Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 8, 2018

The use of the ablative clitic in locative phrases in Iraqw, a Cushitic language of Tanzania

  • Anne Kruijt EMAIL logo

Abstract

This paper examines the use of the ablative case clitic in locative phrases in Iraqw, a South Cushitic language of Tanzania. In the typological classification of locative marker syncretisms, Iraqw has been classified as a language with a Source=Location≠ Goal pattern. This pattern is extremely rare in languages of the world and has been argued to be unattainable. The Iraqw ablative case clitic has been reported as both source and location marker. New data shows that the directional case clitic, a goal marker, appears on locative constructions as well, but that it is used to express purpose rather than location. The data also shows that the ablative case clitic is found mainly in locational clauses with a main verb with a durative aspect. Based on this, I argue that in locative constructions, the ablative clitic expresses duration rather than location and I propose the reanalysis of the ablative marker in locative phrases as a durational marker. The notion of location does not need to be expressed overtly, but is a zero-marker. Therefore, the rare Source=Location≠ Goal pattern is no longer valid for Iraqw, and instead I propose the pattern Source≠ Location≠ Goal, which is common in languages of the world.

Abbreviations

1

first person

2

second person

3

third person

abl

ablative

back

background suffix

bgnd

background aspect

con

construct case

consec

consecutive

dem1

demonstrative 1

dem3

demonstrative 3

dem4

demonstrative 4

dep

dependent

dir

directional

DP

determiner phrase

dur

durative

mph

emphatic

expec

expectational

F

feminine

F1

feminine subclass

hab

habitual

imp

imperative

imps

impersonal

indf

indefinite

ins

instrumental

m

masculine

mid

middle

obj

object

pst

past

pfv

perfective

pl

plural

poss

possessive

reas

causational

respro

resumptive pronoun

sbj

subject

sg

singular.

Acknowledgements

This article could not have been written without Basilisa Hhao, my main language consultant, whose dedication and patience made this research possible. I am also very grateful to Ephraim Neema, who opened his house to me, and the rest of the Kwermusl community for their kindness, acceptance, and support during my research.

References

Andersen, Torben. 2002. Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23. 1–30.10.1515/jall.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol I, 62–154. Cambridge: University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Paul & Roland Kiessling (eds.). 1998. Iraqw texts (Archiv Afrikanistischer Manuskripte: Herausgegeben von Gudrun Miehe und Hilke Meyer-Bahlhurg, band 4). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

The Bible Society of Tanzania. 1995. Iimu/uungw (The book of Genesis). Dodoma: The Bible Society of Tanzania.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: A typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.66.03creSearch in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, vol. 6, 74–126. Oxford: University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Position of Case Affixes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/51 (accessed 03 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Gehrke, Berit. 2007. Goals and sources in event structures. Linguistics in the Netherlands 24(1). 86–98.10.1075/avt.24.10gehSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Terminology of Case. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 505–517. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0034Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Hilda Koopman (ed.), The syntax of specifiers and heads, 204–260. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203171608Search in Google Scholar

Kruijt, Anne 2017. Straight from the source: The semantics and functions of the ablative case clitic of Iraqw. Leiden: Leiden University Master Thesis. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/51473Search in Google Scholar

Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96. 1–33.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Mous, Maarten. 1992. A grammar of Iraqw. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Mous, Maarten. 2015. Copulas in Iraqw, a Cushitic language from Tanzania. Lingue e linguaggio XIV(2). 179–195.Search in Google Scholar

Mous, Maarten, Martha Qorro & Roland Kießling. 2002. Iraqw-English Dictionary. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Mous, Maarten & Safari Sanka. 2008. Géeso Duqang na hadithi nyingine [Géeso Duqang and other stories]. Nairobi: Kijabe Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nam, Seungho. 2004. Goal and source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Workshop on Event Structure. Leipzig, Germany.10.3765/bls.v30i1.940Search in Google Scholar

Narrog, Heiko. 2010. A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic discovery 8(1). 233–254.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.352Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 2008. Patterns of development, patterns of syncretism of relational morphology in the Bodic languages. In Jóhanna Bardal & Shobhana Cheliah (eds.), The role of semantics and pragmatics in the development of case, 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.15nooSearch in Google Scholar

Nordbustad, Frøydis. 1988. Iraqw grammar: An analytical study of the Iraqw language (Language and Dialect Studies in East Africa, 8). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Search in Google Scholar

Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081.10.1515/ling.2010.034Search in Google Scholar

Riemsdijk, Henk van & Riny Huybregts. 2002. Location and locality. In Marc van Oostendorp & Elene Anagnostopoulou (eds.), Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, 1–23. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The cartography of syntactic structure, vol. 6, 127–160. Oxford: University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, Amanda L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition 69. 1–34.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4Search in Google Scholar

Zwarts, Joost. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28. 739–779.10.1007/s10988-005-2466-ySearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-08
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall-2018-0009/html
Scroll to top button