Academic language in Catalan students’ research reports across levels of study

References

Anthony, Laurence. 2011. Antconc (Version 3.2.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Laurence Anthony, University of Waseda.Search in Google Scholar

Aull, Laura L. & Zak Lancaster. 2014. Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus based-comparison. Written Communication 31(2). 151–183.10.1177/0741088314527055Search in Google Scholar

Baratta, Alexandra M. 2010. Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic. Journal of Pragmatics 42(4). 1017–1036.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bereiter, Carl & Marlene Scardamalia. 1987. The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Berkenkotter, Carol, Thomas Huckin & John Ackerman. 1991. Social context and socially constructed tests: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In Charles Bazerman & James Paradis (eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities, 191–215. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence, 9–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.3.05berSearch in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 2007. Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In Erika Hoff & Marilyn Schatz, Blackwell handbook of language development, 347–367. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757833.ch17Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. & Dorit Ravid. 2009. Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 92–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609664.007Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. & Ludo Verhoeven. 2002. Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1). 1–43.10.1075/wll.5.1.02berSearch in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9. 93–124.10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1994. Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1). 2–20.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1). 5–35.10.4324/9781003087991-18Search in Google Scholar

Castelló, Montserrat, Mariona Corcelles, Anna Iñiesta, Gerardo Bañales & Norma Vega. 2011. La voz del autor en la escritura académica: Una propuesta para su análisis. Signos 44(76). 105–117.10.4067/S0718-09342011000200001Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace & Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. San Diego, California: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christie, Frances & Bewerly Derewianka. 2008. School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London, UK: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael. 1994. Inter-cultural communication at work. Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620799Search in Google Scholar

Colombi, M. Cecilia. 2002. Academic language development in Latino Students’ writing in Spanish. In Mary Schleppegrell & M. Cecilia Colombi (eds.), Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages, 67–86. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, Susan. 1996. Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics and Education 8. 299–326.10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90025-XSearch in Google Scholar

Cortes, Viviana. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4). 397–423.10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen & Margaret S. Steffensen. 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 10(1). 39–71.10.1177/0741088393010001002Search in Google Scholar

Cuenca, Maria-Josep. 2003. Two ways to reformulate: A contrastive analysis of reformulation markers. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1069–1093.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00004-3Search in Google Scholar

Cuenca, Maria-Josep. 2005. Sintaxi Catalana. Barcelona: UOC.Search in Google Scholar

Cutillas, Laia, Liliana Tolchinsky, Elisa Rosado & Joan Perera. 2014. Indicators of lexical growth throughout age, genre and modality for a Catalan L1 corpus. In Ana Díaz-Negrillo & Francisco Díaz-Pérez (eds.), Specialisation and variation in language corpora, 161–188. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty L. 1982. The construction of noun phrases in biomedical journal articles. In Jorgen Hoedt , (ed.) Pragmatics and LSP, 49–67. Copenhagen: Copenhagen School of Economics.Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, John. 2014. Foreword. In Luz Gil-Salom & Carmen Soler- Montreal (eds.), Dialogicity in written specialised genres, IX–XVI. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.23.01forSearch in Google Scholar

Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(1). 52–63.10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Sheena & Hilary Nesi. 2013. A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics 34(1). 25–52.10.1093/applin/ams024Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, William & Robert B. Kaplan. 1996. Theory and practice of writing. Essex, UK: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Guillén Galve, Ignacio. 1998. The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalizations occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3). 363–385.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00002-2Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. The language of science. New York, NY: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaia Hasan. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, Alice & Robert Barr. 2010. Comparing indicators of authorial stance in psychology students’ writing and published research articles. Journal of Writing Research 2. 245–264.10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.8Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 1994. Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.54Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London, UK: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2004. A convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion. In Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, 87–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.16.05hylSearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2). 173–192.10.1177/1461445605050365Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2008. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies 8(2). 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & John Milton. 1997. Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6(2). 183–205.10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2). 156–177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Victoria. 2008. Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective. Working Papers (Lund University) 53. 61–79.Search in Google Scholar

Kellogg, Roland T. 2008. Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research 1(1). 1–26.10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Chi-Hua. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2). 121–138.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6Search in Google Scholar

León, Isabel & Lourdes Divasson. 2006. Nominal domains in the biomedical research paper: A grammatico-rhetorical study of modification. In Maurizio Gotti & Françoise Salager-Meyer (eds.), Advances in medical discourse analysis: Oral and written contexts, 289–309. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Lewin, Beverly A. 2005. Hedging: An exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(2). 163–178.10.1016/j.jeap.2004.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45(1). 36–62.10.5054/tq.2011.240859Search in Google Scholar

Malvern, David, Brian Richards, Ngoni Chipere & Pilar Durán. 2004. Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511804Search in Google Scholar

Markkanen, Raija & Hartmut Schröder (eds.). 1997. Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110807332Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, Iliana A. 2005. Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3). 174–190.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Philip M. & Scott Jarvis. 2010. MTLD, Vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42(2). 381–392.10.3758/BRM.42.2.381Search in Google Scholar

McGrath, Lisa & Maria Kuteeva. 2012. Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes 31(3). 161–173.10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Danielle S., Scott A. Crossley & Philip M. McCarthy. 2010. Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication 27(1). 57–86.10.1177/0741088309351547Search in Google Scholar

Mendiluce, Gustavo. 2005. La matización asertiva en el artículo biomédico: Una propuesta de clasificación para los estudios contrastivos inglés-español. Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes 10. 63–90.Search in Google Scholar

Mur, Pilar. 2007. ‘I/we focus only’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(2). 143–162.10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Neff, Joanne & Rosa Prieto. 1994. First language influence on Spanish EFL university writing development. Washington, DC: Educational Resource Information Center.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Nancy & Montserrat Castelló. 2012. Academic writing and authorial voice. In Montserrat Castelló & Christiane Donahue (eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies, 33–52. Bingley, UK: Emerald.10.1163/9781780523873_004Search in Google Scholar

Oliver Del Olmo, Sonia. 2004. Análisis contrastivo Español/ Inglés de la atenuación retórica en el discurso médico. El artículo de investigación y el caso clínico. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24. 492–518.10.1093/applin/24.4.492Search in Google Scholar

Padró, Lluis & Evgeny Stanilovsky. 2012. FreeLing 3.0.: Towards wider Multilinguality. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Istanbul, Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

Pujol Dahme, Ana M. & Moisés Selfa. 2015. The transition from university to publication: Register and interactional metadiscourse features in immunology research written in Catalan and English. Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes 30(1). 155–182.Search in Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit & Ruth A. Berman. 2009. Developing linguistic register across text types. The case of modern Hebrew. Pragmatics and Cognition 17(1). 108–145.10.1075/pc.17.1.04ravSearch in Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit & Liliana Tolchinsky. 2002. Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language 29(2). 417–447.10.1017/S0305000902005111Search in Google Scholar

Rienecker, Lotte & Peter Stray Jörgensen. 2003. The (im)possibilities in teaching university writing in the Anglo-American tradition when dealing with continental student writers. In Lennart Björk, Gerd Bräuer, Lotte Rienecker & Peter Stray Jörgensen (eds.), Teaching academic writing in European higher education, 101–112. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/0-306-48195-2_8Search in Google Scholar

Russell, David R. & Vivana Cortes. 2012. Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? In Montserrat Castelló & Christiane Donahue (eds.), University writing. Selves and texts in academic societies, 3–18. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 149–170.10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2Search in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary J. 2001. The linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4). 431–459.10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0Search in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary J. & M. Cecilia Colombi. 2002. Theory and practice in the development of advanced literacy. In Mary J. Schleppegrell & M. Cecilia Colombi (eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, 1–19. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Snow, Catherine E. & Paola Uccelli. 2009. The challenge of academic language. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 112–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609664.008Search in Google Scholar

Strömqvist, Sven, Victoria Johansson, Sarah Kriz, Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir, Ravid Aisenman & Dorit Ravid. 2002. Toward a cross-linguistic comparison of lexical quanta in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy 5(1). 45–67.10.1075/wll.5.1.03strSearch in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research and research settings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar

Szmrecsányi, Benedikt M. 2004. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds.), Le poids des mots. Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, 2, 1032–1039. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff. 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22(1). 58–78.10.1093/applin/22.1.58Search in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola, Christina Dobbs & Jessica Scott. 2013. Mastering academic language: Organization and stance in the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication 30(1). 36–62.10.1177/0741088312469013Search in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enric. 2002. L’oració com a unitat informativa. In Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez-Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 2, 1221–1279. Barcelona: Empúries.Search in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enric & Elisabet Engdahl. 1995. Information packaging and grammar architecture. North East Linguistics Society 25. 519–533.Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez, Glòria, Fernández, Ana & Martí, Maria Antònia. 2000. Dealing with lexical semantic mismatches between English and Spanish. Proceedings of the International Conference of Knowledge Based Computer Systems, 308–319, Mumbai, 17–19 December.Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez, Ignacio. 2010. A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in Business Management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica, 19. 77–96.Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez, Ignacio & Diana Giner. 2008. Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21. 171–190.10.14198/raei.2008.21.10Search in Google Scholar

Ventola, Eija M. 1996. Packing and unpacking of information in academic. In Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen (eds.), Academic writing. Intercultural and textual issues, 153–194. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.41.12venSearch in Google Scholar

Woerfel, Till & Seda Yilmaz. 2011. Lexical development of German-Turkish bilinguals: A comparative study in written discourse. In Chris Cummins (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, 240–251. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Shunji Inagaki & Hae-Young Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xanthos, Aris. 2014. Textable: Programmation visuelle pour l’analyse de données textuelles. Actes des 12èmes Journées Internationales d’Analyse Statistique de donées textuelles (JADT).Search in Google Scholar