Abstract
In some Bantu languages of western Uganda, we find an interesting construction in which typical transitive verbs such as “to cut (a tree),” “to bend (a wire),” “to smoke (meat),” “to tear (paper),” “to open (a door),” etc., are used intransitively, without any additional suffixes such as passive and neuter. I call this construction the syntactically intransitive construction of transitive verbs, and illustrate it with examples from Tooro, a Bantu language of western Uganda. However, two important restrictions apply regarding the use of this construction. One is that among transitive verbs, only those causing a change of state that take human agents and inanimate objects may be used intransitively, with inanimate objects being promoted to the subject position. The second restriction is that this construction may only be used with the perfective ending -ire/-ere. This last point indicates that this construction is distinct from typical labile verb constructions that, in principle, occur in all tenses, aspects and moods. The analysis of the intransitive construction of transitive verbs inevitably raises the issue of the stative nature of perfective actions.
Funding statement: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24320077.
Abbreviations
- ACC
Accusative
- ASP
Aspect
- AUG
augment (a type of article)
- cl.
class number
- FIN
final vowel
- INF
infinitive
- INTR
intransitive
- NEG
negative
- NFUT
near future
- NOM
nominative
- PASS
passive
- PERF
perfective ending
- PPR
pronominal prefix
- PREFIN
prefinal (tense/aspect marker)
- PRES
Present tense
- PRO
pronoun
- PROG
progressive
- PST
past
- REV
reverse
- RPST
remote past
- SPR
subject prefix
- TM
tense marker
- TR
transitive
References
Botne, Robert. 2009. Perfectives and perfects and pasts, oh my!: On the Semantics of -ile. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Bantu Languages, Tervuren.10.3406/aflin.2010.987Search in Google Scholar
Kaji, Shigeki. 1985. Lexique Tembo I: Tembo – Swahili du Zaïre – Japonais – Français. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Kaji, Shigeki. 2007. A Rutooro vocabulary. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Toward a universal definition of subject. In Li Charles (ed.), Subject and topic, 301–333. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-019882-8.50015-3Search in Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1976. Subjectivization rules in Kinyarwanda. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 258–268.Search in Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Press Publications in Linguistics 91. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1988. Passives in Kinyarwanda. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 355–386. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.16.12kimSearch in Google Scholar
Mchombo, Sam A. 1993. A formal analysis of the stative construction in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 14. 5–28.10.1515/jall.1993.14.1.5Search in Google Scholar
Meeussen, A.E. 1967. Bantu grammatical reconstructions. Africana Linguistica III. 79–121. Tervuren.10.3406/aflin.1967.873Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Joan. 1985. Swahili quasi-passives: The question of context. In Didier L. Goyvaerts (ed.), African linguistics, essays in memory of M.W.K. Semikenke, 477–490. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ssls.6.20rusSearch in Google Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. 2003. Derivation. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 71–89. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred H. 1972. Case complexes in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 3(1). 1–45.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston