim. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09138-9Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz. 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 255–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Hong. 2007. Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16. 43–59.10.1007/s10831-006-9006-9Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
