Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 30, 2019

A wink and a nod: The role of emojis in forming digital communities

  • Sage L. Graham EMAIL logo
From the journal Multilingua

Abstract

As digital interactions become more global, individuals who bring divergent practices ‘to the keyboard’ must interact with other participants who come to the digital space with different cultural norms and expectations. This study explores the interface between local expectations and global practice through emoji use in online gaming – a venue which brings people from around the globe together on a common ‘playing field’. Since emojis were originally designed to tap into universals in human experience and expression, they are a ready-made resource through which individuals can integrate their culture-based expectations with communicative norms that are rooted in the common denominators of the (global) digital environment. Using live chat data from the game streaming platform Twitch, this study examines emojis posted to the open chat room during game streams of one female and one male gamer. The analysis examines the ways that participants use these semiotic images to orient toward gaming communities of practice and claim identities within gaming groups. It also explores whether emoji use is affected by the gender of the streamer. Analysis indicates that participants in the man’s stream differ from participants woman’s stream in the ways they use emojis to claim community membership and employ emojis as phatic devices.

References

Al Zidjaly, Najma. 2010. Intertextuality and constructing Islamic identity online. In Rotimi Taiwo (ed.), Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication: Language structures and social interaction, 191–204. New York: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch012Search in Google Scholar

Al Zidjaly, Najma. 2015. Geosemiotics: Discourses in place. In Sigrid Norris & Carmen Maier (eds.), Interactions, images, and text: A reader in multimodality, 63–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511175.63Search in Google Scholar

Al Zidjaly, Najma. 2017. Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse and Society. 10.117/0957926517721083.Search in Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. From variation to heteroglossia in the study of computer-mediated discourse. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, 77–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Angouri, Jo. 2016. Online communities and communities of practice. In Alexandra Georgakopoulou & Tereza Spilioti (eds.), Routledge handbook of digital communication, 323–338. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Baym, Nancy K. 2015. Personal connections in the digital age. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benwell, Bethan & Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748626533Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2016. ‘Meeting of styles’ and the online infrastructure of graffiti. Applied Linguistics Review 7(2). 99–115.10.1515/applirev-2016-0005Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2017. Society through the lens of language: A new look at social groups and integration. Tilberg Papers in Cultural Studies, Paper 178. Retrieved from: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/0a9afaa2-3e77-4ff4-b267-899296bf4150_TPCS_178_Blommaert.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The semotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474282024Search in Google Scholar

Dresner, Eli & Susan C. Herring. 2010. Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory 20. 249–268.10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_8Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & Sally. McConnell-Ginet. 1999. New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society 28. 185–201.10.1017/S0047404599002031Search in Google Scholar

Ensslin, Astrid. 2012. The language of gaming. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-35708-2Search in Google Scholar

Ensslin, Astrid & Isable Balteiro (eds.). 2019. Approaches to videogame discourse: Lexis, Interaction, textuality. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Press.10.5040/9781501338489Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2003. What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1145/950566.950595Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2015. Unified discourse analysis: Language, reality, virtual worlds and video games. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315774459Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage L. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742–759.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage L. 2016. Relationality, friendship and identity. In Alexandra Georgakopoulou & Tereza Spilioti (eds.), Routledge handbook of digital communication, 305–320. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage L. 2017. Politeness and impoliteness. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Handbook of the pragmatics of social media, 459–491. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110431070-017Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage L. & Claire. Hardaker. 2017. (Im)politeness in digital communication. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Kádár (eds.), Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_30Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage L. & Scott Dutt. 2019. Watch the potty mouth: Negotiating ipoliteness in online gaming. In Ensslin, Astrid & Isabel Balteiro (eds.). Approaches to videogame discourse: Lexis, Interaction, textuality. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Press.10.5040/9781501338489.0017Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. 2004. Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Sasha Barab, Rob Kling & James Gray (eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lavé, Jean & Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam, Brooke Bolander & Nancy Höhn. 2015. Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards. Pragmatics 25(1). 1–21.10.1075/prag.25.1.01locSearch in Google Scholar

Nakandala, Supun, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Norman Makoto Su & Yong-Yeol Ahn. 2016. Gendered conversation in a social game-streaming platform. Acm. 10.1145/1235.Search in Google Scholar

Nardi, Bonnie. 2010. My life as a night Elf priest: An anthropological account of world of warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/toi.8008655.0001.001Search in Google Scholar

Newon, Lisa. 2011. Multimodal creativity and identities of expertise in the digital ecology of a world of warcraft guild. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, 203–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Newon, Lisa. 2016. Online multiplayer games. In Alexandra Georgakopoulou & Tereza Spilioti (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication, 289–304. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, Celia. 2011. Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rheingold, Howard. 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Riot Games. 2015–2017. League of legends. Los Angeles: Riot Games.Search in Google Scholar

Saint-George, Ingrid de. 2015. Mediated discourse analysis, ‘embodied learning’ and emerging social and professional identities. In Sigrid Norris & Carmen Maier (eds.), Interactions, images, and text: A reader in multimodality, 347–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511175.347Search in Google Scholar

Schnoebelen, Tyler. 2012. Do you smile with your nose?: Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18 (2). Retrieved from: http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1242&context=pwplSearch in Google Scholar

Schwämmlein, Eva & Katrtin Wodzicki. 2012. What to tell about me?: Self-presentation in online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17. 387–407.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01582.xSearch in Google Scholar

Vandergriff, Ilona. 2014. A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use in Nonative/native speaker text chat. Language@ Internet 11(Article 4). http://languageatinternet.org/articles/2014/vandergriff.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Alecia. 2000. Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3. 827–833.10.1089/10949310050191809Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2014. Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14(3). http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1518-76322014000300511&script=sci_abstract.10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-01-30
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/multi-2018-0037/html
Scroll to top button