Abstract
This paper argues that Arabic function words (FWs) vary in usage between old and modern Arabic, thus prompting an experimental investigation into their changeability. This investigation is carried out by testing classical Arabic (CA) in Arabic heritage language (AHL) texts – those labeled as archistratum – and the modern standard Arabic (MSA) of Arabic newspaper texts (ANT), each group of which contains randomly collected 5 million (M) word texts. The linguistic theory of the grammar of Arabic FWs is explained through the differences between CA and MSA, despite Arabic FW changes and the unlearnability and/or unusability of some FW constructions between in these two eras of Arabic usage. The dispersion/distribution of the construction grammar (CxG) of FWs and the number (n) of word attractions/repulsions between the two distinct eras is explored using the very latest and most sophisticated Arabic corpus processing tools, and Sketch Engine’s SkeEn gramrels operators. The analysis of a 5 M word corpus from each era of Arabic serves to prove the non-existence of rigorous Arabic CxG. The approach in this study adopts a technique which, by contrasting AHL with ANT, relies on analyzing the frequency distributions of FWs, the co-occurrences of FWs in a span of 2n-grams collocational patterning, and some cases of FW usage changes in terms of lexical cognition (FW grammatical relationships). The results show that the frequencies of FWs, in addition to the case studies, are not the same, and this implies that FWs and their associations with the main part of speech class in a fusion language like Arabic have grammatically changed in MSA. Their constructional changes are neglected in Arabic grammar.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank the anonymous referees for their suggestions that helped clarifying a number of points in the earlier version of this article.
References
Abdulaziz, Mohammad Ḥasan. 1998. Khaṣāᵓiṣ al-ᶜArabiyya al-Muᶜāṣirah: Maẓāhir Hadāthatihā fi al-Mufradāt wa al-Tarākīb [contemporary Arabic features: Arabic modernity aspects in vocabulary and structures]. Majallat al-Lisān al-ᶜarabī [Journal of Arabic Tongue] 45. 143–164.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Mujaiwel, Sultan. 2016 Free/open KACSTAC and its processing tools: Lexical resources for Arabic lexicogrammatical microstructures based on collocational indicators. In Francisco Alonso Almeida, Ivalla Ortega Barrera, Elena Quintana Toledo & Margarita E. Sánchez Cuervo (eds.), Input a word, analyze the world: Selected approaches to corpus linguistics, 153–170. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Almujaiwel, Sultan & Abdulmohsen Al-Thubaity. 2016. Arabic corpus processing tools for corpus linguistics and language teaching. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on the Globalization of Second Language Acquisition and Teacher Education (SLATE), 103–108.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Nasrawi, Al-Habib 2010 Al-Tawlid Al-Lughawi [language generativity]. Irbid (Jordan): Modern Book World.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Thubaity, Abdulmohsen, Marwa Khan, Manal Al-Mazrua & Maram Al-Mousa. 2013. New language resources for Arabic: Corpus containing more than two million words and a corpus processing tool. The International Conference on Asian Language Processing in Urumqi, China, 17–19 August. Beijing: Chinese and Oriental Languages Information Processing Society.10.1109/IALP.2013.21Search in Google Scholar
Al-Thubaity, Abdulmohsen, Marwa Khan, Manal Al-Mazrua & Maram Al-Mousa. 2014. ACP Tools. http://sourceforge.net/projects/kacst-acptool/ (accessed 16 March 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Arts, Jan. 1991. Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 44–62. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Badawi, Elsaid. 1985. Educated spoken Arabic: A problem in teaching Arabic as a foreign language. In Kurt R. Jankowsky (ed.), Scientific and humanistic dimensions of language, 15–22. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/z.22.09badSearch in Google Scholar
Badawi, Elsaid, Michael Carter & Adrian Gully. 2004. Modern written Arabic: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Boas, Hans, C. 2007. Construction grammar in the twenty-first century. English Language and Linguistics 11(3). 569–585.10.1017/S1360674307002390Search in Google Scholar
Boas, Hans. C. 2013. Cognitive construction grammar. In Graham Trousdale & Thomas Huffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 233–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0013Search in Google Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2013. Cognitive grammar. In Graham Trousdale & Thomas Huffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 191–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0011Search in Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 6th edn. Malden (Massachusetts): Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444302776Search in Google Scholar
Dons, Ute. 2004. Descriptive adequacy of early modern English grammars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110906042Search in Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning. 1996. Collins COBUILD grammar patterns, 1: Verbs. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1940. American English grammar. New York: Appleton Century.Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Construction at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Green, Spence & Christopher D. Manning. 2010. Better Arabic parsing: Baselines, evaluations and analysis. In Chu-Ren Huang & Dan Jurafsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Beijing International Convention Center, 394–402. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2). 277–294.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.277Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. In Auilino Sánchez & Moisés Almela (eds.), A mosaic of corpus linguistics: Selected approaches, 269–291. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Data in construction grammar. In Graham Trousdale & Thomas Huffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0006Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. The role of quantitative methods in cognitive linguistics: Corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. In Jocelyne Daems, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman & Hubert Cuykens (eds.), Change of paradigms – New paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics, 311–325. Berlin: De Gruyter Mounton.10.1515/9783110435597-018Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2009. Corpora and grammar. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, volume 2, 933–951. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Habash, Nizar. 2010. Introduction to Arabic natural language processing. USA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.10.2200/S00277ED1V01Y201008HLT010Search in Google Scholar
Ḥasan, ᶜAabbās. 1973. Al-Naḥw al-Wāfī [the thorough grammar]. Cairo: Dār al-Maᶜārif.Search in Google Scholar
Ḥassān, Tammām. 1994. Al-Lugha al-ᶜArabiyya: Maᶜnahā wa Mabnāhā [Arabic language: Its meaning and form]. Casa Blanca: Dār al-Thaqāfah.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, Gill Francis & Elizabeth Manning. 1998. Collins COBUILD grammar patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Ibn, Mālik. 2011. Matin al-ᶜAlfiyya (Body of 1000). Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-Shaᶜbiyya. https://archive.org/details/waq37284 (accessed 18 March 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Jakubicek, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Diana McCarthy & Rychlý. Pavel 2010. Fast syntactic searching in very large corpora for many languages. In Ryo Otoguro, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Umemoto, Kei Yoshimoto & Yasunari Harada (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 24). Tohoku University, 741–748, Tokyo: Waseda University.Search in Google Scholar
Khoja, Shereen. 2001. APT: Arabic part-of-speech tagger. Paper presented in the Student Workshop at the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL). Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University. http://archimedes.fas.harvard.edu/mdh/arabic/NAACL.pdf (accessed 18 March 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on, Lexicography 1(1). 7–36.10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9Search in Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrz & David Tugwell. 2004. The Sketch Engine. Eleventh EURALEX, 6–8 July, Lorient (France).Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Louw, William E. 2010. Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In Willie Van Peer, Sonia Zyngier & Vander Viana (eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies, 79–101. Hershey: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-932-8.ch004Search in Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024Search in Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2006. Corpus linguistics and English reference grammars. In Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds.), The changing face of corpus linguistics, 337–354. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401201797_023Search in Google Scholar
Parkinson, Dilworth. 1991. Searching for modern fusHa: Real-life formal Arabic. Al-ᶜArabiyya 24. 31–64.Search in Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T. 2014. Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12. 1112–1130.10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul, Andrew Wilson & Geoffrey Leech. 2002. Grammatical word class variation within the British National Corpus sampler. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research: Papers from the Twenty-First International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000 (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 36), 295–306. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004334113_020Search in Google Scholar
Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. In Petr Sojka & Aleš Horák (eds.), Recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing, 6–9. Brno (Czech Republic): Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar
Ryding, Karin, C. 2005. A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486975Search in Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSearch in Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2005. Covarying collexemes, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1). 1–43.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees. 1997a. The Arabic tradition. In Sylvain Auroux, Ranko Bugarski, Lia Formigari, John E. Joseph, Hans-Josef Niederehe, Emilio Ridruejo, Rosane Rocher, Vivian Salmon & Kees Versteegh (eds.), The emergence of semantics in four linguistic traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic, 225–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees. 1997b. Landmarks in linguistic thought III: The Arabic linguistic tradition. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
