References

Aoun, Joseph & Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 1989. Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 141–172.Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco & Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1). 28–55.10.1353/lan.2000.0045Search in Google Scholar

Barss, Andrew & Howard Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 347–354.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett-Kastor, Tina L. 1994. Repetition in language development: From interaction to cohesion. in Barbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse (Interdisciplinary Perspectives 1), 155–171. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn. 1977. The effect of a pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16(6). 723–734.10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80031-5Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18. 355–387.10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn, Gary S. Dell, Franklin Chang & Kristine H. Onishi. 2007. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition 104(3). 437–458.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn & Zenzi M. Griffin. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 129(2). 177–192.10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn & David E. Irwin. 1980. Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19. 467–484.10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90321-7Search in Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn & Richard K. Warren. 1985. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition 21(1). 47–67.10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-XSearch in Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering & Alexandra A. Cleland. 2000a. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75(2). B13–B25.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Simon P. Liversedge, Andrew J. Stewart & Thomas P. Urbach. 1995. Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Psycholinguistic Research 24(6). 489–506.10.1007/BF02143163Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Andrew J. Stewart & Janet F. McLean. 2000b. Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference. Memory and Cognition 28(8). 1297–1302.10.3758/BF03211830Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Search in Google Scholar

Brody, Jill. 1986. Repetition as a rhetorical and conversational device in Tojolab’al (Mayan). International Journal of American Linguistics 52(3). 255–274.10.1086/466022Search in Google Scholar

Brody, Jill. 1994. Multiple repetitions in Tojolab’al conversation. in Barbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse (Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2), 3–14. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Brody, Jill. 2003. ‘Why was I late?’ ‘I don’t know.’ - Tojolab’al answers to questions in context. Paper presented at the Inaugural Conference for Indigenous Language of Latin America, Austin TX, 23-25 October.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.11.03chaSearch in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1992. Discourse: An overview. In William Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics 1, 355–358. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1993. Prosodic and functional units of language. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 33–43. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell, J. Kathryn Bock & Zenzi M. Griffin. 2000. Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Psycholinguistic Research 29(2). 217–229.10.1023/A:1005101313330Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Lan-Hsin. 2001a. Chinese ESL learners’ acquisition of English dative alternations: The discourse effect. Working Papers in Linguistics 31. 1–22. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Lan-Hsin. 2001b. Discourse effects on the second language acquisition of English and Chinese dative structures. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Lan-Hsin. 2004. Discourse effects on EFL learners’ production of dative constructions. Journal of Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences 33. 145–169.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Hey-Won. 2008. Beyond grammatical weight: A corpus study of information structure effect on dative-accusative order in Korean. Discourse and Cognition 15. 127–152.10.15718/discog.2008.15.3.127Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Hey-Won. 2009. Ordering a left-branching language: Heaviness vs. givenness. Korean Society for Language and Information 13. 39–56.10.29403/LI.13.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark. 1978. Universals, relativity, and language processing. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language: Method and theory, vol. 1, 225–278. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Albert, Martin J. Pickering & Antonella Sorace. 2008. Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4). 528–556.10.1080/01690960801920545Search in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin. 1996. Functional dimensions of the dative in English. in William Van Belle & Willy Van Langendonck (eds.), The dative 1: Descriptive studies, 289–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cagral.2.12davSearch in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1986. The role of PP in specifying Chinese word order parameters. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), New York: 27-30 December.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1987. Theta theory and the syntax of Chinese PPs. MS. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 1988. Structure vs. function in the Chinese verb phrase. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1979. Discourse constraints on dative movement. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics (Discourse and Syntax 12), 441–467. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_019Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. 2003. The processing basis of syntactic persistence: We repeat what we learn. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, British Columbia: 6-9 November.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. & J. Kathryn Bock. 2006. The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(7-8). 1011–1029.10.1080/01690960600824609Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. & Hiromi Yoshita. 2003. Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. Psycholinguistic Research 32(6). 669–692.10.1023/A:1026146332132Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Larry Selinker. 1992. Language transfer in language learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.5Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1984a. Direct object and dative shifting: Semantic and pragmatic case. In Frans Plank (ed.), Objects, 151–182. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1984b. Universals of discourse structure and second language acquisition. In William E. Rutherford (ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition, 109–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.5.10givSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1989. Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gosling, Samuel D., Simine Vazire, Sanjay Srivastava & Oliver P. John. 2004. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist 59. 93–104.10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93Search in Google Scholar

Green, Georgia M. 1974. Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg & Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65(2). 203–257.10.2307/415332Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Linguistics 3(2). 199–244.10.1017/S0022226700016613Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2. 31–70.10.1075/livy.2.04harSearch in Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Casper Westenberg. 2000. Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition 75(2). B27–B39.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00080-3Search in Google Scholar

Haviland, Susan E. & Herbert H. Clark. 1974. What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13. 512–521.10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554285Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2006. Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua 116(8). 1274–1302.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Hewson, Claire, Peter Yule, Dianna Laurent & Carl Vogel. 2003. Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209298Search in Google Scholar

Hsueh, Frank. 1983. A note of the grammatical function of gei. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 14. 81–85.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Chu-Ren & Kathleen Ahrens. 1999. The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27(2). 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Chu-Ren & Ruo-Ping Mo 1992. Mandarin ditransitive constructions and the category of gei. In Laura A. Buszard-Welcher, Jonathan Evans, David Peterson, Lionel Wee & William Weigel (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS)18. 109–122.10.3765/bls.v18i1.1577Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Shin-chin. 2009. The determining factors of dative alternation in Chinese. Taiwan: National Sun Yat-sen University Master thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara, O. Roy Freedle & Annette Kirk. 1994. Repetition in discourse: A dialogue. in Barbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse (Interdisciplinary Perspectives 1), 1–20. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Elsie & John C. Trueswell. 2004. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition 94(2). 113–147.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. Sentence focus, information structure, and the thetic-categorical distinction. In Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 13. 366–382.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–391.10.4324/9780203429204-7Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 1990. Double objects revisited: A reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 589–632.10.4324/9780203429204-8Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. & Stephanie Kelter. 1982. Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 14. 78–106.10.1016/0010-0285(82)90005-6Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1985. Abstract case in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Yvonne S. H. 2015. Ditransitivity in English-Chinese interlanguages. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Marefat, Hamideh. 2005. The impact of information structure as a discourse factor on the acquisition of dative alternation by L2 learners. Studia Linguistica 59(1). 66–82.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00120.xSearch in Google Scholar

Montrul, Silvina. 2010. Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research 26(3). 293–327.10.1177/0267658310365768Search in Google Scholar

Newman, John. 1993. A cognitive grammar approach to Mandarin gei. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21(2). 313–336.Search in Google Scholar

Odlin, Terence. 1989. Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524537Search in Google Scholar

Oehrle, Richard T. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Holly P. Branigan. 1999. Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(4). 136–141.10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01293-0Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Victor S. Ferreira. 2008. Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134(3). 427–459.10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven A. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Mary C. & Linda Lombardi. 1998. Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 38. 265–282.10.1006/jmla.1997.2546Search in Google Scholar

Prévost, Phillipe, Nelleke Strik & Laurice Tuller. 2014. Wh-questions in child L2 French: Derivational complexity and its interactions with L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input. Second Language Research 30(2). 225–250.10.1177/0267658313519814Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Norvin. 2001. An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 183–192.10.1162/002438901554649Search in Google Scholar

Scheidnes, Maureen & Laurice Tuller. 2010. Syntactic movement in the production of French wh-questions: The role of computational complexity versus L1 transfer in adult L2 acquisition. in Vicenç Torrens, Linda Escobar, Anna Gavarró & Juncal Gutiérrez (eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar, 185–217. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Scheidnes, Maureen, Laurice Tuller & Hélène Delage. 2009. L1 transfer versus computational complexity in adult L2 French: Evidence from a comparison with deaf L1 French learners. In Jean Crawford, Koichi Otaki & Masahiko Takahashi (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008) 3. 241–252. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Schenkein, Jim. 1980. A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation. in Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production, vol. 1, 21–47. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. 1998. The second language instinct. Lingua 106. 133–160.10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00032-1Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. in Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.8.14schSearch in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12(1). 40–72.10.1177/026765839601200103Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, Kieran M. 2003. The relationship between form and function in ditransitive constructions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Rex A. 2006. Full transfer and relexification: Second language acquisition and Creole genesis. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: Dialogues, 169–181. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.42.11sprSearch in Google Scholar

Stallings, Lynne M. 1998. Relative weight in the production of heavy-NP shift. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), New York: 8-11 January.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63(3). 574–605.10.2307/415006Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse, 2nd edn New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618987Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1997a. Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9(1). 81–105.10.1017/S0954394500001800Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1997b. End-weight from the speaker’s perspective. Psycholinguistic Research 26(3). 347–361.10.1023/A:1025080709112Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Weiner, E. Judith & William Labov. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Linguistics 19(1). 29–58.10.1017/S0022226700007441Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Rosemary & Jean-Marc Dewaele. 2010. The use of web questionnaires in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research 26(1). 103–123.10.1177/0267658309337640Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 1994. Second language acquisition of reflexives revisited. Language 70(3). 539–545.10.1353/lan.1994.0015Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 1995. Acquisition of base-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning 45. 201–237.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00455.xSearch in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 1999. Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction in a second language: Evidence from English-speaking learners of L2 Chinese. Linguistics 37. 275–296.10.1515/ling.37.2.275Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2001. The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: Against inevitability of thematic-verb raising in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(3). 248–272.10.1177/026765830101700302Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2007a. Japanese speakers’ second language Chinese wh-questions: A lexical morphological feature deficit account. Second Language Research 23(3). 329–357.10.1177/0267658307077644Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2007b. Behaviours of wh-words in English speakers’ L2 Chinese wh-questions: Evidence of no variability, temporary variability and persistent variability in L2 grammars. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3). 277–298.10.1017/S1366728907003070Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2010. Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics-syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words used as existential polarity words in L2 Chinese grammars. Second Language Research 26(2). 219–260.10.1177/0267658309349421Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Boping. 2015. The effect of computational complexity on L1 transfer: Evidence from L2 Chinese attitude-bearing wh-questions. Lingua 167. 1–18.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Shi. 1990. Correlations between the double object construction and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 21(2). 312–316.Search in Google Scholar