1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Narrative Inquiry
  4. Volume 27, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6740
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9935
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

New parodic genres have emerged across diverse forms of digital media. Sometimes these parodies take the form of mock “narratives of personal experience,” with authors drawing on a range of discursive resources to perform particular identities and in doing so, to create texts written from imagined perspectives. In this article, I focus on parodies of user-generated product reviews on . For over a decade, users have contributed thousands of parodies of reviews written about real products. This analysis focuses on a sample from a data set of 100 parodic reviews written about five different products (which have become the targets of a large number of parody reviews), and demonstrates how authors perform self-disclosure to construct fictional personae. I demonstrate how these discursively-constructed narrative identities are central to the ensuing and improbable narrative events represented in the parodic texts.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
2017-10-06
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Appelbome, P.
    (2009, May24). Think a T-Shirt can’t change your life? A skeptic thinks again. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/nyregion/25towns.html?_r=0
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, M.
    (1981 [1935]) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (Ed.), trans. Caryl Emerson . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. (1984 [1941]) Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baynham, M.
    (2011) Stance, positioning and alignment in narratives of personal experience. Language in Society, 40 (1), 63–74. doi: 10.1017/S0047404510000898
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000898 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blank, T.
    (2015) Faux your entertainment: Amazon.com product reviews as a locus of digital performance. Journal of Folklore, 128(509), 286–297. doi: 10.5406/jamerfolk.128.509.0286
     https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.128.509.0286 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bucholtz, M. , & Hall, K.
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  7. Danet, B.
    (2001) Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. Berg: Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. De Fina, A.
    (2003) Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Denith, S.
    (2000) Parody. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203451335
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451335 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuchs, C.
    (2014) Social media. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4135/9781446270066.n2
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066.n2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2007a) Small stories, interaction, and identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2007b) Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. In Michael Bamberg (ed.), Narrative – State of the art (pp.145–154). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.6.15geo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.6.15geo [Google Scholar]
  13. Hutcheon, L.
    (2000) A theory of parody. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, W. , & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp.12–24). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, C.
    (2014)  Facebook ‘like’ as communicative act: Evidence from online and offline spaces. Paper presented at20th Sociolinguistics Symposium. Jyväskylä, Finland.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Linde, C.
    (1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackiewicz, J.
    (2010a) Assertions of expertise in online product reviews. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24 , 3–28. doi: 10.1177/1050651909346929
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909346929 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2010b) The co-construction of credibility in online product reviews. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19 , 403–426. doi: 10.1080/10572252.2010.502091
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2010.502091 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ochs, E. , & Capps, L.
    (2001) Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Page, R.
    (2010) Re-examining narrativity: Small stories in status updates. Text & Talk, 30 (4), 423–444. doi: 10.1515/text.2010.021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.021 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1df4h49
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1df4h49 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2012) Stories and social media. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Page, R. , Harper, R. , & Frobenius, M.
    (2013) From small stories to networked narrative: The evolution of personal narratives in Facebook status updates. Narrative Inquiry, 23 (1), 191–213. doi: 10.1075/ni.23.1.10pag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.10pag [Google Scholar]
  25. Ray, B.
    (2016) Stylizing genderlect online for social action: A corpus analysis of ‘Bic Crystal for Her’ reviews. Written Communication, 33 (1), 42–67. doi: 10.1177/0741088315621238
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315621238 [Google Scholar]
  26. Reyes, A. & Rosso, P.
    (2011) Mining subjective knowledge from customer reviews: A specific case of irony detection. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 118–124. Retrieved fromwww.aclweb.org/anthology/W11-1715
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Rose, M.
    (1993) Parody: Ancient, modern, and post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Skalicky, S. , & Crossley, S.
    (2015) A statistical analysis of satirical Amazon.com product reviews. European Journal of Humor Research, 2 , 66–85. doi: 10.7592/EJHR2014.2.3.skalicki
     https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.3.skalicki [Google Scholar]
  29. Turkle, S.
    (1995) Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Varis, P.
    (2015) Digital ethnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp.55–68). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Varis, P. , & Blommaert, J.
    (2014) Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes and new social structures. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 108 . Retrieved fromhttps://www.tilburguniversity.edu/research/institutes-and-research-groups/babylon/tpcs/item-paper-108-tpcs.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Vásquez, C.
    (2012) Narrativity and involvement in online consumer reviews: The case of TripAdvisor. Narrative Inquiry, 22 (1), 105–121. doi: 10.1075/ni.22.1.07vas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.07vas [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) The discourse of online consumer reviews. Bloomsbury: London.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) Intertextuality and authorized transgression in parodies of online consumer reviews. Language@Internet, 13, article 6. Vásquez, C. , & China, A. (forthcoming). From “my manly husband …” to “…sitting down to take a pee”: The construction and deconstruction of gender in Amazon reviews. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garces-Conejos Blitvitch (Eds.), Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions. Palgrave-Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Van De Mieroop, D.
    (2015) Social identity theory and the discursive analysis of collective identities in narratives. In (Eds.) A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou , The handbook of narrative analysis (pp.408–428). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Wortham, S.
    (2001) Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zappavigna, M.
    (2011) Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788–806. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385097
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeller, T.
    (2006, August9). On Amazon, all of a sudden everyone is a milk critic. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09milk.html?_r=0
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
Loading
“My life has changed forever!”
Narrative Inquiry 27, 217 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
/content/journals/10.1075/ni.27.2.02vas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Amazon reviews; digital narratives; humor; narrative identities; online identities; parody; performativity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error