An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory

References

1. Barsalou, L.
   (1992) Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clausner, T., & Croft, W.
   (1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282. 10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1 [Google Scholar]
3. Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E.
   (2014) Figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
   (2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 214–255. 10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav [Google Scholar]
5. Edwards, D.
   (1999) Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, vol.5(3), 271–291. 10.1177/1354067X9953001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001 [Google Scholar]
6. Evans, V.
   (2013) Language and time. A Cognitive Linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107340626
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340626 [Google Scholar]
7. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
   (2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gibbs, R. W.
   (2017) The embodied and discourse views of metaphor: Why these are not so different and how they can be brought closer together. InB. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.319–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.018
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.018 [Google Scholar]
9. Goatly, A.
   (1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203210000
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
10. Grady, J. E.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grady, J. E.
    (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. InR. Gibbs & G. Steen, (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
12. Kövecses, Z.
    (1995) American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.315 [Google Scholar]
13. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002/2010) Metaphor. A practical introduction. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. 10.1515/cogl.2010.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.021 [Google Scholar]
15. Kövecses, Z.
    (2015) Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering the role of context in metaphor. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Kövecses, Z.
    (2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052 [Google Scholar]
17. Kövecses, Z.
    (2020) Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
18. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Second edition. (pp.202–251). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
19. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Musolff, A.
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
22. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
    (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, de- velopments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. 10.1080/10926488.2011.583189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583189 [Google Scholar]
23. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
    (2014) Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
24. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2020) Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71, 16–38. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002 [Google Scholar]
25. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Steen, G.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor. Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
27. Steen, G.
    (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
28. Zinken, J.
    (2007) Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 445–466. 10.1515/COG.2007.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.024 [Google Scholar]