Abstract
This article aims to explain the optional gemination in the elided form of the French 3rd p. object pronouns le and la, i.e. before vowel, as in [ʒəllɛvy] for je l’ai vu(e) ‘I saw him/her/it’. This geminate, which cannot be accounted for in purely phonological terms, is shown to follow from a boundary shift within the morphological sequence /il+lə/la+V/, providing the 3rd p. object pronouns with a new geminate allomorph before vowel; thereby, /ll/ can spread to the entire paradigm. It is argued (a) that the resulting allomorphy is the strategy found by speakers to eliminate the irregular allomorphy of the 3rd p. subject pronoun il before consonant; (b) that a perception grammar is needed to capture the reasons for the new allomorphy.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Adèle Jatteau, Noam Faust, and three anonymous reviewers for their input on a previous version of this article. None of them is responsible for any inaccuracies.
References
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland Van Hout & Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, change and phonological Theory, 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.146.04antSearch in Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 2002. Variation and Phonological Theory. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 206–243. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405116923.2003.00013.xSearch in Google Scholar
Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. University of Massachusetts Amherst doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Benz, Anton & Jason Mattausch. 2011. Bidirectional Optimality theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.180Search in Google Scholar
Blutner, Reinhard. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17. 189–216.10.1093/jos/17.3.189Search in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives (LOT International Series 11). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1999. On the need for a separate perception grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive 358. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/percgram.pdf (accessed 12 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2000. The OCP in the perception grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive 435. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/ocp_perc.pdf (accessed 12 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2009. Cue constraints and their interactions in phonological perception and production. In Paul Boersma & Silke Hamann (eds.), Phonology in perception, 55–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró. 2007. Allomorph selection and lexical preferences: Two case studies. Lingua 117. 903–927.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.04.009Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró. 2015. The prenominal allomorphy syndrome. In Eulàlia Bonet, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró (eds.), Understanding allomorphy. Perspectives from Optimality theory, 5–44. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Bougaïeff, André & Pierre Cardinal. 1980. La chute du /l/ dans le français populaire du Québec. La Linguistique 16. 91–102.Search in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 2005. Sources of paradigm uniformity. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 65–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267712.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de & Marc Klein. 2010. Opacité phonologique et liaison en français : De la sous-détermination de la variable à la motivation des variantes. Langue Française 168. 53–70.10.3917/lf.168.0053Search in Google Scholar
Charette, Monik. 1991. Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554339Search in Google Scholar
Diertani, Ariel. 2011. Morpheme boundaries and structural change: Affixes running Amok. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1977. La civilisation des mœurs. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Search in Google Scholar
Elsman, Minta & D. Eric Holt. 2009. When small words collide: Morphological reduction and phonological compensation in old Leonese contractions. In Ronald Leow, Héctor Campos & Donna Lardiere (eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and acquisition, 21–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre. 1988. La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Thomas. 1994. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Iconicity in language, 47–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.110.07givSearch in Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. Iconicity and grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56. 515–540.10.2307/414448Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, Anita Berit. 1994. Etude du E caduc : Stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales. Journal of French Language Studies 4. 25–54.10.1017/S0959269500001964Search in Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, Yuji. 2009. Liaison au XVIIIème siècle. Analyse préliminaire des textes de Gile Vaudelin. Paper presented at the Colloque PFC [Phonologie du Français Contemporain], Paris, 10–12 December.Search in Google Scholar
Keine, Stefan & Gereon Müller. 2015. Differential argument encoding by impoverishment. In Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Andrej Malchukov & Marc D. Richards (eds.), Scales and hierarchies: A cross-disciplinary perspective, 75–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110344134.75Search in Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base identity and uniform exponence: Alternative to cyclicity. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 363–393. Paris-X and Salford: University of Salford Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan. 2007. External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 715–735.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.715Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267712.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. Papers from the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 24. 333–379.Search in Google Scholar
Morin, Yves Charles. 1979. La morphophonologie des pronoms clitiques en français populaire. Cahier de Linguistique 9. 1–36.10.7202/800076arSearch in Google Scholar
Morin, Yves Charles. 2007. Tu ll’as vu? Les sources de la gémination du pronom clitique objet élidé en français. Paper presented at the XXVème Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, Innsbruck, 3–8 September.Search in Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2009. Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Steve Parker (ed.), Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation, 123–154. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Picard, Marc. 1977. Les règles morphophonologiques en diachronie. Recherches Linguistiques à Montréal 8. 129–135.Search in Google Scholar
Picard, Marc. 1990. On morphologically-conditioned sound change: The deletion and gemination of l in Canadian French. Probus 2. 103–111.10.1515/prbs.1990.2.1.103Search in Google Scholar
Pupier, Paul & Luc Légaré. 1973. L’effacement de /l/ dans les articles définis et les clitiques en français de Montréal. Glossa 7. 69–80.Search in Google Scholar
Pupier, Paul & Roland Pelchat. 1972. Observations sur la phonologie des pronoms personnels du français de Montréal. Lingua 29. 326–346.10.1016/0024-3841(72)90029-0Search in Google Scholar
Van Oostendorp, Marc. 1997. Style levels in conflict resolution. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland Van Hout & Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory, 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.146.10oosSearch in Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 1996. The new stability of unstable -e in French. Journal of French language studies 6. 211–229.10.1017/S0959269500003070Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
