Abstract
This article takes a close look at recent proposals that French (ne) … que exceptives are hidden comparatives involving two silent elements: a covert n-word and a phonologically unrealized autre ‘other’ introducing a partially elided comparative clausal standard headed by que ‘than’. I show that assuming the constant presence of an n-word in the exceptive construction allows us to provide inter alia a scopal treatment of the fact that (ne) … que exceptives in modal contexts are systematically ambiguous between an exclusive reading and a minimal sufficiency reading. As regards the comparative analysis of exceptives, I demonstrate that while the locality of association problem raised by (Homer. 2015. Ne … que and its challenges. In Ulrike Steindl, Thomas Borer, Huilin Fang, Alfredo García Pardo, Peter Guekguezian, Brian Hsu, Charlie O’Hara & Iris Chuoying Ouyang (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 111–120. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.) can be resolved by assuming that in French, the standard of comparatives can be clausal or just nominal, the fact that (ne) … que displays a lexically-encoded, conventionalized meaning dependency on focus that is absent from its alleged comparative maximal phonological realization casts some serious doubt on the viability of the comparative analysis of French exceptives. Finally, I examine a number of contexts in which the n-word component of (ne) … que must be overt and argue that this constraint follows from the Intonational Phrase Edge Generalization.
About the author
J.-Marc Authier is Professor of French and Linguistics at the Pennsylvania State University.His research focuses on the syntax-semantics interface with special reference to constructs found in Romance languages.
References
An, Duk-Ho. 2007. Clauses in non-canonical positions at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 10. 38–79.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00096.xSearch in Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc. 2016. Degree quantifiers, bare quantifiers and intensifiers in the midfield: A new look at quantification at a distance. Glossa 1. 1–34.Search in Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Liliane Haegeman. 2019. The syntax of mirative focus fronting: Evidence from French. In Deborah Arteaga (ed.), Contributions of Romance languages to linguistic theory (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 95), 39–63. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-11006-2_3Search in Google Scholar
Azoulay-Vicente, Avigail. 1985. Les tours comportant l’expression de + adjectif. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Search in Google Scholar
Azoulay-Vicente, Avigail. 1988. La syntaxe de ne … que. Linguisticae Investigationes XII(2). 205–233.10.1075/li.12.2.02azoSearch in Google Scholar
Baciu, Ioan. 1978. La négation restrictive. Le Français Moderne 46. 135–142.Search in Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and Logical Form: On the scope of focusing particles and WH-in-situ. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-1272-9Search in Google Scholar
Beaver, David & Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444304176Search in Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & Hotze Rullmann. 1999. A flexible approach to exhaustivity in questions. Natural Language Semantics 7. 249–298.10.1023/A:1008373224343Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 1–46.10.1162/002438904322793338Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Shoichi Takahashi. 2007. Direct comparisons: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives. In Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 19–36. Washington, D.C.: LSA online publications.10.3765/salt.v17i0.2958Search in Google Scholar
Bouchard, David-Etienne & Heather Burnett. 2007. Quantification at a distance across varieties of French. In Milica Radišić (ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, 15. Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto online publications. http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~claacl/actes2007/Arsenault.pdf (accessed 19 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The semantics of syntax: A minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bouvier, Yves-Ferdinand. 2001. Uses, levels, and scopes of negation. Generative Grammar in Geneva 2. 15–37.Search in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 275–343.Search in Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2011. Sole sisters. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 21, 197–217. Washington, D.C.: LSA online publications.10.3765/salt.v21i0.2615Search in Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2013. Mere-ology: Toward a unified analysis of mere and other exclusives. In Anamaria Fălăuş (ed.), Alternatives in semantics, 150–173. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137317247_6Search in Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2014. Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 31. 371–432.10.1093/jos/fft007Search in Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & Anna Lindahl. 2014. Minimal sufficiency readings in conditionals. In Christopher Brown, Qianping Gu, Cornelia Loos, Jason Mielens & Grace Neveu (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Texas Linguistic Society, 24–38. Austin: University of Texas online publications. http://tls.ling.utexas.edu/2014tls/TLS15-Proceedings.pdf (accessed 19 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Corblin, Francis. 1996. Multiple negation processing in natural language. Theoria 62. 214–259.10.1111/j.1755-2567.1996.tb00503.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1975. On generics. In Edward Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 99–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897696.009Search in Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte & Ivan Sag. 2002. Negation and negative concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 373–417.10.1023/A:1020823106639Search in Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2001. Focus and phrasing in French. In Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur vox sapientiae. A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.10.1515/9783050080116.153Search in Google Scholar
Fintel, Kai von & Sabine Iatridou. 2007. Anatomy of a modal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 445–483.10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.445Search in Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Yuji Takano. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7. 27–86.10.4324/9780203479179-11Search in Google Scholar
Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2012. On headless XP-movement/ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 519–562.10.1162/ling_a_00105Search in Google Scholar
Gaatone, David. 1999. Réflexions sur la syntaxe de ne … que. In Marc Plénat, Michel Aurnague, Anne Condamines, Jean-Pierre Maurel, Christian Molinier & Claude Muller (eds.), L’emprise du sens. Structures linguistiques et interprétations. Mélanges de syntaxe et de sémantique offerts à Andrée Borillo par un groupe d’amis, de collègues et de disciples, 101–115. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar
Godard, Danièle. 2004. French negative dependency. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 351–389. Standford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse. 1993. Le bon usage. Paris-Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Search in Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick. 2012. On the grammar of optative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.193Search in Google Scholar
Hackl, Martin. 2001. Comparative quantifiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. In Claudia Corum, Timothy Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the 9th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 179–191. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene 2000 Degree operators and scope. In Brendan Jackson & Tanya Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 214–239. Washington, D.C.: LSA online publications.10.3765/salt.v10i0.3102Search in Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Hui-Chin Tsai. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 575–605.10.1007/s11049-014-9266-4Search in Google Scholar
Homer, Vincent. 2015. Ne … que and its challenges. In Ulrike Steindl, Thomas Borer, Huilin Fang, Alfredo García Pardo, Peter Guekguezian, Brian Hsu, Charlie O’Hara & Iris Chuoying Ouyang (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 111–120. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikel im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111351889Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111682228Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2012. A note on grand and its silent entourage. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33. 71–85.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Modes of comparison. In Malcom Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki & Suwon Yoon (eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 141–165. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2013. A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words. In Ivano Caponigro & Carlo Cecchetto (eds.), From grammar to meaning: The spontaneous logicality of language, 172–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139519328.010Search in Google Scholar
Klima, Edward. 1964. Negation in English. In Jerry Fodor & Jerrold Katz (eds.), The Structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1986. Conditionals. In Anne Farley, Peter Farley & Karl-Erik McCollough (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–15. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In Valerie Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110922011.105Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1988. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 135–179. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.08lamSearch in Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2004. L’association négative: Depuis la syntaxe jusqu’à l’interprétation. Geneva: Droz.Search in Google Scholar
Massicotte, France. 1986. Les expressions de la restriction en français de Montréal. In David Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and diachrony, 325–332. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.53.28masSearch in Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 60–109.10.1162/002438906775321184Search in Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Sandhya Sundaresan. 2018. What the EPP and comp-trace effects have in common: Constraining silent elements at the edge. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.419 (accessed 7 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Menéndez-Benito, Paula. 2013. On dispositional sentences. In Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio Del Prete (eds.), Genericity, 276–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Moignet, Gérard. 1973. Les signes de l’exception dans l’histoire du français. Geneva: Droz.Search in Google Scholar
Nakamura, Yoshio. 2000. The ‘head adjunction’ analysis of preverbal adverbs. Explorations in English Linguistics 15. 47–65. Tohoku University, Japan.Search in Google Scholar
Nouwen, Rick. 2010. Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3. 1–41.10.3765/sp.3.3Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Teresa. 2011. The syntax of ne … que exceptives in French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(1). 175–184.Search in Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1983. Une quantification non-canonique: la quantification à distance. Langue Française 58. 66–88.10.3406/lfr.1983.6415Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, Hazel. 2010. Comparing comparative constructions in Japanese: Two types of implicit comparison. Ms., Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar
Piot, Mireille. 1975. Les restrictions ne … que et seul(e)(s) (aperçu à partir de leur distribution). Recherches Linguistiques 3. 226–264.Search in Google Scholar
Postdam, Eric. 2012. A direct analysis of Malagasy phrasal comparatives. In Lauren Eby Clemens, Greg Scontras & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, 19. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/afla/aflaxviii/meeting/3/ (accessed 7 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Raynal, Céline. 2008. La restriction en français: trois études sémantiques. Paris: Université Paris 7 dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1515/9783110883718Search in Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 2018. French negation and restrictive focus. In Jan Couppens, Hans Smessaert, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (eds.), A coat of many colours: A festschrift for Dany Jaspers on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 15. https://dj60.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/rooryck.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 271–297. London: Basil Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631207498.1997.00013.xSearch in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Yu Alan (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch14Search in Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim. 1990. Focusing and backgrounding operators. In Werner Abraham (ed.), Discourse particles, 37–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 2000. Illicit remnant movement: An argument for feature-driven movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 141–156.10.1162/002438900554325Search in Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. No TP-fronting meets Nearly Headless Nick. Ms., University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar
Xiang, Ming. 2003. A phrasal analysis of Chinese comparatives. In Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 739–754. https://www.igentaconnect.com/content/cls/pcls/2003/00000039/00000001 (accessed 7 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
