1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
  4. Volume 24, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 24, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This article introduces a methodology for the diachronic analysis of large historical corpora, Usage Fluctuation Analysis (UFA). UFA looks at the fluctuation of the usage of a word as observed through collocation. It presupposes neither a commitment to a specific semantic theory, nor that the results will focus solely on semantics. We focus, rather, upon a word’s usage. UFA considers large amounts of evidence about usage, through time, as made available by historical corpora, displaying fluctuation in word usage in the form of a graph. The paper provides guidelines for the interpretation of UFA graphs and provides three short case studies applying the technique to (i) the analysis of the word and (ii) two words related to social actors, and . These case studies relate UFA to prior, labour intensive, corpus and historical analyses. They also highlight the novel observations that the technique affords.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
2019-11-01
2024-04-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijcl.18096.mce.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Annand, W.
    (1661) Panem quotidianum, or, A short discourse tending to prove the legality, decency, and expediency of set forms of prayer in the churches of Christ with a particular defence of the book of common prayer of the Church of England. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Corbet, J.
    (1646) [no title]. London.
  3. Cuff, H.
    (1607) The differences of the ages of mans life together with the originall causes, progresse, and end thereof. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Everard, J.
    (1618) The arriereban a sermon preached to the company of the military yarde, at St. Andrewes Church in Holborne at St. Iames his day last. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Humfrey, R.
    (1607) The conflict of Job. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hurst, H.
    (1678) The revival of grace in the vigour and fragrancy of it by a due application of the blood of Christ to the root thereof. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Latimer, H.
    (1661) The preaching bishop reproving unpreaching prelates. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Norden, J.
    (1619) An eye to heaven in earth. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Penington, I.
    (1659) [no title]. London.
  10. Pollock, R., & Holland, H.
    (1603) Lectures upon the Epistle of Paul to the Colossians. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Sala, A.
    (1619) Opiologia: or, A treatise concerning the nature, properties, true preparation and safe use and administration of opium. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Savage, H.
    (1663) The dew of Hermon which fell upon the hill of Sion, or, An answer to a book entituled, Sions groans for her distressed, &c.London.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Sclater, W.
    (1619) Exposition with notes upon the first Epistle to the Thessalonians. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Secker, W.
    (1660) [no title]. London.
  15. Tavernier, J.
    (1677) The six voyages of John Baptista Tavernier, Baron of Aubonne. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Topsell, E.
    (1658) The history of four-footed beasts and serpents describing at large their true and lively figure, their several names, conditions, kinds, virtues… London.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Trapp, J.
    (1649) [no title]. London.
  18. Vilvain, R.
    (1654) [no title]. London.
  19. William, J.
    (1659) [no title]. London.
  20. Baker, H., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) Ireland in parliamentary debates. InT. Säily, A. Nurmi, M. Palander-Collin & A. Auer (Eds.). Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics (pp.83–107). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ahs.7.04bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.7.04bak [Google Scholar]
  21. Baker, H., McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2017) A corpus-based investigation into English representations of Turks and Ottomans in the early modern period. InM. Pace-Sigge & K. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances (pp.42–66). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.79.02bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.02bak [Google Scholar]
  22. Baker, P.
    (2004) Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–359. 10.1177/0075424204269894
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269894 [Google Scholar]
  23. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman: London.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Brezina, V.
    (2018) Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316410899
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899 [Google Scholar]
  25. Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
    (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
  26. The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition) (2007) Distributed by Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available fromwww.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/ (last accessedAugust 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Cha, S. H.
    (2007) Comprehensive survey on distance similarity measures between probability density functions. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 1(4), 300–307.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Choi, S. S., Cha, S. H., & Tappert, C. C.
    (2010) A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8(1), 43–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Clark, S.
    (2015) Vector space models of lexical meaning. InLappin, S., & Fox, C. (Eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp.493–522). John Wiley & Sons: Oxford. 10.1002/9781118882139.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  30. Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M.
    (2010) Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Eger, S., & Mehler, A.
    (2016) On the linearity of semantic change: Investigating meaning variation via dynamic graph models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02497.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Evert, S.
    (2008) Corpora and collocations. InA. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp.1212–1248). Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Firth, J. R.
    (1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. InStudies in Linguistic Analysis (pp.1–32). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Friedman, J. H., & Stuetzle, W.
    (1982) Smoothing of Scatterplots. Technical Report ORION006. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Dept. of Statistics. 10.21236/ADA119814
     https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA119814 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. 10.1111/lang.12225
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gabrielatos, C., McEnery, T., Diggle, P. & Baker, P.
    (2012) The peaks and troughs of corpus-based contextual analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 37(2), 151–175. 10.1075/ijcl.17.2.01gab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.01gab [Google Scholar]
  37. Gries, S. T., & Hilpert, M.
    (2010) Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb-and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language & Linguistics, 14(3), 293–320. 10.1017/S1360674310000092
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000092 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gwet, K. L.
    (2008) Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 29–48. 10.1348/000711006X126600
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600 [Google Scholar]
  39. Harris, Z.
    (1954) Distributional structure. Word, 10(23), 146–162. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hastie, T. J.
    (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hilpert, M. & Perek, F.
    (2015) Meaning change in a petri dish: Constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 339–350. 10.1515/lingvan‑2015‑0013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoey, M.
    (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Routledge: London.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kelsall, J. E., & Diggle, P. J.
    (1998) Spatial variation in risk of disease: A nonparametric binary regression approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 47(4), 559–573. 10.1111/1467‑9876.00128
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00128 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kutuzov, A., Øvrelid, L., Szymanski, T., & Velldal, E.
    (2018) Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: A survey. InE. M. Bender, L. Derczynski & P. Isabelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp.1384–1397). Santa Fe, NM: Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved fromhttps://aclweb.org/anthology/papers/C/C18/C18-1117/ (last accessedAugust 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Labov, W.
    (1994) Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  48. Mair, C.
    (1997) Corpora and the study of the major varieties of English: Issues and results. InH. Lindquist, S. Klintborg, M. Levin & M. Estling (Eds.). Papers from MAVEN 97 (pp.139–158). Växjo: Växjo Universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McEnery, T.
    (2006) Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. McEnery, T., & Baker, H.
    (2017a) Corpus Linguistics and 17th-century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. Bloomsbury: London.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McEnery, T., & Baker, H. S.
    (2017b) The poor in seventeenth-century England: A corpus based analysis. Token: A Journal for English Linguistics, 6, 51–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Nevalainen, T.
    (1999) Making the best use of ‘bad’ data: Evidence for sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 100(4), 499–533.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. (2015) Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve in diachronic studies of language change. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, 16. Retrieved fromwww.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/nevalainen/ (last accessedAugust 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.
    (1994) Its beauty and the beauty of it: The standardization of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. InD. Stein & I. Tienen-Boob van Ostade (Eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800 (pp.171–216), Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. (2003) Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. Harlow: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sauerbrei, W., Meier-Hirmer, C., Benner, A., & Royston, P.
    (2006) Multivariable regression model building by using fractional polynomials: Description of SAS, STATA and R programs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(12), 3464–3485. 10.1016/j.csda.2005.07.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.07.015 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sinclair, J., Jones, S., & Daley, R.
    (2004) English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report. London: Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1970)
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wood, S. N.
    (2017) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/9781315370279
     https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
Loading
Usage Fluctuation Analysis
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24, 413 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.18096.mce
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collocation; Early Modern English; non-parametric regression; time series data; usage change

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error