Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 3, 2017

Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb derivation: The Agar variety

  • Torben Andersen EMAIL logo

Abstract

In Dinka, a predominantly monosyllabic and highly fusional Western Nilotic language, vowel quality alternation in the root plays a major and systematic role in the morphology of verbs, together with alternations in vowel length, voice quality, and tone. Earlier work has shown that in the inflection of simple, i.e., underived, transitive verbs, the vowel quality alternation conforms to a vowel height gradation system with three vowel grades. The present article shows that this vowel gradation system is also operative in the morphology of derived verbs with a transitive root, but with certain modifications. These include a different distribution of the vowel grades and interaction with a shift in voice quality, to breathy voice.

1 Introduction

The Western Nilotic language Dinka is largely monosyllabic, but nevertheless it has a fairly rich morphology. Most of its morphology is not expressed by affixes, but by alternations in the phonological material of the monosyllabic root, which makes Dinka a highly fusional language. As described in Andersen (1987), the Agar dialect of Dinka has three contrastive degrees of vowel length, two contrastive voice qualities in vowels (breathy and non-breathy), and three contrastive tones. Together with vowel quality alternation, alternations in these three phonological parameters of the syllable peak constitute most of the nonlinear morphology in both verbs and nouns.

In Andersen (1992‒1994) it was demonstrated how voice quality, vowel length and tone are exponents of derivation and/or inflection in verbs with a transitive root in the Agar dialect. In Andersen (1993) it was furthermore shown how vowel quality is an exponent of inflection in simple (i.e., non-derived) verbs with a transitive root, and a system of vowel gradation with three vowel grades was uncovered. The purpose of the present article is to demonstrate how, in the Agar dialect, vowel quality alternation also plays a central role in the formation of derived verbs with a transitive root and in the inflection of such verbs. The article thus fills the gap left by Andersen (1992–1994, 1993) in the description of the central parts of the morphology of transitive verbal roots.

The article is based on data from the Agar dialect collected during ten fieldwork trips to Sudan between 1984 and 1995 and a trip in 2009. What is described here is the variety of the Agar dialect spoken in the village of Pacong about 20 kilometers south-east of Rumbek in South Sudan. The data used are from elicitation sessions with four speakers, namely Isaac Maker, David Daniel Marial and Peter Gum Panther from Pacong and Kuyok Abol Kuyok from north of Rumbek. I worked with Isaac Maker in Juba in 1984, with Kuyok Abol Kuyok in Juba in 1985 and 1986 and in Khartoum in 1988, 1989 and 1990, with David Daniel Marial in Khartoum in 1988 and 1989, and with Peter Gum Panther in Khartoum in 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and again in 2009. [1]

The article is organized as follows. As a prerequisite, Section 2 recapitulates some of the findings in Andersen (1992‒1994, 1993). Section 3 shows that the vowel gradation system also accounts for vowel quality alternation in derived verbs, but with a partly different distribution of the vowel grades and with a partly different manifestation of one of the grades. Section 4 demonstrates that although vowel quality is basically independent of voice quality, the shift from non-breathy to breathy phonation has some consequences for vowel quality. Moreover, it is discussed how this shift interacts with the vowel gradation system. Section 5 is a conclusion which includes some reflections on the historical development of the vowel alternations.

2 Background

2.1 Verb shapes

A verb in Dinka is generally a monosyllable which conforms to the segmental shape C(w)(j)V(V(V))C with optional segments in parentheses. Thus, the verb segmentally consists of an onset consonant (C), optionally followed by one or two glides (/w/ and/or /j/ in that order), a vowel which is either short (V), medium (VV) or long (VVV), and a coda consonant (C). [2] The voice quality of the vowel is either breathy (◌̤) or non-breathy (◌̰), and the vowel carries a tone which in the Agar dialect is either low (◌̀), high (◌́) or falling (◌̂). [3] In my transcription, the voice quality and tone diacritics are placed on the first of a sequence of vowel symbols. [4] The monosyllable may be followed by a suffix with the segmental shape -(C)V.

2.2 Derivational and inflectional categories

2.2.1 Derivational categories

A verb with a transitive root is either simple or derived. As accounted for in Andersen 1992‒1994), derived verbs with a transitive root include the following five categories: centrifugal, which indicates direction towards a goal which is different from the deictic center (Andersen 2012b: 160); centripetal, which indicates direction towards the deictic center; dative, an applicative which makes the verb ditransitive by including a recipient, goal or beneficiary as an extra object [5]; antipassive, which makes the verb intransitive by excluding the object of the simple verb; and dativized antipassive, an applicative which transitivizes the antipassive by including a recipient, goal or beneficiary as an object. [6] All of these derivations are fairly productive. [7] The sentences in (1) with the transitive root mḭ̀it ‘pull’ exemplify the formation and use of the simple verb and the five derived categories listed above. [8]

(1)
a.

Simple [9]:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mḭ̀itwó̰ŋ.
boyd=pullCow
  1. ‘The boy is pulling a cow.’

b.

Centrifugal:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mḭ̂iitwó̰ŋbḛ̂eec.
boyd=pull.cfcowout.all
  1. ‘The boy is pulling a cow out.’

c.

Centripetal:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mì̤iitwó̰ŋ
boyd=pull.cpcow
  1. ʻThe boy is pulling a cow hither.’

d.

Dative:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mî̤itwó̰ŋmò̰c.
boyd=pull.datcowman
  1. ‘The boy is pulling a cow for the man.’

e.

Antipassive:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mì̤it.
boyd=pull.ap
  1. ‘The boy is pulling.’

f.

Dativized antipassive:

d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=mî̤iitmà̰kwá̰c.
boyd=pull.ap.datMakuac
  1. ‘The boy is pulling for Makuac.’

2.2.2 Inflectional categories

As for inflection, verbs are either finite or non-finite (Andersen 1992–1994, 1993), as exemplified with the simple transitive verb mò̰c ʻshoot’ in declarative clauses in (2). [10] All the verb forms in (2) are finite, except for the last one in (2k).

(2)
a.
bò̰olà̰=mò̰clá̤j.
Bold=shootanimal
  1. ʻBol is shooting an animal.’

b.
lá̤jà̰=mó̰ocbò̰ol.
animald=shoot.ntsBol
  1. ʻBol is shooting the animal.’

c.
lá̤jà̰=mwɔ̰̀ɔc.
animald=shoot.1sg
  1. ʻI am shooting the animal.’

d.
lá̤jà̰=mò̰c.
animald=shoot.2sg
  1. ‘You are shooting the animal.’

e.
lá̤jà̰=mò̰oc.
animald=shoot.3sg
  1. ‘He is shooting the animal.’

f.
lá̤jà̰=mó̰c-kṳ̀.
animald=shoot-1pl
  1. ʻWe are shooting the animal.’

g.
lá̤jà̰=mwɔ̰́c-kà̤.
animald=shoot-2pl
  1. ‘You are shooting the animal.’

h.
lá̤jà̰=mó̰c-kè̤.
animald=shoot-3pl
  1. ‘They are shooting the animal.’

i.
lá̤jà̰=mó̰c.
animald=shoot.pass
  1. ʻThe animal is being shot.’

j.
tè̤n=é̤à̰=mô̰oc-è̤lá̤jt̪í̤n.
place.cs1=dem2d=shoot-pass.ctanimalpro.ess/abl
  1. ʻAn animal is being shot in that place.’

k.
bò̰olà̰=cé̤lá̤jmô̰oc.
Bold=pfanimalshoot.nf
  1. ʻBol has shot an animal.’

There are ten finite forms. As exemplified in (2a), one of them is inflectionally unmarked and left unglossed. It is used when the verb is preceded by the subject, whereas the form in (2b), glossed as NTS, indicates that the verb is followed by a non-topical subject. [11] Six other finite forms express a pronominal subject, with a distinction between 1SG, 2SG, 3SG, 1PL, 2PL and 3PL, as exemplified in (2c-h). Two finite forms express an impersonal passive, with a distinction between having an object-topic, as in (2i) and glossed as PASS, and having a circumstantial topic, as in (2j) and glossed as PASS.CT. In addition, there is a non-finite form (NF), which is used when the finite verb is an auxiliary, as in (2k), where the finite verb is the perfect auxiliary cé̤ (PF). [12] Thus, a transitive verb, whether simple or derived, has 11 inflectionally different forms. The inflection may involve one of five suffixes: 2SG -é̤, PASS(.CT) -è̤, 1PL -kṳ, 2PL -ka̤ and 3PL -ke̤ (or -ki̤). [13] The clauses in (2) differ with respect to the syntactic role of the preverbal noun phrase, the “topic”. In (2a) and (2k) the topic is subject, in (2b-i) it is object, and in (2j) it is an adverbial.

Intransitive verbs cannot be inflected for subject in declarative clauses, but in some other clause types they can, for instance in kṳ̀-clauses, as illustrated in (3). [14]

(3)
a.
kṳ̀mwô̤oc.
andshoot.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I shoot.’

b.
kṳ̀mṳ̂uc-kṳ̀.
andshoot.ap-1pl
  1. ʻand we shoot.’

For intransitive verbs there are only 10 inflectionally different forms, since such verbs can only be passive if they have a circumstantial topic.

2.3 Classes of transitive verbal roots

Transitive verbal roots in the Agar dialect fall into four inflectional classes in terms of (i) the vowel length of the inflectionally unmarked (infl. unm.) form of the simple verb and (ii) the tone of the non-finite form of the simple verb (Andersen 1992‒1994: 22–25). Thus, as exemplified in Table 1, a root has either a short vowel and a falling tone (Class 1F), a short vowel and a low tone (Class 1L), a medium-length vowel and a falling tone (Class 2F), or a medium-length vowel and a high tone (Class 2H). The class names given here consist of a number, which indicates the number of morae (1 or 2) in the inflectionally unmarked form, and a letter, which indicates the tone (F for falling, L for low, and H for high) in the non-finite form. As also illustrated in Table 1, all of the four classes contain both non-breathy roots and breathy roots. These classes also determine the way in which derived verbs are formed.

Table 1:

Classes of transitive verbal roots in Agar Dinka, with examples.

Non-breathyBreathy
ClassInfl. unm.Non-finiteInfl. unm.Non-finite
1Fdɔ̰̀mdɔ̰̂ɔmʻcatch’t̪ṳ̀t̪t̪ṳ̂ut̪ʻpierce’
1Lbḭ̀lbḭ̀ilʻtaste’mè̤rmè̤erʻdecorate’
2Fd̪ḭ̀imd̪ḭ̂iimʻfilter’mwò̤ot̪mwô̤oot̪ʻgreet’
2Ht̪à̰alt̪á̰aalʻcook’pì̤icpí̤iicʻtwirl’

Table 2 gives information about the empirical basis of the description. Thus, this table shows for each of the four root classes how many roots have been examined for each of the six derivational categories. Not all the verbs have been examined exhaustively, i.e. with elicitation of all inflected forms, apart from the inflectionally unmarked form and the non-finite form.

Table 2:

Empirical basis of the analysis: Number of verbs examined for each of six derivational categories for each of the four root classes.

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
1F22476545130145
1L80261312762
2F19745243625100
2H1355335241879
Total63620012612380386

2.4 Voice quality alternation

As summarized in Table 3, voice quality alternation is one of the exponents of derivational categories (Andersen 1992‒1994: 33). In this table, “breathy” means that the derivational category is characterized by breathy voice quality in the root vowel, and thus may involve a shift from non-breathy voice to breathy voice, whereas “inherent” means that no voice quality shift takes place. As seen in the table, centripetal, dative and dativized antipassive verbs have breathy voice. To a large extent, this feature also characterizes antipassive verbs, but with some systematic exceptions in terms of the inflectional class of the root and the inflectional category.

Table 3:

Voice quality alternation in verbs with a transitive root.

Root classDerivational (and inflectional) categories
SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
finitenon-finite
1Finherentinherentbreathybreathybreathybreathyinherent
1Linherentinherentbreathybreathybreathyinherentinherent
2Finherentinherentbreathybreathybreathybreathybreathy
2Hinherentinherentbreathybreathybreathybreathyinherent

2.5 Vowel gradation system of simple transitive verbs

In Andersen (1993) it was shown how vowel quality alternation works in the inflection of simple transitive verbs. The account uncovered a vowel gradation system with three vowel grades across basic vowel qualities (“series”). A slightly revised version of this system is shown in Table 4 (based on Table X in Andersen [1993: 19]) without regard to vowel length. [15]

Table 4:

Vowel gradation in the inflection of simple transitive verbs (simplified).

Series
Without postcons. glideWith postcons. /j/With postcons. /w/
ɔ̰jḛja̰jɔ̰wḭwḛwa̰wɔ̰
Non-breathyɛ̰ɔ̰jḛjɛ̰jɔ̰wḭwḛwɛ̰wɔ̰
jɛ̰ɛ̰wɔ̰jɛ̰ja̰ja̰wjɛ̰wɛ̰wa̰ja̰
ɔ̤je̤ja̤jo̤wi̤we̤wa̤wo̤
Breathyɛ̤ɔ̤je̤je̤jo̤wi̤we̤wɛ̤wo̤
je̤ɛ̤ɔ̤wo̤je̤ja̤ja̤wje̤wɛ̤wa̤ja̤

For each root there is a basic vowel quality, called grade 1 (1°), and for each grade 1 vowel the table shows the two other grades, called grade 2 (2°) and grade 3 (3°). The upper part of the table shows non-breathy vowels, the lower part shows breathy vowels. Moreover, a distinction is made between grade 1 vowels in three different phonological contexts: vowels that are not preceded by a postconsonantal glide (on the left), vowels that are preceded by a postconsonantal /j/ (in the middle), and vowels that are preceded by a postconsonantal /w/ (on the right). Grade 2 differs from grade 1 in that the low central vowel quality /a/ is fronted and raised to lower-mid /ɛ/ in accordance with a morphophonological rule called Fronting (Andersen 1993: 21–25). [16] Grade 3 differs from grade 1 in that other vowel qualities than /a/ are lowered in accordance with a morphophonological rule called Lowering (Andersen 1993: 25–32), a process which sometimes involves “breaking” which adds a postconsonantal glide. It should be noted that /ɛ/ is not a basic vowel quality, since it is not a member of the grade 1 inventory; it arises either from fronting of /a/ or from lowering of /e/ or /i/.

The situation delineated in Table 4 is somewhat simplified. Thus, the table disregards that grade 1 of the /a̤/-series has an /ɔ̤/ alternant, cf. Section 4.4 below. It also disregards that some of the vowels have raised variants, cf. Section 4.3 below. Moreover, the table disregards that the contrast between the qualities /a/ and /ɛ/ which exists in medium and long vowels seems to be absent in short vowels (Andersen 1993: 13–14), in which case I use the symbol /a/ to the exclusion of /ɛ/. This means that grade 2 of the various /a/-series appears as /a/ rather than /ɛ/ in short vowels.

Each of the 11 forms of a simple transitive verb “has” (or “belongs to” or “occurs in”) a particular grade. Thus, grade 1, in addition to occurring in the inflectionally unmarked form, is an exponent of 2SG, 1PL, 3PL, PASS and NF. Grade 2 is an exponent of NTS, 3SG and PASS.CT. And grade 3 is an exponent of 1SG and 2PL. Examples are given in Sections 3 and 4 below. The vowel gradation system shown in Table 4 also plays a significant role in the morphology of nouns (Andersen 2002, 2014).

The rest of this article deals with the nature and role of vowel quality alternation in derived verbs with a transitive root, thus complementing the description of the morphology of transitive roots given in Andersen (1992‒1994) and Andersen (1993). First, it is shown that the vowel grade system set up to account for vowel quality alternation in simple verbs also works for derived verbs, but that the distribution of the grades is different and that the phonological range of Fronting is extended. Second, it is shown that the shift from non-breathy voice to breathy voice, which occurs in some derived verbs, involves some systematic shifts in vowel quality as well.

3 Vowel gradation in derived verbs

3.1 Distribution of vowel grades in derived verbs

In general, the vowel qualities used in derived verbs are the same as those used in the corresponding simple verbs, but the distribution of the alternants is partly different. This can be seen in Tables 5 and 6, which show all forms with the inherently breathy roots ɡṳ̀t ʻstab’ and t̪à̤r ʻspear’, respectively. [17] Both of these roots belong to Class 1 F. Since the root ɡṳ̀t in Table 5 has the grade 1 quality /u/, its grade 2 quality is phonologically identical to its grade 1 quality, while its grade 3 quality is /wo/, cf. Table 4 above. Conversely, since the root t̪à̤r in Table 6 has the grade 1 quality /a/, its grade 3 quality is phonologically identical to grade 1, while its grade 2 quality is /ɛ/.

Table 5:

Forms with the transitive breathy root ɡṳ̀t ʻstab’ (Class 1F).

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
Unm.ɡṳ̀tɡṳ́utɡṳ̀utɡṳ́utɡṳ̂utɡṳ̂ut
NFɡṳ̂utɡwó̤otɡwò̤otɡwó̤otɡwô̤otɡṳ̀t
NTSɡṳ́utɡṳ́utɡṳ́utɡṳ́utɡṳ́utɡṳ́ut*
1SGɡwò̤otɡwó̤otɡwò̤otɡwó̤otɡwô̤otɡwô̤ot
2SGɡṳ̀tɡwò̤ot-é̤ɡṳ́utɡwò̤ot-é̤ɡwò̤ot-é̤ɡwò̤ot-é̤
3SGɡṳ̀utɡṳ́utɡṳ̀utɡṳ́utɡṳ̂utɡṳ̂ut
1PLɡṳ́t-kṳ̀ɡṳ́ut-kṳ̀ɡṳ́ut-kṳ̀ɡṳ́ut-kṳ̀ɡṳ̂ut-kṳ̀ɡṳ̂ut-kṳ̀
2PLɡwó̤t-kà̤ɡwó̤ot-kà̤ɡwó̤ot-kà̤ɡwó̤ot-kà̤ɡwô̤ot-kà̤ɡwô̤ot-kà̤
3PLɡṳ́t-kè̤ɡṳ́ut-kè̤ɡṳ́ut-kè̤ɡṳ́ut-kè̤ɡṳ̂ut-kè̤ɡṳ̂ut-kè̤
PASSɡṳ́tɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤
PASS.CTɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤*
Table 6:

Forms with the transitive breathy root t̪à̤r ʻspear’ (Class 1F).

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
Unm.t̪à̤rt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤̀ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤̂ɛr*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr
NFt̪ɔ̤̂ɔrt̪á̤art̪à̤art̪á̤art̪â̤ar*t̪à̤r
NTSt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛr*t̪ɛ̤́ɛr*
1SGt̪à̤art̪á̤art̪à̤art̪á̤art̪â̤art̪â̤ar
2SGt̪à̤rt̪à̤ar-é̤t̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪à̤ar-é̤t̪à̤ar-é̤t̪à̤ar-é̤
3SGt̪ɛ̤̀ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤̀ɛrt̪ɛ̤́ɛrt̪ɛ̤̂ɛrt̪ɛ̤̂ɛr
1PLt̪á̤r-kṳ̀t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kṳ̀t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kṳ̀t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kṳ̀t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-kṳ̀t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-kṳ̀
2PLt̪á̤r-kà̤t̪á̤ar-kà̤t̪á̤ar-kà̤t̪á̤ar-kà̤t̪â̤ar-kà̤t̪â̤ar-kà̤
3PLt̪á̤r-kè̤t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kè̤t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kè̤t̪ɛ̤́ɛr-kè̤t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-kè̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-kè̤
PASSt̪á̤rt̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*
PASS.CTt̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*t̪ɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*

Based on the forms in Tables 5 and 6 taken together, and on antipassive forms dealt with in Section 3.2 below, the distribution of the vowel grades can be determined as being what is shown in Table 7. The distribution in transitive derived verbs is the same in all four root classes, cf. Tables 1013 at the end of this subsection. But in antipassive verbs the distribution depends on the root class, as also shown in Table 7.

Table 7:

Vowel height gradation in verbs with a transitive root.

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
1F1L2F2H
Unm.
NF
NTS
1SG
2SG3°/2°
3SG
1PL1°/2°
2PL
3PL1°/2°
PASS
PASS.CT
Table 10:

Vowel height gradation in centrifugal verbs.

Root class1F1L2F2H
Gloss‘pull’‘plait’‘pull’‘send’
SimpleUnm.t̪ḛ̀lnà̰jmḭ̀ittò̰oc
NFt̪ḛ̂elnà̰ajmı̰̂iittó̰ooc
CFUnm.t̪ḛ́elnɛ̰̂ɛjmı̰̂iittó̰ooc
NFt̪ɛ̰́ɛlnâ̰ajmjɛ̰̂ɛɛttwɔ̰́ɔɔc
NTSt̪ḛ́elnɛ̰́ɛjmı̰́iittó̰ooc
1SGt̪ɛ̰́ɛlnâ̰ajmjɛ̰̂ɛɛttwɔ̰́ɔɔc
2SGt̪ɛ̰̀ɛl-é̤nà̰aj-é̤mjɛ̰̀ɛɛt-é̤twɔ̰̀ɔɔc-é̤
3SGt̪ḛ́elnɛ̰̂ɛjmı̰̂iittó̰ooc
1PLt̪ḛ́el-kṳ̀nɛ̰̂ɛj-kṳ̀mı̰̂iit-kṳ̀tó̰ooc-kṳ̀
2PLt̪ɛ̰́ɛl-kà̤nâ̰aj-kà̤mjɛ̰̂ɛɛt-kà̤twɔ̰́ɔɔc-kà̤
3PLt̪ḛ́el-kè̤nɛ̰̂ɛj-kè̤mı̰̂iit-kè̤tó̰ooc-kè̤
PASSt̪ḛ̂el-è̤nɛ̰̂ɛj-è̤mı̰̂iit-è̤tô̰ooc-è̤
Table 13:

Vowel height gradation in dativized antipassive verbs.

Root class1F1L2F2H
Gloss‘catch’‘dust’‘milk’‘send’
SimpleUnm.dɔ̰̀mtḛ̀ŋrà̰aktò̰oc
NFdɔ̰̂ɔmtḛ̀eŋrâ̰aaktó̰ooc
AP.DATUnm.dô̤omtê̤eŋrɛ̤̂ɛɛktṳ́uc
NFdɔ̤̂ɔmtɛ̤̂ɛŋrâ̤aaktwó̤oc
NTSdó̤omté̤eŋrɛ̤́ɛɛktṳ́uc
1SGdɔ̤̂ɔmtɛ̤̂ɛŋrâ̤aaktwó̤oc
2SGdɔ̤̀ɔm-é̤tɛ̤̀ɛŋ-é̤rà̤aak-é̤twò̤oc-é̤
3SGdô̤omtê̤eŋrɛ̤̂ɛɛktṳ́uc
1PLdô̤om-kṳ̀tê̤eŋ-kṳ̀rɛ̤̂ɛɛk-kṳ̀tṳ́uc-kṳ̀
2PLdɔ̤̂ɔm-kà̤tɛ̤̂ɛŋ-kà̤râ̤aak-kà̤twó̤oc-kà̤
3PLdô̤om-kè̤tê̤eŋ-kè̤rɛ̤̂ɛɛk-kè̤tṳ́uc-kè̤
PASSdô̤om-è̤tê̤eŋ-è̤rɛ̤̂ɛɛk-è̤tṳ̂uc-è̤

In derived transitive (i.e., non-antipassive) verbs, as seen in Table 7, the vowel grade is either 2° or 3°, never 1°. The inflectionally unmarked form of such verbs has grade 2, and this is also the grade of NTS, 2SG in centripetal verbs, 3SG, 1PL, 3PL, PASS and PASS.CT. Grade 3 is found in NF, 1SG, 2SG (except in centripetal verbs) and 2PL. Thus, grade 2 here characterizes all the inflectional categories that have either grade 1 or grade 2 in simple verbs, except for NF. Hence, in derived transitive verbs, grade 2 appears to be the default grade and can therefore be taken to be an exponent of the derived status of the verb rather than a means of inflection. Grade 3, by contrast, must be taken to be a means of inflection, namely an exponent of NF, 1SG, 2SG (except in centripetal verbs) and 2PL.

Although the generalizations expressed in Table 7 are based on breathy roots, they also cover non-breathy roots. But here the situation is complicated by the fact that some derived categories exhibit voice quality shift, and for some non-breathy vowels the shift to breathy voice is accompanied by a change in vowel quality, as described in Section 4 below. In general, however, the vowel quality alternation in verbs with their inherently non-breathy voice shifted to breathy voice is the same as in verbs with inherently breathy voice, cf. Table 4 above. This situation is exemplified in Tables 8 and 9, while exceptions are dealt with in Section 4 below. Table 8 shows all forms with the non-breathy Class 2F root mḭ̀it ʻpull’, for which grade 2 is identical to grade 1. Table 9 shows all forms with the non-breathy Class 1F root bà̰r ʻtake along’, for which grade 3 is identical to grade 1. In Table 8 the breathy grade 2 vowel /i̤/ behaves like an /i̤/ in an inherently breathy root, i.e. it has /je̤/ as its grade 3 counterpart, cf. Table 4 above. In Table 9, similarly, the breathy grade 2 vowel /ɛ̤/ behaves like an /ɛ̤/ in a root with an inherently breathy grade 1 vowel /a̤/, i.e. it has /a̤/ as its grade 3 counterpart, cf. again Table 4 above.

Table 8:

Forms with the transitive Class 2F root mḭ̀it ʻpull’.

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
Unm.mḭ̀itmı̰̂iitmı̤̀iitmı̤̂itmı̤̂iitmı̤̀it
NFmı̰̂iitmjɛ̰̂ɛɛtmjè̤eetmjê̤etmjê̤eetmı̤́iit
NTSmḭ́iitmı̰́iitmı̤́iitmí̤itmí̤iitmı̤́iit
1SGmjɛ̰̀ɛɛtmjɛ̰̂ɛɛtmjè̤eetmjê̤etmjê̤eetmjè̤eet
2SGmı̰̂itmjɛ̰̀ɛɛt-é̤mı̤́iitmjè̤et-é̤mjè̤eet-é̤mjè̤eet-é̤, mí̤it
3SGmı̰̀iitmı̰̂iitmı̤̀iitmı̤̂itmı̤̂iitmı̤̀iit
1PLmḭ̀it-kṳ́mı̰̂iit-kṳ̀mı̤́iit-kṳ̀mı̤̂it-kṳ̀mı̤̂iit-kṳ̀mı̤̀it-kṳ́
2PLmjɛ̰̀ɛt-ká̤mjɛ̰̂ɛɛt-kà̤mjé̤eet-kà̤mjê̤et-kà̤mjê̤eet-kà̤mjè̤et-ká̤
3PLmḭ̀it-ké̤mı̰̂iit-kè̤mí̤iit-kè̤mı̤̂it-kè̤mı̤̂iit-kè̤mı̤̀it-ké̤
PASSmı̰̂itmı̰̂iit-è̤mı̤̂iit-è̤mı̤̂it-è̤mı̤̂iit-è̤
PAS.CTmı̰̂iit-è̤mı̰̂iit-è̤*mı̤̂iit-è̤mı̤̂it-è̤*mı̤̂iit-è̤*mı̤̂iit-è̤
Table 9:

Forms with the transitive Class 1F root bà̰r ʻtake along’.

SimpleCFCPDATAP.DATAP
Unm.bà̰rbɛ̰́ɛrbɛ̤̀ɛrbɛ̤́ɛrbɛ̤̂ɛrbɛ̤̂ɛr
NFbâ̰arbá̰arbà̤arbá̤arbâ̤arbà̰r
NTSbɛ̰́ɛrbɛ̰́ɛrbɛ̤́ɛrbɛ̤́ɛrbɛ̤́ɛrbɛ̤́ɛr*
1SGbà̰arbá̰arbà̤arbá̤arbâ̤arbâ̤ar
2SGbà̰rbà̰ar-é̤bɛ̤́ɛrbà̤ar-é̤bà̤ar-é̤bà̤ar-é̤
3SGbɛ̰̀ɛrbɛ̰́ɛrbɛ̤̀ɛrbɛ̤́ɛrbɛ̤̂ɛrbɛ̤̂ɛr
1PLbá̰r-kṳ̀bɛ̰́ɛr-kṳ̀bɛ̤́ɛr-kṳ̀bɛ̤́ɛr-kṳ̀bɛ̤̂ɛr-kṳ̀bɛ̤̂ɛr-kṳ̀
2PLbá̰r-kà̤bá̰ar-kà̤bá̤ar-kà̤bá̤ar-kà̤bâ̤ar-kà̤bâ̤ar-kà̤
3PLbá̰r-kè̤bɛ̰́ɛr-kè̤bɛ̤́ɛr-kè̤bɛ̤́ɛr-kè̤bɛ̤̂ɛr-kè̤bɛ̤̂ɛr-kè̤
PASSbá̰rbɛ̰̂ɛr-è̤bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤
PAS.CTbɛ̰̂ɛr-è̤*bɛ̰̂ɛr-è̤*bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*bɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*

As mentioned above, the distribution of vowel grades in transitive derived verbs is the same in all four root classes. This fact is illustrated in Tables 1013. Each of these tables shows a paradigm from each root class, centrifugal in Table 10, centripetal in Table 11, dative in Table 12 and dativized antipassive in Table 13. [18] The tables also show the inflectionally unmarked form and the non-finite form of the corresponding simple verbs.

Table 11:

Vowel height gradation in centripetal verbs.

Root class1F1L2F2H
Gloss‘pull’‘water’‘pull’‘send’
SimpleUnm.t̪ḛ̀ljò̰rmḭ̀ittò̰oc
NFt̪ḛ̂eljò̰ormı̰̂iittó̰ooc
CPUnm.t̪è̤eljṳ̀urmı̤̀iittṳ̀uuc
NFt̪ɛ̤̀ɛljwò̤ormjè̤eettwò̤ooc
NTSt̪é̤eljṳ́urmı̤́iittṳ́uuc
1SGt̪ɛ̤̀ɛljwò̤ormjè̤eettwò̤ooc
2SGt̪é̤eljṳ́urmı̤́iittṳ́uuc
3SGt̪è̤eljṳ̀urmı̤̀iittṳ̀uuc
1PLt̪é̤el-kṳ̀jṳ́ur-kṳ̀mı̤́iit-kṳ̀tṳ́uuc-kṳ̀
2PLt̪ɛ̤́ɛl-kà̤jwó̤or-kà̤mjé̤eet-kà̤twó̤ooc-kà̤
3PLt̪é̤el-kè̤jṳ́ur-kè̤mı̤́iit-kè̤tṳ́uuc-kè̤
PASSt̪ê̤el-è̤jṳ̂ur-è̤mı̤̂iit-è̤tṳ̂uuc-è̤
Table 12:

Vowel height gradation in dative verbs.

Root class1F1L2F2H
Gloss‘kick’‘plait’‘call’‘open’
SimpleUnm.wḛ̀cnà̰jcɔ̰̀ɔlŋà̰aɲ
NFwḛ̂ecnà̰ajcɔ̰̂ɔɔlŋá̰aaɲ
DATUnm.wé̤ecnɛ̤̂ɛjcô̤olŋɛ̤́ɛɲ
NFwɛ̤́ɛcnâ̤ajcɔ̤̂ɔlŋá̤aɲ
NTSwé̤ecnɛ̤́ɛjcó̤olŋɛ̤́ɛɲ
1SGwɛ̤́ɛcnâ̤ajcɔ̤̂ɔlŋá̤aɲ
2SGwɛ̤̀ɛc-é̤nà̤aj-é̤cɔ̤̀ɔl-é̤ŋà̤aɲ-é̤
3SGwé̤ecnɛ̤̂ɛjcô̤olŋɛ̤́ɛɲ
1PLwé̤ec-kṳ̀nɛ̤̂ɛj-kṳ̀cô̤ol-kṳ̀ŋɛ̤́ɛɲ-kṳ̀
2PLwɛ̤́ɛc-kà̤nâ̤aj-kà̤cɔ̤̂ɔl-kà̤ŋá̤aɲ-kà̤
3PLwé̤ec-kè̤nɛ̤̂ɛj-kè̤cô̤ol-kè̤ŋɛ̤́ɛɲ-kè̤
PASSwê̤ec-è̤nɛ̤̂ɛj-è̤cô̤ol-è̤ŋɛ̤̂ɛɲ-è̤

3.2 Vowel grades in antipassive verbs

3.2.1 Introduction to vowel gradation in antipassive verbs

The morphophonology of the antipassive is more complex than that of the other derivational categories. This concerns not only vowel length, voice quality and tone (Andersen 1992‒1994), but also vowel quality alternation. The following subsections therefore deal in more detail with the antipassive for each of the four root classes. Table 14 summarizes the inflection of antipassive verbs by means of paradigms of generalized forms. Since the inflection of verbs with Class 2F roots depends on the lexical voice quality of the root, two paradigms are given for this class. In the generalized forms, the vowel grade is indicated by a subscript number after the coda consonant, and the voice quality symbol /◌̤/ indicates that the form is breathy, whereas the absence of a voice quality symbol indicates that the form has the voice quality which is inherent in the root.

Table 14:

Inflection of antipassive verbs, shown by generalized forms.

1F1L2F, -breathy2F, +breathy2H
Unm.CV̤̂VC2CV̂VC3CV̤̀VC2CV̤́V(V)C2CV̤̀C1
NFCV̀C1CV̂VC1CV̤́VVC2CV̤̀V(V)C2CV̀C1
NTSCV̤́VC2CV́VC2CV̤́VVC2CV̤́V(V)C2CV̤́VC2
1SGCV̤̂VC3CV̂VC3CV̤̀VVC3CV̤́V(V)C3CV̤̀VC3
2SGCV̤̀VC3-é̤CV̀VC3-é̤CV̤̀VVC3-é̤CV̤̀V(V)C3-é̤CV̤̀VC3-é̤
3SGCV̤̂VC2CV̂VC2CV̤̀VVC2CV̤́V(V)C2CV̤̀VC2
1PLCV̤̂VC2-kṳ̀CV̂VC2-kṳ̀CV̤̀VC2-kṳ́CV̤́V(V)C2-kṳ̀CV̤́C1-kṳ̀/CV̤́VC2-kṳ̀
2PLCV̤̂VC3-kà̤CV̂VC3-kà̤CV̤̀VC3-ká̤CV̤́V(V)C3-kà̤CV̤́C3-kà̤/CV̤́VC3-kà̤
3PLCV̤̂VC2-kè̤CV̂VC2-kè̤CV̤̀VC2-ké̤CV̤́V(V)C2-kè̤CV̤́C1-kè̤/CV̤́VC2-kè̤
PASS.CTCV̤̂VC2-è̤CV̂VC2-è̤CV̤̂VVC2-è̤CV̤̂V(V)C2-è̤CV̤̂VC2-è̤

3.2.2 Antipassive with Class 1F roots

Table 15 shows paradigms with four antipassive verbs with Class 1F roots, non-breathy bà̰r ʻtake along’ and mò̰c ʻshoot’, and breathy ɡṳ̀t ʻstab’ and t̪jà̤k ʻbury’. The table also shows the inflectionally unmarked form and the non-finite form of the corresponding simple verbs.

Table 15:

Paradigms with antipassive (AP) verbs with Class 1F roots.

Gloss‘take along’‘shoot’‘stab’‘bury’
SimpleUnm.bà̰rmò̰cɡṳ̀tt̪jà̤k
NFbâ̰armô̰ocɡṳ̂utt̪jô̤ok
APUnm.bɛ̤̂ɛrmṳ̂ucɡṳ̂utt̪jê̤ek
NFbà̰rmò̰cɡṳ̀tt̪jà̤k
NTSbɛ̤́ɛr*mṳ́ucɡṳ́ut*t̪jé̤ek*
1SGbâ̤armwô̤ocɡwô̤ott̪jâ̤ak
2SGbà̤ar-é̤mwò̤oc-é̤ɡwò̤ot-é̤t̪jà̤ak-é̤
3SGbɛ̤̂ɛrmṳ̂ucɡṳ̂utt̪jê̤ek
1PLbɛ̤̂ɛr-kṳ̀mṳ̂uc-kṳ̀ɡṳ̂ut-kṳ̀t̪jê̤ek-kṳ̀
2PLbâ̤ar-kà̤mwô̤oc-kà̤ɡwô̤ot-kà̤t̪jâ̤ak-kà̤
3PLbɛ̤̂ɛr-kè̤mṳ̂uc-kè̤ɡṳ̂ut-kè̤t̪jê̤ek-kè̤
PASS.CTbɛ̤̂ɛr-è̤*mṳ̂uc-è̤ɡṳ̂ut-è̤*t̪jê̤ek-è̤*

The distribution of vowel grades in antipassive verbs with Class 1F roots is the same as in derived transitive verbs, except for the non-finite form. Unlike the other forms, which have a medium-length vowel characterized by breathy voice, the non-finite form has a short vowel with inherent voice quality. In fact, it is phonologically identical to the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb, and it may therefore be said to occur in grade 1.

3.2.3 Antipassive with Class 1L roots

Antipassive verbs with Class 1L roots differ from antipassive verbs with other roots in that they are not characterized by breathy voice, but retain the inherent voice quality of the simple verb. This is seen in Table 16, which shows paradigms with the two non-breathy roots jò̰r ʻwater’ and nà̰j ʻplait’, and the two breathy roots bṳ̀t̪ ʻbuild’ and kɔ̤̀t ʻscratch’.

Table 16:

Paradigms with antipassive (AP) verbs with Class 1L roots.

Gloss‘water’‘plait’‘build’‘scratch’
SimpleUnm.jò̰rnà̰jbṳ̀t̪kɔ̤̀t
NFjò̰ornà̰ajbṳ̀ut̪kɔ̤̀ɔt
APUnm.jwɔ̰̂ɔrnâ̰ajbwô̤ot̪kâ̤at
NFjô̰ornâ̰ajbṳ̂ut̪kɔ̤̂ɔt
NTSjó̰or*nɛ̰́ɛj*bṳ́ut̪kɛ̤́ɛt*
1SGjwɔ̰̂ɔrnâ̰ajbwô̤ot̪kâ̤at
2SGjwɔ̰̀ɔr-é̤nà̰aj-é̤bwò̤ot̪-é̤kà̤at-é̤
3SGjô̰ornɛ̰̂ɛjbṳ̂ut̪kɛ̤̂ɛt
1PLjô̰or-kṳ̀nɛ̰̂ɛj-kṳ̀bṳ̂ut̪-kṳ̀kɛ̤̂ɛt-kṳ̀
2PLjwɔ̰̂ɔr-kà̤nâ̰aj-kà̤bwô̤ot̪-kà̤kâ̤at-kà̤
3PLjô̰or-kè̤nɛ̰̂ɛj-kè̤bṳ̂ut̪-kè̤kɛ̤̂ɛt-kè̤
PASS.CTjô̰or-è̤*nɛ̰̂ɛj-è̤*bṳ̂ut̪-è̤kɛ̤̂ɛt-è̤*

Antipassive verbs with Class 1L roots furthermore differ from transitive derived verbs in that their inflectionally unmarked form has grade 3 rather than grade 2, and in that their non-finite form has grade 1 rather than grade 3. Taken in isolation, the non-finite forms jô̰or of ʻwater’, bṳ̂ut̪ of ʻbuild’ and kɔ̤̂ɔt of ʻscratch’ are ambiguous between grades 1 and 2, while, conversely, the non-finite form nâ̰aj of ʻplait’ is ambiguous between grade 1 and grade 3; but for exactly this reason, all of these forms must be taken to have grade 1.

3.2.4 Antipassive with Class 2F roots

The formation of antipassive verbs with Class 2F roots depends on the inherent voice quality of the root vowel. All forms have breathy voice quality, but the two subclasses differ with respect to vowel length and tone (Andersen 1992‒1994). With non-breathy roots, as exemplified in Table 17, the inflectionally unmarked form has a medium-length vowel and a low tone, while the non-finite form has a long vowel and a high tone.

Table 17:

Paradigms with antipassive (AP) verbs with non-breathy Class 2F roots.

Gloss‘pull’‘hate’‘drive’‘milk’
SimpleUnm.mḭ̀itmà̰ankwà̰at̪rà̰ak
NFmı̰̂iitmâ̰aankwâ̰aat̪râ̰aak
APUnm.mı̤̀itmɛ̤̀ɛnkwè̤et̪rɔ̤̀ɔk
NFmı̤́iitmɛ̤́ɛɛnkwé̤eet̪rɔ̤́ɔɔk
NTSmı̤́iitmɛ̤́ɛɛn*kwé̤eet̪*rɔ̤́ɔɔk
1SGmjè̤eetmà̤aankwɛ̤̀ɛɛt̪rà̤aak
2SG3°/2°mjè̤eet-é̤, mı̤́itmɛ̤́ɛnkwɛ̤̀ɛɛt̪-é̤, kwé̤et̪rà̤aak-é̤
3SGmı̤̀iitmɛ̤̀ɛɛnkwè̤eet̪rɔ̤̀ɔɔk
1PLmı̤̀it-kṳ́mɛ̤̀ɛn-kṳ́kwè̤et̪-kṳ́rɔ̤̀ɔk-kṳ́
2PLmjè̤et-ká̤mà̤an-ká̤kwɛ̤̀ɛt̪-ká̤rà̤ak-ká̤
3PLmı̤̀it-ké̤mɛ̤̀ɛn-ké̤kwè̤et̪-ké̤rɔ̤̀ɔk-ké̤
PASS.CTmı̤̂iit-è̤mɛ̤̂ɛɛn-è̤*kwê̤eet̪-è̤*rɔ̤̂ɔɔk-è̤

In three of the four paradigms in Table 17, it is indeterminable whether the vowel quality grade of the inflectionally unmarked form and the non-finite form is 1° or 2° when viewed in isolation. This is the case for /i̤/ in ʻpull’, /e̤/ in ʻdrive’, and /ɔ̤/ in ʻmilk’. In the paradigm with ʻhate’, however, the /ɛ̤/ unambiguously belongs to grade 2. So generalizing, the vowel qualities /i̤/, /e̤/ and /ɔ̤/ in the other paradigms may also be taken to belong to grade 2. Given this generalization, Table 17 further reveals that for roots with the non-breathy quality /a̰/, there are three different breathy grade 2 alternants: /ɛ̤/ in ʻhate’, /e̤/ in ʻdrive’ and /ɔ̤/ in ʻmilk’. This alternation is dealt with and discussed in Section 4.4 below.

Table 17 also illustrates that the 2SG form of antipassive verbs with roots of this subclass exhibits free variation between a form with the suffix -é̤ and with grade 3 in the root (CV̤̀VVC3-é̤) and a form without a suffix and with grade 2 in the root (CV̤́VC2). [19] Thus, for instance, there is free variation between mjè̤eet-é̤ and mı̤́it with the root mḭ̀it ʻpull’ and between kwɛ̤̀ɛɛt̪-é̤ and kwé̤et̪ with the root kwà̰at̪ ʻdrive’.

With breathy Class 2F roots, as illustrated in Table 18, the inflectionally unmarked form has a medium or long vowel and a high tone, while the non-finite form also has a medium or long vowel, but a low tone. [20] In this case it seems to be indeterminable whether these two forms belong to grade 1 or grade 2. The reason is that, apparently, there are no transitive roots with a medium breathy /a̤/. Such roots would have the quality /a̤/ in grade 1 and the quality /ɛ̤/ in grade 2. But given the evidence from the corresponding forms of antipassive verbs with non-breathy Class 2F roots, the forms in question may be taken to belong to grade 2.

Table 18:

Paradigms with antipassive (AP) verbs with breathy Class 2F roots.

Gloss‘crack’‘withhold’‘wake up’‘ask’
SimpleUnm.tò̤okpè̤enpwò̤oct̪jè̤ec
NFtô̤ookpê̤eenpwô̤ooct̪jê̤eec
APUnm.tó̤ookpé̤eenpwó̤oct̪jé̤ec
NFtò̤ookpè̤eenpwò̤oct̪jè̤ec
NTStó̤ookpé̤een*pwó̤oc*t̪jé̤ec
1SGtɔ̤́ɔɔkpɛ̤́ɛɛnpjá̤act̪jé̤ec
2SGtɔ̤̀ɔɔk-é̤pɛ̤̀ɛɛn-é̤pjà̤ac-é̤t̪jè̤ec-é̤
3SGtó̤ookpé̤eenpwó̤oct̪jé̤ec
1PLtó̤ook-kṳ̀pé̤een-kṳ̀pwó̤oc-kṳ̀t̪jé̤ec-kṳ̀
2PLtɔ̤́ɔɔk-kà̤pɛ̤́ɛɛn-kà̤pjá̤ac-kà̤t̪jé̤ec-kà̤
3PLtó̤ook-kè̤pé̤een-kè̤pwó̤oc-kè̤t̪jé̤ec-kè̤
PASS.CTtô̤ook-è̤pê̤een-è̤pwô̤oc-è̤*t̪jê̤ec-è̤

3.2.5 Antipassive with Class 2H roots

The formation and inflection of antipassive verbs with Class 2H roots are exemplified with four roots in Table 19: the non-breathy roots lɔ̰̀ɔk ʻwash’ and ŋà̰aɲ ‘open’, and the breathy roots d̪è̤et̪ ʻtransport’ and kɔ̤̀ɔm ʻthresh’.

Table 19:

Paradigms with antipassive (AP) verbs with Class 2H roots.

Gloss‘wash’‘open’‘transport’‘thresh’
SimpleUnm.lɔ̰̀ɔkŋà̰aɲd̪è̤et̪kɔ̤̀ɔm
NFlɔ̰́ɔɔkŋá̰aaɲd̪é̤eet̪kɔ̤́ɔɔm
APUnm.lò̤kŋà̤ɲd̪è̤t̪kɔ̤̀m
NFlɔ̰̀kŋà̰ɲd̪è̤t̪kɔ̤̀m
NTSló̤okŋɛ̤́ɛɲ*d̪é̤et̪*kɔ̤́ɔm*
1SGlɔ̤̀ɔkŋà̤aɲd̪ɛ̤̀ɛt̪kà̤am
2SGlɔ̤̀ɔk-é̤ŋà̤aɲ-é̤d̪ɛ̤̀ɛt̪-é̤kà̤am-é̤
3SGlò̤okŋɛ̤̀ɛɲd̪è̤et̪kɔ̤̀ɔm
1PL1°/2°ló̤k/ló̤ok-kṳ̀ŋɛ̤́ɛɲ-kṳ̀d̪é̤t̪/d̪é̤et̪-kṳ̀kɔ̤́m/kɔ̤́ɔm-kṳ̀
2PLlɔ̤́k/lɔ̤́ɔk-kà̤ŋá̤aɲ-kà̤d̪á̤t̪/d̪ɛ̤́ɛt̪-kà̤ká̤m/ká̤am-kà̤
3PL1°/2°ló̤k/ló̤ok-kè̤ŋɛ̤́ɛɲ-kè̤d̪é̤t̪/d̪é̤et̪-kè̤kɔ̤́m/kɔ̤́ɔm-kè̤
PASS.CTlô̤ok-è̤ŋɛ̤̂ɛɲ-è̤*d̪ê̤et̪-è̤*kɔ̤̂ɔm-è̤*

The inflectionally unmarked form and the non-finite form both have a short vowel. But whereas the inflectionally unmarked form is characterized by breathy voice like the other finite forms, the non-finite form retains the inherent voice quality of the root. Determining the vowel grade of these two forms, however, is problematic. Grade 3 is excluded, because the forms do not exhibit lowering. But there is no way of distinguishing between grade 1 and grade 2 here, since I assume that the contrast between the qualities /a/ and /ɛ/ in medium-length and long vowels is absent in short vowels (cf. Section 2.5 above), and since fronting, which is the basis for positing grade 2, only applies to /a/. For reasons of parsimony, however, I posit grade 1 for these forms, since grade 1 is overall the “unmarked” grade.

The root vowel of the three plural forms varies freely between short and medium. [21] The root vowel of the 2PL form belongs to grade 3, since ‘wash’, ‘transport’ and ‘thresh’ exhibit lowering with both vowel lengths. The 1PL and 3PL forms with a medium vowel belong to grade 2, since ‘open’ undergoes fronting. But when the root vowel of these forms is short, the above-mentioned problem of distinguishing between grade 1 and grade 2 recurs, and again I posit grade 1. As a consequence of this analysis, the inflection of antipassive verbs with Class 2H roots, when the root vowel is short in the plural forms, follows the same pattern as that of simple verbs with Class 1F or 1L roots, except for the non-finite form and the 2SG form.

3.3 Range of Fronting in grade 2

In simple verbs, the morphophonological rule of Fronting, which characterizes grade 2, applies only to the low central vowel quality /a/, as exemplified in (4) with the non-breathy root bà̰r ʻtake along’ (Class 1F) and in (5) with the breathy root t̪à̤r ʻspear’ (Class 1F). Vowel grade specification of the verb is indicated in parentheses after the sentences. [22]

(4)
a.
mò̰cà̰=bà̰rtɔ̰̀ŋ. (1°)
mand=take_alongspear
  1. ‘The man is taking a spear along.’

b.
wó̰ŋà̰=bɛ̰̀ɛr. (2°)
cowd=take_along.3sg
  1. ʻHe is taking the cow along.’

(5)
a.
mò̰cà̰=t̪à̤rlá̤j. (1°)
mand=spearanimal
  1. ʻThe man is spearing an animal.’

b.
lá̤jà̰=t̪ɛ̤̀ɛr. (2°)
animald=spear.3sg
  1. ʻHe is spearing the animal.’

As seen in the 3SG forms, which are grade 2 forms, Fronting has the effect of changing /a/ to /ɛ/, whether the voice quality is non-breathy (4b) or breathy (5b). In derived verbs, however, Fronting may in addition apply to roots with the rounded lower-mid back vowel quality /ɔ/ (whether non-breathy or breathy) and to roots which have breathy /o̤/ as a raised variant of /ɔ̤/. In that case, Fronting also involves unrounding. I have not examined how common this extension of the range of Fronting is.

Fronting of non-breathy /ɔ̰/ to /ɛ̰/ is seen in derived verbs that do not undergo voice quality shift, i.e., centrifugal verbs with roots of any of the four classes and antipassive verbs with Class 1L roots. The application of Fronting to /ɔ̰/ in centrifugal verbs is illustrated in (6) with the root cɔ̰̀ɔl ʻcall’ (Class 2F).

(6)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cɔ̰̀ɔlmḛ̀t̪. (1°)
womand=callchild
  1. ʻThe woman is calling the child.’

b.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cɔ̰̀ɔɔl. (2°)
childd=call.3sg
  1. ʻShe is calling the child.’

c.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cɔ̰̂ɔɔl/cɛ̰̂ɛɛlmḛ̀t̪. (2°)
womand=call.cfchild
  1. ʻThe woman is calling the child (away).’

d.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cɔ̰̂ɔɔl/cɛ̰̂ɛɛl. (2°)
childd=call.cf.3sg
  1. ʻShe is calling the child (away).’

e.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cò̤oolmḛ̀t̪. (2°)
womand=call.cpchild
  1. ʻThe woman is calling the child hither.’

f.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cò̤ool. (2°)
childd=call.cp.3sg
  1. ʻShe is calling the child hither.’

In (6a) we find the vowel quality /ɔ̰/ as grade 1 in cɔ̰̀ɔl, the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb. In (6b) the 3SG form of the simple verb, cɔ̰̀ɔɔl, occurs in grade 2, but has the same vowel quality. In the centrifugal grade 2 forms in (6c-d), Fronting applies optionally, so that the inflectionally unmarked or 3SG form cɔ̰̂ɔɔl varies freely with the fronted variant cɛ̰̂ɛɛl. Centripetal and other derived categories characterized by breathiness are not affected by Fronting since their vowel quality is /o/ rather than /ɔ/, as illustrated in (6e-f).

The application of Fronting to /ɔ̰/ in antipassive verbs with Class 1L roots is illustrated in (7) with the root tɔ̰̀ŋ ʻlight a cow-dung fire’.

(7)
a.
mò̰cà̰=tɔ̰̀ŋɡɔ̰́l. (1°)
mand=lightcow_dung_fire
  1. ʻThe man is lighting a cow-dung fire.’

b.
kṳ̀tɔ̰̂ɔŋ/tɛ̰̂ɛŋ. (2°)
andlight.ap.3sg
  1. ʻand he is lighting.’

As seen in (7b), the 3SG antipassive form varies freely between non-fronted tɔ̰̂ɔŋ and fronted tɛ̰̂ɛŋ.

Fronting may also apply to roots in which /ɔ̰/ is preceded by postconsonantal /j/, as in (8) with the root rjɔ̰̀p ʻpay wages, hire, rent’ (Class 1F).

(8)
a.
bá̤ɲà̰=rjɔ̰̀pkâ̰ac=k-ḛ̀. (1°)
chiefd=payperson.pl.cs2=pl-3sg
  1. ‘The chief is paying his people.’

b.
bá̤ɲà̰=rjɛ̰́ɛpɰò̤t. (2°)
chiefd=pay.cfhouse
  1. ‘The chief is renting a house (for somebody or away).’

As seen in (8b), the inflectionally unmarked form of the centrifugal verb has been attested with the fronted form rjɛ̰́ɛp.

Again, Fronting applies optionally in grade 2 to a non-breathy /ɔ̰/ preceded by a postconsonantal /w/, but here with an additional consequence, as illustrated in (9) with the root bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪ ʻfollow’ (Class 2F).

(9)
a.
ɟó̤à̰=bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪mò̰c. (1°)
dogd=followman
  1. ʻThe dog is following the man.’

b.
ɟó̤à̰=bwɔ̰̂ɔɔt̪/bjɛ̰̂ɛɛt̪mò̰cró̰oor. (2°)
dogd=follow.cfmanbush.loc
  1. ‘The dog is following the man (away) into the bush.’

c.
ɟó̤à̰=cé̤mò̰cbjâ̰aat̪ró̰oor. (3°)
dogd=pfmanfollow.cf.nfbush.loc
  1. ʻThe dog has followed the man (away) into the bush.’

Corresponding to the simple verb with the inflectionally unmarked grade 1 form bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪ in (9a), the centrifugal, inflectionally unmarked grade 2 form bwɔ̰̂ɔɔt̪ in (9b) varies freely with the fronted form bjɛ̰̂ɛɛt̪. In the latter variant, the postconsonantal labiovelar glide /w/ has been replaced with the palatal glide /j/. This is similar to the grade 3 alternant of such verbs, as seen in (9c), where the grade 3 form is bjâ̰aat̪. Thus, the unrounding of /ɔ/ is accompanied by unrounding of the preceding /w/, presumably as a result of assimilation.

In Andersen (1993: 21) it was argued, on the basis of the morphology of simple verbs, that although either of grades 1 and 2 could be considered basic, it is simpler to take grade 1 to be basic. We now see independent and decisive evidence for this analysis in the following fact: The contrast between /a̰/ and /ɔ̰/, which exists in grade 1, is (optionally) neutralized in grade 2 forms of centrifugal verbs. Hence grade 2 cannot be basic.

Fronting of breathy /ɔ̤/ to /ɛ̤/ in derived verbs is illustrated in (10) with the root kɔ̤̀l ʻfan’ (Class 1F).

(10)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=kɔ̤̀lmḛ̀t̪. (1°)
womand=fanchild
  1. ʻThe woman is fanning the child.’

b.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=kɔ̤̀ɔl. (2°)
childd=fan.3sg
  1. ʻShe is fanning the child.’

c.
tı̰̀ikà̰=kɛ̤́ɛljâ̤ar. (2°)
womand=fan.cfleaf
  1. ʻThe woman is fanning (with) a leaf.’

d.
jâ̤arà̰=kɛ̤́ɛl. (2°)
leafd=fan.cf.3sg
  1. ʻShe is fanning (with) the leaf.’

e.
tı̰̀ikà̰=kɛ̤̀ɛljâ̤ar. (2°)
womand=fan.cpleaf
  1. ʻThe woman is fanning (with) a leaf hither.’

f.
jâ̤arà̰=kɛ̤̀ɛl. (2°)
leafd=fan.cp.3sg
  1. ʻShe is fanning (with) the leaf hither.’

In (10a-b) the verb ʻfan’ is simple, with the inflectionally unmarked form kɔ̤̀l occurring in grade 1, and the 3SG form kɔ̤̀ɔl occurring in grade 2. In (10c-d) the verb is centrifugal and in (10e-f) centripetal, and the forms given here also occur in grade 2, but with the fronted quality /ɛ̤/. [23]

Free inter- and intra-individual variation between the non-fronted quality /ɔ̤/ and the fronted quality /ɛ̤/ is exemplified in (11) with the root ɡɔ̤̀t ʻwrite’ (Class 1F). As seen in (11b), the 3SG antipassive verb varies freely between ɡɔ̤̂ɔt and ɡɛ̤̂ɛt.

(11)
a.
bá̤ɲà̰=ɡɔ̤̀tà̰t̪ô̤oor. (1°)
chiefd=writeletter
  1. ‘The chief is writing a letter.’

b.
kṳ̀ɡɔ̤̂ɔt/ɡɛ̤̂ɛt. (2°)
andwrite.ap.3sg
  1. ʻand he is writing.’

In derived verbs, Fronting also applies in grade 2 to breathy /o̤/ preceded by a postconsonantal /w/, as illustrated with the root bwò̤ok ʻslap’ (Class 2F) in (12).

(12)
a.
mò̰cà̰=bwò̤okmḛ̀t̪. (1°)
mand=slapchild
  1. ‘The man is slapping the child.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=bjê̤eekḛ̀cı̰́inpı̰̀ɲ. (2°)
mand=slap.cf3sghandground.all
  1. ʻThe man is slapping his hand onto the ground.’

c.
mò̰cà̰=cḛ̂ecı̰́inbjâ̤aakpı̰̀ɲ. [24] (3°)
mand=pf.3sghandslap.cf.nfground.all
  1. ʻThe man has slapped his hand onto the ground.’

The centrifugal counterpart of the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb bwò̤ok in (12a) has the form bjê̤eek, as seen in (12b). As in (9) above, the fronting here has the additional consequence that the postconsonantal /w/ is turned into /j/. This change in the postconsonantal glide is also seen in the grade 3 form bjâ̤aak in (12c) as a result of Lowering. The fact that Fronting applies to /wo̤/ is evidence that /wo̤/ is a raised form of underlying /wɔ̤/, an analysis argued for in Andersen (1993: 16 and 28–29). The fronting in (12b) may thus be said to apply to the underlying form /bwɔ̤̂ɔɔk/ with the output /bjɛ̤̂ɛɛk/, which in turn undergoes raising to the actual form bjê̤eek.

4 Voice quality shift and vowel quality

4.1 From /ɔ̰/ to /o̤/, and from /o̰/ to /ṳ/

The shift from non-breathy voice to breathy voice, which is an exponent of derivation, may involve a shift in vowel quality, more specifically a shift in height and, to a more limited extent, a shift in rounding.

The basics of voice quality shift (VQS) are most clearly seen in the antipassive of Class 2H roots, since the set of forms with this derivational status here arguably exhibits all three vowel alternation grades (cf. Section 3.2.5 above), whereas other derivational categories characterized by VQS only involve grades 2 and 3. Table 20 shows, for each of the five non-breathy grade 1 vowels without a preceding postconsonantal glide, the following four forms: the simple verb’s inflectionally unmarked form (which has grade 1) and three representative forms of the antipassive verb, namely the inflectionally unmarked form, which has grade 1, the 3SG form, which has grade 2, and the 1SG form, which has grade 3.

Table 20:

Voice quality shift in the antipassive of non-breathy Class 2H roots.

SimpleAntipassive
Unm.Unm.3SG1SG
/ḭ/dı̰̀ildı̤̀ldı̤̀ildjè̤elʻplug’
/ḛ/wḛ̀ecwè̤cwè̤ecwɛ̤̀ɛcʻsweep’
/a̰/ŋà̰aɲŋà̤ɲŋɛ̤̀ɛɲŋà̤aɲʻopen’
/ɔ̰/lɔ̰̀ɔklò̤klò̤oklɔ̤̀ɔkʻwash’
/o̰/ŋò̰otŋṳ̀tŋṳ̀utŋwò̤otʻcut’

As seen in the table, the unrounded vowels /ḭ/, /ḛ/ and /a̰/ retain their quality in grade 1 when they become breathy. By contrast, the rounded vowels /ɔ̰/ and /o̰/ are raised to /o̤/ and /ṳ/, respectively. Thus, both of them are raised by one step: /ɔ̰/ from lower-mid to higher-mid, and /o̰/ from higher-mid to high. This alternation is completely regular, as illustrated with centripetal verbs in (13) and (14), which show the inflectionally unmarked form of simple verbs and of the corresponding centripetal verbs.

(13)
SimpleCP
cɔ̰̀ɔlcò̤ool‘call’ (2F)
dɔ̰̀mdò̤omʻcatch’ (1F)
jɔ̰̀ɔtjò̤ootʻjump over’ (2H)
ɟɔ̰̀tɟò̤otʻlift’ (1F)
lɔ̰̀ɔklò̤ookʻwash’ (2H)
rɔ̰̀ɔt̪rò̤oot̪ʻsmear’ (2F)
t̪ɔ̰̀nt̪ò̤onʻsend for’ (1F)
tɔ̰̀ctò̤ocʻanoint’ (1F)
tɔ̰̀ɔŋtò̤ooŋʻinterfere’ (2H)
ɰɔ̰̀ɔlɰò̤oolʻdig out’ (2F)
(14)
SimpleCP
cò̰olcṳ̀uul‘pay’ (2H)
cò̰pcṳ̀upʻpursue’ (1F)
dò̰ldṳ̀ulʻroll up’ (1L)
d̪ò̰ŋd̪ṳ̀uŋʻbreak’ (1F)
jò̰rjṳ̀urʻwater’ (1L)
kò̰ɲkṳ̀uɲʻhelp’ (1F)
mò̰cmṳ̀ucʻshoot’ (1F)
ɲò̰ot̪ɲṳ̀uut̪ʻpoint at’ (2F)
tò̰octṳ̀uucʻsend’ (2H)
tò̰omtṳ̀uumʻinject’ (2H)

In transitive derived verb categories characterized by breathy voice, there are no grade 1 forms. When a non-breathy /a̰/ becomes breathy in such categories, it either undergoes fronting (and raising) to /ɛ̤/ in grade 2 forms or it is manifested as /a̤/ in grade 3 forms.

Once having become breathy, the vowels in Table 20 conform to the same vowel gradation system as inherently breathy root vowels, cf. Table 4 above.

4.2 From /wɔ̰/ to /o̤/

In grades 1 and 2 of simple verbs, there is complementary distribution between /wɔ̰/ and /ɔ̰/ after an onset consonant (Andersen 1993: 18). Thus, /wɔ̰/ only occurs after labial onsets, while /ɔ̰/ only occurs after non-labial onsets and after a postconsonantal /j/. As exemplified with inflectionally unmarked forms in (15), /wɔ̰/ thus occurs after the labial consonants /p/ (15a), /b/ (15b) and /m/ (15c).

(15)
a.
pwɔ̰̀ɔt̪‘skin, bark’ (2F)
b.
bwɔ̰̀kʻblow (of wind)’ (1F)
bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪ʻfollow’ (2F)
c.
mwɔ̰̀ɔcʻgive’ (2F)
mwɔ̰̀ɔkʻchurn’ (2F)

As similarly exempified with inflectionally unmarked forms in (16), /ɔ̰/ occurs after interdentals (16a), alveolars (16b), palatals (16c), and velars (16d).

(16)
a.
t̪ɔ̰̀nʻsend for’ (1F)
d̪ɔ̰̀mʻstalk’ (1F)
b.
tɔ̰̀ɔŋʻknock’ (2H)
dɔ̰̀kʻspin’ (1F)
lɔ̰̀ɔkʻwash’ (2H)
rɔ̰̀mʻshare’ (1F)
c.
cɔ̰̀ɔlʻcall’ (2F)
ɟɔ̰̀t‘lift’ (1F)
ɲɔ̰̀r‘bewitch’ (1L)
jɔ̰̀ŋ‘mistreat’ (1L)
t̪jɔ̰̀ɔɲ‘press’ (2H)
d.
kɔ̰̀ɔc‘sew, mend’ (2F)
ɡɔ̰̀l‘begin’ (1F)
ŋɔ̰̀k‘vomit’ (1F)
ɰɔ̰̀ɔc‘buy’ (2F)

Given this distribution, Andersen (1993: 18) analyzed post-onset /wɔ̰/ as derived from underlying /ɔ̰/ by a rule of Labialization after labial onsets.

When roots with post-onset /wɔ̰/ undergo voice quality shift, the postconsonantal /w/ disappears, as seen in (17).

(17)
a.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪mâ̰an. (1°)
childd=followmother.3sg
  1. ‘The child is following his mother.’

b.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=bwɔ̰̂ɔɔt̪mâ̰anwı̤́iir. (2°)
childd=follow.cfmother.3sgriver.loc
  1. ‘The child is following his mother to the river.’

c.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=bò̤ot̪. (2°)
childd=follow.ap
  1. ‘The child is following.’

d.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=bò̤oot̪mâ̰anlà̰aaŋ. (2°)
childd=follow.cpmother.3sgside.cs1.dem1
  1. ‘The child is following his mother this way.’

e.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cé̤mâ̰anbɔ̤̀ɔɔt̪là̰aaŋ. (3°)
childd=pfmother.3sgfollow.cp.nfside.cs1.dem1
  1. ʻThe child has followed his mother this way.’

The simple verb ‘follow’ has a postconsonantal /w/ in the inflectionally unmarked form bwɔ̰̀ɔt̪ (17a), a /w/ which also occurs in the inflectionally unmarked centrifugal form bwɔ̰̂ɔɔt̪ (17b). But in the breathy forms with this root, there is no postconsonantal /w/, as seen in the inflectionally unmarked antipassive form bò̤ot̪ with grade 2 in (17c), in the inflectionally unmarked centripetal form bò̤oot̪ with grade 2 in (17d), and in the non-finite centripetal form bɔ̤̀ɔɔt̪ with grade 3 in (17e). Thus, /wɔ̰/ (with a postconsonantal /w/) behaves in the same way as /ɔ̰/ (without a postconsonantal /w/), its breathy counterparts being /o̤/ in grade 2 and /ɔ̤/ in grade 3, cf. Section 4.1 above. So VQS does not apply to the surface form with /wɔ̰/, but to the underlying form with /ɔ̰/.

4.3 Raising

In some cases, the voice quality shift involves more vowel quality changes than those dealt with in Section 4.1 above. In particular, some vowels undergo raising conditioned by the preceding consonant. Such raising, which is possibly specific to the Agar dialect, is accounted for in the following subsections. It is argued that in some cases the raising is an integral part of the voice quality shift, whereas in other cases it is due to a separate process.

4.3.1 From /a̰/ to /e̤/ after /w/

When /a̰/ undergoes voice quality shift, it basically becomes /a̤/ in grade 1, /ɛ̤/ in grade 2, and /a̤/ in grade 3. However, when /a̰/ is preceded by /w/, it becomes /e̤/ in grades 1 and 2, and /ɛ̤/ in grade 3. This is the case whether the preceding /w/ is an onset or occurs in postconsonantal position. The clauses in (18) illustrate the phenomenon with /w/ as onset in the non-breathy root wà̰ak ʻrinse’ (Class 2H).

(18)
a.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=wà̰akà̰lâ̰at̪. (1°)
childd=rinsecloth
  1. ‘The child is rinsing a cloth.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wè̤k. (1°)
womand=rinse.ap
  1. ‘The woman is rinsing.’

c.
kṳ̀wè̤ek. (2°)
andrinse.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and she is rinsing.’

d.
kṳ̀wɛ̤̀ɛk. (3°)
andrinse.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am rinsing.’

In (18a) the root occurs as a simple verb in its inflectionally unmarked form. In (18b) it occurs in the corresponding inflectionally unmarked antipassive form wè̤k with the grade 1 vowel /e̤/. In (18c) it occurs in the 3SG antipassive form wè̤ek with the grade 2 vowel /e̤/. And in (18d) it occurs in the 1SG antipassive form wɛ̤̀ɛk with the grade 3 vowel /ɛ̤/. In this way, the breathy alternants of /a̰/ here merge with the breathy alternants of /ḛ/. This is seen when (18) is compared with the parallel set of forms with the non-breathy root ɡḛ̀et ʻroast’ (Class 2H) in (19).

(19)
a.
má̰lè̤nà̰=ɡḛ̀etɲṳ́m. (1°)
maternal_aunt.1sgd=roastsesame.pl
  1. ‘My maternal aunt is roasting sesame.’

b.
má̰lè̤nà̰=ɡè̤t. (1°)
maternal_aunt.1sgd=roast.ap
  1. ‘My maternal aunt is roasting.’

c.
kṳ̀ɡè̤etá̰jà̰. (2°)
androast.ap.3sgalso
  1. ʻand she is also roasting.’

d.
kṳ̀ɡɛ̤̀ɛtá̰jà̰. (3°)
androast.ap.1sgalso
  1. ʻand I am also roasting.’

As in (18), grades 1 and 2 are /e̤/, and grade 3 is /ɛ̤/.

That /w/ has the same effect in postconsonantal position is seen in (20) with the non-breathy root ɟwà̰ar ʻcollect’ (Class 2H).

(20)
a.
mò̰cà̰=ɟwà̰arɰɔ̤́k. (1°)
mand=collectcow.pl
  1. ʻThe man is collecting cows.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=ɟwè̤r. (1°)
mand=collect.ap
  1. ʻThe man is collecting.’

c.
mà̰ŋò̤okà̰=ɟwé̤erɰɔ̤́kbá̤ɲ. (2°)
Mangokd=collect.datcow.plchief
  1. ‘Mangok is collecting cows for the chief.’

d.
mà̰ŋò̤okà̰=cé̤ɰɔ̤́kɟwɛ̤́ɛrbá̤ɲ. (3°)
Mangokd=pfcow.plcollect.dat.nfchief
  1. ‘Mangok has collected cows for the chief.’

In (20a) the root occurs as a simple verb in its inflectionally unmarked form. In (20b) it occurs in the corresponding inflectionally unmarked antipassive form ɟwè̤r with the grade 1 vowel /e̤/. In (20c) the root occurs in the inflectionally unmarked dative form ɟwé̤er, with the vowel /e̤/ here belonging to grade 2. And in (20d) it occurs in the non-finite dative form ɟwɛ̤́ɛr, whose vowel /ɛ̤/ belongs to grade 3.

The same phenomenon is seen in (21) with the non-breathy root ɡwà̰r ʻclear a field’ (Class 1F).

(21)
a.
wá̤amá̤at̪à̰=ɡwà̰rdò̰mı̰̀c. (1°)
brother.1sgd=clearfieldstomach
  1. ‘My brother is clearing the field.’

b.
kṳ̀ɡwê̤er. (2°)
andclear.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and he is clearing.’

c.
kṳ̀ɡwɛ̤̂ɛr. (3°)
andclear.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am clearing.’

In (21b) the 3SG antipassive verb has the grade 2 form ɡwê̤er, and in (21c) the 1SG antipassive verb has the grade 3 form ɡwɛ̤̂ɛr. Again, the breathy alternants of /a̰/ here merge with the breathy alternants of /ḛ/, cf. the parallel set of examples in (22) with the root cwḛ̀t ʻeat meat’ (Class 1F).

(22)
a.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cwḛ̀trı̤́iŋ. (1°)
childd=eatmeat
  1. ‘The child is eating meat.’

b.
kṳ̀cwê̤et. (2°)
andeat.ap.3sg
  1. ʻand he is eating.’

c.
kṳ̀cwɛ̤̂ɛt. (3°)
andeat.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am eating.’

A /w/ has no raising effect on forms whose root has an inherently breathy /a̤/. This is the case whether the /w/ is an onset or occurs in postconsonantal position, as seen in (23)–(24). The /w/ is postconsonantal in the root ɡwà̤r ʻgrind’ (Class 1F) in (23), which parallels and contrasts with (21) with the root ɡwà̰r ʻclear a field’.

(23)
a.
ɲà̰à̰=ɡwà̤rrà̰p. (1°)
girld=grindsorghum.pl
  1. ‘The girl is grinding sorghum.’

b.
kṳ̀ɡwɛ̤̂ɛr. (2°)
andgrind.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and she is grinding.’

c.
kṳ̀ɡwâ̤ar. (3°)
andgrind.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am grinding.’

In the 3SG antipassive form in (23b), the grade 2 vowel is manifested as /ɛ̤/, and in the 1SG antipassive form in (23c), the grade 3 vowel is manifested as /a̤/. In (24) the preceding /w/ occurs in onset position in the root wà̤l ‘pour’ (Class 1F), and grade 2 is again manifested as /ɛ̤/, here in the inflectionally unmarked antipassive form in (24b).

(24)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wà̤lpı̤̂iw. (1°)
womand=pourwater.pl
  1. ‘The woman is pouring water.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wɛ̤̂ɛl. (2°)
womand=pour.ap
  1. ‘The woman is pouring.’

Because only roots with a lexically non-breathy vowel are affected by a preceding /w/, the raising of the breathy alternant of non-breathy /a̰/ from /a̤/ to /e̤/ after /w/ in grades 1 and 2 must be an integral part of the VQS itself. If it were a result of a general assimilation rule raising grade 1 // to //, grade 2 /ɛ̤/ to /e̤/ and grade 3 /a̤/ to /ɛ̤/ after the high semivowel /w/, then such a rule should also affect the corresponding inherently breathy vowels, but as seen in (23)–(24), this is not the case. Hence, when grade 3 is /ɛ̤/, the corresponding grade 2 vowel /e̤/ is underlyingly /e̤/ and not just a raised manifestation of underlying /ɛ̤/.

4.3.2 From /a̰/ to /e̤/ after a palatal

Raising may also affect the breathy alternants of /a̰/ after the palatal postconsonantal glide /j/, but here there is some variability. In (25) raising affects the breathy alternants of /a̰/ in the root n̪jà̰c ʻsqueeze’ (Class 1F).

(25)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=n̪jà̰cà̰lâ̰at̪. (1°)
womand=squeezecloth
  1. ‘The woman is wringing a cloth.’

b.
à̰kṳ́uurà̰=n̪jé̤ecmâ̰ancjé̤ec. (2°)
Akurd=squeeze.datmother.3sghoney
  1. ‘Akur is squeezing honey for her mother.’

c.
à̰kṳ́uurà̰=cé̤mâ̰ann̪jé̤eccjé̤ec. (3°)
Akurd=pfmother.3sgsqueeze.dat.nfhoney
  1. ‘Akur has squeezed honey for her mother.’

Here the breathy grade 2 alternant of /ja̰/ is /je̤/, as seen in the inflectionally unmarked dative form n̪jé̤ec in (25b). The breathy grade 3 alternant is manifested in the same way, as seen in the homonymous non-finite dative form n̪jé̤ec in (25c). The same pattern is found in (26) with the root t̪jà̰ak ʻmarry, pay bride price’ (Class 2F).

(26)
a.
mò̰cà̰=t̪jà̰aktı̰̀ik. (1°)
mand=marrywoman
  1. ‘The man is marrying a woman.’

b.
rà̰aanà̰=t̪jè̤eektı̰̀ik. (2°)
persond=marry.cpwoman
  1. ‘The person is marrying a woman and bringing her here.’

c.
rà̰aanà̰=cé̤tı̰̀ikt̪jè̤eek. (3°)
persond=pfwomanmarry.cp.nf
  1. ‘The person has married a woman and brought her here.’

Thus, the breathy alternants of /ja̰/ are here indistinguishable from the inherently breathy /je̤/ series, which is exemplified in (27) with the root t̪jè̤ec ʻask’ (Class 2F).

(27)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=t̪jè̤eccó̰ol. (1°)
womand=askCol
  1. ‘The woman is asking Col.’

b.
ká̤awà̰=t̪jê̤eecbò̰ol. (2°)
Kaud=ask.ap.datBol
  1. ‘Kau is asking on behalf of Bol.’

c.
ká̤awà̰=cé̤bò̰olt̪jê̤eec. (3°)
Kaud=pfBolask.ap.dat.nf
  1. ʻKau has asked on behalf of Bol.’

Here grades 2 and 3 are also both /je̤/, like grade 1. So the raising that occurs when the roots n̪jà̰c in (25) and t̪jà̰ak in (26) become breathy seems to be an integral part of VQS.

For unknown reasons, the situation is different for some other roots with /ja̰/, for instance tjà̰am ʻwin’ (Class 2H), which exhibits another pattern, as seen in (28).

(28)
a.
d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=tjà̰amt̪è̤eec. (1°)
boyd=wingame
  1. ʻThe boy is winning the game.’

b.
mı̤̀it̪á̰a=tjé̤emwwô̤on=d-ɛ̰́ɛn. (2°)
child.pld.pl=win.ap.datcattle_camp.cs2=sg-3pl
  1. ‘The children are winning for their cattle camp.’

c.
mı̤̀it̪à̰a=cé̤wwô̤on=d-ɛ̰́ɛntjá̤am. (3°)
child.pld.pl=pfcattle_camp.cs2=sg-3plwin.ap.dat.nf
  1. ‘The children have won for their cattle camp.’

In (28b) the breathy grade 2 alternant of /ja̰/ is /je̤/, as in (25b) above, but the grade 3 alternant is /ja̤/, as seen in (28c). [25] Thus, the breathy forms with this root behave (more) like forms of roots with inherently breathy /ja̤/, as seen in (29) with the root t̪jà̤k ʻbury’ (Class 1F) and in (30) with the root d̪jà̤m ʻdestroy’ (Class 1F).

(29)
a.
mò̰cà̰=t̪jà̤kmá̰n̪=d-ḛ̀. (1°)
mand=burychild.cs2=sg-3sg
  1. ‘The man is burying his child.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=t̪jɛ̤̂ɛk/t̪jê̤ek. (2°)
mand=bury.ap
  1. ‘The man is burying.’

c.
kṳ̀t̪jâ̤ak. (3°)
andbury.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am burying.’

(30)
a.
mò̰cà̰=d̪jà̤mpâ̤aɲ. (1°)
mand=destroywall
  1. ‘The man is destroying the wall.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=d̪jɛ̤̂ɛm/d̪jê̤em. (2°)
mand=destroy.ap
  1. ‘The man is destroying.’

c.
pâ̤aɲà̰=d̪jà̤am. (3°)
walld=destroy.1sg
  1. ‘I am destroying the wall.’

Here grade 2 varies between /jɛ̤/ and /je̤/, as in (29b) and (30b), so the raising of /jɛ̤/ to /je̤/ is optional, while grade 3 is invariably /ja̤/, as illustrated in (29c) and (30c). Hence the raising in (28b) above is not an integral part of VQS, but is a process occurring after the voice quality shift.

A palatal onset may have the same effect as a postconsonantal /j/ when /a̰/ undergoes voice quality shift. That is, the grade 2 quality /ɛ̤/ may be raised to /e̤/, while the grade 3 quality /a̤/ is unaffected. This can be seen in the behaviour of the root cà̰m ʻeat’ (Class 1F) in (31), the root cà̰k ʻcreate’ (Class 1F) in (32), and the root ɲà̰n ʻlick’ (Class 1F) in (33) with variation recorded.

(31)
a.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cà̰mcwı̤̂in. (1°)
childd=eatporridge
  1. ‘The child is eating porridge.’

b.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=cê̤em. (2°)
childd=eat.ap
  1. ‘The child is eating.’

c.
kṳ̀câ̤am. (3°)
andeat.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am eating.’

(32)
a.
n̪já̰lı̰̀cà̰=cà̰krà̰aan. (1°)
Godd=createperson
  1. ʻGod is creating a human being.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=cê̤ekmḛ̀t̪. (2°)
mand=create.ap.datchild
  1. ‘The man is naming a child.’

c.
mò̰cà̰=cé̤mḛ̀t̪câ̤ak. (3°)
mand=pfchildcreate.ap.dat.nf
  1. ʻThe man has named a child.’

(33)
a.
ɟó̤à̰=ɲà̰nkṳ́uurı̰̀c. (1°)
dogd=lickgrinding_stonestomach
  1. ‘The dog is licking the grinding stone.’

b.
ɟó̤à̰=ɲɛ̤̂ɛn/ɲê̤en. (2°)
dogd=lick.ap
  1. ‘The dog is licking.’

Again, such raising also occurs in grade 2 of roots with an inherently breathy /a̤/ after a palatal onset, as in (34) with the root cà̤p ʻput’ (Class 1F).

(34)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cà̤pà̰bwò̤oc. (1°)
womand=putpot
  1. ‘The woman is encircling the pot with sand (in order to support it).’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cé̤epà̰bwò̤ocmɛ̰̂ɛɛc. (2°)
womand=put.cfpotfire.all
  1. ‘The woman is putting the pot on fire.’

c.
tı̰̀ikà̰=câ̰abwò̤occá̤apmɛ̰̂ɛɛc. [26] (3°)
womand=pf.potput.cf.nffire.all
  1. ‘The woman has put the pot on fire.’

This shows that the raising in (31)–(33) is not an integral part of VQS, but rather is due to an optional phonetic rule of raising that raises underlying /ɛ̤/ to [e̤].

4.3.3 From /ḛ/ to /e̤/ in grade 3 after a palatal

When /ḛ/ undergoes VQS, grades 1 and 2 appear as /e̤/, and grade 3 normally appears as /ɛ̤/, as exemplified in Section 4.1 above, and as further illustrated in (35) with the root ɡḛ̀er ʻrow’ (Class 2H).

(35)
a.
mò̰cà̰=ɡḛ̀errjà̤aj. (1°)
mand=rowboat
  1. ‘The man is rowing a boat.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=ɡè̤eerrjà̤aj. (2°)
mand=row.cpboat
  1. ‘The man is rowing a boat hither.’

c.
mò̰cà̰=cé̤rjà̤ajɡɛ̤̀ɛɛr. (3°)
mand=pfboatrow.cp.nf
  1. ‘The man has rowed a boat hither.’

However, when /ḛ/ is preceded by a palatal, its breathy grade 3 alternant is /e̤/ rather than /ɛ̤/, as illustrated in (36) with the root cḛ̀ec ʻchase’ (Class 2H) and in (37) with the root jḛ̀p ʻcut’ (Class 1F).

(36)
a.
lwà̰alà̰=cḛ̀ecdjɛ̰̀ɛt. (1°)
Luald=chasebird.pl
  1. ‘Lual is chasing birds.’

b.
lwà̰alà̰=cè̤eect̪ò̤ok. (2°)
Luald=chase.cpgoat.pl
  1. ‘Lual is chasing goats hither.’

c.
lwà̰alà̰=cé̤t̪ò̤okcè̤eec. (3°)
Luald=pfgoat.plchase.cp.nf
  1. ‘Lual has chased goats hither.’

(37)
a.
mò̰cà̰=jḛ̀p tı̰̀im. (1°)
mand=cut tree
  1. ‘The man is cutting down a tree.’

b.
lwà̰alà̰=jé̤epmò̰ctı̰̀im. (2°)
Luald=cut.datmantree
  1. ‘Lual is cutting down a tree for the man.’

c.
lwà̰alà̰=cé̤tı̰̀imjé̤epmò̰c. (3°)
Luald=pftreecut.dat.nfman
  1. ʻLual has cut down a tree for the man.’

In (36) and (37) the palatal that precedes /ḛ/ is the onset, but a postconsonantal /j/ has the same effect, as seen in (38) with the root ljḛ̀p ʻopen’ (Class 1F).

(38)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=ljḛ̀pà̰t̪ı̤̀in. (1°)
womand=opendoor
  1. ʻThe woman is opening the door.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=ljé̤epà̰t̪ı̤̀inmò̰c. (2°)
womand=open.datdoorman
  1. ‘The woman is opening the door for the man.’

c.
tı̰̀ikà̰=câ̰at̪ı̤̀inljé̤epmò̰c. [27] (3°)
womand=pf.dooropen.dat.nfman
  1. ‘The woman has opened the door for the man.’

This is like the situation with inherently breathy roots, as illustrated in (39) with the root t̪jè̤ep ʻtaste’ (Class 2F), and as also seen with the root t̪jè̤ec ʻask’ (Class 2F) in Section 4.3.2 above.

(39)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=t̪jè̤eprı̤́iŋ. (1°)
womand=tastemeat
  1. ‘The woman is tasting the meat.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=t̪jê̤eepɲà̰n=d-ḛ̀. (2°)
womand=taste.ap.datgirl.cs2=sg-3sg
  1. ‘The woman is tasting on behalf of her daughter.’

c.
tı̰̀ikà̰=cé̤ɲà̰n=d-ḛ̀t̪jê̤eep. (3°)
womand=pfgirl.cs2=sg-3sgtaste.ap.dat.nf
  1. ‘The woman has tasted on behalf of her daughter.’

Because of this similarity, it must be concluded that the raising of grade 3 /ɛ̤/ to /e̤/ is not an integral part of VQS, but is due to a more general assimilation rule whereby breathy lower-mid /ɛ̤/ becomes higher-mid /e̤/ after a palatal.

4.3.4 From /jɔ̰/ to /jo̤/ in grade 3

When /ɔ̰/ undergoes VQS, grades 1 and 2 appear as /o̤/, and grade 3 normally appears as /ɔ̤/, as exemplified in Section 4.1 above, and as further illustrated in (40) with the root dɔ̰̀m ʻcatch’ (Class 1F).

(40)
a.
d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=dɔ̰̀mwó̰ŋ. (1°)
boyd=catchcow
  1. ʻThe boy is catching a cow.’

b.
d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=dó̤ommò̰cwó̰ŋ. (2°)
boyd=catch.datmancow
  1. ‘The boy is catching a cow for the man.’

c.
d̪ɔ̤̀ɔkà̰=cé̤mò̰cdɔ̤́ɔmwó̰ŋ. (3°)
boyd=pfmancatch.dat.nfcow
  1. ‘The boy has cought a cow for the man.’

However, when /ɔ̰/ is preceded by a postconsonantal /j/, its breathy grade 3 alternant is often /o̤/ rather than /ɔ̤/. This is illustrated in (41) with the root t̪jɔ̰̀ɔɲ ʻpress’ (Class 2H) and in (42) with the root rjɔ̰̀p ʻpay wages, hire, rent’ (Class 1F).

(41)
a.
lṳ̂ut̪à̰=t̪jɔ̰̀ɔɲtjɔ̰̀ɔp. (1°)
mud_fishd=pressmud
  1. ‘The mud fish is pressing the mud.’

b.
lwà̰alà̰=t̪jò̤ooɲtjɔ̰̀ɔplà̰aaŋ. (2°)
Luald=press.cpmudside.cs1.dem1
  1. ‘Lual is pressing the mud this way.’

c.
lwà̰alà̰=cé̤tjɔ̰̀ɔpt̪jò̤ooɲlà̰aaŋ. (3°)
Luald=pfmudpress.cp.nfside.cs1.dem1
  1. ‘Lual has pressed the mud this way.’

(42)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=rjɔ̰̀pd̪ɔ̤̀ɔk. (1°)
womand=payboy
  1. ‘The woman is hiring a boy.’

b.
kṳ̀rjô̤op. (2°)
andpay.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and he is paying.’

c.
kṳ̀rjɔ̤̂ɔp/rjô̤op. (3°)
andpay.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am paying.’

As seen here, grade 3 merges with grade 2, the grade 3 forms t̪jò̤ooɲ (41c) and rjô̤op (42c) being homonymous with the corresponding grade 2 forms in (41b) and (42b), respectively. In this respect, /jɔ̰/ differs from its inherently breathy counterpart /jo̤/, whose behaviour is exemplified in (43) with the root rjò̤p ʻpound’ (Class 1F) to be compared with the root rjɔ̰̀p ‘pay’ in (42).

(43)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=rjò̤prà̰p. (1°)
womand=poundsorghum.pl
  1. ‘The woman is pounding sorghum.’

b.
kṳ̀rjô̤op/rjê̤ep. (2°)
andpound.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and she is pounding.’

c.
kṳ̀rjâ̤ap. (3°)
andpound.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I am pounding.’

As seen in (43c), grade 3 of /jo̤/ is /ja̤/, so that (43c) is distinct from (42c). This is the case in spite of the fact that the grade 2 forms of the two verbs may be homonymous, cf. (43b) and (42b), with the grade 2 form rjô̤op in (43b) having the fronted variant rjê̤ep. Given these facts, it must be concluded that /o̤/ in (42c), where it varies with /ɔ̤/, is due to raising of /ɔ̤/ and thus not an integral part of VQS.

Raising of grade 3 /ɔ̤/ to /o̤/ does not occur after a patalal onset, as seen in (44) with the non-breathy root jɔ̰̀ɔt ʻjump over’ (Class 2H).

(44)
a.
wá̤lè̤nà̰=jɔ̰̀ɔtkɔ̤̂ɔln̪ò̰m. (1°)
paternal_uncle.1sgd=jump_overholehead
  1. ‘My paternal uncle is jumping over the hole.’

b.
kṳ̀jò̤ot. (2°)
andjump_over.ap.3sg
  1. ‘and he jumped.’

c.
kṳ̀jɔ̤̀ɔt. (3°)
andjump_over.ap.1sg
  1. ‘and I jumped.’

Here, as in (40) above, the /ɔ̰/ which has undergone VQS behaves in the same way as an inherently breathy /o̤/. The vowel gradation of the latter is exemplifed in (45) with the root jò̤k ʻfind’ (Class 1L).

(45)
a.
rà̰aanà̰=jò̤kmjè̤et̪. (1°)
persond=findfood
  1. ‘The person is finding food.’

b.
mjè̤et̪à̰=jò̤ok. (2°)
foodd=find.3sg
  1. ʻHe is finding food.’

c.
mjè̤et̪à̰=jɔ̤̀ɔk. (3°)
foodd=find.1sg
  1. ʻI am finding food.’

4.4 From /a̰/ to /ɔ̤/

Another complication in the effect of voice quality shift on vowel quality is found in antipassive forms with Class 2F roots. Antipassive verbs with such roots normally conform to the vowel gradation seen in Table 20 in Section 4.1 above. This is exemplified in (46) with the root d̪ı̰̀im ʻfilter’.

(46)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=d̪ı̰̀immà̤aw. (1°)
womand=filterbeer
  1. ‘The woman is filtering beer.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=d̪ı̤̀im. (2°)
womand=filter.ap
  1. ‘The woman is filtering.’

c.
kṳ̀d̪jè̤eem. (3°)
andfilter.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am filtering.’

While (46a) shows the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb, (46b) shows the inflectionally unmarked form of the antipassive verb, which has the shape CV̤̀VC with a grade 2 vowel. The corresponding grade 3 vowel is seen in (46c).

However, whereas the vowel /a̰/ normally becomes /ɛ̤/ (or /e̤/) in grade 2 when undergoing vowel quality shift, there is a systematic exception to this in antipassive verbs with Class 2F roots. Here the breathy counterpart of /a̰/ either has the normal quality /ɛ̤/ (or the raised variant //) or it has the quality /ɔ̤/. The distribution of these alternants is determined by the preceding consonant, as can be observed in Table 21, which shows the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb and of the antipassive verb.

Table 21:

The effect of voice quality shift on /a̰/ in antipassive verbs with Class 2F roots.

Preceding consonantSimple, infl. unm.AP, infl. unm.
Labialmà̰an/ɛ̤/mɛ̤̀ɛnʻhate’
bà̰ajbɛ̤̀ɛjʻdisregard’
pà̰anpɛ̤̀ɛnʻmistake’
Postconsonantal glidet̪jà̰ak/e̤/t̪jè̤ekʻmarry’
kwà̰at̪kwè̤et̪ʻdrive’
Alveolarrà̰ak/ɔ̤/rɔ̤̀ɔkʻmilk’
là̰arlɔ̤̀ɔrʻnarrate’
Palatalcà̰ar/ɔ̤/cɔ̤̀ɔrʻexamine’
jà̰aŋjɔ̤̀ɔŋʻskin’

As seen in the table, /ɛ̤/ occurs after a labial onset, /e̤/ occurs after a postconsonantal glide, and /ɔ̤/ occurs after an alveolar or palatal onset, whereas no instances have been attested in which the vowel occurs immediately after an interdental or velar onset. The variation is exemplified by the sets of clauses in (47)-(50) with the roots mà̰an ʻhate’, t̪jà̰ak ʻmarry’, kwà̰at̪ ʻdrive’ and rà̰ak ‘milk’. The (a)-clauses illustrate the use of the inflectionally unmarked form of the simple verb, and the (b)-clauses illustrate the use of the inflectionally unmarked form of the antipassive verb, while the (c)-clauses show the 1SG form of the antipassive verb.

(47)
a.
mò̰cà̰=mà̰antı̰̀ik. (1°)
mand=hatewoman
  1. ‘The man hates the woman.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=mɛ̤̀ɛn. (2°)
mand=hate.ap
  1. ‘The man hates.’

c.
kṳ̀mà̤aan. (3°)
andhate.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I hate.’

(48)
a.
mò̰cà̰=t̪jà̰aktı̰̀ik. (1°)
mand=marrywoman
  1. ‘The man is marrying a woman.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=t̪jè̤ek. (2°)
mand=marry.ap
  1. ‘The man is marrying.’

c.
kṳ̀t̪jè̤eek. (3°)
andmarry.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am marrying.’

(49)
a.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=kwà̰at̪ɰɔ̤́k. (1°)
childd=drivecow.pl
  1. ‘The child is driving cows.’

b.
mḛ̀t̪à̰=kwè̤et̪. (2°)
childd=drive.ap
  1. ‘The child is driving.’

c.
kṳ̀kwɛ̤̀ɛɛt̪. (3°)
anddrive.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am driving.’

(50)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=rà̰akwó̰ŋ. (1°)
womand=milkcow
  1. ‘The woman is milking a cow.’

b.
tı̰̀ikà̰=rɔ̤̀ɔk. (2°)
womand=milk.ap
  1. ʻThe woman is milking.’

c.
kṳ̀rà̤aak. (3°)
andd=milk.ap.1sg
  1. ʻand I am milking.’

All the grade 2 variants behave like inherently breathy grade 2 vowels with respect to vowel gradation, as seen in the (c)-clauses of (47)-(50), whose verb has a grade 3 vowel. Thus, /ɛ̤/ and /ɔ̤/ become /a̤/ in grade 3, while /e̤/ becomes /ɛ̤/ after a postconsonantal /w/, but remains as /e̤/ after a postconsonantal /j/.

It is not clear why /ɔ̤/ occurs as a breathy counterpart of /a̰/ here, while the normal counterpart of /a̰/ is /ɛ̤/. Nor is it clear why /ɛ̤/ occurs specifically and only after labials here. As shown in Andersen (1993: 15–16), the quality /ɔ̤/ also appears as the medium counterpart of short breathy /a̤/ in grade 1 of simple transitive verbs. This alternation is exemplified by the sentences in (51).

(51)
a.
mò̰cà̰=dà̤kwjê̤en. (1°)
mand=untierope
  1. ‘The man is untying the rope.’

b.
mò̰cà̰=cé̤wjê̤endɔ̤̂ɔk. (1°)
mand=pfropeuntie.nf
  1. ʻThe man has untied the rope.’

The inflectionally unmarked form of the simple transitive verb ʻuntie’ in (51a) has a short breathy [a̤], whereas the non-finite form in (51b), which also belongs to the range of vowel grade 1, has a medium breathy [ɔ̤ɔ]. However, this shift from an unrounded to a rounded vowel is independent of the preceding consonant, as seen in Table 22.

Table 22:

Examples of the alternation between short [a̤] and medium [ɔ̤ɔ] or [o̤o] as grade 1 vowels in simple transitive verbs (Class 1F).

Preceding consonantSimple, infl. unm.Simple, NF
Labialpà̤lpwô̤olʻlet go, leave’
mà̤rmwô̤orʻlet get lost’
Interdentalt̪à̤rt̪ɔ̤̂ɔrʻspear’
d̪à̤ld̪ɔ̤̂ɔlʻdespise’
Alveolardà̤kdɔ̤̂ɔkʻuntie’
Palatalcà̤pcɔ̤̂ɔpʻput’
ɲà̤ŋɲɔ̤̂ɔŋʻwithhold from’
Labiovelarwà̤lwwô̤olʻpour’
Postconsonantal /j/t̪jà̤kt̪jô̤okʻbury’
Postconsonantal /w/ɡwà̤rɡwô̤orʻgrind’

Thus, the alternation between [a̤] and [ɔ̤ɔ] or its variant [o̤o] has been attested after onsets that are labial, interdental, alveolar, palatal and labiovelar, and also after postconsonantal /j/ and /w/, while [a̤] has not been attested immediately after a velar onset. As also seen in Table 22, the [ɔ̤ɔ] alternant undergoes Labialization after a labial, and raising after a glide (Andersen 1993: 16–17).

As pointed out in Andersen (1993: 15–16), positing a rule that rounds a non-short breathy /a̤/ to /ɔ̤/ also accounts for the absence of simple transitive verbs with a medium breathy /a̤/ in the inflectionally unmarked form and the corresponding presence of simple transitive verbs with a medium breathy /ɔ̤/ in this form. Again, the occurrence of this /ɔ̤/ and its raised variant /o̤/ is not constrained by the preceding consonant, since it occurs after consonants with all points of articulation, as seen in Table 23. As also seen in this table, /ɔ̤/ is raised to /o̤/ after a postconsonantal glide.

Table 23:

Examples of simple transitive verbs with medium /ɔ̤/, or its raised variant /o̤/, in the inflectionally unmarked form.

Preceding consonantSimple, infl. unm.
Labial + postconsonantal /w/pwò̤owʻpierce’ (2F)
bwò̤okʻslap’ (2F)
mwò̤ot̪ʻgreet’ (2F)
Interdentalt̪ɔ̤̀ɔt̪ʻforge’ (2H)
Alveolartɔ̤̀ɔwʻput’ (2F)
rɔ̤̀ɔt̪ʻbewitch’ (2H)
lɔ̤̀ɔɲʻscald’ (2H)
Palatalɟɔ̤̀ɔɲʻchallenge’ (2H)
jɔ̤̀ɔpʻhunt’ (2F)
Velarkɔ̤̀ɔmʻthresh’ (2H)
ɡɔ̤̀ɔjʻsurprise’ (2F)
ɰɔ̤̀ɔlʻpound’ (2H)
Postconsonantal /j/ljò̤okʻstir’ (2H)
Postconsonantal /w/ɲwò̤ot̪ʻgraze’ (2H)

4.5 Summary of voice quality shift

The basics of voice quality shift are summarized in Figure 1. The arrows show the shift from non-breathy grade 1 vowels to the corresponding breathy grade 1 vowels and subsequently grades 2 and 3 of these breathy vowels. Excluded from the figure are (i) special vowel quality changes connected with preceding postconsonantal glides and (ii) variants that are the effect of raising caused by the preceding consonant.

Figure 1: Voice quality shift and vowel height gradation.
Figure 1:

Voice quality shift and vowel height gradation.

5 Conclusion and comparative reflections

As shown in this article, the vowel quality alternation system (called vowel gradation) which is operative in simple transitive verbs is also operative in derived verbs with a transitive root, but with three modifications. First, the distribution of the vowel grades in derived verbs is partly different from the distribution in simple verbs. In simple verbs, both grade 2 and grade 3 are exponents of inflection (together with vowel length and tone); but in derived verbs, grade 2 is mainly an exponent of the derived derivational status (whose specific status is expressed by voice quality, vowel length and tone), and therefore in most cases, only grade 3 is an exponent of inflection (together with tone and, in antipassive verbs, vowel length). Second, in derived verbs the morphophonological rule of Fronting, which defines grade 2, applies not only to /a/, as in simple verbs, but also (optionally) to /. Third, although vowel quality is basically, or to a large extent, independent of voice quality, the morphophonological rule of voice quality shift, which changes the voice quality from non-breathy to breathy, affects some vowel qualities. Most saliently, voice quality shift affects the height of rounded vowels so that non-breathy /ɔ̰/ and /o̰/ become breathy /o̤/ and /ṳ/, respectively.

As an expansion of Table 4 in Section 2.5, Table 24 shows the full vowel gradation system of verbs with a transitive root, comprising both simple verbs and derived verbs.

Table 24:

Vowel quality alternation in simple and derived verbs with a transitive root.

Non-breathy vowels
Without postconsonantal glideWith postconsonantal /j/With postconsonantal /w/
ɔ̰jḛja̰jɔ̰wḭwḛwa̰wɔ̰
ɛ̰ɔ̰. ɛ̰jḛjɛ̰jɔ̰. jɛ̰wḭwḛwɛ̰wɔ̰. jɛ̰
jɛ̰ɛ̰wɔ̰jɛ̰ja̰ja̰wjɛ̰wɛ̰wa̰ja̰
Non-breathy vowels having undergone voice quality shift
Without postconsonantal glideWith postconsonantal /j/With postconsonantal/w/
a̤, e̤je̤je̤jo̤wi̤we̤we̤
ɛ̤, e̤; ɔ̤je̤je̤jo̤wi̤we̤we̤
je̤ɛ̤, e̤a̤, ɛ̤ɔ̤wo̤je̤ja̤, je̤jɔ̤, jo̤wje̤wɛ̤wɛ̤ɔ̤
Breathy vowels
Without postconsonantal glideWith postconsonantal/j/With postconsonantal/w/
a̤; ɔ̤ɔ̤je̤ja̤jo̤wi̤we̤wa̤wo̤
ɛ̤ɔ̤. ɛ̤je̤jɛ̤, je̤jo̤. je̤wi̤we̤wɛ̤wo̤. je̤
je̤ɛ̤ɔ̤wo̤je̤ja̤ja̤wje̤wɛ̤wa̤ja̤

Vertically, the table has three parts: inherently non-breathy root vowels (at the top), inherently non-breathy root vowels having undergone voice quality shift (in the middle), and inherently breathy root vowels (at the bottom). Each of these parts shows the three vowel grades. Horizontally, the table also has three parts: root vowels inherently not preceded by a postconsonantal glide in grade 1 (on the left), root vowels inherently preceded by a postconsonantal /j/ in grade 1 (in the middle), and root vowels inherently preceded by a postconsonantal /w/ in grade 1 (on the right). [28] Some cells include more than one variant. Three types of variation are distinguished in the table by the symbol that separates the variants: A dot (x. y) indicates variation involving extension of the range of Fronting in derived verbs in the second variant; a semicolon (x; y) indicates variation involving rounding in the second variant; and a comma (x, y) indicates variation involving raising in the second variant.

Table 24 takes non-breathy /ɔ̰/ and /o̰/, as grade 1 vowels, to be the functional counterparts of breathy /o̤/ and /ṳ/, respectively. Non-breathy /a̰/, as a grade 1 vowel, has two different breathy functional counterparts, namely /a̤/ and /ɔ̤/. As noted in Andersen (2006: 17), they must be assumed to go back to the same vowel in Proto-Western Nilotic vowel, namely /ʌ/, cf. Table 25 below. [29]

Table 25:

Regular reflexes of Proto-Western Nilotic vowels in five languages.

PWNMabaanJumjumMayakPäriDinka
[–ATR]*ɪɪiiiiiiɪɪɪɪɪɪḭi
*ɛɛiiɛɛɛɛɛɛɛɛɛɪɛḛe
*a*aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa̰a
*ɔɔuauuaɔɔɔɔɔɔɔɔʊɔɔ̰ɔ̰ɔ
*ʊʊuuuuuuʊʊʊɔʊʊo̰o
[+ATR]*i*iiieiieɪɪɪiiiiiii̤i
*e*eeɛɛɛɪɪɪɪɪɪeeiee̤e
*ʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌʌa̤, ɔ̤ɔ̤ɔ
*o*ooɔɔɔʊʊʊʊʊʊoouoo̤o
*u*uuuuʌʊʊʊuuuuuuṳu

As illustrated in this article, almost all of the morphology in Dinka is expressed by alternations in phonological material of the root. Many of these alternations can be explained historically as reflecting former suffixes, as evidenced by a comparison with other Western Nilotic languages. In Andersen (1990), a comparison of Dinka with Päri, a Northern Lwo language, revealed that some vowel length alternations in Dinka are due to lengthening that compensated for a lost suffix vowel and which gave rise to the ternary vowel length contrast in this language. Moreover, as argued in Andersen (2014: 239–240), assimilation of the root vowel to such suffix vowels explains some of the vowel height alternations in Dinka. More specifically, a comparison with the Northern Burun language Surkum suggests that in non-derived verbs in Dinka, vowel grade 2, which raises grade 1 /a/ to /, reflects a suffixal non-low front vowel and that grade 3, which lowers the other vowel qualities, reflects a suffixal low central vowel. This umlaut explanation can be extended to derived verbs, as seen by a comparison with Kurmuk, another Northern Burun language. As shown in Section 3.1 above, the inflectionally unmarked form of derived transitive verbs and of some subclasses of antipassive verbs has grade 2 vowels. Corresponding verb forms in Kurmuk all have a derivational suffix with a high vowel. This is illustrated in (52)-(56) with SV(O) clauses, in which the verb has an inflectionally unmarked form in both Dinka and Kurmuk (Andersen 2015b). The examples are selected in such a way that the verbs are cognate in the two languages. The root ‘sweep’ is used in the simple verbs in (52), in the centrifugal verbs in (53), in the centripetal verbs in (54), and in the antipassive verbs in (55), and the root ‘hoe’ is used in the dative verbs in (56). [30]

(52)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wḛ̀ecpı̰̀ɲ.(Dinka)
womand=sweepground
  1. ‘The woman is sweeping the ground.’

b.
kámbálwɛ́ɛʃʔʊ́ʊtʊ̀n.(Kurmuk)
girlsweepplace
  1. ‘The girl is sweeping the place.’

(53)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wḛ́eecà̰ɲwɔ̰̀ɔɔn.(Dinka)
womand=sweep.cfweed
  1. ‘The woman is sweeping the weed away.’

b.
kámbálwɛ̀ɛʃ-ɪ́bʊ́rwóo.(Kurmuk)
girlsweep-cfdustout
  1. ‘The girl is sweeping dust out.’

(54)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wè̤eecà̰ɲwɔ̰̀ɔɔn.(Dinka)
womand=sweep.cpweed
  1. ‘The woman is sweeping the weed hither.’

b.
kámbál wɪ̀ɪz-ʊ́ʊbʊ́r.(Kurmuk)
girlsweep-cpdust
  1. ‘The girl is sweeping dust hither.’

(55)
a.
tı̰̀ikà̰=wè̤c.(Dinka)
womand=sweep.ap
  1. ‘The woman is sweeping.’

b.
kámbálwɪ́ʃ-í-r.(Kurmuk)
girlsweep-ap-foc
  1. ‘The girl is sweeping.’

(56)
a.
à̰=pṳ́urmı̤̀it̪rà̰p.(Dinka)
d=hoe.datchild.plsorghum.pl
  1. ‘He is cultivating sorghum for the children.’

b.
tʊ̀ʊlpúr-íʃt̪áarákwàŋ.(Kurmuk)
childhoe-datpersonfield
  1. ‘The child is hoeing the field for the man.’

Like Dinka, Kurmuk has no suffix in the inflectionally unmarked form of an underived verb, as seen (52). Unlike Dinka, however, Kurmuk has a derivational suffix in the inflectionally unmarked form of derived verbs, namely centrifugal -(C)ɪ (53), centripetal -ʊʊ/-uu (54), antipassive -(C)ɪ/-(C)i (55), and dative -(C)ɪʃ/-(C)iʃ (56). Three of these suffixes include a high front vowel, which may be what has brought about grade 2 in corresponding Dinka forms.

As argued in Andersen (1999: 117–118), the voice quality contrast in Dinka between non-breathy and breathy goes back to a contrast between [–ATR] and [+ATR], which is found in many other Western Nilotic languages, and which can be reconstructed for Proto-Western Nilotic (PWN). Table 25 from Andersen (2006: 17) shows regular correspondences between root vowels in Mabaan, Jumjum, Mayak, Päri and Dinka, and the corresponding reconstructed PWN vowel system, with short and long vowels. The vowel systems of Surkum and Kurmuk are identical to that of Mayak in the table.

The alternation between non-breathy and breathy vowels in Dinka is much older than the vowel height alternations and most of the vowel length alternations. This is evidenced by the fact that in the other Western Nilotic languages, those derived verbs that are characterized by breathy voice in Dinka are characterized by [+ATR] (or [–ATR] evolved from [+ATR] by regular sound changes, as in Mabaan, Jumjum and Mayak), namely centripetal verbs, dative verbs and antipassive verbs. For this reason, the [ATR] alternation must be considered to go back to Proto-Western Nilotic. In those Western Nilotic languages which have an [ATR] contrast, the [+ATR] vowels are higher than their [–ATR] counterparts. This may explain why in Dinka, the non-breathy rounded back vowels /o̰/ and /ɔ̰/ are lower than their breathy counterparts /ṳ/ and //. By contrast, there is no considerable height difference between, on the one hand, the non-breathy front vowels /ḭ/ and //, and on the other hand, their breathy counterparts // and //. The reason may be that Dinka has an extra front vowel quality, namely /, which arose as a result of fronting of /a/ (or /) or lowering of /e/ or /i/, and which reduced the available vowel space for /i/ and /e/.

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Danish Research Council for the Humanities and from the Nordic Africa Institute. I also wish to thank my principal Dinka informants Isaac Maker, Kuyok Abol Kuyok, David Daniel Marial and Peter Gum Panther for their assistance. In addition, I wish to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

Andersen, Torben. 1987. The phonemic system of Agar Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 9(1). 1‒27.10.1515/jall.1987.9.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1990. Vowel length in Western Nilotic languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22. 5–26.10.1080/03740463.1990.10411520Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1991. Subject and topic in Dinka. Studies in Language 15(2). 265–294.10.1075/sl.15.2.02andSearch in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1992‒1994. Morphological stratification in Dinka: On the alternations of voice quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verbal roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics 23(1). 1‒63.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1993. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection. Phonology 10(1). 1‒42.10.1017/S095267570000172XSearch in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1999. Vowel quality alternation in Mabaan and its Western Nilotic history. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 20(1). 97–120.10.1515/jall.1999.20.2.97Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2002. Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23(1). 1–30.10.1515/jall.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2006. [ATR] reversal in Jumjum. Diachronica 23(1). 3–28.10.1075/dia.23.1.03andSearch in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2007a. Auxiliary verbs in Dinka. Studies in Language 31(1). 89–116.10.1075/sl.31.1.04andSearch in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2007b. Kurmuk phonology. Studies in African Linguistics 36(1). 29–90.10.32473/sal.v36i1.107305Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2012a. Verbal directionality and argument alternation in Dinka. In Angelika Mietzner & Ulrike Claudi (eds.), Directionality in grammar and discourse: Case studies from Africa, 35‒53. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2012b. Spatial roles and verbal directionality in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 33(2). 143–179.10.1515/jall-2012-0007Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2014. Number in Dinka. In Anne Storch & Gerrit Dimmendaal (eds.), Number – constructions and semantics: Case studies from Africa, Amazonia, India and Oceania (Studies in Language Companion Series 151), 221–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.151.09andSearch in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2015a. Information structure in Dinka. In Osamu Hieda (ed.), Information structure and Nilotic languages (Studies in Nilotic Linguistics 10), 61–75. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 2015b. Syntacticized topics in Kurmuk: A ternary voice-like system in Nilotic. Studies in Language 39(3). 508–554.10.1075/sl.39.3.01andSearch in Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert. 2010. Tone systems of Dinka dialects. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Tone and Intonation (TIE4), Stockholm University, September 9–11, 2010. http://www.nordiska.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.30134.1320939962!/Remijsen_TIE4_final.pdf [accessed July 19, 2012].Search in Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert & D. Robert Ladd. 2008. The tone system of the Luanyjang dialect of Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 29(2). 173–213.10.1515/JALL.2008.009Search in Google Scholar

Robertshaw, Peter. 1981. Expedition to the Southern Sudan of British Institute in Eastern Africa. Nyame Akuma: Newsletter of the Society of Africanist Archaeologists in America 18. 48–50.Search in Google Scholar

Robertshaw, Peter & Ari Siiriäinen. 1985. Excavations in Lakes Province, Southern Sudan. Azania, Journal of the British Institute in Eastern Africa 20. 89–161.10.1080/00672708509511360Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-5-3
Published in Print: 2017-5-24

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall-2017-0001/html
Scroll to top button