Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 17, 2018

Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages

  • Meagan Vigus EMAIL logo
From the journal Linguistic Typology

Abstract

This paper presents a cross-linguistic investigation of the antipassive within the framework of Radical Construction Grammar. Based on function, this study identifies constructions in 70 languages from 25 language families and four geographical macro areas. Iconically motivated correlations were found between functions and the morphosyntactic strategies they employ. The results of this study suggest that constructions indicating the lower individuation of patients and constructions indicating the lower affectedness of patients, previously grouped together as ‘antipassive’, should be considered two separate construction types. This is based on their separate functions, the distinct morphosyntactic strategies used to encode them across languages, and differences in productivity with regard to semantic classes of verbs.

Abbreviations

1/2/3 = 1st/2nd/3rd person; 1/2 trans = half transitivizer; ii = series II; a = agent; abs = absolutive; anph = anaphoric; antip = antipassive; asp = aspect; assoc = association marker; cls = close to speaker; colI = column I; colII = column II; con = connective; cont = continuous; d = d-classifier; def = definite; dem = demonstrative; do = direct object; dyn = dynamic; enc = enclitic pronoun; erg = ergative; f = feminine; ff = far future; fin = finite; fp = far past; fut = future; fv = final vowel; gen = genitive; gnr = generic; im = immediate; imp = imperative; impf = imperfective enclitic particle; impfk = imperfective morphological prefix; ind = indicative; infr = inferred; instr = instrumental; ipfv = imperfective; itr = intransitive; = l = ł-classifier; link = prosodic linker; loc = locative; loc18 = locative noun prefix of class 18; m = masculine; mid = middle; mot = motion; nar = narrative; nf = non-feminine; nom = nominative; np1 = nominal prefix of class 1; np7 = nominal prefix of class 7; npst = non-past; obj = object; ongo = ongoing; op = operative; pa = personal article; pc1 = pronominal concord of class 1; pc7 = pronominal concord of class 7; per = personal-factual evidential; perf = perfect; pfv = perfective; pl = plural; pn = proper noun; poss = possessive; prs = present; prx = proximal; pst = past; quot = quote; refl = reflexive; rep = reported evidential; rpt = repetitive; sbj = subject; sbrd = subordinator; sc = serial verb connective; seq = sequential; sg = singular; th = thematic prefix; tr = transitive; vis = visual-sensory evidential; yestp = yesterday past.

Acknowledgements

First, I would like to thank William Croft for many valuable comments, suggestions, and discussions throughout the earlier stages of this project and on previous drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank Rosa Vallejos and Melissa Axelrod for helpful suggestions on an early version of the paper. Finally, I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

Appendix

A

LanguageFamily > Sub-familyaAreaReferenceb
BandjalangAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaFoley & Valin (1984, 172)
DiyariAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaAustin (1981, 153–155)
DjabugayAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaPatz (1991, 298)
DjaruAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaTsunoda (1981, 149–151)
DyirbalAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaDixon (2010, 167)
LanguageFamily > Sub-familyaAreaReferenceb
Guugu YimidhirrAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaHaviland (1979, 128–132)
KalkatunguAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaBlake (1978)
Kuku YalanjiAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaPatz (2002, 145)
WarlpiriAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaHale (1982, 237–250)
YidinyAustralian > Pama-NyunganOceaniaFoley & Valin (1984, 172)
AlawaAustralian > GunwingguanOceaniaSharpe (1972, 102–103)
MangarayiAustralian > GunwingguanOceaniaMerlan (1982, 134–135)
ChamorroAustronesian > Sunda-SulawesiOceaniaCooreman (1988), 1994
EmbalohAustronesian > Sunda-SulawesiOceaniaAdelaar (1995, 389–394)
KapampanganAustronesian > PhilippineOceaniaMithun (1994, 257–270)
FijianAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaDixon (1988, 48–50, 175–181)
IaaiAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaOzanne-Rivierre(1976: 176), cited in Bril(2005: 38)
NakanaiAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaJohnston (1980, 39, 138)
NeververAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaBarbour (2012, 241–244)
SamoanAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaCooreman (1994, 61–62)
SinaugoroAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaTauberschmidt(1999: 37)
TinrinAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaOsumi (1995, 224–225)
LanguageFamily > Sub-familyaAreaReferenceb
ToqabaqitaAustronesian > OceanicOceaniaLichtenberk (2008, 864–866)
OksapminTrans-New GuineaOceaniaLoughnane (2009, 238–241)
WaremboriLower MamberamoOceaniaDonohue (1999, 43)
YeleisolateOceaniaHenderson (1995, 26–27)
BelorussianIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaKovaleva (1967, 10), cited in Geniušienė(1987: 249)
BulgarianIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaGeniušienė (1987, 249)
CzechIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaGeniušienė (1987, 250)
MacedonianIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaGeniušienė (1987, 250)
RussianIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaSay (2005)
SlovakIndo-European > Balto-SlavicEurasiaGeniušienė (1987, 249)
EnglishIndo-European > GermanicEurasiaLevin (1993, 33, 41–42)
SwedishIndo-European > GermanicEurasiaGeniušienė (1987, 249–250)
BalochiIndo-European > Indo-IranianEurasiaAxenov (2006, 73–75)
FrenchIndo-European > RomanceEurasiaHerslund (1997)
BeztiNortheast Caucasian > TsezicEurasiaHewitt (1981)
GodoberiNortheast Caucasian > Avar-AndicEurasiaTatevosov (2011)
AbkhazNorthwest CaucasianEurasiaHewitt (1989, 168–170)
BzhedukhNorthwest CaucasianEurasiaHewitt (1981, 160)
KabardianNorthwest CaucasianEurasiaMatasović (2008)
LanguageFamily > Sub-familyaAreaReferenceb
LazKartvelianEurasiaHarris (1985, 128)
SvanKartvelianEurasiaHarris (1985, 128)
TuvanNorthern Turkic > SiberianEurasiaKuular (2007, 1173)
ChukchiChukotko-KamchatkanEurasiaNedjalkov (2006, 222), Janic (2013b, 66–68)
CilubàNiger-Congo > BantuAfricaBostoen et al. (2015: 734)
KirundiNiger-Congo > BantuAfricaNdayiragije (2006, 275–276)
LogbaNiger-Congo > KwaAfricaDorvlo (2008, 134–135)
SupyireNiger-Congo > GurAfricaCarlson (1994, 407–413)
BariNilo-Saharan > NiloticAfricaSpagnolo (1933, 239)
PäriNilo-Saharan > NiloticAfricaAndersen (1988, 300–303)
GumuzNilo-Saharan > KomuzAfricaAhland (2012, 189–190, 341–342)
!XunKhoisan > K’xaAfricaHeine & König (2010, 54)
Central Alaskan Yup’ikEskimo-Aleut > YupikAmericasMithun (2000, 93–98)
I nupiaqEskimo-Aleut > InuitAmericasMacLean (1986, 131–140)
West GreenlandicEskimo-Aleut > InuitAmericasFortescue (1984, 82–88)
K’ekchi MayanMayan > QicheanAmericasBerinstein (1998)
TzutujilMayan > QicheanAmericasDayley (1985, 345–351)
MamMayan > MameanAmericasEngland (1988, 533)
ComancheUto-Aztecan > NumicAmericasCharney (1993, 117–131)
UteUto-Aztecan > NumicAmericasGivón (2011, 259–260)
TolowaAthapaskan > Pacific Coast AthapaskanAmericasGivón & Bommelyn(2000)
SlaveAthapaskan > Northwestern CanadaAmericasRice (1989, 629–630)
LakhotaSiouan > Western SiouanAmericasVan Valin (1977, 13–14)
LanguageFamily > Sub-familyaAreaReferenceb
ApinajeJê > Northern JêAmericasOliveira (2005, 130–134, 260–261)
MatsesPanoan-Takanan > PanoanAmericasFleck (2003, 930–941)
KadiweuGuaykuruanAmericasSandalo (1997, 107–109)
KiowaKiowa-TanoanAmericasWatkins & McKenzie(1984: 138)
Nez PerceSahaptianAmericasRude (1986)
TrumaiisolateAmericasGuirardello (1999, 340–341)
  1. aThe family listed is the highest level grouping. The sub-family listed is either the next order sub-grouping, or the most salient sub-group to which the language belongs.

  2. bPage numbers indicate the most relevant section for the constructions analyzed here. Other sections of the reference material may have been consulted.

References

Adelaar, Alexander K. 1995. Problems of definiteness and ergativity in Embaloh. Oceanic Linguistics 34(2). 75–409.10.2307/3623049Search in Google Scholar

Ahland, Colleen Anne. 2012. A grammar of Northern and Southern Gumuz. PhD diss., University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar

Aldridge, Edith. 2007. Minimalist analysis of ergativity. Sophia Linguistica 55. 123–142.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1988. Ergativity in Päri, a Nilotic OVS language. Lingua 75. 289–324.10.1016/0024-3841(88)90008-3Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Peter. 1981. A grammar of Diyari, South Australia, vol. 32. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Axenov, Serge. 2006. The Balochi language of Turkmenistan: A corpus-based grammatical description, vol. 10. Studia Iranica Upsaliensia. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark & William Croft. 2017. Lexical categories: Legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics 3. 179–197.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034134Search in Google Scholar

Barbour, Julie. 2012. A grammar of neverver. Berlin: De Gruyer Mouton.10.1515/9783110289619Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John. 2010. The structure of lexical meaning: Why semantics really matters. Language 86(4). 821–864.10.1353/lan.2010.0040Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John. 2011. On affectedness. Natural language & linguistic theory 29(2). 335–370.10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6Search in Google Scholar

Berinstein, Ava. 1998. Antipassive and 2-3 retreat in K’ekchi Mayan: Two constructions with the same verbal reflex. In Leanne Hinton & Pamela Munro (eds.), Studies in American Indian languages: Description and theory, 212–222. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Barry Jake. 1978. From semantic to syntactic anti-passive in Kalkatungu. Oceanic Linguistics 17. 163–169.10.2307/3622910Search in Google Scholar

Blight, Robert. 2004. Head movement, passive, and antipassive in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar

Bostoen, Koen, Sebastian Dom & Guillaume Segerer. 2015. The antipassive in Bantu. Linguistics 53(4). 731–772.10.1515/ling-2015-0016Search in Google Scholar

Bril, Isabelle. 2005. Semantic and functional diversification of reciprocal and middle prefixes in New Caledonian and other Austronesian languages. Linguistic Typology 9(1). 25–76.10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.25Search in Google Scholar

Brus, Ineke. 1992. Towards a typology of voice. In Michel Kefer & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Meaning and grammar: Cross-linguistic perspectives, vol. 10, 10–45. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, Robert. 1994. A grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883053Search in Google Scholar

Charney, Jean Ormsbee. 1993. A grammar of Comanche. Studies in the anthropology of North American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1998. The design of agreement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic typology, by Winfrid Lehmann, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cooreman, Ann. 1988. The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.16.19cooSearch in Google Scholar

Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara A. Fox and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.27.05cooSearch in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840579Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2014. Comparing categories and constructions crosslinguistically (again): The diversity of ditransitives. review of Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, edited by Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie. Linguistic Typology 18(3). 533–551.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2016. Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 377–393.10.1515/lingty-2016-0012Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Keith T. Poole. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34. 1–37.10.1515/THLI.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

Dayley, Jon P. 1985. Tzutujil grammar, vol. 107. University of California Publications in Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084987Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59–138.10.2307/412519Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010. Methodology, vol. 1. Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 1997. A typology of argument-determined constructions. In John Haiman, Sandra A. Thompson, Talmy Givón & Joan Bybee (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Giv&’on, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/z.82.08dixSearch in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark. 1999. Warembori. Languages of the World/Materials 341. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Dorvlo, Kofi. 2008. A grammar of Logba (Ikpana). PhD diss., Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT), Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar

England, Nora C. 1988. Mam voice. In Shibatani Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and voice, 525–545. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.16.17engSearch in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles F. 1986. Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 95–107.10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles F. & Paul Kay. 1993. Null instantiation and coinstantiation.Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, David William. 2003. A grammar of Matses. PhD diss., Rice University.Search in Google Scholar

Foley, William A. & Robert Van Valin. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2012. The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46(1). 75–108.10.1515/flin.2012.3Search in Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. Croom Helm descriptive grammars. London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Geniušienė, Emma. 1987. The typology of reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110859119Search in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy. 1981. Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2). 163–193.10.1075/sl.5.2.03givSearch in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Giv&’on (ed.), Topic continuity in Ddscourse: A quantitative cross-language study, vol. 3, 1–42. Typological studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.3.01givSearch in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy (ed.). 1994. Voice and inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy. 2001a. Syntax, vol 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy. 2001b. Syntax, vol 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy. 2011. Ute reference grammar. Culture and Language Use: Studies in Anthropological Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Giv&’on, Talmy & Loren Bommelyn. 2000. The evolution of de-transitive voice in Tolowa Athabaskan. Studies in Language 24. 41–76.10.1075/sl.24.1.03givSearch in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals: With special reference to future hierarchies. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Jeffrey S. 2001. A configurational account of syntactic ergative patterning. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39. 43–66.Search in Google Scholar

Guirardello, Raquel. 1999. A reference grammar of Trumai. PhD diss., Rice University.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Stephen M. Swartz (ed.), Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst, 217–315. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Australian Aborigines Branch.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 1985. Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case, vol 18. Syntax and Semantics. Orlando: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373143Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 86(3). 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15. 535–567.10.1515/LITY.2011.035Search in Google Scholar

Haviland, John. 1979. Guugu Yimidhirr. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, vol. 1, 27–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/z.hal1.06havSearch in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 202–211.10.3765/bls.v2i0.2278Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Christa König. 2010. The !Xun language: A dialect grammar of Northern Khoisan. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, James. 1995. Phonology and grammar of Yele, Papua New Guinea. Pacific Linguistics. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific/Asian Studies, Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Herslund, Michael. 1997. Passive and antipassive in a functional description of French reflexive verbs. Hermes 19. 75–92.10.7146/hjlcb.v10i19.25425Search in Google Scholar

Hewitt, Brian George. 1981. Antipassive and labile constructions in North Caucasian. General Linguistics 22. 158–171.Search in Google Scholar

Hewitt, Brian George. 1989. Abkhaz. Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60(4). 703–752.10.1353/lan.1984.0020Search in Google Scholar

Janic, Katarzyna. 2013a. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Ph.D. diss., University of Lyon.Search in Google Scholar

Janic, Katarzyna. 2013b. The Slavonic languages and the development of the antipassive marker. In Irina Kor-Chahine (ed.), Current studies in Slavic languages, 61–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/slcs.146.04janSearch in Google Scholar

Johnston, Raymond Leslie. 1980. Nakanai of New Britain: The grammar of an Oceanic language. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Kazenin, Konstantin. 1998. On patient demotion in Lak. In Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds.), Typology of verbal categories, 95–115. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110913750.95Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.23Search in Google Scholar

Kovaleva, M. T. 1967. Vozvratnye glagoly v sovremennom belorusskom jazyke (Reflexive verbs in modern Byelorussian). PhD diss., Minsk.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2011. Voice typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0019Search in Google Scholar

Kuular, Kh. B. 2007. Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assitives in Tuvan. Typological Studies in Language 71(3). 1163–1230.10.1075/tsl.71.38kuuSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud & Kevin Lemoine. 2005. Definite null subjects in (spoken) French: A construction-grammar account. In Miriam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots, 13–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/cal.4.03lamSearch in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 1998. Actancy, edited by Georg Bossong and Bernard Comrie, vol. 19. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808100Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Situation types, valency frames and operations. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, 1547–1596. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429343-017Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199062Search in Google Scholar

Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A grammar of Oksapmin, Ph.D. diss., School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne.Search in Google Scholar

MacLean, Edna Ahgeak. 1986. North Slope Iñupiaq grammar, first year. Alaska Native Language Center.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej. 2006. Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations. In Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Case, valency and transitivity, vol. 77, 329–357. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.77Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej. 2010. Analyzing semantic maps: A multifactorial approach. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 176–198.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.350Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Massam, Diane. 2009. Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(4). 1076–1096.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00140.xSearch in Google Scholar

Matasović, Ranko. 2008. Transitivity in Kabardian. In Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Investigations of the syntaxsemantics- pragmatics interface, 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/slcs.105.08matSearch in Google Scholar

Merlan, Francesca. 1982. Mangarayi. Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60. 847–894.10.1353/lan.1984.0038Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1994. The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.27.11mitSearch in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 84–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627750.004Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. On the case marking of objects. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 4, 249–289. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Næss, Åshild. 2004. What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114. 1186–1212.10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Ndayiragije, Juvenal. 2006. The ergativity parameter: A view from antipassive. In Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity, 271–292. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_11Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2006. Chukchi reciprocals (with an appendix on Koryak and Itelmen). In Masayoshi Shibatani, Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: In honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 217–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.65.13nedSearch in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Christiane Cunha de. 2005. The language of the Apinajé people of Central Brazil. PhD diss., University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar

Osumi, Midori. 1995. Tinrin Grammar, vol. 25. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise. 1976. Le iaai: langue mélanésienne d’Ouvéa, Nouvelle-Calédonie: phonologie, morphologie, esquisse syntaxique, vol. 20. Leuven: Peeters Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Patz, Elizabeth. 1991. Djabugay. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.), The handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 4, 244–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Patz, Elizabeth. 2002. A grammar of the Kuku Yulanji language of North Queensland. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/108.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2017. Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110861822Search in Google Scholar

Rude, Noel. 1986. Topicality, transitivity, and the direct object in Nez Perce. International Journal of American Linguistics 52. 124–153.10.1086/466009Search in Google Scholar

Sandalo, Filomena. 1997. A grammar of Kadiwéu with special emphasis to the polysynthesis parameter. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Say, Sergey. 2005. Antipassive sja-verbs in Russian: Between inflection and derivation. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th Morphology meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/cilt.264.16saySearch in Google Scholar

Sharpe, Margaret C. 1972. Alawa phonology and grammar, vol 37. Australian Aboriginal Studies Linguistic Series 15. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2006. On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44(2). 217–269.10.1515/LING.2006.009Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London/Sydney/Dover: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1972. Chinook jargon: Language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems. Language 48. 378–406.10.2307/412141Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Linguistic Series No. 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Spagnolo, Lorenzo M. 1933. Bari grammar. Verona: Missioni Africane.Search in Google Scholar

Spreng, Bettina. 2010. On the conditions for antipassives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7). 556–575.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00204.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Detelicization and argument supression: Evidence from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1). 135–174.10.1515/ling.2011.004Search in Google Scholar

Tauberschmidt, Gerhard. 1999. A grammar of Sinaugoro: An Austronesian language of the Central Province of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.10.7560/750357-006Search in Google Scholar

Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. The Djaru language of Kimberley, Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 385–396.10.1017/S0022226700010318Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. 1977. Aspects of Lakhota syntax: A study of Lakhota (Teton Dakota) syntax and its implications for universal grammar. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Laurel J. & Parker McKenzie. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Studies in the Anthropology of North American Indians. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-01-05
Revised: 2018-05-02
Published Online: 2018-10-17
Published in Print: 2018-10-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingty-2018-0013/html
Scroll to top button