Negotiating digital surveillance legislation in post-Snowden times

References

1. Audi, Robert
   2006 Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203015681
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015681 [Google Scholar]
2. Allmer, Thomas
   2012 Towards a Critical Theory of Surveillance in Informational Capitalism. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01459‑4
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01459-4 [Google Scholar]
3. Barnard-Wills, David
   2011 “UK News Media Discourses of Surveillance.” The Sociological Quarterly52 (4): 548–567. doi:  10.1111/j.1533‑8525.2011.01219.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01219.x [Google Scholar]
4. Fairclough, Norman
   1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
   2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
   2013 “Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA perspective.” Political Studies Review, 11(3): 336–344. doi:  10.1111/1478‑9302.12025
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12025 [Google Scholar]
7. Finlayson, Alan
   2013 “Critique and Political Argumentation.” Political Studies Review, 11(3): 313–320. doi:  10.1111/1478‑9302.12023
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12023 [Google Scholar]
8. Foucault, Michel
   1972 The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Foucault, Michel
   1977 Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fuchs, Christian, Kees Boersma, Anders Albrechtslund, and Marisol Sandoval
    2012 “Introduction: Internet and Surveillance.” InInternet and Surveillance. The challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, ed. byFuchs, Christian, Kees Boersma, Anders Albrechtslund, and Marisol Sandoval, 1–30. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fuchs, Christian
    2015 “Surveillance and Critical Theory.” Media and Communication3(2): 6–9. doi:  10.17645/mac.v3i2.207
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i2.207 [Google Scholar]
12. Gee, James Paul
    2014 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Haggerty, Kevin D., and Richard V. Ericson
    2000 “The Surveillant Assemblage.” The British Journal of Sociology51(4): 605–622. doi:  10.1080/00071310020015280
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280 [Google Scholar]
14. Hay, Colin
    2013 “Political Discourse Analysis: The Dangers of Methodological Absolutism.” Political Studies Review, 11(3): 321–327. doi:  10.1111/1478‑9302.12026
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12026 [Google Scholar]
15. Hintz, Arne, and Ian Brown
    2017 “Enabling Digital Citizenship? The Reshaping of Surveillance Policy After Snowden.” International Journal of Communication, 11(20): 782–801.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jokinen, Arja
    1999 ”Vakuuttelevan ja suostuttelevan retoriikan analysoiminen [Analysing persuading and convincing rhetoric].” InDiskurssianalyysi liikkeessä [Discourse analysis in motion]ed. byJokinen, Arja, Kirsi Juhila, and Eero Suoninen, 126–159. Tampere: Vastapaino.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kakkuri-Knuuttila, Marja-Liisa
    1998 Argumentti ja kritiikki. Lukemisen, keskustelun ja vakuuttamisen taidot [Argument and critique. The skills of reading, conversation and convincing]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lischka, Juliane A.
    2017 “Explicit Terror Prevention Versus Vague Civil Liberty: How the UK Broadcasting News (De) Legitimatise Online Mass Surveillance Since Edward Snowden’s Revelations.” Information, Communication & Society20(5): 665–682. doi:  10.1080/1369118X.2016.1211721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1211721 [Google Scholar]
19. Lyon, David
    1994 Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lyon, David
    2014 “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique.” Big Data & Society1(2): 1–13. doi:  10.1177/2053951714541861
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861 [Google Scholar]
21. Lyon, David
    2015 Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mathiesen, Thomas
    2013 Towards a Surveillant Society: The Rise of Surveillance Systems in Europe. Sherfield on Loddon: Waterside Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Marx, Gary T.
    2002 “What’s New about the ’New Surveillance’? Classifying for Change and Continuity.” Surveillance & Society1(1): 9–29. 10.24908/ss.v1i1.3391
    https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i1.3391 [Google Scholar]
24. Ministry of Defence
    Ministry of Defence 2015 “Guidelines for Developing Finnish Intelligence legislation: Working Group Report”, accessedDecember 14, 2017, https://www.defmin.fi/files/3016/Suomalaisen_tiedustelulainsaadannon_suuntaviivoja.pdf
25. Ni Loideain, Nora
    2015 EU Law and Mass Internet Metadata Surveillance in the Post-Snowden Era. Media and Communication, 3(2): 56–62. 10.17645/mac.v3i2.297
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i2.297 [Google Scholar]
26. Pietikäinen, Sari, and Anne Mäntynen
    2009 Kurssi kohti diskurssia [Course towards discourse]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Scheinin, Martin
    2015 “The State of Our Union: Confronting the Future.” International Journal of Constitutional Law13(3): 559–566. doi:  10.1093/icon/mov051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov051 [Google Scholar]
28. Schulze, Matthias
    2015 “Patterns of Surveillance Legitimization: The German Discourse on the NSA Scandal.” Surveillance & Society13(2): 197–217. doi:  10.24908/ss.v13i2.5296
    https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i2.5296 [Google Scholar]
29. Scollon, Ron, and Suzie Wong Scollon
    2004 Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203694343
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343 [Google Scholar]
30. Simone, Maria A.
    2009 “Give Me Liberty and Give Me Surveillance: A Case Study of the US Government’s Discourse of Surveillance.” Critical Discourse Studies6(1): 1–14. doi:  10.1080/17405900802559977
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900802559977 [Google Scholar]
31. Steiger, Stefan, Wolf J. Schünemann, and Katharina Dimmroth
    2017 “Outrage without consequences?: Post-Snowden Discourses and Governmental Practice in Germany.” Media and Communication5(1): 7–16. 10.17645/mac.v5i1.814
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.814 [Google Scholar]
32. Tiainen, Minna
    2017 “(De)legitimating Electronic Surveillance: a Critical Discourse Analysis of the Finnish News Coverage of the Edward Snowden Revelations.” Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 402–419. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2017.1320296
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1320296 [Google Scholar]
33. Tréguer, Félix
    2017 “Intelligence Reform and the Snowden Paradox: The Case of France.” Media and Communication, 5(1): 17–28. 10.17645/mac.v5i1.821
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.821 [Google Scholar]
34. Toulmin, Stephen E.
    2003 The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
35. Van Gulijk, Coen,
    2014 “Paper Assessing Surveillance in the Context of Preventing a Terrorist Act.” Seventh Framework Programme. Surveillance: Ethical Issues, Legal Limitations, and Efficiency, AccessedDecember 14, 2017, https://surveille.eui.eu/research/publications/
    [Google Scholar]
36. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication1(1): 91–112. doi:  10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
37. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, Lucy Bennett, and Gregory Taylor
    2017 “The Normalization of Surveillance and the Invisibility of Digital Citizenship: Media Debates after the Snowden Revelations.” International Journal of Communication, 11: 740–762.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Walton, Douglas
    2006 Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Walton, Douglas
    2007 Media Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619311
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619311 [Google Scholar]
40. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    (eds.) 2016 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]