Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Comparative Analysis of Flight Search Representations

Comparative Analysis of Flight Search Representations

Aimal Tariq Rextin, Fatima Iftekhar, Muhammad Muddasir Malik, Faheem Abbas
Copyright: © 2019 |Volume: 31 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 15
ISSN: 1546-2234|EISSN: 1546-5012|EISBN13: 9781522563778|DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.2019100104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Rextin, Aimal Tariq, et al. "Comparative Analysis of Flight Search Representations." JOEUC vol.31, no.4 2019: pp.74-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2019100104

APA

Rextin, A. T., Iftekhar, F., Malik, M. M., & Abbas, F. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Flight Search Representations. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 31(4), 74-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2019100104

Chicago

Rextin, Aimal Tariq, et al. "Comparative Analysis of Flight Search Representations," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 31, no.4: 74-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2019100104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Visualization has been extensively used in almost all the fields, but unfortunately, there is very little work on the visualization of flight search. The literature discusses only two representations: textual representation and linear representation. In this study, the authors introduce a new form of visualization called circular representation and compare it with the existing visualization techniques. The authors found that each representation has its own merits and demerits. More specifically, they found that users were able to find required flight circular efficiently when using circular representation, while most errors were committed by the user when using textual representation, and users ranked circular representation low in terms of qualitative satisfaction.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.